Victoria Plaza
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Victoria Plaza
Building Overview
Victoria Plaza, Makiki-Tantalus — concrete building (built 1968); pets and short-term rentals are not allowed.
About Victoria Plaza
Based on MLS data, Victoria Plaza is a condominium building located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood. According to available records it was built in 1968 and is constructed of concrete. Size and unit count are not specified in the provided MLS information.
Key policies noted in the MLS-derived data include a prohibition on pets and a prohibition on short-term rentals. No additional amenity or building feature details were provided in the available MLS excerpts.
Management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data. Other important details such as parking, maintenance fees, assessments, and specific building amenities are not included in the supplied records and should be verified by buyers or their agents. This description is based on MLS data and buyers should confirm all information independently.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for explicit percentages and owner-occupancy language ('owner occupied', 'owner-occupied', 'percent owner occupied', 'majority owner occupied') and found none. Because there is no numeric statement, the owner-occupancy percentage is unknown and cannot be inferred.
Listings repeatedly mention elevator access and an elevator with a FOB access system, confirming elevators exist. However, none of the public remarks state a numeric count (e.g., '4 elevators'), so the exact number is unknown and cannot be changed or guessed.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
4 of 6 current MLS listings list HOTWAT in association_fee_includes, but none of the public remarks mention 'hot water included' or describe a building hot water system. This appears to be MLS checkbox data (possible agent copy/paste) rather than confirmed in remarks, so support is moderate but not strong.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 6 current MLS listings include SEWER in association_fee_includes, but none of the public remarks explicitly state 'sewer included' or discuss utility billing. The evidence comes solely from MLS checkbox fields (consistent across listings) and is moderately supportive but not corroborated in agent remarks.
All 6 MLS listings list WATER in association_fee_includes, but none of the public remarks say 'water included' or detail water billing. Consistent MLS checkbox data gives moderate support, though there's no corroborating language in the remarks and the evidence may reflect copy/pasted agent entries.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings mention shared recreation amenities (3 distinct remark sections): 'lush landscaping around a grassy recreation area', 'community garden', and 'fenced park'. CURRENT MLS shows RECARE checked in 4/6 listings and the remarks across different agents consistently reference common outdoor/rec spaces, providing strong corroboration.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Bike storage is explicitly mentioned, but surfboard-specific storage is not referenced in the public remarks, so surfboard storage is not supported by the listings.
No analysis available
All 6 MLS listings have the TRACHU amenity checked, but none of the combined public remarks reference a 'trash chute', 'garbage chute', or 'refuse chute'. The uniform checklist suggests the building is recorded as having a chute, but absence of explanatory remarks across agents lowers confidence to a moderate level.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All six current MLS listings have the POOL amenity checked and every set of public remarks mentions a pool (quotes include 'refreshing swimming pool', 'gated swimming pool', and 'swimming pool and community garden'). Evidence is consistent across multiple agent remarks and matches the MLS checkbox, supporting a high-confidence determination that the building has a swimming pool.
No analysis available
Pool is mentioned several times, but there is no language indicating a saltwater system, so 'salt' pool is not supported by the remarks.
All six provided listings explicitly mention in-unit laundry: phrases include 'in-unit washer/dryer', 'Stand-alone washer/dryer stack in unit', 'new front loading washer and dryer', and 'Washer & dryer in the unit.' Multiple agents/remarks consistently describe in-unit washers/dryers (some noting new installations), giving strong evidence the building offers units with in-unit laundry.
No analysis available
No evidence of paid community laundry in the public remarks; listings reference in-unit laundry instead and do not describe a coin or card-operated laundry room.
No mentions of floor-by-floor or per-floor community laundry. Multiple remarks specifically note a washer/dryer in the unit, so community laundry on every floor is not indicated.
No analysis available
Multiple listings explicitly reference assigned parking: remarks include phrases like 'dedicated parking stall', 'The parking stall has a gated secured entry', and 'Two parking stalls'. This matches the MLS checkbox prevalence (5/6) and appears consistently across different agent remarks, supporting a high-confidence inclusion of assigned parking for the building.
No public remarks describe covered or enclosed parking; the term 'covered' in remarks consistently refers to the lanai (e.g., '173 sq ft covered lanai'). Although some MLS checkboxes indicate covered parking (3/6), agent remarks do not corroborate, so evidence for covered parking is weak.
Public remarks confirm parking stalls/covered parking exist (including references to two stalls in some remarks) but do not state the stalls are deeded. Because deeded ownership is not explicitly mentioned, set to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
There is no information in the public remarks about a parking fee or monthly parking charge, so the value is unknown (null).
No analysis available
Several listings explicitly reference secured parking features: 'gated parking', 'The parking stall has a gated secured entry', and building access notes like 'FOB access system' and 'secured elevator access'. These repeated agent remarks across listings provide strong evidence the building offers secured-entry parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Remarks make no mention of a parking waitlist system; therefore parking_waitlist is set to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
The building has electronic FOB/key-card style access to the elevator and secured entry per the public remarks, supporting a card/fob access security system.
No analysis available
Listings describe secured entry and FOB access but do not reference a security patrol or roving guards, so there is no evidence of a patrol service in the remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All six current MLS entries (6/6) have 'CONCRE' checked for construction_materials, but none of the six public remarks mention concrete, reinforced concrete, or similar phrasing. No user/owner verification or historical confidence exists, so the feature is included based on consistent MLS checkbox data only and assigned a moderate confidence (0.75) due to lack of corroborating remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Public remarks do not mention short-term rentals or any hotel/TVU program. In absence of any mention, set to false with medium confidence.
No evidence of participation in a hotel rental pool; since short-term rentals are not mentioned, set to false.
There is no indication of a mandatory hotel/rental pool in the public remarks. With STR not mentioned, mandatory participation is set to false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no indication in the public remarks that this is a leasehold property or any lease expiry year. Returned null for unknown.
Public remarks do not mention VA loan approval or acceptance. I searched for terms like 'VA approved', 'VA financing', and 'VA loans accepted' and found no matches, so set to false with medium-low confidence.
I searched the remarks for terms such as 'fully insured', 'full insurance', 'walls-in coverage', and 'comprehensive building insurance' and found no references. With no explicit statements in the public remarks, the building is marked as not fully insured by HOA with medium confidence.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for phrases like 'fire life safety evaluation passed', 'FLSE passed', 'fire safety certified', and 'passed fire inspection' and found no references. Because there is no explicit mention and no current verified value, the field is set to false with medium confidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Three listings explicitly reference ocean/Pacific Ocean views (phrases include "Pacific Ocean" and "panoramic ocean view"). Remarks consistently describe ocean-facing sightlines from the lanai and living areas across multiple agent write-ups, indicating the building offers ocean-view units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple remarks reference views of the Honolulu skyline and city lights and note proximity to Downtown, with at least several listings explicitly mentioning skyline/city views. Evidence comes from multiple agent descriptions and aligns with MLS view_descriptions indicating city-view units are available.
No listings or remarks mention "coastline", "shoreline", or "coastal view." While beaches and Ala Moana are noted as nearby, there are no explicit coastline-view claims across the six listings, so the building does not appear to advertise coastline-specific views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Listings describe ocean and skyline views but do not explicitly say residents can watch fireworks from the unit or lanai, so fireworks view is not supported by the remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Two of six current listings include RESMAN in the MLS amenities, but none of the six public remarks mention 'resident manager', 'on-site manager', or similar phrasing. This suggests the checkbox may reflect partial/agent-entered data (possible copy/paste); recommend seller/manager confirmation or a site visit to verify presence of a live-in/on-site manager.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.