Walea II at Koa Ridge Phase I
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Walea II at Koa Ridge Phase I
Building Overview
Walea II at Koa Ridge Phase I in Mililani-Waipio, built 2025; pets and short-term rentals are not allowed.
About Walea II at Koa Ridge Phase I
Walea II at Koa Ridge Phase I is a condominium project located in the Mililani-Waipio neighborhood, with a year built listed as 2025. Based on MLS data, information on unit sizes, number of buildings, and construction type is not provided in the available records.
According to available records, the development does not allow pets and does not permit short-term rentals. The management company is listed as Unknown in MLS data, and no specific on-site amenities are detailed in the provided information.
Additional details such as parking arrangements, maintenance fees, association rules, and other building features are not specified in the MLS data reviewed. Buyers should verify all building facts, policies, fees, and amenity availability with the listing agent or the homeowners' association before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Both current listings indicate common-area electricity is included, with 2/2 showing OTCOEX. The public remarks do not address fees, so the MLS data is the primary evidence here. This looks like consistent building-level information rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Neither listing indicates hot water is included, while both explicitly include WTRHTR, a strong sign the building does not provide hot water as a common fee item. The remarks also mention a solar water heater, reinforcing that hot water is handled at the unit level. This is strong evidence to exclude hot water from maintenance fees.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer is listed in the association fee inclusions on both current listings, making this a very strong building-level signal. The public remarks are silent on fees, but nothing contradicts the MLS data. This appears to be a stable shared expense for the complex.
Water is included on both current listings, with 2/2 showing WATER in the fee inclusions. The remarks do not mention utilities directly, but there is no evidence against the MLS checkbox data. This looks like a consistent community-wide inclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
One of two MLS listings includes the WAJOPA amenity code, suggesting the building/community offers a jogging or walking path. However, the public remarks do not reference any path, so this looks like unconfirmed MLS data rather than corroborated agent description.
No analysis available
2 of 2 current listings have PRIYAR checked in MLS amenities, but neither public remark mentions a private yard, fenced yard, or enclosed outdoor space. Evidence is limited to the repeated checkbox data across listings, so this is moderate-confidence only and may be copy-paste rather than verified by remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence for in-unit laundry. One listing directly states "in-unit laundry," and the MLS data currently shows washer/dryer included in 1 of 2 listings. This looks like a real building feature rather than a copy-paste-only checkbox.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Covered parking is clearly present: 1 of the provided remarks explicitly says "2-car garage" and another says "enclosed garages." This is strong, direct evidence from the listing copy rather than just checkbox data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Guest parking appears to be offered based on the current MLS checkbox data, with 2 of 2 listings marking it. However, none of the public remarks explicitly confirm visitor/guest parking, so this is supported more by MLS data than by listing text and should be treated as moderate-confidence evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks explicitly mention split AC: 'Mitsubishi split-system AC in every room.' This is strong, direct evidence from the listing text itself and indicates the feature is available in the building's units. The feature is confirmed by the current listing description, so it should be included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
0 of the provided remarks reference double wall construction. The listings describe a modern townhome with standard amenities, but there is no structural wording supporting a double-wall feature. This appears unconfirmed in the public remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
0 of the provided remarks explicitly say the building has steel frame construction. The only steel reference is to the garage door, which is a separate component and does not confirm structural framing. Evidence is too weak to validate steel frame as a building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
0 of the provided remarks explicitly mention wood frame construction. The description emphasizes modern finishes, steel garage door, and split-system AC, but nothing about wood framing. This looks more like copy/paste MLS construction data than verified building structure information.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Fire sprinklers appear to be present based on the MLS amenities flag, which is checked in 2 of 2 listings. No public remark explicitly says "sprinkler" or "fire suppression," so this is supported more by consistent MLS data than by agent description. Because both listings show the same amenity, it looks like a building-level feature rather than a unit-specific copy/paste error.
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views appear to be available in at least some units of the building, based on current MLS data showing 1 of 2 listings with MOUNTA in the view description. The public remarks do not discuss views either way, so this is supported more by the MLS field than by narrative confirmation.
No analysis available
City views appear to be available in at least some units of the building, based on current MLS data showing 1 of 2 listings with CITY in the view description. The remarks are silent on views, so the evidence is limited to the MLS data and could be unit-specific rather than universal.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.