Waimalu Park
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Waimalu Park
Building Overview
Waimalu Park in Aiea, built 1973; condo building with pet and short-term rental restrictions (per MLS data).
About Waimalu Park
Waimalu Park is a condominium building located in the Aiea neighborhood, originally built in 1973. Based on MLS data, specific details such as building size (number of units) and construction type are not provided in the available records.
Key amenities and on-site features are not listed in the MLS information for this property. According to available records, there is no management company identified in the MLS data.
Policies noted in the MLS include that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not allowed. Other details commonly of interest to buyers — including parking arrangements, maintenance/association fees, and any additional rules — are not specified in the MLS data. Buyers should verify all information with the listing agent or management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for owner-occupancy indicators such as "80% owner occupied," "majority owner occupied," or "highly owner occupied," but found none. With no explicit percentage or descriptive ownership mix in the remarks, the owner-occupancy rate remains unknown.
I searched the remarks for explicit elevator references such as "elevator," "lift," "4 elevators," or "multiple elevators," but found none. Because this is a numeric field and there is no current value provided, the number of elevators remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
10 of 17 current listings include OTCOEX, suggesting common-area electricity is likely included in the maintenance fee. No remarks mention hall/elevator/amenity power specifically, so confidence is moderate and based mainly on the MLS pattern rather than explicit narrative confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water inclusion appears to be absent for this building: 0 of 17 current listings show HOTWAT, while 15 of 17 show WTRHTR. Multiple remarks mention a unit water heater or new hot water heater, which is consistent with individual unit equipment rather than a building-paid hot water system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
13 of 17 current listings include SEWER, which is strong evidence that sewer is included in the HOA/maintenance fees. There are no remarks suggesting otherwise, and the repeated MLS pattern looks more like a building feature than a copy/paste anomaly.
13 of 17 current listings include WATER, making this a strong building-level fee inclusion. The remarks are silent on water charges, but the MLS pattern is consistent enough to treat water as included.
BBQ/grilling facilities are strongly supported for this building. At least 3 listing remarks explicitly mention a BBQ area, and the current MLS data shows BBQ checked in 14 of 17 listings, which looks consistent rather than a one-off copy/paste error. The repeated wording across multiple listings supports this as a real shared building amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for surfboard storage-related amenities such as surf storage, board storage, and bike/surfboard storage. The remarks mention general storage in one unit, but nothing specific to surfboard storage facilities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for salt-water pool wording such as "salt water pool," "saltwater pool," and "saline pool." Nothing in the remarks indicates a pool exists at this building, and the current context already says pool is false.
In-unit laundry is confirmed across most recent listings: 16 of 17 MLS entries include washer/dryer, and many remarks explicitly say 'washer and dryer in unit,' 'new stack washer and dryer,' or 'full-sized washer and dryer in unit.' The repeated wording across multiple listings suggests this is not a copy-paste error, but a real and common feature in the building.
No analysis available
The remarks directly reference coin/community washer and dryer, which is clear evidence that the building has paid shared laundry facilities. This is the strongest possible type of public-remarks evidence for this feature.
I searched the public remarks for phrases like "laundry on each floor," "laundry room on every floor," and similar wording. The listings only mention in-unit washer/dryer or coin/community washer and dryer, not laundry facilities on every floor.
Parking is strongly supported across the remarks: multiple listings explicitly mention 'one assigned parking stall,' 'one assigned parking,' 'one open parking stall,' and '1 parking stall.' There are many independent listings saying the unit/building includes parking, so this does not look like a copy-paste error.
Assigned/reserved parking is clearly supported by the remarks, with many listings explicitly stating 'assigned parking stall' and one describing 'assigned open parking fronting the unit.' The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and aligns with the current MLS checkbox data, so confidence is very high.
No analysis available
I looked for deeded, owned, included, or parking-stall-in-deed language and found none. The listings consistently describe assigned/open stalls, which suggests the parking is not deeded with the unit.
No analysis available
I searched for parking fee, monthly parking charge, parking rental, or similar wording. The remarks do not provide any parking cost information, so no fee can be extracted.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for parking waitlist, waiting list, or join-waitlist language and found nothing. The public remarks describe assigned/open stalls but do not indicate any waitlist system.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for card/fob access language such as key card entry, fob access, and electronic access. The listings do not mention any card-based security system for the building.
No analysis available
I looked for public remarks describing patrol service or roving security. There is no indication of any security patrol presence in the listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete construction appears to be the prevailing building material in the MLS history, with 14 of 17 listings coded CONCRE. None of the public remarks suggest a different construction type or a recent change, so this looks like a stable building-level attribute rather than copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 2 of 17 listings currently carry the MASSTU construction code, so evidence is limited. The remarks are silent on exterior construction, which makes this look more like weak MLS checkbox data than a clearly verified building feature.
No analysis available
Slab foundation appears in just 3 of 17 MLS records, so support is thin. Because none of the public remarks mention a concrete slab or foundation work, confidence remains low and this may reflect inconsistent MLS entry rather than a confirmed building-wide feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for STR-related terms such as short-term rental allowed, STR permitted, TVU, NUC, and vacation rental language. The remarks do not mention any allowance for short-term rentals, so I treat STR as not evidenced in the public remarks.
I looked for hotel rental pool, hotel-managed program, brand pool references, and similar terms. None were found, and because the remarks do not show STR allowance, hotel pool participation is not supported.
I searched for mandatory pool language such as required participation, must rent, or cannot opt out. There is no evidence of any rental-pool requirement in the remarks, so this is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for leasehold language such as lease expires, ground lease, leasehold, renewal, or extension years. Nothing in the listings mentions a land lease or an expiry date, so the lease expiry year remains unknown.
Public remarks directly state that the building is VA-approved, which is strong evidence that VA financing is allowed. I also found a listing mentioning a VA assumable rate, reinforcing that VA-related financing is supported.
The public remarks explicitly describe the development as having "100% liability insurance - full hurricane insurance," which strongly supports that the building is fully insured by the HOA. This is direct evidence from the listing remarks and is consistent with full walls-in style coverage.
No analysis available
I looked for language indicating the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation, including phrases like FLSE passed, fire safety certified, life safety compliant, or passed fire inspection. None of the public remarks mention this, so there is no evidence to support a pass.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Some units in the building appear to offer garden-type views: 5 of 17 current listings list GARDEN, while 12 list NONE. The public remarks mostly describe ground-floor yards or nice grounds, but they do not explicitly confirm building-wide garden views, so the evidence is moderate and somewhat MLS-driven.
No analysis available
Some units in the building appear to offer marina-related views: 3 of 17 current listings list MARCAN, while 12 list NONE. The public remarks do not mention marina, harbor, yacht harbor, or canal views, so this looks like a limited MLS-only signal rather than strong cross-agent confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like "fireworks view," "watch fireworks from lanai," and "see fireworks from unit." The remarks discuss parks, rail, shopping, and nearby attractions, but do not mention any fireworks views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.