Varsity Villa
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Varsity Villa
Building Overview
Varsity Villa in McCully-Moiliili (1972) — concrete construction with assigned parking; pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About Varsity Villa
Based on MLS data, Varsity Villa is a condominium building located in the McCully-Moiliili neighborhood. The building was constructed in 1972 and is of concrete construction. Size and unit count are not provided in the available MLS records.
Key features reported in the MLS include assigned parking availability. Pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted according to the listing data. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS information.
Additional details such as maintenance fees, utility arrangements, specific parking stall allocations, and on-site amenities are not included in the provided MLS data. Buyers should verify all building details, rules, and fees with the listing agent or management; this summary is based solely on the available MLS records.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit owner-occupancy numbers and qualitative descriptions such as "80% owner occupied" or "mostly owner occupied." The remarks do not provide any owner-occupancy information, so the value is unknown.
I looked for explicit elevator counts such as "4 elevators," "multiple elevators," or similar wording, but found none. The only evidence is proximity language, so the current value of 1 is kept with low confidence.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
CURRENT MLS shows SEWER checked on 14/17 listings, but none of the public remarks across the listings mention sewer being included (no phrases like 'sewer included' or 'sewer in HOA fees'). With no prior verification and no explicit remarks confirming the feature, the evidence for sewer being included is weak and likely a checkbox error across listings.
CURRENT MLS shows WATER checked on 14/17 listings, but none of the public remarks mention 'water included' or similar wording. Given the absence of prior verification and no explicit remarks supporting water being included, there is insufficient evidence to conclude water is included in maintenance fees; the MLS checkbox entries appear uncorroborated.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Shared laundry is strongly supported for this building. Multiple listings explicitly mention "community laundry," including phrases like "community laundry room is secured," "community laundry facility on the first floor," and "community laundry on first floor." Combined with the high-confidence MLS history (15/18 COMLAU), this is solid evidence that the building offers common laundry facilities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is strongly supported. Across the provided remarks, many listings explicitly say the unit includes parking, such as '1 parking stall included,' 'one dedicated parking stall,' and '1 assigned open parking stall.' Combined with the current MLS parking-feature codes showing parking on all listings and none marked 'NONE', this is very strong building-level evidence.
Assigned parking is strongly supported by both MLS codes and public remarks. Multiple listings specifically mention 'assigned parking stall,' 'one designated parking stall,' and '1 assigned open parking stall,' indicating this is not just copy-paste noise. The feature appears in many listings across the set, so confidence is very high.
No analysis available
I looked for wording such as deeded parking, owned stall, or parking included in deed and found none. The remarks indicate assigned/dedicated parking, which is not the same as deeded ownership.
No analysis available
I searched for any parking fee language, including monthly parking charges or parking rental terms, and found nothing. The listings only mention that one parking stall is included or assigned.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for references to a parking waitlist or joining a list for parking and found none. The remarks consistently describe parking as included or assigned, with no indication of a waitlist system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
12 of 18 current MLS listings have 'CONCRE' checked for construction materials, which is fairly consistent across the building records. The public remarks in the provided listings do not mention construction type at all, so there is no contrary evidence to override the MLS data. This supports including concrete construction with moderate confidence.
Most listings for this building do not indicate double wall construction: only 3 of 16 currently check DOUWAL and historically it was rarely selected, with 13 of 15 omitting it. None of the public remarks across many listings mention double-wall or any structural renovation that would add it. This pattern suggests the building is not double-wall construction and that the few positive checkboxes are likely mistakes.
Across the latest listings, 13 of 16 units mark hollow tile (HOLTIL) in the construction materials, matching earlier sets where 12 of 15 did so. Although the public remarks do not explicitly mention hollow tile, the consistent selection of this field across many agents and over time strongly supports that the building is hollow-tile construction. There is no textual or data evidence indicating a change away from hollow tile.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental indicators such as STR permitted, legal vacation rental, NUC, or TVU and found no supporting language. There is also no mention of 30-day minimum language or any other indication that short-term rentals are allowed.
I looked for hotel rental pool references such as Hilton/Trump/Ritz-style programs or managed rental pools and found none. Because there is no evidence that STR is allowed, this must be false.
I searched for wording like mandatory participation, required rental program, or cannot opt out and found nothing. Since there is no evidence of an STR or hotel pool program, mandatory participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings consistently identify this as a leasehold building with the lease ending in 2029. The most specific date given is September 1, 2029, which matches the repeated year references.
I searched the public remarks for any explicit VA loan approval language and found none. Since this feature is only determined from public remarks, there is no evidence to support VA approval.
I looked for insurance-related language indicating the HOA provides full building or walls-in coverage. The remarks do not mention insurance coverage at all, so there is no basis to mark this as fully insured.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for fire/life safety evaluation language, including FLSE passed, fire safety certified, and passed fire inspection. Nothing in the public remarks confirms the building has passed such an evaluation, so this remains unverified.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no evidence that this building offers sunset views. Across the current MLS set, 0 of 18 listings mention SUNSET and 14 explicitly list NONE, while public remarks only describe mountain/city views or general exposure. This looks consistent across listings and appears to be absent rather than a copy-paste omission.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS amenities show RESMAN checked on 4 of 17 listings, but zero public remarks reference a resident or on-site manager (no phrases like 'resident manager', 'on-site manager', or 'live-in manager'). This pattern looks like inconsistent checkbox usage across agents rather than confirmed building staffing; therefore the feature is omitted until corroborating remarks or owner/manager verification appears.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.