Waiau Garden Court
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Waiau Garden Court
Building Overview
Waiau Garden Court in Pearl City — built 1979; pets and short-term rentals are not allowed.
About Waiau Garden Court
Waiau Garden Court is located in the Pearl City neighborhood and was built in 1979. Specifics about unit count, building size, and construction type are not specified in the available MLS data.
Key policies documented in MLS records include no pets allowed and no short-term rentals permitted. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS; other amenity and service details are not provided in the available listing information.
Parking, maintenance fees, utilities, and other ownership details were not included in the MLS data provided. According to available records, buyers should verify all building features, policies, and fees with the listing agent or management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
The county parcel record and the state registration both report 2 floors, and the MLS floor field reaches 2. The unit-number floor signal is inconsistent and is not persuasive for this low-rise property.
The state registration reports 37 units for one building, making it the best directly scoped authoritative figure. The county parcel reports 176 units, but this conflicts with the registration; the currently stored 176 is therefore not retained.
Owner occupancy from AOUO registration(s) 1038. Refreshed by Real_Estate_Scraper/reb_registry/propagate_owner_occupancy.py, which this lock does not block.
I searched for explicit references such as "elevators," "multiple elevators," or a stated number of elevators, but none appeared in the public remarks. The number of elevators is therefore unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Common area electricity appears to be included in the maintenance fee. The current MLS set shows OTCOEX in 15 of 20 listings, which is strong building-level evidence and likely reflects repeated copy/paste across agents rather than isolated notes.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water is not supported as a building-wide maintenance-fee inclusion: 0 of 20 current listings mention HOTWAT, and 13 of 20 list WTRHTR. Remarks include phrases such as "New water heater" and "water heater" in multiple listings, providing consistent evidence that units have individual water heaters.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer is included in the maintenance fee across all 20 current listings. The 20/20 MLS consistency is strong building-level evidence, even though individual public remarks generally do not repeat the fee inclusions.
Water is included in the maintenance fee across all 20 current listings. The 20/20 consistency across the MLS data is strong evidence of a stable building-wide feature, although public remarks rarely restate the inclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 10 listings explicitly mention patio/deck-type features, including "spacious patio," "private outdoor patio," "private lanai," "enclosed patio," "screened-in lanai," and "covered lanai." The repeated descriptions across multiple listings and agents strongly confirm that Waiau Garden Court offers patio/lanai outdoor space, rather than this being a copied checkbox error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is strong evidence that Waiau Garden Court offers storage, with historical MLS data showing storage in both building amenities and unit features across many listings. Current public remarks also confirm it, including phrases like "the outdoor storage closet" and "storage closet" that indicate storage space is available to residents. This appears consistent across multiple listings rather than a one-off agent copy-paste.
The public remarks describe location, parking, pets, private yards/lanai, renovations, and insurance, but do not reference any type of surfboard or board storage facility. I specifically looked for phrases like 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', 'surf storage', or combined bike/surfboard storage and found none. In the absence of any mention, it is more likely that dedicated surfboard storage is not provided in this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The public remarks discuss location, renovations, parking, pet-friendliness, private yards/lanai, and insurance, but do not mention any swimming pool, let alone a salt water pool. I specifically looked for terms like 'salt water pool', 'saltwater', 'saline', or 'salt pool' and found none. Given the absence of any pool references, a salt water pool is unlikely for this building based solely on these remarks.
In-unit laundry is strongly supported across the building: at least 4 current listings explicitly mention washer/dryer in the unit, including full-size appliances, and 18/20 listings include WASHER/DRYER in MLS inclusions. The evidence is consistent with the previously high-confidence determination and appears across multiple distinct remarks, not just a single copied statement.
No analysis available
I looked for terms like coin-op, card-operated, community laundry, or paid laundry and did not find any. Because laundry is described as being inside the units and there is no indication of paid common laundry, it is likely there is no paid community laundry setup.
I searched for any references to laundry on each floor, common laundry rooms, or floor-by-floor laundry and found none. Instead, the remarks emphasize in-unit washers and dryers, suggesting the building does not rely on community laundry on every floor.
Parking is strongly confirmed across the building: at least 15 of the provided remarks explicitly mention a parking stall, parking stalls, or parking. The evidence appears across multiple listings and agents, including references to assigned, open, uncovered, and side-by-side parking, rather than relying only on copied checkbox data.
