Victoria Plaza
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Victoria Plaza
Building Overview
Victoria Plaza, Makiki-Tantalus — concrete building (built 1968); pets and short-term rentals are not allowed.
About Victoria Plaza
Based on MLS data, Victoria Plaza is a condominium building located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood. According to available records it was built in 1968 and is constructed of concrete. Size and unit count are not specified in the provided MLS information.
Key policies noted in the MLS-derived data include a prohibition on pets and a prohibition on short-term rentals. No additional amenity or building feature details were provided in the available MLS excerpts.
Management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data. Other important details such as parking, maintenance fees, assessments, and specific building amenities are not included in the supplied records and should be verified by buyers or their agents. This description is based on MLS data and buyers should confirm all information independently.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for explicit percentages and phrases indicating owner-occupancy (e.g., 'owner occupied', 'owner-occupied', 'percent owner occupied') and found no information. Because owner-occupancy is a numeric field and there is no explicit statement or existing current value, the percentage is unknown.
The remarks clearly reference elevator access (e.g., 'secured elevator access', 'an elevator with FOB access system'), but no explicit number of elevators is given. I searched the full public remarks for numeric phrases like '4 elevators', 'four elevators', or 'multiple elevators' and found none. Because there is no numeric evidence and no existing current value to retain, the elevator count is unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
4 of 6 current MLS listings list HOTWAT in association_fee_includes, but none of the public remarks mention 'hot water included' or describe a building hot water system. This appears to be MLS checkbox data (possible agent copy/paste) rather than confirmed in remarks, so support is moderate but not strong.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 6 current MLS listings include SEWER in association_fee_includes, but none of the public remarks explicitly state 'sewer included' or discuss utility billing. The evidence comes solely from MLS checkbox fields (consistent across listings) and is moderately supportive but not corroborated in agent remarks.
All 6 MLS listings list WATER in association_fee_includes, but none of the public remarks say 'water included' or detail water billing. Consistent MLS checkbox data gives moderate support, though there's no corroborating language in the remarks and the evidence may reflect copy/pasted agent entries.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings mention shared recreation amenities (3 distinct remark sections): 'lush landscaping around a grassy recreation area', 'community garden', and 'fenced park'. CURRENT MLS shows RECARE checked in 4/6 listings and the remarks across different agents consistently reference common outdoor/rec spaces, providing strong corroboration.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', or 'surf storage'. The remarks list 'bike storage' but make no reference to surfboard storage facilities, so there's no evidence it exists.
No analysis available
All 6 MLS listings have the TRACHU amenity checked, but none of the combined public remarks reference a 'trash chute', 'garbage chute', or 'refuse chute'. The uniform checklist suggests the building is recorded as having a chute, but absence of explanatory remarks across agents lowers confidence to a moderate level.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All six current MLS listings have the POOL amenity checked and every set of public remarks mentions a pool (quotes include 'refreshing swimming pool', 'gated swimming pool', and 'swimming pool and community garden'). Evidence is consistent across multiple agent remarks and matches the MLS checkbox, supporting a high-confidence determination that the building has a swimming pool.
No analysis available
I looked for 'salt water pool', 'saltwater', 'saline pool' terms. While a pool is described several times, there is no indication it is a salt pool.
All six provided listings explicitly mention in-unit laundry: phrases include 'in-unit washer/dryer', 'Stand-alone washer/dryer stack in unit', 'new front loading washer and dryer', and 'Washer & dryer in the unit.' Multiple agents/remarks consistently describe in-unit washers/dryers (some noting new installations), giving strong evidence the building offers units with in-unit laundry.
No analysis available
I looked for terms such as 'coin laundry', 'coin-op', 'quarters', 'card operated', or 'paid laundry'. The remarks make no mention of paid community laundry and instead reference an in-unit washer/dryer, so no evidence supports paid community laundry.
I searched the remarks for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'laundry room on every floor', or 'floor-by-floor laundry'. The listing instead states an in-unit washer/dryer and does not describe community laundry on every floor, so there's no evidence this exists.
No analysis available
Multiple listings explicitly reference assigned parking: remarks include phrases like 'dedicated parking stall', 'The parking stall has a gated secured entry', and 'Two parking stalls'. This matches the MLS checkbox prevalence (5/6) and appears consistently across different agent remarks, supporting a high-confidence inclusion of assigned parking for the building.
No public remarks describe covered or enclosed parking; the term 'covered' in remarks consistently refers to the lanai (e.g., '173 sq ft covered lanai'). Although some MLS checkboxes indicate covered parking (3/6), agent remarks do not corroborate, so evidence for covered parking is weak.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Several listings explicitly reference secured parking features: 'gated parking', 'The parking stall has a gated secured entry', and building access notes like 'FOB access system' and 'secured elevator access'. These repeated agent remarks across listings provide strong evidence the building offers secured-entry parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for 'key card access', 'fob access', and similar phrases. The listing explicitly mentions an elevator with a FOB access system and secured elevator access, indicating card/fob entry security is present.
No analysis available
I searched for terms like 'security patrol', 'roving security', or 'patrol service'. The remarks describe secured entry, gated parking, and FOB access but do not reference any security patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All six current MLS entries (6/6) have 'CONCRE' checked for construction_materials, but none of the six public remarks mention concrete, reinforced concrete, or similar phrasing. No user/owner verification or historical confidence exists, so the feature is included based on consistent MLS checkbox data only and assigned a moderate confidence (0.75) due to lack of corroborating remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I reviewed the remarks for terms like 'fully insured', 'full insurance', 'walls-in coverage', and 'comprehensive building insurance' and found no references. Because the remarks do not state that the HOA carries full building (walls-in) insurance and there is no prior/current value, this is set to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for phrases such as 'fire life safety evaluation passed', 'FLSE passed', 'fire safety certified', and 'passed fire inspection' and found no references. With no explicit statement that the building passed an FLSE and no prior/current value, the field is set to false with medium confidence (absence of mention suggests it is likely not documented in remarks).
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Three listings explicitly reference ocean/Pacific Ocean views (phrases include "Pacific Ocean" and "panoramic ocean view"). Remarks consistently describe ocean-facing sightlines from the lanai and living areas across multiple agent write-ups, indicating the building offers ocean-view units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple remarks reference views of the Honolulu skyline and city lights and note proximity to Downtown, with at least several listings explicitly mentioning skyline/city views. Evidence comes from multiple agent descriptions and aligns with MLS view_descriptions indicating city-view units are available.
No listings or remarks mention "coastline", "shoreline", or "coastal view." While beaches and Ala Moana are noted as nearby, there are no explicit coastline-view claims across the six listings, so the building does not appear to advertise coastline-specific views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit phrases like 'watch fireworks from', 'fireworks view', or 'see fireworks from the lanai'. The remarks describe ocean, Diamond Head and city views but do not state that fireworks are visible from the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Two of six current listings include RESMAN in the MLS amenities, but none of the six public remarks mention 'resident manager', 'on-site manager', or similar phrasing. This suggests the checkbox may reflect partial/agent-entered data (possible copy/paste); recommend seller/manager confirmation or a site visit to verify presence of a live-in/on-site manager.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.