Victoria Plaza
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Victoria Plaza
Building Overview
Victoria Plaza, Makiki-Tantalus — concrete building (built 1968); pets and short-term rentals are not allowed.
About Victoria Plaza
Based on MLS data, Victoria Plaza is a condominium building located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood. According to available records it was built in 1968 and is constructed of concrete. Size and unit count are not specified in the provided MLS information.
Key policies noted in the MLS-derived data include a prohibition on pets and a prohibition on short-term rentals. No additional amenity or building feature details were provided in the available MLS excerpts.
Management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data. Other important details such as parking, maintenance fees, assessments, and specific building amenities are not included in the supplied records and should be verified by buyers or their agents. This description is based on MLS data and buyers should confirm all information independently.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
The state registration reports 17 floors, matching the stored value. Listings reach only floor 14 and have no penthouse listings, while the county reports 15 floors, so the listings do not establish the top residential floor.
The county assessor reports 72 reconciled residential units and the state registration independently reports 72 units for this single-building registration. The stored value is supported.
Owner occupancy from AOUO registration(s) 158. Refreshed by Real_Estate_Scraper/reb_registry/propagate_owner_occupancy.py, which this lock does not block.
The listings confirm elevator access, including FOB-controlled access. No explicit count such as "4 elevators" or "multiple elevators" was found, so the number is unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Six of eight current listings indicate common-area expenses are included via OTCOEX. None of the eight public remarks explicitly mention common-area electricity, so the evidence is moderately strong but may reflect copied MLS checkbox data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Seven of nine current listings include HOTWAT in the association-fee inclusions, while none list WTRHTR. No public remarks explicitly mention hot water, so the evidence is primarily MLS checkbox data and may partly reflect copied building-level information.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All nine current listings identify SEWER as included in the association fee. Although no public remarks quote sewer inclusion, the unanimous data across listings and previously high historical confidence provide strong building-level evidence.
All nine current listings identify WATER as included in the association fee. Public remarks do not explicitly mention water, but the unanimous current MLS data and high historical confidence strongly support this feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 1 listing explicitly mentions a "grassy recreation area," with another referring to a community garden. This confirms the building offers shared recreational space, consistent with the historically high-confidence data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
One listing confirms bike storage, which does not establish surfboard storage. No dedicated surfboard or board-storage facility is mentioned.
No analysis available
All 9 current listings include the TRACHU amenity, but 0 listings mention a “trash chute,” “garbage chute,” or “refuse chute” in their remarks. The consistent checkbox across multiple listings supports the feature, though the absence of descriptive remarks suggests it may be copied MLS data rather than independently verified.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The pool is strongly confirmed across the building: 9/9 current listings include pool-related MLS amenities, and approximately 7 of the 9 provided listing remarks explicitly mention or reference it. Remarks describe Victoria Plaza’s “swimming pool,” “secured pool,” and “gated swimming pool,” indicating a consistent building amenity rather than an isolated or copied checkbox.
No analysis available
Multiple listings confirm that Victoria Plaza has a pool. No wording indicates that the pool uses salt water.
In-unit laundry is strongly supported across the building: at least 5 current remarks explicitly mention washer/dryer in the unit, including full-size, stacked, brand-new, and front-loading units. This confirms the historical high-confidence determination and is supported by the MLS inclusion data for all 9 of 9 listings.
No analysis available
The listings describe in-unit laundry rather than shared laundry facilities. No references were found to coins, quarters, laundry fees, or card-operated machines.
The remarks repeatedly describe in-unit washers and dryers, but do not describe community laundry facilities. No evidence establishes laundry availability on every floor.
Parking is strongly supported across the building: at least five listings explicitly mention parking, including covered spaces and units with one or two stalls. This aligns with the current MLS data, where all 8 of 8 listings have a parking-related feature and none are marked NONE.
Assigned parking is strongly supported by both the historical building record and current MLS data, where 8 of 9 listings indicate assigned parking. Multiple remarks identify specific stalls or quantities, including one or two stalls per unit, so this does not appear to be solely copied checkbox data.
Covered parking is confirmed across multiple listings and by current MLS data on 5 of 9 listings. Explicit remarks repeatedly use phrases such as "covered parking" and "covered parking space," demonstrating strong building-level evidence rather than an isolated checkbox.
