Windsurfer
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Windsurfer
Building Overview
Windsurfer in Kailua, built 1984; pets and short-term rentals are not allowed.
About Windsurfer
Based on MLS data, Windsurfer is a condominium building located in the Kailua neighborhood and was built in 1984. Size (unit count/square footage) and construction type are not specified in the available MLS records.
The MLS records do not list specific building amenities or interior features for Windsurfer. No amenity details (such as pool, fitness center, or common areas) are provided in the data available for this listing.
According to available records, pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data. Buyers should verify building size, construction type, amenities, management and current policies with the listing agent or management before making purchasing decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no explicit remark support for common-area electricity being included in the maintenance fee. The only MLS signal is 1/3 listings marked OTCOEX, which appears weak and possibly unrelated to common electric, so this feature is best treated as not established for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listing indicates hot water is included in the fee, and every listing instead shows WTRHTR in the inclusions. That combination is strong evidence against a building-paid hot water benefit.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All current listings consistently show sewer included in the association fees. This is a strong, cross-listing signal rather than a one-off agent entry.
Water is consistently listed as included across all current MLS entries for the building. The repeated checkbox data strongly supports this as a building-level fee inclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building clearly offers patio/deck-type outdoor space. All 3 recent listings mention it in remarks, with phrases like "large back lanai," "spacious back lanai," and "private, tiled courtyard," and the current MLS amenities also show 2/3 listings tagged with PATDEC/COVPAT. This looks consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is supported by both MLS data and the public remarks. Across 3/3 listings, unit features include storage, and 2/3 also list it as an amenity; the remarks reinforce this with phrases like 'spacious storage closet' and 'large closet where you can store gardening tools or recreational equipment.'
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Three of three current listings include washer/dryer in the MLS inclusions, which is strong evidence that the building offers in-unit laundry. None of the public remarks mention laundry, so this appears to be driven by consistent MLS data rather than copy-pasted descriptive text, but the inclusions are still a reliable signal.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building clearly offers parking-related access, with current MLS data showing parking features in all 3/3 listings. One remark explicitly references "extra guest parking spaces," which supports that parking is available at the building. The evidence is consistent and not just a single checkbox with no context.
Assigned parking appears to exist for some units in the building based on current MLS data (2/3 listings marked ASSIGN). The public remarks mention guest parking but do not directly confirm assigned spaces, so this is supported more by the MLS pattern than by narrative description. It is likely a real building feature, but the evidence is not as explicit as for general or guest parking.
No analysis available
Two reserved parking spaces and guest parking are mentioned, but reserved parking does not establish deeded ownership. No explicit wording such as deeded, owned, included in the deed, or owned stall was found.
No analysis available
The remarks mention reserved spaces and guest parking but provide no parking rental fee or additional monthly charge. The parking cost is therefore unknown.
Guest parking is well supported: 2/3 current listings indicate GUEST parking, and the remarks directly mention "extra guest parking spaces." This is strong building-level evidence that visitors have parking available. The wording appears in the narrative rather than only a checkbox, which increases confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks describe reserved parking and guest parking but do not mention a parking waitlist. No evidence of a waiting-list system was found.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Split A/C is strongly supported: 2 listings explicitly mention a 'split A/C system throughout,' including one that says it is 'newly installed.' MLS inclusions also show ACSPL in 3/3 listings, so this appears consistent across the building rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Double wall construction appears in 2 of 3 current MLS listings, indicating it may be a genuine building feature but with less consistency than wood frame. No public remarks mention double-wall construction, so this is supported only by partial MLS evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 3 of 3 current listings carry the WOOFRA construction code, which strongly suggests wood frame construction for this building. The public remarks do not mention construction type, so this is supported primarily by consistent MLS coding rather than narrative confirmation.
Above-ground construction is coded in 2 of 3 current listings, suggesting the feature may apply to the building. There is no explicit mention in the remarks, so confidence is moderate and based on MLS data only.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings focus on the residence, beach location, parking, and pet friendliness. They do not state that short-term rentals are allowed or prohibited, so there is no affirmative STR evidence.
No hotel pool or hotel rental program is referenced in the remarks. Because STR allowance is not established, this feature must also be false.
The remarks contain no evidence of required participation in a hotel rental pool. Because STR allowance and hotel pool participation are not established, mandatory participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks contain no specific lease-expiry or lease-renewal year. No leasehold information was found from which to extract a date.
The remarks do not mention VA approval, VA financing, or acceptance of VA loans. Without explicit evidence, there is no support for VA eligibility.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Garden-type views appear to be present in some units of the building based on MLS view data (2 of 3 listings). The remarks are not explicit, but phrases like “overlooking a picturesque lily pond” and “fenced front courtyard” support a garden/courtyard setting rather than a purely interior or ocean-only view. This looks like building-level copy that may be inconsistently entered by agents, but the current evidence still supports inclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunset views appear to be available in at least one unit, based on MLS view data showing 1 of 3 listings with SUNSET. The public remarks instead emphasize sunrise and beach access, so there is no strong textual confirmation beyond the MLS view field. Confidence is moderate because the feature is supported by current listing data but not reinforced across multiple remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.