Waiau Garden Court
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Waiau Garden Court
Building Overview
Waiau Garden Court in Pearl City — built 1979; pets and short-term rentals are not allowed.
About Waiau Garden Court
Waiau Garden Court is located in the Pearl City neighborhood and was built in 1979. Specifics about unit count, building size, and construction type are not specified in the available MLS data.
Key policies documented in MLS records include no pets allowed and no short-term rentals permitted. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS; other amenity and service details are not provided in the available listing information.
Parking, maintenance fees, utilities, and other ownership details were not included in the MLS data provided. According to available records, buyers should verify all building features, policies, and fees with the listing agent or management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for owner-occupancy clues such as '80% owner occupied,' 'majority owner occupied,' or similar descriptive phrases, but none were present. The remarks do not provide any percentage or clear occupancy mix, so this remains unknown.
I searched the public remarks for explicit elevator references such as 'elevators,' 'multiple elevators,' or a specific count, but found none. Because this appears to be a low-rise townhome/condo-style community and the remarks do not confirm an elevator count, the number remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Common area electricity appears to be included in maintenance fees for this building. In the current MLS set, 14 of 19 listings include OTCOEX, which is strong evidence that hall/elevator/amenity power is covered. The remarks don’t explicitly mention it, but the checkbox pattern is broad enough to support inclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water is not supported by the current evidence for this building. No current MLS listing includes HOTWAT, and many list WTRHTR instead, which typically means the unit has its own water heater rather than receiving hot water from the association. Remarks about 'New water heater' and 'water heater' reinforce that this is unit-owned equipment, not a fee-included utility.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer is very clearly included in the maintenance fee. Every current MLS listing reviewed, 19 out of 19, includes SEWER, making this one of the strongest confirmed features. There is no meaningful contrary evidence in the remarks.
Water is included in the maintenance fee for this building. All 19 current MLS listings list WATER, which is very strong confirmation of a shared building-level inclusion. No remarks suggest otherwise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that the building offers patio/deck-type outdoor space. At least 12 of the provided remarks explicitly mention a patio, lanai, covered lanai, enclosed patio, screened-in lanai, or private yard/courtyard, with several listing descriptions clearly emphasizing the outdoor area as a selling point. The consistency across multiple listings suggests this is a real shared or available unit feature, not just a copy-paste checkbox.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is strong evidence that Waiau Garden Court offers storage, with historical MLS data showing storage in both building amenities and unit features across many listings. Current public remarks also confirm it, including phrases like "the outdoor storage closet" and "storage closet" that indicate storage space is available to residents. This appears consistent across multiple listings rather than a one-off agent copy-paste.
The public remarks describe location, parking, pets, private yards/lanai, renovations, and insurance, but do not reference any type of surfboard or board storage facility. I specifically looked for phrases like 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', 'surf storage', or combined bike/surfboard storage and found none. In the absence of any mention, it is more likely that dedicated surfboard storage is not provided in this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The public remarks discuss location, renovations, parking, pet-friendliness, private yards/lanai, and insurance, but do not mention any swimming pool, let alone a salt water pool. I specifically looked for terms like 'salt water pool', 'saltwater', 'saline', or 'salt pool' and found none. Given the absence of any pool references, a salt water pool is unlikely for this building based solely on these remarks.
Strong evidence that some units have in-unit laundry: MLS checkbox historically set in 17/18 listings and multiple current public remarks (at least 5–6 separate listing remarks in the aggregated text) explicitly state 'full-sized washer and dryer are located in the unit' or 'in-unit washer and dryer.' Evidence is consistent across many agent remarks and matches the historical MLS inclusions, so inclusion is high-confidence.
No analysis available
I looked for terms like coin-op, card-operated, community laundry, or paid laundry and did not find any. Because laundry is described as being inside the units and there is no indication of paid common laundry, it is likely there is no paid community laundry setup.
I searched for any references to laundry on each floor, common laundry rooms, or floor-by-floor laundry and found none. Instead, the remarks emphasize in-unit washers and dryers, suggesting the building does not rely on community laundry on every floor.
Parking is clearly present across the building: current MLS data shows 19/19 listings with parking features, and the remarks mention it in many listings. Examples include 'one assigned parking stall,' 'two parking stalls,' '1 open parking,' and 'ample street parking,' which indicates parking is a consistent building feature rather than a one-off unit amenity.
