Village on the Green 2B
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Village on the Green 2B
Building Overview
Village on the Green 2B in Waipahu — built 2001; pets and short-term rentals are not allowed, per MLS data.
About Village on the Green 2B
Village on the Green 2B is located in the Waipahu neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 2001. Specifics on unit sizes, number of floors, and construction type are not provided in the MLS data.
Based on MLS data, the property has policies that do not allow pets and do not permit short-term rentals. The management company is listed as unknown in the available records. No additional amenity information (such as pool, gym, or community areas) is included in the MLS-provided details.
Details such as parking arrangements, maintenance fees, reservation rules, or other assessments are not specified in the MLS data. Buyers should verify all building features, policies, and fees with the listing agent or management prior to making decisions, as this summary is based solely on available MLS information.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the listings, hot water is not shown as an HOA-maintained inclusion; in fact, all current examples point to a water heater being present in the unit. The public remarks repeatedly mention a "newer water heater," not hot water included in fees, which aligns with the MLS pattern. Confidence is very high that hot water is not included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer appears in the HOA fee inclusions on 4 of 5 listings, which is enough to treat it as a building-level inclusion. None of the remarks contradict this, and the pattern is consistent across multiple listings, suggesting it is not just one agent's copy-paste error.
Water is listed in the association fee inclusions on 4 of 5 listings, indicating it is likely included at the building level. The public remarks do not mention water explicitly, but there is no contrary evidence, and the MLS pattern is consistent across multiple listings.
Across the provided listings, BBQ/grill facilities are not explicitly mentioned at all. The remarks instead describe nearby community amenities such as the pool, park, playground, and golf course, which does not support a building-level BBQ feature. The single MLS checkbox appears likely to be copy/paste noise rather than verified amenity data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the provided listings, there are 0 explicit mentions of a car wash, auto wash, or vehicle wash area. With only 2 of 4 MLS entries checking CRWSH and no supporting remarks, the evidence looks like unreliable checkbox data rather than a confirmed building amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Private yard space is explicitly mentioned in multiple current listings for Village on the Green. Remarks include phrases like "fenced front and back lanai," "your backyard," and "your own enclosed yard," indicating this is not just a checkbox artifact. The evidence appears consistent across several listings rather than a single copy-paste remark.
No analysis available
None of the remarks explicitly reference a recreation area or amenity deck. While the building/community is described as having nearby pool, park, playground, and golf access, that is not the same as a documented recreation area. With only 1/5 listings checking the box and no corroborating text, the evidence points to an unverified MLS entry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The pool feature is supported by current listing remarks that directly reference the 'Waikele Community pool.' In total, 1 of 5 provided remarks explicitly mentions the pool, while the MLS amenity data shows pool in 3 of 5 listings, suggesting the amenity is real and likely being carried in the MLS data consistently. Because this is a shared community amenity and not a unit-specific feature, it should be included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
In-unit laundry appears to be available in this building based on current MLS inclusions: 4 of 5 listings list washer/dryer. None of the public remarks explicitly call it out, so the evidence comes mainly from repeated MLS data rather than agent descriptions, but it is still strong enough to include.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is strongly confirmed for this building. Across multiple listings, agents mention 'two parking stalls,' 'two-car attached garage,' and '2 car garage,' which aligns with the current MLS data showing parking features on all 5/5 listings. The evidence is consistent across several remarks and does not appear to be a one-off or copy-paste error.
No analysis available
Covered parking is strongly confirmed for this building. Multiple listings explicitly describe a garage or attached garage, including phrases like 'two-car attached garage' and '2 car garage,' and the current MLS data shows covered parking in all 5/5 listings. This is consistent across several agents and strongly supports the feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Guest parking appears to be available at the building. It is explicitly mentioned in one remark as being near the "guest parking area," and current MLS data shows 2 of 5 listings checked for GUEST parking. The mixed MLS checkbox data suggests this may be inconsistently entered by agents, but the direct remark confirms the feature exists.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Split AC is clearly present in at least one listing, with the remarks saying the home has 'split AC units in the living area and primary bedroom.' That is explicit evidence that this building offers units with ductless mini-split air conditioning. The mention is specific and not just an MLS checkbox, so confidence is very high.
Window AC is suggested by the MLS inclusions data, with 4 of 5 listings checked for ACWIUN. However, the public remarks do not say 'window AC' or 'window unit'; the only explicit AC description is 'split AC units,' which points to a different system. Overall, this looks like weak-to-moderate evidence and may reflect MLS copy/paste rather than verified window units.
No public remarks in the provided listings mention concrete, reinforced concrete, or a concrete building. With only 2 of 5 current MLS entries checked and no corroborating agent comments, there is not enough evidence to treat concrete construction as a confirmed building feature.
Double wall construction remains the strongest of the three features based on MLS patterning: 4 of 5 current listings have DOUWAL checked, and prior confidence was already medium. None of the public remarks explicitly confirm it, so this is better treated as moderately supported MLS evidence rather than remark-based verification.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence for steel frame construction is weak. Only 1 of 4 listings has the STEFRA checkbox, and there are no supporting remarks, so this may be an agent-entered MLS checkbox rather than confirmed building construction.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listing remarks explicitly refer to wood frame construction. Because the feature only appears in 2 of 5 MLS records and the remarks are silent, this looks unverified and could be erroneous checkbox data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence is limited but present: 1 of 4 current listings has a golf-course view code (GOLCOU). Remarks repeatedly mention the golf course as a nearby amenity, but none explicitly say the building overlooks it, so this appears to be a unit-level view rather than a broadly advertised building feature.
No analysis available
One of four current listings includes SUNRIS in the MLS view description, which is enough to indicate some units in the building offer sunrise views. No public remarks confirm the exposure, so confidence is moderate rather than strong.
There is some building-level evidence that sunset-facing units exist, but it is not strong across the remarks. Only 1 of 5 current listings explicitly shows SUNSET in MLS view data, and the remarks mostly focus on lanai/outdoor living rather than direct sunset views. This looks like partial unit variation rather than a consistently advertised building-wide feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.