Waipio Gardens
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Waipio Gardens
Building Overview
Waipio Gardens, Mililani-Waipio — concrete construction built 1965; pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About Waipio Gardens
Waipio Gardens is located in the Mililani-Waipio neighborhood and was built in 1965. According to available records the building is constructed of concrete. Size and unit count are not provided in the MLS data.
Key property policies indicated in the MLS include no pets and no short-term rentals. The listing data does not specify on-site amenities (such as pools, fitness facilities, or common areas) or unit-level features.
Management company is listed as unknown in the MLS and information on parking, maintenance fees, assessments, or other homeowner association policies was not provided. Based on MLS data; buyers should verify all building details, policies, fees, and availability of amenities with the listing agent or management.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for any explicit owner-occupancy percentage or qualitative statements about high owner-occupancy and found none. With no numeric/current value provided and no remarks evidence, I cannot provide an owner-occupancy percentage, so the value is null.
I searched all public remarks for explicit elevator references or counts and found none. Because there is no current numeric value provided and no remarks evidence, I cannot infer a number and therefore return null.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
9 of 9 current MLS listings list SEWER in association_fee_includes, but none of the public remarks for the building mention sewer being included. Evidence is strong across MLS checkbox data but is not corroborated in remarks, suggesting agent copy/paste is possible; included with moderate confidence (0.75).
8 of 9 current MLS listings list WATER in association_fee_includes, while none of the public remarks reference water being included. MLS checkbox data supports inclusion but lack of corroborating remarks suggests potential copy/paste—included with moderate confidence (0.73).
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
4 of 9 current MLS listings include the CRWSH amenity flag, but none of the combined public remarks mention a car wash (no phrases like 'car wash', 'auto wash', or 'vehicle wash area'). There is no prior/historical confirmation and no remarks describing installation or existence, so the evidence for a true building car wash is weak and likely a checkbox error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 9 current MLS listings list washer/dryer in inclusions and multiple remarks explicitly state in-unit laundry, with phrases like 'front-load washer and dryer', 'washer-dryer in-unit', and 'full-sized washer and dryer'. This consistent, building-wide evidence across listings indicates the building offers units with in-unit laundry; while agents may copy/paste, the unanimous and explicit mentions support a high-confidence true value.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 9 listings include parking in MLS checkbox data and multiple remarks explicitly state parking (e.g., '1 parking stall', '1 parking', 'parking'). Evidence is consistent across listings and agents, indicating building-level parking is available.
Most listings (8 of 9) list ASSIGN in parking features and several remarks explicitly state 'assigned parking spot' or 'one assigned parking', supporting that assigned/reserved parking is offered in the building.
No analysis available
Listings repeatedly note an assigned/one parking stall for the unit, but there is no explicit language saying the parking is deeded/owned with the unit, so deeded cannot be confirmed from remarks.
No analysis available
Searched for 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', 'parking rental' in the public remarks and found no reference to any monthly parking charge; amount (if any) is unknown.
Guest parking is indicated in 6 of 9 MLS parking feature checkboxes and is mentioned in the remarks ('guest parking'), though fewer remarks reference it directly; evidence is moderate and suggests guest parking is available.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched remarks for 'waitlist'/'waiting list' related to parking and found none; absence of mention suggests no waitlist is indicated in public remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
8 out of 9 current MLS listings list construction_materials as 'CONCRE', suggesting concrete/reinforced-concrete construction. Public remarks across listings do not explicitly state construction material (no agent text like 'concrete building'), but the consistent checkbox across multiple listings from different agents provides strong evidence that the building is concrete rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for explicit STR language and found none. With no evidence in the remarks that STRs are permitted, STR allowance is assumed false based on available public remarks.
Because there is no evidence STRs are allowed and no mention of a hotel-managed rental pool or hotel program in the remarks, hotel-pool participation is set to false.
No listing mentions a required hotel rental pool or mandatory program. Given STRs are not indicated as permitted, mandatory pool participation is set to false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched remarks for phrases like 'lease expires', 'land lease to', or any 4-digit lease expiry year; found none, so lease expiry year is unknown.
Multiple remarks explicitly reference VA financing and state 'VA Approved Building!', indicating VA loans are accepted for the building.
The public remarks explicitly reference a special assessment for an insurance increase, which implies the HOA was not fully covered at the time and is raising funds to address insurance shortfalls. Because the remarks point to an insurance issue rather than stating 'fully insured' or 'walls-in coverage', I set insured_fully to false with high confidence.
No analysis available
I reviewed the remarks for explicit statements that the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation or similar certification and found none. With no mentions and no current value indicating a pass, the field is set to false with medium confidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Current MLS data shows 0 of 9 listings reporting a garden view and 2 listings explicitly list View=NONE. None of the public remarks use phrases like 'garden view', 'courtyard view', or 'landscaped view' (remarks only mention a unit's 'front and back yard'). With no supporting remarks and MLS checkboxes unset, there is strong evidence the building does not offer a garden view.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.