Assigned parking is strongly supported by both MLS data and public remarks. At least several listings explicitly use phrases like 'one assigned parking stall,' 'one assigned, corner parking stall,' and 'one assigned parking stall and ample street parking,' showing this is a common building-level parking type. The repeated wording across multiple listings suggests consistent reporting rather than isolated copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
I searched for deeded, owned, or parking-in-deed wording and found none. The remarks consistently describe parking as assigned or open, which does not indicate deeded parking.
No analysis available
I looked for monthly parking cost, parking rental, additional parking charge, or similar language. The remarks mention assigned stalls and street parking, but no fee is stated.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for parking waitlist, parking waiting list, and join-list language and found nothing. With no evidence of a formal waitlist system in the remarks, this is marked false at medium confidence.
No analysis available
All remarks were reviewed for terms like key card access, fob entry, card reader, or electronic access system and none were present. In the absence of any reference to controlled electronic entry, this building is assumed not to have card/fob access based on the listings alone.
No analysis available
The remarks were checked for any indication of on-site patrols or roving security services and none were identified. With no explicit evidence of a patrol service, the building is treated as not having security patrol based on current listing information.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
11 of 17 current MLS listings include the ACWIUN checkbox indicating window/wall units, while public remarks rarely specify unit type; only one remark mentions "air conditioning in each bedroom." The preponderance of MLS inclusions suggests some units likely have window/wall AC, but the lack of explicit "window AC" wording in remarks means confidence is moderate and the feature may reflect agent checkbox practices rather than uniform building-wide installations.
No analysis available
10 of 18 current MLS listings have DOUWAL in construction_materials, but public remarks from the provided listings do not mention 'double wall', 'double-wall', or 'two walls'. With no historical confirmation and no remarks describing double-wall construction, the evidence is weak and inconsistent, so the feature is omitted for now (possible agent checkbox inconsistency).
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Wood frame construction is strongly supported by the MLS history: 16 of 19 current listings list WOOFRA, with prior aggregated data also around 82%. None of the public remarks contradict this, and the repeated MLS coding suggests this is a stable building characteristic rather than a one-off agent entry.
Only 5 of 17 listings include ABOGRO (≈29%), and none of the public remarks mention 'above ground' or 'above ground materials'. The sparse, inconsistent checkbox usage and absence of confirming remarks across multiple agents suggest this is likely agent checkbox error rather than a real building feature, so the feature is omitted with high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for short-term rental terms such as STR permitted, legal vacation rental, NUC, or TVU and found no evidence. Nothing in the public remarks suggests short-term rentals are allowed.
I looked for hotel pool language such as hotel rental pool, managed by hotel, or brand-specific pool programs and found none. Since there is no evidence STR is allowed either, this remains false.
I searched for mandatory pool wording like required participation, must be in rental program, or cannot opt out and found nothing. There is no evidence of a mandatory hotel rental pool in the remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The public remarks give a specific lease end date of 04/02/35. Converting that to a year yields 2035, which is the lease expiry year.
The listings directly identify the project as VA approved, which is strong evidence that VA financing is accepted. I did not find any conflicting remarks suggesting the approval status has changed.
Multiple listings directly state that the community has 100% hurricane insurance/coverage, which is strong evidence of full insurance coverage at the HOA level. This is repeated enough across remarks to support a high-confidence true value.
No analysis available
I looked for references to a fire/life safety evaluation, fire inspection pass, FLSE pass, or life-safety compliance, and found no such language in the remarks. With no explicit confirmation, I cannot mark this as passed.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no strong evidence that this building offers sunset views. Across the remarks, only generic phrases like "take in the view from your lanai" and one mention of "Pearl Harbor ocean views" appear, but nothing explicitly references sunset, western exposure, or evening sun. The current MLS view data also supports absence, with 0/19 listings showing SUNSET and many marked NONE.
No analysis available
Remarks were checked for phrases like fireworks views, watching fireworks from the lanai, or similar, and none were found. In the absence of any such mention, fireworks views are assumed not to be a noted feature.
No analysis available
None of the provided public remarks (0/18) mention a resident or on-site manager; only 2 of 18 MLS listings have the RESMAN amenity checked. With no remarks describing a live-in/building manager and no prior verification, the evidence points to agents inconsistently checking the box rather than the building actually having a resident manager.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.