Waiau Garden Court
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Waiau Garden Court
Building Overview
Waiau Garden Court in Pearl City — built 1979; pets and short-term rentals are not allowed.
About Waiau Garden Court
Waiau Garden Court is located in the Pearl City neighborhood and was built in 1979. Specifics about unit count, building size, and construction type are not specified in the available MLS data.
Key policies documented in MLS records include no pets allowed and no short-term rentals permitted. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS; other amenity and service details are not provided in the available listing information.
Parking, maintenance fees, utilities, and other ownership details were not included in the MLS data provided. According to available records, buyers should verify all building features, policies, and fees with the listing agent or management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched all remarks for explicit owner-occupancy figures or descriptive phrases (e.g., 'owner occupied', '% owner occupied') and found none. Because there is no explicit numeric statement and no current value provided, the owner-occupancy percentage is unknown (null) with low confidence.
I searched all public remarks for explicit statements such as '4 elevators', 'four elevators', or 'elevator' and found no references. Because there is no explicit numeric statement and no current numeric value provided, the number of elevators is unknown (kept as null) with low confidence.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
13/18 current MLS listings list OTCOEX (common area electric) in association_fee_includes, suggesting maintenance likely covers common area electricity. Public remarks for the units do not explicitly state 'common area electric' or 'building power included', so the support is primarily MLS checkbox data appearing across many agent listings and may reflect copy/paste but is consistent across most listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No MLS listings include HOTWAT (0/18) and 11/18 list WTRHTR (water heater). Several public remarks explicitly state 'New water heater' or 'water heater replaced', supporting that hot water is provided by in-unit heaters and not included in the maintenance fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 18 current MLS listings include SEWER in association_fee_includes, and historical data showed the same, so maintenance fees very likely include sewer service. Public remarks do not contradict this and the MLS support is unanimous across listings.
All 18 current MLS listings include WATER in association_fee_includes, matching prior high-confidence data that HOA fees include water. Public remarks do not explicitly state 'water included' but do not contradict the unanimous MLS association_fee_includes entries.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple agent remarks across listings describe unit outdoor space: at least 10 of 17 public remarks explicitly mention 'private lanai', 'covered lanai', 'enclosed patio', 'private yard', or 'screened-in lanai'. Current MLS amenity checkboxes also show PATDEC/COVPAT on 9/17 listings. Evidence is consistent across several different listings and agents, so confidence is high that the building offers patios/decks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Substantial evidence that the building/units offer storage: 3 of 18 listings have storage in building amenities and 8 of 18 list storage in unit features. Public remarks across listings explicitly state "storage closet" and "outdoor storage closet," indicating available extra storage rather than a checkbox copy-paste error; confidence is high (0.90).
The public remarks describe location, parking, pets, private yards/lanai, renovations, and insurance, but do not reference any type of surfboard or board storage facility. I specifically looked for phrases like 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', 'surf storage', or combined bike/surfboard storage and found none. In the absence of any mention, it is more likely that dedicated surfboard storage is not provided in this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The public remarks discuss location, renovations, parking, pet-friendliness, private yards/lanai, and insurance, but do not mention any swimming pool, let alone a salt water pool. I specifically looked for terms like 'salt water pool', 'saltwater', 'saline', or 'salt pool' and found none. Given the absence of any pool references, a salt water pool is unlikely for this building based solely on these remarks.
Strong evidence that some units have in-unit laundry: MLS checkbox historically set in 17/18 listings and multiple current public remarks (at least 5–6 separate listing remarks in the aggregated text) explicitly state 'full-sized washer and dryer are located in the unit' or 'in-unit washer and dryer.' Evidence is consistent across many agent remarks and matches the historical MLS inclusions, so inclusion is high-confidence.
No analysis available
I looked for terms like coin-op, card-operated, community laundry, or paid laundry and did not find any. Because laundry is described as being inside the units and there is no indication of paid common laundry, it is likely there is no paid community laundry setup.
I searched for any references to laundry on each floor, common laundry rooms, or floor-by-floor laundry and found none. Instead, the remarks emphasize in-unit washers and dryers, suggesting the building does not rely on community laundry on every floor.
All 18 current MLS listings include parking features (various open/covered/garage types). Remarks across listings reference parking repeatedly—e.g., "one uncovered parking stall," "TWO parking stalls," "ample street parking"—indicating building provides parking options. Evidence is consistent across many agents and listings, so parking is very likely present.
