Queen Victoria Residences
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Queen Victoria Residences
Building Overview
Queen Victoria Residences in Makiki-Tantalus, a 1990 concrete condo with ocean and mountain views; amenities include pool and fitness center.
About Queen Victoria Residences
Queen Victoria Residences is a condominium located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood, constructed in 1990 using concrete. According to available records, the building offers ocean and mountain views and is a residential property in an established neighborhood.
Key on-site amenities include a pool, fitness center, and a BBQ area. The property also reports a resident manager and a security guard, and units are served by central air conditioning.
Parking is available with covered, assigned stalls and guest parking. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed per the MLS information. Management company details were not provided in the available records. Based on MLS data; buyers should verify all details, including fees, rules, and management information, with the listing agent or association.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for owner-occupancy figures or qualitative descriptions in the remarks, but none were provided. Mentions of unit counts, privacy, and floor layout do not establish how many units are owner-occupied.
Multiple remarks explicitly describe the building as having an east wing and west wing, each with its own pair of elevators. Another remark says there are "2 elevators" to the floor, which is consistent with a total of four elevators across the two wings.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
10 of 11 current MLS listings list CABTV in association_fee_includes, indicating cable is generally reported as included. None of the public remarks explicitly state 'cable included' or describe building-provided cable, so the evidence relies on MLS checkboxes and may reflect agent copy/paste.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
9 of 11 current MLS listings list HOTWAT in association_fee_includes, suggesting hot water is typically reported as included in the maintenance fee. Public remarks do not confirm or deny this and no listings include WTRHTR, so the assertion is based on MLS checkbox data and could reflect copy/paste.
Internet appears in association_fee_includes on 3 of 10 MLS listings (INTSER). No public remarks mention 'internet included' or 'wifi included', so evidence is limited to a few MLS checkboxes and is therefore moderate/low strength.
No analysis available
10 of 11 current MLS listings list SEWER in association_fee_includes, indicating sewer is generally reported as included. There are no public remarks explicitly stating 'sewer included,' so this determination relies on the consistency of MLS checkboxes across multiple listings.
10 of 11 current MLS listings list WATER in association_fee_includes, suggesting water is commonly reported as included in fees. The public remarks contain no explicit 'water included' language, so this conclusion is based on MLS checkbox consistency and may reflect agent copy/paste.
Clear confirmation: MLS currently lists BBQ for all units (11/11) and multiple public remarks explicitly reference 'BBQ', 'BBQ grills' or 'BBQ area' (e.g., 'BBQ', 'poolside BBQ grills'). The evidence is repeated across different listings and appears reliable.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Ambiguous evidence: MLS checkboxes indicate a dog-park amenity in 7/11 listings, but none of the public remarks explicitly state 'dog park' or 'dog run'—remarks only note 'pet-friendly' and 'grass areas'. Inclusion reflects MLS data but confidence is moderate due to lack of explicit agent language in remarks.
No analysis available
Strong evidence: MLS currently lists EXEROO for all units (11/11) and multiple agent remarks explicitly state 'fitness center', 'fitness room' or 'gym' across the public remarks (mentioned in numerous listings). Evidence is consistent across different agent remarks and aligns with prior high-confidence data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Six of 11 current MLS listings include PATDEC/COVPAT in the amenities, though none of the public remarks explicitly say 'patio' or 'deck'. Remarks do reference 'BBQ', 'poolside BBQ grills', and 'grass areas', which may imply outdoor space, but evidence appears to be primarily from MLS checkbox entries and could reflect agent copy/paste rather than detailed descriptions.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Supported: Several agent remarks reference common-area entertainment/meeting space ('party room', 'meeting room/kitchen', 'meeting space', 'recreation room'), appearing in multiple listings. MLS shows recreation-room amenity in 6 of 11 listings, and remarks corroborate shared recreation/meeting facilities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings explicitly state the building/units include storage: remarks reference a "dedicated storage unit," "large walk in storage closet," "storage room," and storage in the parking garage. MLS checkbox data likewise indicates storage in 8 of 11 listings and unit-level storage in 5 of 11, so evidence is strong and consistent across multiple agents rather than appearing to be a single copy/paste error.
