Waiau Gardens Kai E
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Waiau Gardens Kai E
Building Overview
Waiau Gardens Kai E in Pearl City — built 1974. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed, management company unknown.
About Waiau Gardens Kai E
Based on MLS data, Waiau Gardens Kai E is a residential building in the Pearl City neighborhood built in 1974. Size and construction type are not specified in the available MLS records.
Key policies recorded for the building include a no-pets policy and a prohibition on short-term rentals. The MLS information does not list amenities, unit mix, or on-site facilities.
Additional details such as parking arrangements, monthly maintenance or HOA fees, and the management company are not provided in the MLS data (management company listed as unknown). Buyers should verify all building facts, rules, and fees with official building management or their agent, as this summary is based solely on available MLS records.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the 6 current listings have 'hot water included' (0/6 HOTWAT) while 3/6 explicitly list WTRHTR (water heater), implying unit-supplied hot water. Public remarks across listings do not mention building-provided hot water, so the evidence (MLS checkboxes + inclusions) strongly supports setting fee_inc_hot_water to false.
Internet appears to be included in the association fee for at least some units in this building. The evidence comes from current MLS checkbox data (3 of 7 listings marked INTSER) rather than remarks, which do not mention internet/wifi. This looks like a building-level amenity that may be inconsistently copied into listings, so confidence is moderate rather than high.
No analysis available
Sewer is included in the association fee in most current MLS records, with 5 of 7 listings checking SEWER. There are no contrary remarks, and the majority pattern suggests this is a real building-level fee inclusion rather than a one-off agent copy-paste error.
Water is the strongest of the three fee inclusions here: 6 of 7 current listings check WATER in association_fee_includes. With no conflicting remarks and a clear majority of listings agreeing, this is strong evidence that water is included in the maintenance fee.
There is no public-remarks evidence for building BBQ/grilling amenities across the listings reviewed. The feature appears only once in MLS amenities (1/7), which is too weak to support inclusion and looks like an outlier rather than a confirmed shared amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
5+ of the provided listings explicitly mention a lanai or outdoor area, including phrases like "private covered lanai," "large open lanai," "open lanai," and "Permitted Enclosed Lanai." The repeated references across multiple remarks make this a strong building-level feature rather than an MLS checkbox error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Public remarks support this feature in multiple listings: one describes a 'well-maintained community with amenities like pool and recreational area,' and another mentions the nearby 'Waiau Community Park Recreation Center.' Combined with 3/7 MLS amenity hits, the evidence suggests a real community recreation area, not just agent copy-paste.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool is strongly supported for this building: 7 of 7 current listings list it in MLS amenities, and all public remarks mention it directly (e.g., “shared pool,” “community amenities like a swimming pool,” “Only a few steps to the Community Pool”). The repeated language across listings suggests a stable shared amenity rather than copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence supports in-unit laundry for this building. All 7 current MLS listings include washer/dryer in inclusions, and several remarks explicitly mention it, including "full-sized washer and dryer," "washer/dryer in unit," and "in-unit washer." The repeated confirmation across multiple listings suggests this is a real building feature rather than copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is consistently confirmed across the listings, with all 7 remarks referencing parking in some form. Multiple agents describe "2 parking stalls," "2 assigned parking stalls," "2 parking spaces," and "2 dedicated parking stalls," so this does not look like a copy-paste anomaly.
Assigned parking is strongly supported by both the MLS data and the public remarks. Several listings explicitly mention "2 assigned parking stalls" or "2 dedicated parking stalls," indicating this is a stable building feature rather than an unchecked or incidental note.
No analysis available
I checked for explicit deeded/owned parking language such as "deeded parking," "owned stall," or "parking included in deed." The listings only describe assigned or dedicated stalls, which is not enough to confirm deeded parking.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for any parking cost references, including monthly fees or rental charges. None were found, so there is no public evidence of a parking fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for phrases like "parking waitlist," "waiting list," or "join the waitlist for parking." The remarks do not mention any parking waitlist process.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least one listing explicitly states "Stay cool year-round with split AC units," and another advertises "New ACs in all 3 bedrooms and 2 downstairs," while multiple other listings mention window ACs. This mixed but non-contradictory evidence (1 explicit mention + 1 supporting remark out of 6 listings) indicates some units offer split/installed ACs, so the building should be listed as offering split ACs.
Window AC is clearly supported across the remarks: 4+ listings explicitly mention window units, including phrases like 'window AC unit in every room' and 'windowAC's.' The MLS data also aligns, with ACWIUN checked in 5 of 7 listings, so this appears to be a consistent building feature rather than a one-off agent error.
No analysis available
0 of 7 listings mention double wall construction in the remarks. Since the descriptions contain no explicit construction details and the feature appears only in MLS checkbox data, it is not validated here.
No analysis available
0 of 7 remarks mention masonry, stucco, or "masonry and stucco." Because the public descriptions do not support the MLS checkbox data, this feature is not confirmed for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
0 of 7 public remarks mention wood frame construction, and none include phrases like "wood frame" or "wood frame construction." With only current MLS checkbox data and no supporting agent remarks, this feature is not validated for the building.
Only 2 of 6 current listings have ABOGRO in construction_materials, but across six public remarks there are zero mentions of 'above ground', 'above ground construction', or related materials. Evidence for this feature is weak and appears to be inconsistent checkbox usage by agents rather than supported by remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental indicators such as "STR allowed," "vacation rental," "NUC," and "TVU." There is no public evidence that short-term rentals are allowed in this building.
I looked for hotel-pool terms like "hotel rental pool," brand-managed rental programs, or similar references. Since there is no evidence that STR is allowed, this is also not supported.
I searched for language indicating a required hotel or rental pool, such as "must participate" or "cannot opt out." No such language appears in the remarks, so mandatory pool participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for lease terms like "lease expires," "ground lease ends," "leasehold expiring," and any renewal year references. Nothing in the remarks indicates the land tenure is leasehold or provides an expiry year.
I searched the public remarks for explicit VA financing language such as "VA approved" or "VA loans accepted" and found none. With no public evidence, the building is treated as not confirmed VA-approved.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no evidence this building has sunset views. Across 7 recent listings, 0 mention SUNSET in the MLS view field and the public remarks never describe sunset, western exposure, or similar wording. The current data looks consistently negative rather than copy-pasted confirmation of the feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listing remarks explicitly describe a resident manager, live-in manager, or on-site building manager. With only 2 of 7 MLS entries showing RESMAN and no corroborating language in the remarks, this does not provide reliable evidence that the building has a resident manager.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.