Woodlawn Terr-Melema
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Woodlawn Terr-Melema
Building Overview
Woodlawn Terr-Melema in Mililani-Waipio, built 1972. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed.
About Woodlawn Terr-Melema
Woodlawn Terr-Melema is a residential building located in the Mililani‑Waipio neighborhood. According to available records, the building was built in 1972. MLS data does not specify building size, number of units, or construction type.
Key policies noted in the MLS include that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not allowed. The listing data does not identify a management company or list specific on-site amenities; buyers should not assume additional services or facilities without verification.
Additional details commonly of interest—such as parking arrangements, maintenance fees, homeowner association rules, and other charges—are not provided in the MLS summary. Based on MLS data, prospective buyers should verify all property specifics, policies, and fees with the listing agent or management prior to making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks provide no owner-occupancy percentage or descriptive indication such as "majority owner occupied" or "highly owner occupied." Rental references describe individual units only and cannot establish the building-wide owner-occupancy rate.
The remarks do not state a number of elevators or refer to multiple elevators. Searches for terms such as "4 elevators," "four elevators," and "multiple elevators" found no relevant evidence, so the elevator count remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Ten of 12 current listings include OTCOEX, the MLS code for common-area electricity. No public remarks explicitly state that common electric or building power is included, but the repeated MLS coding across most listings provides strong support.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water is not included in any of the 12 current MLS records, and eight listings identify WTRHTR. Public remarks repeatedly reference a “new water heater” or “brand new water heater,” making the exclusion highly consistent across listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 12 current listings include SEWER in the association fee inclusions. One listing explicitly says the fees “cover water and sewer,” confirming the feature in public remarks as well as across the MLS data.
WATER appears in the association fee inclusions for all 12 current listings. A public remark directly states that the maintenance fees “cover water and sewer,” so the evidence is strong and not dependent solely on potentially copied MLS fields.
Three of twelve listings list BBQ in the MLS amenities, but zero listings explicitly mention BBQ or grilling facilities in their remarks. Because the evidence comes only from a minority of amenity checkboxes and is not confirmed across agent remarks, this feature should be treated as low-confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Patio/deck access is strongly supported across multiple listings and agents: 7 of 12 current remarks mention a lanai, including covered, screened, roomy, large, and private lanais. This confirms the historically high-confidence building feature, and the matching MLS amenity data in 6 of 12 listings further supports including it.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 1 of 12 listings includes storage in the unit features, while 0 of 12 list it as a building amenity. None of the supplied remarks mention storage, so this appears to be an isolated MLS entry rather than strong, consistently verified building-wide evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Five of 12 listings explicitly mention a pool, using phrases such as "community pool," "private pool," and "community swimming pool." The repeated references across multiple listings, together with 7/12 MLS amenity records and previously high confidence, strongly support that the building offers pool access.
No analysis available
No analysis available
In-unit laundry is strongly supported across the listing set and remains consistent with the MLS inclusions (12/12 listings). At least five remarks explicitly mention the feature using varied language, including full-size, brand-new, and combo washer/dryer descriptions, indicating strong corroboration beyond a single copied checkbox.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is strongly supported across the building: all 12 listings contain parking-related MLS data, and at least 8 remarks reference parking or a parking stall/spot. Key phrases include "assigned parking stall," "assigned parking spot," "Second parking stall is also available for rent," and "1 parking (right in front)."
Assigned parking is very strongly supported, with 11 of 12 listings marked ASSIGN in MLS and at least 6-7 remarks explicitly stating "assigned parking stall" or "assigned parking spot." The repeated, detailed references across multiple listings confirm this is a building-level feature rather than an isolated claim.
No analysis available
Several listings confirm assigned parking, but assigned parking does not establish deeded ownership. No remarks use terms such as deeded parking, owned stall, or parking included in the deed.
No analysis available
The remarks indicate that an additional parking stall may be rented for an extra cost. No specific parking fee or monthly parking charge was stated, so the amount is unknown.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings discuss assigned stalls, street parking, and possible rental of an additional stall. They do not mention a building parking waitlist system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete construction is strongly supported across the building: 12/12 current listings identify CONCRE in the construction materials. One remark explicitly says 'solid concrete construction,' providing direct confirmation beyond checkbox data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public remarks mention above-ground construction across the 12 listings. Although 3/12 listings contain ABOGRO in MLS data, this limited and unsupported checkbox pattern conflicts with the previously high-confidence absence of evidence and appears likely to be copy-pasted or unverified.
There is no meaningful evidence that this building is brick constructed. None of the current remarks mention brick, and the listings focus on concrete construction instead. The MLS brick checkbox appears to be unsupported by the public remarks.
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for short-term rental permission, vacation-rental approval, NUC, TVU, and minimum-stay terms. None were found, so STR permission is not established and is treated as false.
The remarks contain no references to a hotel rental pool, hotel rental program, or hotel-operated rentals. Because STR is not established as allowed, this feature must be false under the prerequisite rule.
The listings do not mention mandatory hotel-pool participation or required rental management. Since STR is not established as allowed, mandatory pool participation must also be false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for leasehold terminology, ground-lease language, expiration dates, and renewal or extension dates. No specific lease expiry year was found, so the value is unknown.
Multiple listings directly confirm VA financing eligibility, including an assumable VA loan and explicit VA-approved language. This is repeated, strong public-remarks evidence.
The remarks do not mention full HOA insurance, comprehensive building insurance, walls-in coverage, or that the building is fully insured. References to VA approval and maintenance fees do not establish full insurance coverage.
No analysis available
The remarks contain no statement that the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation, FLSE, or fire inspection. No language such as "fire safety certified," "life safety compliant," or "passed fire inspection" was found.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Three of 12 listings contain MOUNTA in the view description, supporting mountain-view availability for some units. However, none of the supplied remarks explicitly quote mountain, Koolau, or mauka views, so the MLS checkbox evidence may be partially unverified or copied.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Four of 12 listings contain GARDEN in the view description. Several remarks describe green or landscaped surroundings, including 'open green space' and a 'lush city park,' but no listing explicitly states 'garden view,' so the evidence is moderate and partly implied.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no evidence in the provided listings that this building offers sunset views. Across 11 listings, none mention SUNSET in the view field, and more than half explicitly say NONE; the public remarks likewise only mention park, green space, or general views. The lack of any sunset-related language across multiple agents suggests the feature should not be included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the 12 listing remarks mention a resident manager or on-site management. RESMAN appears in only 2 of 12 MLS amenity records, without supporting remarks or repeated descriptions across agents, so the feature is omitted as likely unverified checkbox data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.