Waiau Gardens Kai G-1
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Waiau Gardens Kai G-1
Building Overview
Waiau Gardens Kai G-1 in Pearl City, built 1975; pets and short-term rentals are not allowed (per MLS data).
About Waiau Gardens Kai G-1
Waiau Gardens Kai G-1 is a residential building located in Pearl City, originally built in 1975. According to available records, specific details on unit sizes and the building's construction type are not provided in the MLS data.
Key features and on-site amenities are not listed in the MLS information for this property, and the management company is shown as Unknown. There are no amenity listings or building-specific descriptions available in the provided data.
Policy details in the MLS indicate that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not allowed. Information about parking, maintenance fees, HOA dues, and other operational details is not included in the MLS excerpts provided. This summary is based on MLS data; buyers should verify all details with the listing agent or managing entity before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
The public remarks contain no information about percentage of owner-occupied units. Because there is no prior numeric value and no explicit percentage in the remarks, owner-occupancy is unknown and cannot be inferred from the listing text. Provide an owner/manager verification if available to set a numeric percentage with higher confidence.
No information about elevators appears in any public remarks. I searched the remarks for explicit counts or mentions (e.g., 'elevator', '4 elevators', 'multiple elevators') and found none. Because there is no prior numeric value and no explicit statement, the number of elevators is unknown and cannot be inferred.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings indicate hot water is included (0/13 HOTWAT). Twelve listings explicitly list 'WTRHTR' or note new 30-gal/new water heater in the unit, and none of the remarks say 'hot water included' or 'hot water in HOA.' The consistent presence of unit water heaters across multiple agents and the unchecked MLS hot-water box provide strong evidence that hot water is not covered by the maintenance fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 13 listings have 'WATER' checked in association fee includes (13/13). While remarks do not explicitly mention 'water included,' the complete consistency of the MLS checkbox across multiple agent listings strongly supports that water is included in the HOA/maintenance fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence across the current listings that some units have in-unit laundry: at least a dozen listings include washer/dryer in inclusions and remarks repeatedly state 'washer/dryer in unit', 'washer/dryer in the ground floor half bathroom', and 'brand new washer and dryer'. While some remark text is repeated (possible copy/paste), the consistent, explicit mentions across many listings indicate the building offers in-unit laundry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 13 current MLS listings include parking in the checkbox fields and the public remarks repeatedly mention parking: phrases include 'reserved parking stall', 'assigned parking stall #101', and '1 parking stall'. Evidence is strong and consistent across multiple agent listings, indicating building offers assigned/reserved parking stalls for units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for wording like 'deeded parking' or 'owned parking' and found none; instead the listings use 'reserved' or 'assigned stall', which typically indicates assigned use but not deeded ownership. Therefore, deeded parking is unlikely based on these remarks.
No analysis available
I searched for terms like 'parking fee', 'monthly parking charge', or 'parking rental' and found no references. There is no information to determine whether a separate parking fee applies.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for phrases such as 'parking waitlist' or 'join waitlist for parking' and found none. Absence of mention suggests no waitlist is referenced in these listings, but this is not definitive.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
11 of 13 current MLS listings include 'DOUWAL' (double wall) in construction_materials. Although none of the provided public remarks explicitly reference double-wall construction, the high frequency of the MLS checkbox across agents provides strong, consistent evidence that double-wall construction is present in the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
5 of 13 current MLS listings indicate 'SLAB' (concrete slab foundation) in construction_materials, but the public remarks are silent about foundation type. The mixed MLS reporting and lack of corroborating remarks yield weak evidence that the building is constructed on a concrete slab.
No analysis available
9 of 13 current MLS listings include 'WOOFRA' (wood frame) in construction_materials, but none of the public remarks mention construction type. Evidence comes primarily from MLS checkbox data across multiple listings and is implied rather than explicitly confirmed in agent remarks, suggesting moderate confidence that the building has wood frame construction.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit STR-related terms and found none; statements refer to converting to a rental (long-term) if not sold, which does not imply STR permission. Based on the absence of any STR-specific language, short-term rental allowance is not supported by these remarks.
Because there is no evidence that short-term rentals are allowed, hotel rental pool participation cannot apply. I searched for 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel program', or brand-managed rental language and found none.
Since short-term rentals are not supported by the remarks, mandatory hotel-pool participation cannot be true. I also found no language such as 'mandatory hotel pool' or 'required to participate'.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for explicit mentions such as 'lease expires', 'land lease to YYYY', or 'leasehold expiring in YYYY' and found no references. Without any year provided, the lease expiry is unknown from these remarks.
I searched the remarks for phrases like 'VA approved', 'VA financing', or 'VA loans accepted' and found none. Given the absence of any VA-related language in these listings, VA approval is unlikely based on available public remarks.
There is no statement in the remarks that the HOA provides full building/walls-in insurance. Following the rules, with no mention and no prior data this is set to false with medium confidence. If you can provide HOA documentation or an owner's confirmation that the building is fully insured, I can update the value with higher confidence.
No analysis available
The public remarks do not mention any fire/life safety evaluation or certification. Per the rules, when no mention exists and there is no prior value, the feature is set to false with medium confidence (absence likely means not stated/publicized). If you have a user verification or documentation indicating a passed FLSE, that would supersede this.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
0 of 13 current listings mention sunset views (MLS view_descriptions: 0 SUNSET, 5 NONE). The provided public remarks contain no phrases like 'sunset', 'western exposure', or 'evening sun'. Given the lack of historical data and no supporting remarks across listings, conclude the building does not offer sunset views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.