Ward Villa
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Ward Villa
Building Overview
Ward Villa in Makiki-Tantalus — concrete building (1977) with a pool and covered parking. Pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About Ward Villa
Based on MLS data, Ward Villa is a residential building located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood. The building was constructed in 1977 and is of concrete construction. Unit size and count were not provided in the available MLS records.
According to available records, Ward Villa offers on-site amenities that include a pool. No other building amenities are listed in the MLS data provided.
MLS data indicate covered parking is available. Pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS. Prospective buyers should verify details, fees, rules and current conditions with the listing agent or management, as this summary is based solely on MLS information.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for any owner-occupancy language such as a percentage or descriptive terms like 'majority owner occupied,' but nothing was provided in the public remarks. Without explicit evidence, the owner-occupancy level cannot be determined.
I searched the public remarks for any reference to the number of elevators, including phrases like '4 elevators' or 'multiple elevators,' but found none. Since there is no explicit elevator count in the remarks, the value remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water inclusion appears to be present in part of the building’s listings: 5 of 8 current MLS records include HOTWAT, and none show WTRHTR. The remarks across these listings do not mention hot water directly, so this rests mainly on the MLS pattern rather than copy-pasted text confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer is very likely included in the maintenance fee. The current MLS data shows SEWER in 7 of 8 listings, and none of the public remarks suggest otherwise. This is a strong cross-listing pattern and looks more reliable than any single agent remark.
Water appears to be included in the maintenance fee. Seven of eight current MLS listings include WATER, and the public remarks do not contradict that pattern. The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and likely reflects building-level coverage.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Trash chute is supported by the MLS amenity data in 4 of 8 listings, with prior confidence already at medium. None of the public remarks explicitly mention a trash/garbage chute, so this is driven by listing data rather than narrative confirmation. Because the amenity appears repeatedly across multiple listings, it is likely a shared building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 8 current MLS listings list a pool-related amenity, which is strong building-level evidence even though the public remarks never mention it. This looks more like a standard shared amenity omitted from remarks than a copy-paste mistake, since every listing shows the same pool flag.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence the building has shared laundry facilities. One current remark explicitly says "access to community laundry," and the MLS checkbox is present in 6 of 8 listings. The pattern appears consistent across agents rather than a one-off copy/paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 7 public-remark blocks reference unit parking (phrases include '1 parking', 'large size covered parking stall', 'covered parking', and 'parking on the same level as your apartment'), suggesting units have a designated stall. MLS checkbox data shows 3/7 listings with ASSIGN, so agent checkbox use is inconsistent, but consistent remarks across multiple agents imply assigned parking is offered in the building.
Covered parking is confirmed across multiple listings, with several remarks explicitly stating "covered parking" or "1 covered parking." The evidence is consistent across different listings and agents, so this appears to be a stable building feature rather than a copy-paste error.
The listings consistently describe a dedicated parking stall that is included with the condo, including covered parking and parking on the same level as the apartment. While the remarks do not use the exact phrase "deeded parking," the repeated unit-specific parking references support deeded/included parking.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for terms like parking fee, monthly parking cost, rental, or extra charge and found nothing. The listings instead emphasize covered parking/included parking, so there is no evidence of a separate parking fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for any reference to a parking waitlist, joining a waitlist, or similar language and found none. The remarks describe parking as available with the units, not as a limited waitlisted amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
5 of 7 current MLS listings include the ACWIUN inclusion indicating window air-conditioning units. None of the public remarks explicitly mention 'window AC' or 'window unit', so the support comes from multiple listings' checkbox data rather than textual confirmation; this is moderate but not definitive evidence that some units have window AC.
6 of 7 current listings indicate concrete construction (CONCRE) in the MLS checkbox fields, and historical data showed medium confidence for concrete. Public remarks across the listings do not mention construction materials (no phrases like 'concrete building' or 'reinforced concrete'), so the conclusion relies on repeated MLS checkbox entries—likely reliable but possibly copy/pasted by agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Masonry and stucco construction is indicated in the MLS checkbox data for a majority of current listings (5 of 8). None of the public remarks explicitly mention 'masonry' or 'stucco,' so this appears to come from MLS field data rather than copy in the remarks, but the repeated checkbox pattern across listings supports inclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental terms such as STR, vacation rental, NUC, TVU, or minimum-stay rules and found no policy language. With no explicit allowance in the remarks, the conservative conclusion is that STR is not confirmed/allowed from the public text.
I looked for hotel pool language such as hotel rental program, managed by hotel, or brand pool references and found none. Since STR itself is not supported by the remarks, there is also no basis for a hotel pool designation.
I searched for wording like mandatory pool, required to participate, cannot opt out, or owner can use unit and found none. There is no evidence in the remarks that any rental pool exists, much less that participation is mandatory.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for lease expiry years, ground lease end dates, and renewal language, but found none. The explicit "Fee simple" remark points to ownership rather than a leasehold, so there is no lease expiry year to extract.
The public remarks repeatedly state that the building is VA approved, which strongly indicates VA financing is accepted. I found no contradictory language.
The remarks repeatedly and directly state that the building is fully insured, including the phrase 'Building is fully insured' and '100% hurricane insured.' This is strong evidence for walls-in/full HOA insurance coverage.
No analysis available
I looked for any statement that the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation or similar safety certification language, but there was no such mention in the remarks. In the absence of explicit evidence, this is set to false with low-to-moderate confidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Seven of eight current MLS entries list CITY in the view field, while one lists NONE, indicating that city views are available in the building but not from every unit. None of the public remarks explicitly describe a city view; they mostly reference the building’s central Honolulu/Kakaako location and proximity to Downtown. The evidence comes from repeated MLS view data across multiple listings rather than agent narrative, which suggests a consistent building feature rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.