Wiliwili Vista
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Wiliwili Vista
Building Overview
Wiliwili Vista in McCully-Moiliili — concrete building built in 1991; pets and short-term rentals not allowed (based on MLS data).
About Wiliwili Vista
Wiliwili Vista is located in the McCully-Moiliili neighborhood and was built in 1991. According to available records, the building is of concrete construction. Size details (such as number of units, floors, or square footage) are not provided in the MLS data available for this listing.
Key features from the MLS-derived data include the building's construction type and occupancy policies: pets are not allowed, and short-term rentals are not permitted. The management company is listed as unknown in the available records.
Additional details commonly of interest to buyers—such as parking, maintenance fees, amenities, and specific unit-level information—are not included in the provided MLS data. Based on MLS data, prospective buyers should verify all building details, rules, and fees with the listing agent or management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for a stated owner-occupancy percentage or wording suggesting a highly owner-occupied building, but found no such references. Because the remarks do not provide any occupancy breakdown, the percentage cannot be determined.
I looked through all remarks for any reference to elevators or a stated elevator count, but none was found. Since there is no explicit evidence, the number of elevators cannot be determined from the public remarks.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The evidence points against hot water being included in the maintenance fee. Only 1 of 3 current listings checks HOTWAT, and all 3 mention WTRHTR in inclusions, which is a strong sign the unit has its own water heater rather than building-provided hot water. No public remarks mention hot water service, so this looks like a likely MLS checkbox mismatch rather than an amenity offered by the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer is consistently included across all current MLS records (3 of 3 listings). The public remarks do not mention sewer specifically, but there is no sign of contradiction, and the MLS data is uniform enough to treat this as a building-level included expense.
Water is consistently included across all current MLS records (3 of 3 listings). The public remarks do not mention water service, but the MLS fields are unanimous, so this appears to be a standard building-level inclusion rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listing remarks describe a car wash, auto wash, or vehicle wash station. With only 1 of 3 MLS records showing CRWSH and no supporting language in the remarks, the evidence is weak and appears inconsistent with a true shared building amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool is strongly supported for this building. Two separate listings explicitly mention 'swimming pool' / 'pool,' and the current MLS amenities show 3/3 listings checked for pool-related amenities. This looks consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
In-unit laundry appears to be consistently supported: 3/3 current MLS listings include washer/dryer, and one listing specifically mentions "newer washer/dryer." This looks like a building feature rather than a copy-paste anomaly, with no remarks suggesting otherwise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the 3 provided listings, none explicitly mention assigned, reserved, or deeded parking. The only parking-related wording is "guest parking" and "secured parking area," which does not establish assigned stalls. This looks like standard MLS copy rather than a clear indication of assigned parking.
No listing remarks explicitly describe covered parking, garage, carport, or covered stalls. Even though the MLS has coverage-related parking codes in 3/3 listings, the public remarks do not confirm the feature, so the evidence is not strong enough to include it. This appears more like checkbox data than verified description.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
This feature is supported by both the MLS data and the remarks: 2/3 listings carry the SECENT parking code, and one public remark states the building "has secured parking area." The repeated secured-parking language suggests this is a building-level amenity rather than a one-off agent copy/paste issue.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window AC is supported by current MLS inclusions in 2 of 3 listings, plus one public remark noting a 'huge Living Room A/C.' The evidence is moderate and somewhat MLS-driven, with no clear contradictory remarks. It appears likely the building offers unit-based air conditioning, but the exact type is not explicitly confirmed in every listing.
There is no explicit remark evidence for concrete construction across the 3 listing remarks provided. The current MLS data is mixed, so this looks like an unverified checkbox rather than confirmed building construction.
No listing remarks describe double wall construction or two walls. With only mixed MLS checkbox data and no supporting remarks, this feature is not confirmed from the public remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I checked the remarks for any indication that the HOA provides full or walls-in insurance coverage, but nothing like that was stated. With no explicit insurance coverage language, this feature is not supported by the public remarks.
One listing explicitly mentions "Building has sprinklers," which is direct evidence of a fire sprinkler system. The remark is clear and building-level, so it should be included for buyers searching for sprinkler-equipped buildings.
I searched for language indicating a passed fire/life safety evaluation or related certification, but the remarks only mention sprinklers. Sprinklers are not enough to confirm FLSE status, so this remains unverified and is treated as not evidenced in the remarks.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
City views appear in all 3 MLS listings, suggesting this is a building-level feature available to buyers. However, none of the public remarks explicitly describe a city or downtown view, so this looks like repeated MLS data rather than agent-verified commentary.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunrise-oriented views show up in 2 of 3 MLS listings, indicating some units likely have eastern or morning-sun exposure. The remarks themselves are silent on views, so this is suggestive but not strongly corroborated by narrative descriptions.
Sunset views appear in 1 of 3 MLS listings, so the building may offer sunset-facing units even though the remarks do not mention it. Because this is based on a single MLS entry and no supporting remarks, confidence is lower than the other view features.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
One listing explicitly confirms "a resident manager on site (office in lobby)." This is strong building-level evidence from the remarks, not just a copied checkbox, so the feature should be included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.