Victoria Mansions
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Victoria Mansions
Building Overview
Victoria Mansions in Makiki-Tantalus — concrete building (1966) with a pool and ocean/mountain views.
About Victoria Mansions
Victoria Mansions is located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood and was built in 1966. According to available records the building is of concrete construction. Specific unit counts or floorplan sizes are not provided in the MLS-derived data.
Based on MLS data, on-site amenities include a pool and a resident manager. Units in the building report ocean and mountain views. No other amenity details are available in the provided records.
Parking is available and assigned. The MLS data indicates pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. The management company is listed as unknown in the available records. This summary is based on MLS data; buyers should verify all details, rules, and fees with current management or official documents.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for owner-occupancy details such as a percentage, "majority owner occupied," or other explicit occupancy descriptions. The remarks only suggest stable ownership through phrases like low turnover and owner satisfaction, which are not enough to estimate a percentage. No exact owner-occupancy figure is stated.
I searched the remarks for an explicit number of elevators or phrasing like "4 elevators" or "multiple elevators." The listings mention an elevator and secured elevator access, but they do not state how many elevators the building has. Without a count, the number remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Common area electricity appears to be included at this building based on current MLS data: 8 of 10 listings have OTCOEX checked. The remarks are silent on the exact utility, but there is no contrary evidence and the current checkbox pattern is strong enough to treat this as a building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water does not appear to be included in the maintenance fee. None of the current MLS listings checked HOTWAT, and several remarks mention a 'water heater' or 'newer water heater' inside the unit, which points away from building-supplied hot water.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer is very likely included in the maintenance fee. Current MLS data shows SEWER on 8 of 10 listings, and the remarks are silent on any separate sewer billing. This looks consistent across multiple listings rather than a one-off copy-paste.
Water appears to be included in the maintenance fee. Current MLS data shows WATER on 8 of 10 listings, and none of the remarks indicate separate water billing. The evidence is consistent across multiple listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Patio/deck-type outdoor space is mentioned in several listings, most clearly as a "private lanai" and "covered lanai," with additional rooftop-area wording in one penthouse listing. The evidence appears repeated across multiple remarks rather than a single copied note, so this is a reliable building-level feature for buyers searching for lanai/deck space.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for surfboard storage, board storage, and surf storage references. The remarks mention bike storage/bike rack, but nothing about surfboard storage facilities.
No analysis available
Trash chute is supported by the current MLS amenity checkbox in 9 of 10 listings. None of the public remarks explicitly mention a trash chute, garbage chute, or refuse chute, so the evidence comes primarily from MLS data rather than agent descriptions. The pattern appears consistent across multiple listings, suggesting the feature is likely present in the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool is strongly supported by the current remarks and prior MLS history. At least 2 listings explicitly mention it, including one that says "Building amenities include a pool" and another noting "pool (currently unavailable for use)." The repeated references across listings indicate this is a real building amenity, though one remark suggests it may be temporarily out of service.
No analysis available
I searched for "salt water pool," "saltwater pool," "salt pool," and similar terms. The public remarks confirm a pool exists, but there is no evidence that it is salt water.
In-unit laundry is strongly confirmed across the listing set. At least 6 current remarks explicitly mention a washer/dryer in the unit, including phrases like 'in-unit washer/dryer,' 'washer, dryer ... are in the unit,' and 'stackable front-load washer and dryer.' This is consistent with the high-confidence historical MLS data and does not appear to be a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
I looked for references to coin laundry, paid laundry, quarters, cards, or laundry fees. The remarks repeatedly describe in-unit washer/dryer, which does not support paid community laundry.
I searched the public remarks for wording like "laundry on each floor," "laundry room on every floor," and similar phrases. The listings only mention in-unit washer/dryer and a laundry room in the penthouse, not community laundry on every floor.
Parking is strongly supported across the building. Multiple remarks explicitly reference parking, including "1 assigned partial open parking," "1 assigned parking stall," and "two side side-by-side parking stalls," while the MLS data shows parking features in all listings. This looks consistent across multiple agents rather than copy-paste noise.
Assigned parking is clearly present in the building. At least several remarks explicitly state assigned stalls or assigned parking, matching the MLS data where every listing has ASSIGN in parking_features. The evidence is strong and consistent across multiple listings.