I looked for mentions of surfboard storage or related board-storage amenities and found none. The remarks mention storage units and closets, but nothing specific to surfboards or sports equipment storage.
No analysis available
Confirmed: MLS shows trash chute for all units (11/11) and one remark explicitly says 'private trash chute' while other listings reference building conveniences and private services. This explicit mention plus consistent MLS checks support inclusion with high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Well supported: MLS lists whirlpool/spa for all units (11/11) and numerous remarks explicitly mention 'spa', 'hot tub' or 'heated pool and hot tub' across listings, indicating a building-level hot tub/spa amenity that is consistently advertised.
Strong supporting evidence that the building has a pool: at least 7 of the provided listing remarks explicitly mention a pool, with phrases such as 'Roman-inspired pool', 'heated pool and hot tub', and 'swimming pool, spa, BBQ'. The mentions appear across multiple listings/agents and align with prior MLS checkbox data, so confidence is high.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for any reference to a saltwater or saline pool, but none was found. The pool is mentioned as heated/roman-inspired/resort-style, but not as salt water.
Strong, consistent evidence that some units have in-unit laundry: 11/11 current MLS listings include washer/dryer in the inclusions and at least six public remarks explicitly state in-unit laundry (quotes include 'dedicated laundry area offers a full-size washer and dryer', 'separate laundry room/sink', and 'new LG washer/dryer'). The mentions appear across multiple listings/agents and align with prior high-confidence data, so include laundry_in_unit = true.
No analysis available
I looked for evidence of paid community laundry such as coin laundry, card-operated machines, quarters, or laundry fees, but the remarks do not mention any of these. The only laundry references are to unit laundry setups, so there is no public-remark support for paid community laundry.
I searched the public remarks for phrases like "laundry on each floor," "laundry room on every floor," and similar wording, but found nothing indicating community laundry on every floor. The remarks only mention in-unit laundry areas or washer/dryer in specific units, which does not support this feature.
No analysis available
Assigned parking is indicated across the listing set and in MLS data (8/11). Several remarks explicitly state "Includes two... parking stalls" or describe "two parking spaces" and "dedicated" stalls, implying parking is reserved for the unit rather than purely guest/common.
Covered parking is consistently documented across MLS checkboxes (11/11) and multiple agent remarks reference an enclosed garage and covered side-by-side stalls. Evidence is strong and consistent across many listings and agents.
The listings consistently describe parking as included, secured, and tied to the unit, which strongly suggests ownership-style parking for the residence. While the word 'deeded' is not used explicitly, the repeated 'includes' and 'parking stalls' language supports a true value.
No analysis available
I searched for any mention of parking charges, monthly fees, rental costs, or similar add-ons. The remarks only describe parking as included/secured, with no fee disclosed.
Guest parking is present per MLS (8/11) and reinforced by remarks that specifically state "ample guest parking" in multiple listings. The evidence indicates guest/visitor parking is available in the building.
Secured-entry parking is strongly supported by MLS flags (9/11) and repeated remarks mentioning "secured" parking stalls, a "secured entrance", 24/7 secured access, and fob access. The evidence is consistent across many listings and appears reliable.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for 'parking waitlist,' 'waiting list,' and 'join waitlist for parking.' None of the remarks reference any waitlist system, and the listings instead imply parking is included.
No analysis available
There are multiple public remarks indicating fob-based secured access, including statements about fobs programmed to a specific floor and secured entrances. That is strong evidence for card/fob access security.
9 of 11 current MLS listings have the SECGUA amenity checked and several listing remarks explicitly describe building security: phrases include "24/7 secured entrance", "secured entrance", "Private & secure", and "fobs programmed to your specific floor." Evidence is consistent across multiple agent remarks and MLS checkbox data, indicating the building offers on-site security/secured access.
