Waiau Gardens Kai B
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Waiau Gardens Kai B
Building Overview
Waiau Gardens Kai B in Pearl City — built 1973; pets allowed; short-term rentals not permitted.
About Waiau Gardens Kai B
Waiau Gardens Kai B is a residential building located in the Pearl City neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1973. MLS data does not specify unit count, building size, or construction type for this property.
Based on MLS data, key policies for Waiau Gardens Kai B include that pets are allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. The listing information does not provide details on specific on-site amenities or common area features.
Additional operational details such as parking arrangements, maintenance fees, homeowner association management, and the management company are not provided in the MLS data (management company listed as Unknown). Buyers should verify all building characteristics, policies, fees, and availability of amenities with the listing agent or management prior to making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings indicate individual water heaters (WTRHTR in 4/5 listings) and remarks state a "new water heater," suggesting hot water is not provided by the building/HOA. No public remarks claim "hot water included" or similar; evidence is strong across several listings and appears consistent rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least two separate listing remarks explicitly say "Water and sewer are sub-metered and paid through the HOA" and "Water and sewer are not included in the maintenance fee." This direct language from multiple listings contradicts some MLS checkboxes and indicates sewer is not included in the HOA maintenance fee.
Multiple listing remarks (appearing in more than one agent's public remarks) state "Water and sewer are sub-metered and paid through the HOA" and explicitly note water is not included in maintenance. Given this direct language across listings, water should be marked as not included despite a small number of MLS checkboxes indicating otherwise.
MLS amenities list BBQ in 1 of 5 current listings, but none of the five public remarks include 'BBQ', 'grill', or similar phrasing. There is no historical confirmation or owner/site verification and the references appear isolated (single listing), so this is weak evidence and may be an agent checkbox/copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 2 of 5 current listings and multiple public remarks explicitly reference a covered patio/lanai (quotes: "The covered patio offers a washer and dryer area"; "Covered lanai for your enjoyment"). MLS checkbox PATDEC/COVPAT is set on 2 listings, and the feature is described concretely in agent remarks rather than being implied, so include patio/deck as a building amenity. Evidence appears across different listings rather than a single copy/paste instance.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings (MLS: 2/5 with building-level storage checkbox, 1/5 with unit storage) and the public remarks reference "additional storage," "plenty of storage space," and a washer/dryer area with additional storage on the covered lanai. Evidence indicates the building offers extra storage (in-unit/lanai or assigned storage) across several listings, but remarks describe in-unit/lanai storage more than clearly defined separate storage lockers.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
4 of 5 current MLS listings have POOL checked, and at least 2 separate public remarks explicitly refer to shared pool access — phrases include "access to a community pool" and "access to a refreshing swimming pool." Evidence comes from multiple agents and MLS checkbox data; while a couple of listings omit mention (likely copy-paste variation), the preponderance of checkbox data plus explicit remarks supports including the pool feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that units have in-unit laundry: the MLS inclusions show WASHER/DRYER on all 5 listings and at least 3 separate public remarks state phrases like 'washer and dryer area', 'brand new washer and dryer', and 'washer and dryer located in the closet on the lanai'. This is consistent across listings and agents, supporting a high-confidence true value.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings and MLS checkboxes indicate building parking: 4/5 current MLS records include parking codes (OPEN/GARAGE/COVERED/etc.) and 3 of the public remarks explicitly mention parking (e.g., "two side-by-side parking stalls", "1 parking corner unit"). Evidence is consistent across different agent remarks, supporting a high-confidence conclusion that the building offers parking.
Assigned parking is supported by MLS data and agent remarks: 3/5 MLS entries include ASSIGN and multiple remarks state assigned/side-by-side stalls (quotes: "2 assigned side by side parking stalls", "two side-by-side parking stalls"). The convergence of MLS flags and explicit remarks across listings indicates assigned/reserved stalls are available.
No analysis available
Listings repeatedly state assigned/side-by-side parking stalls near the unit, which indicates dedicated stalls, but there is no explicit language such as 'deeded parking' or 'owned parking' in the remarks. Therefore deeded parking cannot be confirmed from the remarks.
No analysis available
Searched for 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', 'parking charge', or similar. The remarks only reference assigned stalls and proximity; no fee information was provided.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Looked for 'parking waitlist', 'waiting list', or instructions to join a list for parking. The remarks do not mention any waitlist system, suggesting none is indicated in the public remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Three of five current MLS listings for this building list construction_materials= WOOFRA (wood frame), but none of the public remarks mention construction type. This appears to be an MLS checkbox entry across multiple listings (possible copy/paste) rather than explicit agent/owner text, so inclusion is implied (moderate confidence) rather than directly confirmed.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched remarks for STR indicators (short-term rental allowed, vacation rental, NUC, TVU, 30-day minimum wording). There is no STR-related language in the remarks, so short-term rentals cannot be confirmed and are treated as not allowed based on the absence of evidence.
Because there is no evidence that STRs are permitted, hotel rental pool participation cannot be true. No remarks reference a hotel rental program or hotel management.
With no evidence that STRs or hotel pools exist for this building, mandatory participation is not applicable and is therefore false. No listing language suggests required enrollment in any rental program.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for phrases like 'lease expires', 'land lease to', 'leasehold', and explicit years (e.g., 2050). No leasehold/land tenure expiry information was provided in the public remarks.
Remarks explicitly state VA approval/acceptance (e.g., "VA-approved!" and "Pet and VA Friendly!"). This provides strong evidence that the building is VA loan approved.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the 5 current listings mention sunset views (0/5 have SUNSET; 2/5 show NONE in view_descriptions) and the combined public remarks contain no phrases like 'sunset', 'western exposure', or 'evening sun.' Given the lack of any remarks and that MLS view checkboxes no longer indicate SUNSET, there is strong evidence the building should not be labeled as having sunset views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
3 of 5 current MLS listings include the RESMAN amenity checkbox, but none of the provided public remarks mention a resident or on-site manager. Evidence is mixed — multiple agents marked the building as having a resident manager, but the lack of any remarks suggests possible copy/paste. Marked true with moderate confidence pending owner/property-manager verification.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.