Waipio Gardens
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Waipio Gardens
Building Overview
Waipio Gardens, Mililani-Waipio — concrete construction built 1965; pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About Waipio Gardens
Waipio Gardens is located in the Mililani-Waipio neighborhood and was built in 1965. According to available records the building is constructed of concrete. Size and unit count are not provided in the MLS data.
Key property policies indicated in the MLS include no pets and no short-term rentals. The listing data does not specify on-site amenities (such as pools, fitness facilities, or common areas) or unit-level features.
Management company is listed as unknown in the MLS and information on parking, maintenance fees, assessments, or other homeowner association policies was not provided. Based on MLS data; buyers should verify all building details, policies, fees, and availability of amenities with the listing agent or management.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like "80% owner occupied," "majority owner occupied," or similar indicators of owner occupancy, but found none. Mentions such as "original owner" and "perfect for owner-occupants" describe individual units, not the building’s overall occupancy mix.
I searched the remarks for explicit elevator references such as "elevator," "elevators," or a count like "4 elevators," and found none. With no current numeric value provided and no remark evidence, the elevator count remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
9 of 9 current MLS listings list SEWER in association_fee_includes, but none of the public remarks for the building mention sewer being included. Evidence is strong across MLS checkbox data but is not corroborated in remarks, suggesting agent copy/paste is possible; included with moderate confidence (0.75).
8 of 9 current MLS listings list WATER in association_fee_includes, while none of the public remarks reference water being included. MLS checkbox data supports inclusion but lack of corroborating remarks suggests potential copy/paste—included with moderate confidence (0.73).
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
4 of 9 current MLS listings include the CRWSH amenity flag, but none of the combined public remarks mention a car wash (no phrases like 'car wash', 'auto wash', or 'vehicle wash area'). There is no prior/historical confirmation and no remarks describing installation or existence, so the evidence for a true building car wash is weak and likely a checkbox error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 9 current MLS listings list washer/dryer in inclusions and multiple remarks explicitly state in-unit laundry, with phrases like 'front-load washer and dryer', 'washer-dryer in-unit', and 'full-sized washer and dryer'. This consistent, building-wide evidence across listings indicates the building offers units with in-unit laundry; while agents may copy/paste, the unanimous and explicit mentions support a high-confidence true value.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 9 listings include parking in MLS checkbox data and multiple remarks explicitly state parking (e.g., '1 parking stall', '1 parking', 'parking'). Evidence is consistent across listings and agents, indicating building-level parking is available.
Most listings (8 of 9) list ASSIGN in parking features and several remarks explicitly state 'assigned parking spot' or 'one assigned parking', supporting that assigned/reserved parking is offered in the building.
No analysis available
The listings consistently describe parking as assigned/included with the unit, but there is no explicit language that it is deeded. Since the remarks never state ownership of the stall, deeded parking cannot be confirmed.
No analysis available
I looked for mentions of parking rent, monthly parking charges, or additional parking costs, but found none. The remarks only mention an assigned parking stall, not any separate fee.
Guest parking is indicated in 6 of 9 MLS parking feature checkboxes and is mentioned in the remarks ('guest parking'), though fewer remarks reference it directly; evidence is moderate and suggests guest parking is available.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for any reference to a parking waitlist, waiting list, or join-the-waitlist language and found none. There is no public remark evidence indicating a waitlist system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
8 out of 9 current MLS listings list construction_materials as 'CONCRE', suggesting concrete/reinforced-concrete construction. Public remarks across listings do not explicitly state construction material (no agent text like 'concrete building'), but the consistent checkbox across multiple listings from different agents provides strong evidence that the building is concrete rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit short-term rental language such as STR permitted, legal vacation rental, NUC, or TVU and found nothing. With no evidence that short-term rentals are allowed, this is set to false.
The remarks do not indicate that short-term rentals are allowed, and there is no mention of a hotel rental pool, hotel management, or any similar program. Because STR is not supported by the remarks, hotel pool participation must be false.
I looked for language suggesting owners must participate in a rental pool or hotel program, but found none. Since STR is not evidenced as allowed and no mandatory pool is described, this is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for ground lease, leasehold, lease expires, and renewal language, but found no specific 4-digit expiry year. The remarks do not provide enough information to determine land tenure expiration.
Public remarks directly indicate the building is VA approved and eligible for VA financing. One listing also says the condo may qualify for "$0 down programs such as USDA and VA loans."
The remarks explicitly mention a special assessment for an insurance increase, which is strong evidence that the building was not fully covered at that time. That conflicts with the idea of fully insured walls-in coverage, so this is marked false.
No analysis available
I looked for phrases indicating the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation, fire inspection, or similar certification, but none were present in the public remarks. Since there is no explicit confirmation, this cannot be marked as passed.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Current MLS data shows 0 of 9 listings reporting a garden view and 2 listings explicitly list View=NONE. None of the public remarks use phrases like 'garden view', 'courtyard view', or 'landscaped view' (remarks only mention a unit's 'front and back yard'). With no supporting remarks and MLS checkboxes unset, there is strong evidence the building does not offer a garden view.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.