Most listings (MLS shows ASSIGN on 16 of 18) and numerous public remarks explicitly mention assigned parking—quotes include "one assigned parking stall" and "one assigned, corner parking stall." The consistency across many listings and agents supports high confidence that assigned/reserved parking is provided.
No analysis available
Listings mention assigned, uncovered, or open parking stalls and ample street parking, but there is no explicit language that parking is deeded/owned with the unit; therefore deeded parking is not supported by the remarks.
No analysis available
Searched for terms like 'parking fee', 'monthly parking charge', or 'parking rental' and found no references. No parking-specific fee is stated in the public remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched remarks for 'parking waitlist', 'waiting list', or similar phrases and found none; there is no evidence of a formal parking waitlist system.
No analysis available
All remarks were reviewed for terms like key card access, fob entry, card reader, or electronic access system and none were present. In the absence of any reference to controlled electronic entry, this building is assumed not to have card/fob access based on the listings alone.
No analysis available
The remarks were checked for any indication of on-site patrols or roving security services and none were identified. With no explicit evidence of a patrol service, the building is treated as not having security patrol based on current listing information.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
11 of 17 current MLS listings include the ACWIUN checkbox indicating window/wall units, while public remarks rarely specify unit type; only one remark mentions "air conditioning in each bedroom." The preponderance of MLS inclusions suggests some units likely have window/wall AC, but the lack of explicit "window AC" wording in remarks means confidence is moderate and the feature may reflect agent checkbox practices rather than uniform building-wide installations.
No analysis available
10 of 18 current MLS listings have DOUWAL in construction_materials, but public remarks from the provided listings do not mention 'double wall', 'double-wall', or 'two walls'. With no historical confirmation and no remarks describing double-wall construction, the evidence is weak and inconsistent, so the feature is omitted for now (possible agent checkbox inconsistency).
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
15 of 18 current MLS listings list WOOFRA (≈83%) and prior aggregated data showed ~82% listing wood frame, supporting that the building is wood frame. None of the public remarks explicitly say 'wood frame', so the conclusion relies on consistent MLS checkbox entries across multiple listings rather than explicit agent remarks; some risk of copy/paste exists but the strong majority across listings indicates the building is likely wood frame.
Only 5 of 17 listings include ABOGRO (≈29%), and none of the public remarks mention 'above ground' or 'above ground materials'. The sparse, inconsistent checkbox usage and absence of confirming remarks across multiple agents suggest this is likely agent checkbox error rather than a real building feature, so the feature is omitted with high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Reviewed remarks for STR-related terms and found no indication STRs are permitted. Absence of evidence in the public remarks leads to a likely conclusion that STRs are not allowed.
No evidence in the public remarks of participation in a hotel rental pool. Because short-term rentals are not indicated as allowed, hotel-pool participation cannot apply.
There is no evidence of any hotel rental pool, let alone a mandatory program. Additionally, since STRs are not indicated as allowed, a mandatory pool is not applicable.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Remarks explicitly state the unit is leasehold and the lease is good until 04/02/35, which corresponds to a 2035 lease expiry.
Multiple listings explicitly state the project is VA approved, indicating VA financing is accepted for units in this building.
Multiple remarks explicitly advertise '100% hurricane insurance' or '100% hurricane coverage' and refer to the community as '100% hurricane insured', which indicates the HOA provides comprehensive hurricane insurance coverage. Based on these explicit statements in the public remarks, insured_fully is set to true with high confidence.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for phrases indicating the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation or inspection (e.g., 'FLSE passed', 'fire safety certified') and found none. In the absence of any mention and with no current value provided, I report false with medium confidence (absence of mention suggests not reported).
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings (0/18) mention sunset, evening sun, or western/west-facing exposure. Public remarks include phrases like 'east-facing corner end unit' and 'Pearl Harbor ocean views' but contain no 'sunset' or 'western exposure' language, so there is strong, consistent evidence across multiple listings that the building does not advertise sunset views.
No analysis available
Remarks were checked for phrases like fireworks views, watching fireworks from the lanai, or similar, and none were found. In the absence of any such mention, fireworks views are assumed not to be a noted feature.
No analysis available
None of the provided public remarks (0/18) mention a resident or on-site manager; only 2 of 18 MLS listings have the RESMAN amenity checked. With no remarks describing a live-in/building manager and no prior verification, the evidence points to agents inconsistently checking the box rather than the building actually having a resident manager.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.