Victoria Plaza
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Victoria Plaza
Building Overview
Victoria Plaza, Makiki-Tantalus — concrete building (built 1968); pets and short-term rentals are not allowed.
About Victoria Plaza
Based on MLS data, Victoria Plaza is a condominium building located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood. According to available records it was built in 1968 and is constructed of concrete. Size and unit count are not specified in the provided MLS information.
Key policies noted in the MLS-derived data include a prohibition on pets and a prohibition on short-term rentals. No additional amenity or building feature details were provided in the available MLS excerpts.
Management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data. Other important details such as parking, maintenance fees, assessments, and specific building amenities are not included in the supplied records and should be verified by buyers or their agents. This description is based on MLS data and buyers should confirm all information independently.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit owner-occupancy indicators such as a percentage or descriptive phrases about ownership concentration. None were found in the remarks, so the owner-occupancy rate cannot be determined from the provided text.
I found clear evidence that the building has elevator access, including secured/FOB-controlled access. However, I did not find any remark giving a count such as "2 elevators" or "multiple elevators," so the number remains unconfirmed.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
4 of 6 current MLS listings list HOTWAT in association_fee_includes, but none of the public remarks mention 'hot water included' or describe a building hot water system. This appears to be MLS checkbox data (possible agent copy/paste) rather than confirmed in remarks, so support is moderate but not strong.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 7 current MLS listings include sewer in the association fee details, which makes this a strong building-level feature. None of the public remarks explicitly say 'sewer included,' so this appears to come from consistent MLS association_fee_includes data rather than agent commentary.
All 7 current MLS listings list water in association_fee_includes, indicating maintenance fees include water. Public remarks do not spell this out, so the evidence comes from uniform MLS data rather than remarks, but it is consistent across every current listing.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings mention shared recreation amenities (3 distinct remark sections): 'lush landscaping around a grassy recreation area', 'community garden', and 'fenced park'. CURRENT MLS shows RECARE checked in 4/6 listings and the remarks across different agents consistently reference common outdoor/rec spaces, providing strong corroboration.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for surfboard-specific storage terms and found nothing. The only storage amenity mentioned is bike storage, which does not support surfboard storage.
No analysis available
All 7 current MLS listings have the TRACHU amenity checked, but the public remarks do not mention a "trash chute," "garbage chute," or "refuse chute" in any listing. Because there is no direct remark confirmation, the evidence is moderate rather than strong, and it could reflect repeated MLS checkbox copying.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool is strongly confirmed across the current listings: 7/7 MLS entries have the pool amenity checked, and all remarks mention it. Multiple agents describe it in similar terms ('secured pool,' 'gated swimming pool,' 'building amenities include a swimming pool'), which makes this a high-confidence building feature rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
I searched for saltwater pool wording such as salt pool or saline pool and found nothing. The remarks confirm a pool exists, but do not specify that it is salt water.
In-unit laundry is strongly supported and appears consistent across the listings. At least 4 of the provided remarks explicitly mention it, using multiple formulations such as "in-unit washer/dryer," "Stand-alone washer/dryer stack in unit," and "Washer & dryer in the unit." This looks like genuine building/unit feature evidence, not just a single copy-paste mention.
No analysis available
I looked for terms such as coin laundry, paid laundry, laundry fee, or card-operated machines and found nothing. The public remarks only mention washer/dryer inside the units, not a paid shared laundry room.
I searched for wording like laundry on each floor, community laundry on every floor, or floor-specific laundry rooms, but found none. The listings consistently describe in-unit washer/dryer instead, so there is no public-remarks evidence for this feature.
No analysis available
Assigned parking is strongly supported. Multiple listings reference a dedicated or gated secured parking stall, and one listing notes "Two parking stalls," indicating reserved parking rather than open/common parking. The evidence appears across multiple remarks and is not limited to checkbox-only MLS data.
Covered parking is confirmed by the public remarks, including an explicit statement that Victoria Plaza has "covered parking." Historical MLS data also showed covered/garage-type parking in 4 of 7 listings, so the feature is supported by both remarks and listing data. Overall confidence is high because the evidence is consistent across listings rather than a single agent copy-paste.
I found parking references, including covered parking and two stalls, but nothing that explicitly states the parking is deeded or owned with the unit. Based on the remarks alone, deeded parking is not confirmed.
No analysis available
I searched for any indication of a separate parking cost, such as a monthly fee or rental charge. The remarks do not mention any parking fee, so this cannot be extracted.
No analysis available
Several listings explicitly reference secured parking features: 'gated parking', 'The parking stall has a gated secured entry', and building access notes like 'FOB access system' and 'secured elevator access'. These repeated agent remarks across listings provide strong evidence the building offers secured-entry parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for references to a parking waitlist, waiting list, or instructions to join one. There is no such language in the remarks, so a waitlist system is not evidenced.
No analysis available
The remarks clearly support card/fob-based security access. Multiple listings mention FOB access and secured entry/elevator access, which is strong evidence for this feature.
No analysis available
I searched for language about security patrols or roving guards and found none. The building is described as secured, but there is no public-remarks evidence of a patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 7 current listings indicate concrete construction in MLS (7/7 with CONCRE checked). The public remarks do not explicitly repeat the construction type, so this appears to be MLS data rather than agent commentary, but the consistency across every current listing is strong and suggests a reliable building-level attribute.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental indicators such as STR allowed, TVU, NUC, legal vacation rental, or similar wording. None appear in the remarks, so short-term rental allowance is not confirmed and is treated as not evidenced here.
I looked for hotel pool language such as hotel rental pool, managed by hotel, or brand-specific rental programs. There is no evidence of a hotel pool arrangement in the remarks, and STR is not supported by the text.
I searched for wording indicating mandatory participation in a rental pool, such as required enrollment or no opt-out. The remarks contain no such references, so mandatory pool participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold language such as "lease expires," "ground lease ends," or any renewal/extension year. The remarks contain no land-tenure or lease-expiry details, so the expiry year cannot be determined from this data.
I searched the public remarks for any VA-related financing language, including explicit approval statements and acceptance of VA loans. None were found, so there is no evidence this building is VA approved.
I looked for statements indicating HOA walls-in coverage or full building insurance. The remarks do not mention insurance status at all, so there is no evidence to mark the building as fully insured.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for fire/life safety evaluation language, including FLSE-related wording and inspection-pass references. Nothing in the listings indicates the building has passed a fire/life safety evaluation, so this is not supported by the provided remarks.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence for ocean views. At least 3 of the remarks explicitly mention ocean/Pacific Ocean views, including 'Pacific Ocean' and 'panoramic ocean view,' and the MLS view data also shows ocean on 5/7 listings. This looks consistent across multiple listings rather than a one-off agent note.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Very strong building-level evidence for city views. Multiple remarks reference the Honolulu skyline, city lights, and views stretching 'from the city skyline to the Pacific Ocean,' aligning with the current MLS view data showing CITY on 6/7 listings. The consistency across listings suggests this is a real and broadly available feature, not copy-paste noise.
No listings or remarks mention "coastline", "shoreline", or "coastal view." While beaches and Ala Moana are noted as nearby, there are no explicit coastline-view claims across the six listings, so the building does not appear to advertise coastline-specific views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for references to watching fireworks from the unit or lanai, but none were present. The listings describe panoramic city and ocean views, which do not confirm a fireworks view.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listing remarks explicitly describe a resident manager or on-site management, despite 3 of 7 current MLS records showing RESMAN in amenities. Because this feature is not corroborated in the remarks and the prior confidence was low, the MLS checkbox alone is not strong enough to treat it as confirmed.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.