Waimalu Park
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Waimalu Park
Building Overview
Waimalu Park in Aiea, built 1973; condo building with pet and short-term rental restrictions (per MLS data).
About Waimalu Park
Waimalu Park is a condominium building located in the Aiea neighborhood, originally built in 1973. Based on MLS data, specific details such as building size (number of units) and construction type are not provided in the available records.
Key amenities and on-site features are not listed in the MLS information for this property. According to available records, there is no management company identified in the MLS data.
Policies noted in the MLS include that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not allowed. Other details commonly of interest to buyers — including parking arrangements, maintenance/association fees, and any additional rules — are not specified in the MLS data. Buyers should verify all information with the listing agent or management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I reviewed all remarks for explicit owner-occupancy percentages or clear qualitative statements. None were present, so the percentage of owner-occupied units cannot be determined from the remarks and remains unknown.
I reviewed all public remarks for explicit references to elevators or counts (e.g., '4 elevators', 'four elevators', 'lift'). None were found. The phrase 'second story walk-up' appears in one remark, implying stairs-only access for that unit, but there is no definitive statement about building elevators, so the number remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', 'surf storage', and related phrases and found no evidence. The listings focus on interior upgrades and location amenities rather than specialized storage facilities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building context shows no pool and none of the public remarks reference a pool, let alone a 'salt water' or 'saltwater pool'. Therefore a salt pool does not exist on the property.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Public remarks explicitly reference a 'coin/community washer and dryer', indicating that community laundry (when present) is paid/coin-operated. Multiple listings also emphasize that many units have in-unit washers/dryers, but the explicit 'coin/community' language supports that the shared laundry (when available) requires payment.
I searched the public remarks for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'laundry room on every floor', or 'floor-by-floor laundry' and found none. Most listings repeatedly state units have a washer/dryer in-unit, which suggests shared floor-by-floor laundry is unlikely. No evidence supports this feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for wording such as 'deeded parking', 'owned parking', or 'parking included in deed' but found only references to 'assigned' or 'open' parking stalls. Because deeded ownership is not explicitly stated in the public remarks, the feature is set to false.
No analysis available
I searched for 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', 'parking charge', and similar phrases; the remarks only reference assigned parking stalls and do not mention any recurring parking fee or rental cost.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for 'parking waitlist', 'waiting list', or instructions to 'join waitlist for parking' but found none. The remarks consistently describe assigned stalls, suggesting no waitlist is referenced.
No analysis available
I searched remarks for 'key card', 'fob', 'card reader', and similar phrases and found no references. Security features are not highlighted, so there's no evidence the building has card/fob access.
No analysis available
I searched for terms like 'security patrol', 'roving security', and 'patrolled building' and found nothing. The remarks do not describe onsite or roving security services.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for 'short-term rental', 'STR', 'vacation rental', '30-day minimum', 'TVU', 'NUC', and related phrases but found no evidence permitting STR. Absence of STR language in the remarks leads to a determination of not allowed.
There are no mentions of any hotel rental pool, hotel-managed program, or branded-hotel affiliation in the remarks. Because STR was not indicated, hotel-pool participation cannot apply.
I looked for 'mandatory hotel pool', 'required to participate', or language indicating owners must enroll in a rental program and found none. Given the absence of any rental-pool references and STR not indicated, mandatory participation is not supported by the remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for phrases like 'lease expires', 'land lease', 'leasehold', and explicit years (e.g., 2050, 2065). There is no information about land tenure or any lease expiry year in the provided remarks.
Multiple remarks explicitly reference VA approval and an assumable VA rate, indicating the building is VA loan approved. This is direct evidence from the public remarks.
The public remarks explicitly state the development is covered by full insurance ('100% liability insurance - full hurricane insurance'), which matches the 'fully insured / walls-in coverage' concept. Based on that explicit language, this is marked true with high confidence.
No analysis available
I scanned all remarks for explicit statements that the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation (FLSE) or similar phrasing. There are no mentions indicating the building has passed such an evaluation, so absent any current value or user verification, this field is marked false with medium confidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like 'fireworks view', 'watch fireworks from lanai', or 'see fireworks from unit' and found no references. The remarks focus on nearby parks, shopping, and transport, not any fireworks views from the property.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.