Assigned parking is strongly supported by both MLS data and repeated remarks from multiple listings. At least 5 remarks explicitly use 'assigned parking stall' or equivalent designated-stall language, while other listings describe specific one- or two-stall arrangements; this supports assigned parking as a building-level feature.
No analysis available
Multiple listings describe parking as assigned or included with the unit, but none use wording such as deeded parking, owned stall, or parking included in the deed. Deeded status therefore cannot be confirmed from the remarks.
No analysis available
The remarks discuss maintenance fees and a $950 monthly lease fee for the leasehold land, but do not identify any parking charge. The parking fee is unknown from the available remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings describe assigned stalls, multiple stalls, and street parking, but do not mention a parking waitlist system. No evidence confirms that a waitlist exists.
No analysis available
All remarks were reviewed for terms like key card access, fob entry, card reader, or electronic access system and none were present. In the absence of any reference to controlled electronic entry, this building is assumed not to have card/fob access based on the listings alone.
No analysis available
The remarks were checked for any indication of on-site patrols or roving security services and none were identified. With no explicit evidence of a patrol service, the building is treated as not having security patrol based on current listing information.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window/wall AC appears to be a building-level option in a meaningful share of current listings: 12 of 20 MLS entries have the ACWIUN inclusion checked. The public remarks rarely specify the AC type and mostly just mention general comfort or, in one case, "air conditioning in each bedroom" without clarifying the unit style, so this is driven primarily by MLS data rather than remarks.
No analysis available
Eleven of 20 listings identify double-wall construction through the MLS construction-materials field. None of the provided public remarks explicitly mention double-wall construction or related wording, so support is based on the repeated MLS designation rather than narrative confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Seventeen of 20 listings identify the building as wood-frame construction through the MLS construction-materials field. No public remarks explicitly mention "wood frame," so the evidence comes primarily from consistent MLS data rather than agent narrative, but it is strong across the listing set.
Only 5 of 17 listings include ABOGRO (≈29%), and none of the public remarks mention 'above ground' or 'above ground materials'. The sparse, inconsistent checkbox usage and absence of confirming remarks across multiple agents suggest this is likely agent checkbox error rather than a real building feature, so the feature is omitted with high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The public remarks focus on residential ownership and do not provide evidence that short-term rentals are allowed. There is also no explicit prohibition, so this is based on absence of supporting STR language.
The remarks contain no evidence of participation in a hotel rental pool. Because STR permission is not supported and the hotel-pool prerequisite is not met, this is false.
The listings do not describe any hotel rental program or mandatory participation requirement. Since STR permission and hotel-pool participation are not established, mandatory pool participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The leasehold expiration is explicitly given as April 2, 2035. No later renewal or extension year is mentioned.
The remarks directly identify Waiau Garden Court as VA approved. This is strong evidence that VA financing is accepted for the building.
Several listings explicitly report 100% hurricane insurance or coverage for the community. This is strong, repeated evidence that the association has comprehensive building insurance, although the remarks do not specifically use the term "walls-in coverage."
No analysis available
I searched for references to a passed fire/life safety evaluation, FLSE approval, fire safety certification, life safety compliance, or a passed fire inspection, but found none. There is no public-remarks evidence confirming this feature.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
A small minority of listings (2 of 20) show MOUNTA in the MLS view field, while most show NONE. The remarks do not explicitly mention mountain, Koolau, or mauka views, so this looks like limited MLS-only evidence rather than a consistently advertised building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Garden/courtyard-type views are supported by both MLS data and remarks: 4 of 20 listings show GARDEN, while several descriptions mention a 'private enclosed courtyard,' 'lush green area,' and a 'screened-in lanai overlooking a beautiful grassy knoll.' This appears to be a real building-level feature available in some units, not just copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listing explicitly mentions sunset views or western exposure. One listing mentions Pearl Harbor ocean views, while another identifies an east-facing unit, and the current MLS data is predominantly marked NONE (13 of 20 listings), so there is no strong evidence that the building offers sunset-view units.
No analysis available
Remarks were checked for phrases like fireworks views, watching fireworks from the lanai, or similar, and none were found. In the absence of any such mention, fireworks views are assumed not to be a noted feature.
No analysis available
None of the 20 provided listings mention a resident manager, on-site manager, live-in manager, or building manager. Although 5 of 20 current MLS records show RESMAN in amenities, the lack of supporting remarks across multiple agents and the prior high-confidence absence indicate this is likely copied or inaccurate checkbox data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.