The remarks describe secured, covered parking and one or two parking stalls, including phrases such as "one secured, covered parking space" and "2 parking stalls." They do not state that the parking is deeded, owned, included in the deed, or otherwise separately owned.
No analysis available
The remarks mention covered and secured parking but do not identify a monthly parking fee, rental charge, or additional parking cost. The stated maintenance fee is not identified as a parking fee.
No analysis available
Several listings explicitly reference secured parking features: 'gated parking', 'The parking stall has a gated secured entry', and building access notes like 'FOB access system' and 'secured elevator access'. These repeated agent remarks across listings provide strong evidence the building offers secured-entry parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks describe available parking stalls but do not refer to a parking waitlist, waiting list, or instructions to join one. There is no public-remarks evidence of a building parking waitlist.
No analysis available
The explicit FOB-access statement directly supports card or fob-based security. This is consistent with additional references to secured elevator and building access.
No analysis available
The remarks describe the building as secured and mention gated or secured access. They do not indicate that security personnel patrol the property.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public remarks explicitly mention concrete construction. However, 8 of 9 current listings mark CONCRE in the construction materials, consistent with the previously high-confidence building record; this appears to be a strong cross-listing consensus rather than an isolated agent entry.
No analysis available
None of the 8 listings mention “hollow tile” or “hollow tile construction.” With only 1/8 MLS records checking HOLTIL and no corroborating remarks from multiple agents, evidence is insufficient and the feature is omitted as likely checkbox error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks do not mention short-term rentals, vacation rentals, transient vacation use, NUC, TVU, or any other STR authorization. Based on the available public remarks, STR allowance is not evidenced.
The remarks contain no references to a hotel rental pool, hotel rental program, hotel management, or a branded rental pool. Because STR allowance is not established, this feature is also false under the prerequisite rule.
The remarks do not state that owners must participate in a hotel pool, are required to enroll, or cannot opt out. Since STR allowance is not established, mandatory hotel-pool participation must also be false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks contain no references to leasehold ownership, a ground lease, lease expiration, or lease renewal. No specific lease-expiry year can be extracted.
The remarks do not mention VA approval, VA financing, or acceptance of VA loans. There is no public-remarks evidence that the building is VA approved.
The remarks were searched for fully insured, full insurance, comprehensive building insurance, and walls-in coverage language. No insurance information was found.
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for fire/life safety evaluation, FLSE, fire safety certification, life safety compliance, and passed inspection language. Nothing confirming or denying a passed evaluation was found.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence for ocean views. At least 3 of the remarks explicitly mention ocean/Pacific Ocean views, including 'Pacific Ocean' and 'panoramic ocean view,' and the MLS view data also shows ocean on 5/7 listings. This looks consistent across multiple listings rather than a one-off agent note.
No analysis available
Two listings explicitly confirm Diamond Head views, including a "peek-a-boo view of Diamond Head" and "sweeping views of Diamond Head." This is strong, independent remark evidence that at least some units in the building offer this view.
City views are strongly supported across the building, with 8 of 9 listings carrying CITY and multiple remarks citing "sweeping city lights," "city skyline," "Honolulu city lights," and views over the city. The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and confirms the prior High-confidence assessment.
Two current listings identify coastline-related views, including the phrase "beautiful coastal horizons." Earlier evidence did not mention coastline views, but the current MLS data and explicit remark indicate that at least some units offer coastal or shoreline views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
One listing explicitly describes views "from sunrise to sunset," and another references the lanai's "morning sun." Although the MLS checkbox appears in only 1 of 9 listings, the direct remarks support sunrise exposure for at least some units.
A listing directly confirms views "from sunrise to sunset," providing explicit evidence of sunset views. The feature is also consistent with the building's elevated orientation and city/ocean-facing remarks, though only one listing directly identifies it.
No analysis available
Several listings describe broad urban and coastal views from the lanais. None specifically state that fireworks can be viewed from a unit or the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No provided listing remarks mention a resident manager or use phrases such as “on-site manager” or “live-in manager.” However, RESMAN is present in 4 of 9 current MLS records and was previously present in 5 of 9 records, suggesting the building likely offers this feature, though the checkbox may be copied across listings and lacks remark-level confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.