Waipio Gardens
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Waipio Gardens
Building Overview
Waipio Gardens, Mililani-Waipio — concrete construction built 1965; pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About Waipio Gardens
Waipio Gardens is located in the Mililani-Waipio neighborhood and was built in 1965. According to available records the building is constructed of concrete. Size and unit count are not provided in the MLS data.
Key property policies indicated in the MLS include no pets and no short-term rentals. The listing data does not specify on-site amenities (such as pools, fitness facilities, or common areas) or unit-level features.
Management company is listed as unknown in the MLS and information on parking, maintenance fees, assessments, or other homeowner association policies was not provided. Based on MLS data; buyers should verify all building details, policies, fees, and availability of amenities with the listing agent or management.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for a stated owner-occupancy percentage or descriptions such as "majority owner occupied" or "highly owner occupied," but none appeared. References to first-time buyers, investors, and owner-occupants do not establish a building-wide percentage.
I searched for explicit references such as "elevator," "elevators," or a stated count like "4 elevators," but none appeared. The building has only two floors, but that does not establish whether an elevator exists, so the number remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 10 current listings identify SEWER as included in the association fee, but 0 of 10 public remarks mention sewer being included. The consistent MLS checkbox data supports inclusion, though the lack of explicit remarks means the evidence may reflect copied or unverified agent data.
Water is marked as included in the association fee on 9 of 10 current listings, while 0 of 10 public remarks reference included water or water fees. This is moderately supportive across listings but could reflect repeated MLS data rather than independently verified building information.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
4 of 9 current MLS listings include the CRWSH amenity flag, but none of the combined public remarks mention a car wash (no phrases like 'car wash', 'auto wash', or 'vehicle wash area'). There is no prior/historical confirmation and no remarks describing installation or existence, so the evidence for a true building car wash is weak and likely a checkbox error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 5 listings explicitly mention in-unit laundry, including “front-load washer and dryer,” “washer-dryer in-unit,” “full-sized washer and dryer,” and “washer and dryer.” The evidence is strong across multiple remarks and is consistent with the current MLS data showing washer/dryer in inclusions for all 10 listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 9 listings include parking in MLS checkbox data and multiple remarks explicitly state parking (e.g., '1 parking stall', '1 parking', 'parking'). Evidence is consistent across listings and agents, indicating building-level parking is available.
Assigned parking is strongly supported: 3 listings explicitly mention "assigned parking spot" or "one assigned parking," while several others state the unit includes one parking space or stall. The evidence appears across multiple listings and is consistent with the historical MLS pattern of ASSIGN in 8 of 9 listings.
No analysis available
Multiple listings confirm that the unit has an assigned parking space. However, assigned parking does not establish deeded ownership, and no remarks state that the stall is included in the deed or owned with the unit.
No analysis available
The remarks describe assigned or included parking but do not mention a recurring parking fee or rental charge. No public-remark evidence supports a parking fee.
Guest parking is indicated in 6 of 9 MLS parking feature checkboxes and is mentioned in the remarks ('guest parking'), though fewer remarks reference it directly; evidence is moderate and suggests guest parking is available.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings mention assigned parking and guest parking, but no parking waitlist system is described. There is no public-remark evidence of a waitlist.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Three of ten current listings include ACWIUN in the MLS inclusions, supporting that window air conditioning may be available in some units. No listing remarks explicitly confirm a window AC or describe its installation, so confidence is moderate rather than strong.
8 out of 9 current MLS listings list construction_materials as 'CONCRE', suggesting concrete/reinforced-concrete construction. Public remarks across listings do not explicitly state construction material (no agent text like 'concrete building'), but the consistent checkbox across multiple listings from different agents provides strong evidence that the building is concrete rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Four of ten listings identify ABOGRO in the construction materials data, suggesting the building may have above-ground construction. No listing remarks explicitly mention above-ground construction, so the evidence is moderate and could reflect inconsistent MLS data entry rather than confirmation from multiple agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks were checked for explicit STR-permission language, vacation-rental references, NUC, TVU, and rental-duration rules. None were found, so short-term-rental permission is not evidenced and is treated as false.
The listings do mention a community pool, but there is no indication that it is a hotel rental pool or that units participate in hotel operations. Because STR permission is not established, the hotel-pool feature is false.
The remarks contain no statements that owners must participate in a rental program or cannot opt out. Since neither STR permission nor hotel-pool participation is supported, mandatory hotel-pool participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks were checked for leasehold, ground lease, lease expiration, lease expiry, and renewal language. No specific four-digit expiration year was found, so the lease expiry remains unknown.
Multiple listings explicitly state that the condo may qualify for VA loans, and one listing directly describes Waipio Gardens as a "VA Approved Building." This is strong public-remark evidence that VA financing is available.
The insurance-related special assessment is strong evidence against full HOA insurance coverage during the referenced listing period. No remark states that the building has comprehensive or walls-in coverage, so the verified negative status is retained.
No analysis available
I searched for statements that the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation, was FLSE passed, fire-safety certified, life-safety compliant, or passed a fire inspection. None were found in the remarks, so there is no evidence confirming passage.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views appear in 3 of 10 current listings through the MLS designation “MOUNTA,” while 6 of 10 list “NONE.” No public remarks explicitly mention mountain, Koolau, or mauka views, so the feature is included as an available view for some units but the evidence is not strong across multiple descriptive remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Current MLS data shows 0 of 9 listings reporting a garden view and 2 listings explicitly list View=NONE. None of the public remarks use phrases like 'garden view', 'courtyard view', or 'landscaped view' (remarks only mention a unit's 'front and back yard'). With no supporting remarks and MLS checkboxes unset, there is strong evidence the building does not offer a garden view.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the 10 listing remarks mention a resident or on-site manager. The feature is checked in 9/10 MLS amenity records, but the absence of any supporting remarks across multiple listings makes that checkbox evidence insufficient to confirm the building has a resident manager.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.