Waialua Palms
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Waialua Palms
Building Overview
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings' public remarks mention common area electricity or that building power is included. MLS data is mixed (1 of 2 listings has OTCOEX checked), suggesting agents may be inconsistently checking the box; lacking further confirmation, treat as not reliably included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings' public remarks mention hot water being included in the maintenance fee, and the current MLS data does not show HOTWAT in any of the 3 listings. Two listings instead show WTRHTR in inclusions, which is a strong indicator that units have their own water heaters rather than building-supplied hot water. The evidence points consistently toward hot water not being included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public remarks state 'sewer included' or similar. Current MLS checkboxes are inconsistent (SEWER checked on 1 of 2 listings), so there's insufficient evidence that sewer is reliably included in maintenance fees.
Public remarks contain no phrases like 'water included' or 'water in HOA.' With MLS boxes inconsistently checked (WATER checked on 1 of 2 listings) and no agent remarks confirming inclusion, there is not enough evidence to assert water is included in fees.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the supplied remarks, 0 listings explicitly mention a patio, deck, lanai, or covered patio. The language only references general 'outdoor areas' and a 'lush, tropical landscaped yard,' which supports outdoor space but not this specific amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
2 of 3 listing remarks explicitly mention yard space, including the phrase 'Step outside to a lush, tropical landscaped yard.' The repeated description of an outdoor shower and outdoor storage suggests a real private yard feature rather than copied checkbox data, and it is consistent across multiple remarks.
No analysis available
One of two current MLS listings has the RECARE amenity checked, but none of the provided public remarks mention a recreation area, 'rec area', or 'amenity deck'. Evidence is limited and possibly due to agent copy/paste, so inclusion is cautious (low-moderate confidence) until more listings or explicit remarks confirm the shared recreation area.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is supported by the current MLS checkbox data in 2 of 3 listings, suggesting the building offers some storage or additional storage space. The public remarks do not clearly describe a storage locker or dedicated unit storage, so the evidence is moderate rather than explicit. The repeated amenity checkbox may reflect building-level availability, but it could also be copy-paste MLS behavior.
I searched the remarks for storage amenities including 'surfboard storage' or combined 'bike and surfboard storage'. No such language appears, so surfboard storage is marked false with limited confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit references to a salt water pool. The remarks contain no pool information, and the provided building context indicates pool=False, so salt pool is marked false with limited confidence.
In-unit laundry is supported by the current MLS data: 3 of 3 listings include "WASHER/DRYER" in the inclusions. None of the public remarks explicitly mention washer/dryer in-unit, so this appears to be MLS-level evidence rather than remark-based confirmation, but the consistency across all current listings makes it reliable.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit language indicating paid laundry (coin-op, card-operated, laundry fee, etc.). The remarks contain no laundry-related details, so paid community laundry is marked false with limited confidence.
I searched the public remarks for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'laundry room on every floor', and 'floor-by-floor laundry'. There are no references to community laundry facilities at all, so this feature is marked false with limited confidence.
Parking is strongly confirmed. Across the provided remarks, 3 listings describe parking, including 'two dedicated parking spaces' and '2 nearby open parking stalls (tandem)'. This aligns with the current MLS data and does not look like a copy-paste error.
Assigned parking appears to be available in the building. Two listings show ASSIGN in MLS data, and the remarks specifically mention 'two dedicated parking spaces,' which supports reserved/assigned stalls. One listing describes the stalls as open/tandem, so the evidence is strong but not perfectly uniform across all remarks.
No analysis available
I checked for language indicating deeded or owned parking stalls, but the listings only mention dedicated, nearby open tandem stalls. That wording suggests assigned parking, not deeded parking ownership.
No analysis available
I searched for any parking rental, monthly parking charge, or additional parking cost and found none. The remarks describe parking availability but do not state any fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Listing remarks explicitly describe the stalls as 'tandem' ('2 nearby open parking stalls (tandem)') and one MLS record lists TANDEM in parking features. Multiple data points corroborate that some parking is tandem-style.
No analysis available
I looked for terms like "parking waitlist," "waiting list," or "join waitlist for parking" and found nothing. There is no evidence in these remarks that parking is managed by a waitlist.
No analysis available
I looked for terms like 'key card access', 'fob', or 'card entry' in the public remarks. There are no such references, so card/fob security is marked false with limited confidence.
No analysis available
I searched for any reference to security patrols or patrolled building services. The remarks do not mention security patrol, so this feature is marked false with limited confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Double-wall construction is consistently present in the MLS data across all available listings (3/3). The public remarks do not address construction type, and there is no contradictory evidence indicating a change. This is strong building-level evidence and should be retained.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Wood frame construction appears consistently in the MLS data across all available listings (3/3). None of the public remarks mention construction type or suggest a change, so there is no evidence to override the current MLS material. This looks like stable building-level data rather than copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental indicators such as STR allowed, vacation rental, NUC, TVU, or minimum-stay rules and found no references. With no public remark evidence, short-term rental permission cannot be confirmed.
I looked for hotel rental pool language such as hotel-managed, Hilton pool, or similar program references and found none. Since there is no evidence of STR allowance, this must remain false.
I searched for wording like mandatory rental pool participation, required hotel pool, or cannot opt out, and found nothing. There is also no evidence that any hotel rental program exists here.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold terminology like "lease expires," "ground lease," or any 4-digit lease end year and found no references. The remarks do not provide any land tenure or lease expiry information.
I searched the remarks for VA approval language such as "VA approved," "VA financing," or "VA loans accepted" and found nothing. There is no public-remark evidence to confirm VA eligibility.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Mountain views are strongly supported across the building: 3 of 3 current MLS listings include MOUNTA in the view descriptions. Public remarks explicitly reference 'With majestic Mount Ka'ala behind you,' which aligns with the MLS data and suggests this is a real, repeatable building-level feature rather than a one-off agent mistake.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for wording that the building or units offer a view of Friday night fireworks or similar. The public remarks do not mention fireworks views, so this is marked false with limited confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.