Vista Del Mar
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Vista Del Mar
Building Overview
Vista Del Mar in Aliamanu-Salt Lake — concrete construction with ocean and mountain views. Pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About Vista Del Mar
Vista Del Mar is a residential building located in the Aliamanu-Salt Lake neighborhood. According to available records, the building was built in 1972 and is constructed of concrete. MLS data does not specify unit count or floorplan sizes.
Key features noted in MLS data include ocean and mountain views. The listing data does not provide additional amenity details such as a pool or fitness facilities.
Parking is available and covered. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed per the MLS information. The management company is listed as unknown in the available records. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all building details, policies, and fees with the seller or managing agent before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit owner-occupancy percentages and descriptive phrases indicating ownership levels and found none. Because owner-occupancy is a numeric field and no evidence is present in the remarks or prior data, the percentage is unknown.
The public remarks mention 'elevator modernization' indicating elevators exist, but no explicit count is provided. I searched the remarks for phrases like '4 elevators', 'four elevators', or 'multiple elevators' and found none. Because a numeric count is not stated and there is no prior data, the exact number is unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listing consistently references an assigned/designated parking stall for the unit, but there is no explicit statement that the parking is deeded (owned with the unit). Therefore we do not mark it as deeded based solely on these remarks.
No analysis available
Remarks reference assigned parking, street parking, and metered nearby parking, but provide no monthly parking fee amount or rental cost. Parking fee information is unknown from the remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Remarks discuss assigned parking and nearby parking options but contain no indication of a waitlist system. Absence of any waitlist language suggests there is no formal waitlist (medium confidence).
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Public remarks do not address short-term rental policy. In absence of any STR-related language, we mark STR as not allowed with medium confidence (no direct evidence either way).
There is no language about participation in a hotel rental pool or hotel-managed program. Because STRs are not referenced, hotel-pool participation is marked false (medium confidence).
No evidence that units are required to participate in any rental pool. As STRs and hotel-pool programs are not referenced, mandatory pool participation is marked false (medium confidence).
No analysis available
No analysis available
No evidence in the public remarks about a leasehold or lease expiry year. Searched remarks for any 4-digit expiry year or lease wording and found none, so the expiry year is unknown.
Remarks explicitly call out a VA loan assumption and address VA buyers, indicating the building/unit is VA-eligible/VA-financed. High confidence because the language explicitly references VA financing.
I looked for explicit insurance statements such as 'fully insured', 'full insurance', or 'walls-in coverage' and found none in the public remarks. With no prior data, the lack of mention results in a medium-confidence assumption that full building insurance is not documented in the remarks.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for explicit language indicating a passed fire/life safety evaluation (e.g., 'FLSE passed', 'fire safety certified') and found no such statements. With no current value provided, absence in the remarks leads to a medium-confidence inference that the FLSE pass is not documented in public remarks.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.