Waikiki Parkway Apartments
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Waikiki Parkway Apartments
Building Overview
Waikiki Parkway Apartments in McCully-Moiliili, built 1964; pets and short-term rentals not allowed per MLS data.
About Waikiki Parkway Apartments
Waikiki Parkway Apartments is located in the McCully-Moiliili neighborhood and was built in 1964. According to available records, specific details such as total units, building size, and construction type are not provided in the MLS data.
The MLS data does not list on-site amenities or building features for Waikiki Parkway Apartments. Buyers seeking information on utilities, common areas, or recent updates should request the full property disclosure or contact the listing agent for details.
Based on MLS data, pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted at this property. The management company is listed as unknown in the available records. Prospective buyers should verify all building policies, management arrangements, parking, maintenance fees, and other material facts with the seller or managing agent prior to making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
County assessor records and the state registration both report 3 floors; the sparse listings reach only floor 2 and provide no penthouse evidence.
The county's reconciled unit count and the state's registration total both report 31 units; the state's separate residential_units value of 30 is set aside because total_units is authoritative for the registration.
Owner occupancy from AOUO registration(s) 20. Refreshed by Real_Estate_Scraper/reb_registry/propagate_owner_occupancy.py, which this lock does not block.
The remarks describe the property as a walk-up complex but do not explicitly state the number of elevators. Because no numeric elevator information is provided, the value remains unknown rather than being inferred.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the 4 listings indicate hot water is included, and 3 list WTRHTR. Multiple remarks reference a "new water heater" or water-heater upgrades, so the hot-water-included feature should be corrected to false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 4 listings include SEWER in association_fee_includes. No remarks contradict this, and the consistency across listings strongly supports that sewer is included in the maintenance fee.
All 4 listings include WATER in association_fee_includes. The remarks are largely silent on fee inclusions, but the consistent 4/4 MLS data provides strong evidence that water is included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Community laundry is explicitly mentioned in 2 of 4 listings, using the phrases "community laundry" and "close to the community laundry." The consistent MLS amenity designation across all 4 listings supports that this is a building-level shared amenity rather than an isolated or copied claim.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Three of four listings explicitly mention parking or a parking stall. The repeated references across multiple listings, including reserved and assigned stalls, provide strong building-level evidence that parking is available.
At least two listings explicitly confirm assigned or reserved parking, with key phrases '1 reserved parking stall' and 'one assigned parking stall.' The MLS data also marks assigned parking in 3 of 4 listings, supporting a building-level assigned parking feature.
No analysis available
Multiple listings mention one reserved or assigned parking stall. Because the remarks do not explicitly say deeded, owned, or included in the deed, deeded parking cannot be confirmed.
No analysis available
The remarks describe parking as reserved, assigned, or included with the unit but provide no parking fee amount. The monthly parking cost is therefore unknown.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings mention assigned or reserved parking but do not discuss a waitlist system. There is no public-remarks evidence of a parking waitlist.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
2 of 4 listings explicitly mention window AC, including 'new window ACs' and 'each bedroom is equipped with a window AC.' The remarks from separate listings provide strong confirmation, consistent with the ACWIUN inclusion appearing in 2 of 4 current MLS records.
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the 4 listings mention hollow tile construction in their remarks. Although 2 of 4 MLS records contain the HOLTIL checkbox, this appears to be unverified MLS data rather than consistent evidence from multiple agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks discuss investment potential and prior rental history but do not explicitly permit short-term rentals. No public-remarks evidence supports STR eligibility.
The listings contain no references to a hotel-operated rental program, Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool, or similar arrangement. Because STR permission is not established, hotel-pool participation is false under the prerequisite rule.
The remarks provide no evidence that owners must participate in a hotel rental pool. Since STR permission is not established, mandatory pool participation is false under the prerequisite rule.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks contain no leasehold or ground-lease information and no specific expiration year. Therefore, the lease expiry year is unknown.
The remarks were reviewed for VA approval and VA financing language, but none was found. This does not confirm the building is ineligible; it only indicates no public-remarks evidence of VA approval.
The remarks discuss maintenance fees and building improvements but do not address whether the HOA provides full or walls-in insurance coverage. With no explicit evidence, this is recorded as false with medium-low confidence.
No analysis available
The remarks mention security cameras, plumbing replacement, and buyer due diligence, but provide no evidence about fire or life safety evaluation status. With no current verified value and no explicit statement, this is recorded as false with medium-low confidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the 4 listings mention sunset views or related indicators. Three listings explicitly report NONE in the view descriptions, and the absence of supporting remarks across multiple listings strongly indicates the building should not be tagged as offering sunset views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.