No analysis available
I found references to "1 assigned partial open parking," "1 assigned parking stall," and "two side side-by-side parking stalls," but nothing indicating the parking is deeded to the unit. Assigned parking alone does not establish deeded ownership, so this remains unsupported.
No analysis available
I searched for language such as "parking fee," "monthly parking," "parking rental," or any additional charge for parking. The remarks only mention assigned parking and street parking, with no public-remarks evidence of a parking fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for references to a parking waitlist, waiting list, or any instruction to join a parking queue. The listings mention assigned stalls and street parking, but nothing about a waitlist.
No analysis available
The remarks directly support card/fob access security with a clear mention of a secured elevator and key fob access. This is strong evidence of an electronic access-control system for the building.
No analysis available
I searched for patrol-related wording such as "security patrol," "roving security," and "patrolled building." The remarks mention secure access and a resident manager, but no patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete construction appears to be a stable building-level feature for this property. All current listings flag CONCRE in MLS (10/10), and none of the public remarks suggest a change away from concrete. The evidence is strong and consistent across multiple listings, with no signs of agent correction or contradiction.
Three of eight current MLS listings indicate double-wall construction (DOUWAL). There are no mentions of 'double wall' or similar in the public remarks, so this is reported based on MLS checkbox entries but is not directly corroborated by agent descriptions.
No analysis available
Two of eight current MLS listings include masonry/stucco (MASSTU). No public remarks contain 'masonry' or 'stucco' phrasing, so inclusion is based on MLS checkbox entries and treated as implied rather than explicitly confirmed.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Above-ground construction is present in a minority of current MLS records (4 of 9), but none of the public remarks explicitly describe it. Because the evidence comes mainly from the checkbox data and not from multiple remarks, confidence is moderate and this may reflect inconsistent agent input.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit short-term rental indicators like "STR permitted," "vacation rental allowed," "NUC," or "TVU," and found none. The note that the unit was "Rented monthly on Airbnb" suggests a booking platform use, but it does not confirm building-level STR permission, so I cannot mark STR as allowed.
I looked for references to a hotel pool, hotel rental program, or branded management such as Hilton, Ritz, or Trump pool arrangements. None appear in the remarks, and there is no evidence the building permits STRs in the first place, so this is false.
I searched for wording like "mandatory rental pool," "must participate," "cannot opt out," or similar language. The remarks contain no such statements, and there is no evidence of a hotel rental pool program, so mandatory participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks say this is a "leasehold unit" and mention an "option to convert to fee simple," but they do not provide a ground-lease expiration year. I looked for phrases like "lease expires 20xx," "ground lease ends," or renewal language, and found no specific year.
I searched the public remarks for explicit VA-approval language such as "VA approved," "VA financing," and "VA loans accepted." None of the listings mention VA eligibility, so there is no public-remarks evidence that this building is VA approved.
I searched the public remarks for HOA insurance language indicating the building is fully insured or walls-in covered. The remarks do not mention insurance coverage at all. Since there is no supporting evidence, this remains unconfirmed.
No analysis available
I looked for direct fire/life safety compliance references such as FLSE passed, fire safety certified, or passed fire inspection. The remarks only discuss building security, resident manager, and general condition, with no fire/life safety approval language. With no evidence in the remarks, this is treated as not confirmed.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views appear to be available in the building, with 5 of 10 current MLS records showing MOUNTA in the view field. The public remarks do not explicitly repeat this, so the evidence is mainly from the MLS view data rather than agent descriptions.
Diamond Head views are supported by both MLS data and public remarks. Two of ten current listings include DIAHEA, and at least one remark explicitly mentions 'Diamond Head' along with ocean and city views, indicating this is a real building-level offering.
City views are strongly supported across the current listings. Nine of ten MLS records list CITY, and multiple public remarks independently describe 'city skyline views' and 'city views,' making this a high-confidence building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for language such as "view fireworks from the unit," "watch fireworks from lanai," or similar wording. The remarks mention city, ocean, and Diamond Head views, but nothing about Friday night fireworks views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence confirms Victoria Mansions has a resident manager on-site. At least 4 current remarks explicitly mention a resident manager, including phrases like "on-site resident manager," "Great resident manager," and "dedicated Resident Manager is on-site." The repeated wording across multiple listings suggests consistent building-level amenity data rather than a one-off agent error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.