I searched for any indication of a patrol-based security service, but the remarks only discuss secured entrances, fobs, and privacy. There is no public-remark evidence of a security patrol.
No analysis available
Strong, consistent evidence that the building offers central air: historical MLS fields indicated central AC across almost all listings (ACCEN/CENAC), and multiple current remarks explicitly state 'Central air conditioning', 'Four zones of central air conditioning', and 'central air with 3 stations'. The references appear across several agent remarks rather than being a single copy/paste, supporting high confidence that the building has central air.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 11 current MLS records list construction_materials=CONCRE (previously 10/10), supporting concrete/reinforced-concrete construction. None of the public remarks explicitly state 'concrete', but there is strong, consistent MLS-level evidence across multiple listings/agents that the building is concrete. Evidence is strong and consistent across listings rather than being a single-agent copy/paste anomaly.
No public remarks (0/11) mention 'double wall' or similar wording. Only 4 of 11 current MLS records have DOUWAL checked and historical confidence was low, indicating the double-wall flag is inconsistent and likely a copy/paste/agent-entry issue. Given lack of corroborating remarks or majority MLS support, the building is treated as not having confirmed double-wall construction.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for STR-related terms such as 'short-term rental allowed,' 'vacation rental,' 'NUC,' 'TVU,' and minimum-stay language. The public remarks do not indicate that short-term rentals are allowed, so the safest reading is false.
I looked for hotel pool language such as 'hotel rental pool,' 'managed by hotel,' or branded rental-program references. Nothing in the remarks suggests a hotel rental pool, so this is false.
I searched for 'mandatory,' 'required to participate,' 'cannot opt out,' and similar rental-pool terms. Since the remarks do not describe any hotel pool program, there is no basis for mandatory participation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for land-tenure language including 'lease expires,' 'ground lease,' 'leasehold,' and any 4-digit expiry year. The remarks contain no leasehold references at all, so the expiry year cannot be determined from the listings.
I searched the listings for explicit VA language such as 'VA approved,' 'VA financing,' and 'VA loans accepted.' None of the public remarks mention VA eligibility, so there is no evidence to support approval.
I looked for explicit building insurance language in the public remarks, including fully insured or walls-in coverage, and found nothing. Without a direct mention, there is no basis to mark the building as fully insured from the remarks alone.
Strong evidence that the building has a sprinkler system: at least two separate listing remarks state 'fire sprinklers' or 'sprinklers' (e.g., 'Central air conditioning and fire sprinklers provide comfort...' and '...sprinklers, and more!'), and historical MLS amenities have FIRSPR checked on the majority of listings (≈9/11). Multiple agents mention sprinklers rather than a single copy/paste occurrence, supporting high confidence.
I searched the remarks for explicit FLSE or fire/life-safety approval language such as "passed," "certified," or "compliant," and found none. The only related references are to fire sprinklers and fire doors, which suggest safety features but do not confirm a passed evaluation.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
High-confidence evidence that the building has city views: 8 of 11 listings in MLS mention CITY in view_descriptions and multiple public remarks explicitly state city/cityscape/downtown views (e.g., "Enjoy this luxurious Queen Victoria Residence with city views!", "floor to ceiling glass walls framing ocean and city views", "melody of cityscape, treetops, ocean and partial Diamond Head views"). Mentions appear across several listings/agents, supporting a building-level characteristic rather than an isolated copy-and-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit references to being able to see Friday night fireworks from the building or from a lanai/unit, and found none. The remarks describe city, ocean, and partial Diamond Head views, but that is not the same as a fireworks view.
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS amenities list a resident manager on every listing (RESMAN on 11/11), but zero public remarks mention 'resident manager', 'on-site manager', or 'live-in manager'. This suggests possible agent checkbox copy/paste; therefore the feature is recorded as present per MLS but with low confidence pending owner/property-manager verification or a remark explicitly confirming/denying it.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.