Varsity Villa
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Varsity Villa
Building Overview
Varsity Villa in McCully-Moiliili (1972) — concrete construction with assigned parking; pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About Varsity Villa
Based on MLS data, Varsity Villa is a condominium building located in the McCully-Moiliili neighborhood. The building was constructed in 1972 and is of concrete construction. Size and unit count are not provided in the available MLS records.
Key features reported in the MLS include assigned parking availability. Pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted according to the listing data. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS information.
Additional details such as maintenance fees, utility arrangements, specific parking stall allocations, and on-site amenities are not included in the provided MLS data. Buyers should verify all building details, rules, and fees with the listing agent or management; this summary is based solely on the available MLS records.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I reviewed the remarks for explicit percentages or phrases about owner-occupancy (such as 'majority owner occupied' or numeric rates) and found none; listings instead reference students, investors, leases, and rental use. Per numeric-field rules, do not infer a percentage without explicit evidence, so the value remains unknown.
Public remarks explicitly mention proximity to an elevator (e.g., "near the elevator"), confirming at least one elevator exists, but no explicit count is provided in any listing. Per rules, do not guess a numeric count without an explicit number in the remarks.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
CURRENT MLS shows SEWER checked on 14/17 listings, but none of the public remarks across the listings mention sewer being included (no phrases like 'sewer included' or 'sewer in HOA fees'). With no prior verification and no explicit remarks confirming the feature, the evidence for sewer being included is weak and likely a checkbox error across listings.
CURRENT MLS shows WATER checked on 14/17 listings, but none of the public remarks mention 'water included' or similar wording. Given the absence of prior verification and no explicit remarks supporting water being included, there is insufficient evidence to conclude water is included in maintenance fees; the MLS checkbox entries appear uncorroborated.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence the building has shared laundry: 14 of 17 MLS listings currently have the COMLAU amenity checked, and at least 8 separate public remarks explicitly state 'community laundry' or 'community laundry room' (phrases include 'community laundry facility on the first floor', 'secured community laundry', and 'community laundry room is secured & conveniently located on lower level lobby'). Evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents, supporting inclusion of the feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that the building provides parking: 17/17 current MLS entries include parking codes and none indicate 'NONE'. Public remarks across the listings repeatedly note '1 parking stall included' or 'one parking stall', confirming parking is provided for units. Evidence is consistent across multiple agents and listings.
Assigned parking is strongly supported: most MLS entries include the ASSIGN code (15/17) and numerous remarks explicitly say 'assigned parking stall', 'designated parking stall', or 'assigned open parking stall'. The language appears across many listings (multiple agents), indicating assigned/reserved stalls are typical for units.
No analysis available
I searched for language like 'deeded parking', 'owned parking', or 'parking included in deed' but found none. The remarks consistently describe an assigned or included stall, which implies allocation but not explicitly deeded ownership, so deeded is marked false with medium-low confidence.
No analysis available
I searched for 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', or similar phrasing and found no references. Because parking is repeatedly described as included/assigned, there is no evidence of a separate monthly parking fee; the value is unknown (null) with medium-low confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for 'parking waitlist', 'waiting list', or similar phrasing and found none. The consistent language of assigned/dedicated stalls suggests there is no building waitlist system, so this is marked false with medium-low confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
11 of 17 current MLS listings have 'CONCRE' checked in construction materials, providing moderate evidence the building is concrete. However, none of the public remarks across the listings mention concrete or reinforced construction (no phrases like 'concrete building' or 'reinforced concrete'), suggesting the checkbox may be copy-pasted by agents. Confidence is moderate (0.75) because the MLS checkbox agreement is reasonably common but not corroborated by descriptive remarks or user/site-visit verification.
Most listings for this building do not indicate double wall construction: only 3 of 16 currently check DOUWAL and historically it was rarely selected, with 13 of 15 omitting it. None of the public remarks across many listings mention double-wall or any structural renovation that would add it. This pattern suggests the building is not double-wall construction and that the few positive checkboxes are likely mistakes.
Across the latest listings, 13 of 16 units mark hollow tile (HOLTIL) in the construction materials, matching earlier sets where 12 of 15 did so. Although the public remarks do not explicitly mention hollow tile, the consistent selection of this field across many agents and over time strongly supports that the building is hollow-tile construction. There is no textual or data evidence indicating a change away from hollow tile.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for 'short-term rental', 'STR', 'vacation rental', '30-day minimum', 'NUC', and similar terms and found no indications that STRs are permitted. The listings emphasize student/long-term use and leasehold negotiation, so STR allowed is marked false with medium-low confidence.
Because short-term rentals are not indicated, and there is no mention of a hotel rental pool or hotel management program, this is marked false with relatively high confidence. Hotel-pool participation would be expected to be explicitly stated, which it is not.
No remark references a mandatory hotel rental pool or required participation; coupled with absence of STR/hotel pool mentions, mandatory pool is marked false with relatively high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Several listings explicitly reference the lease/land lease expiring in 2029, including precise references to September 1, 2029. Where multiple dates appear, the most recent/explicit expiry (2029) was used.
I searched the remarks for terms like 'VA approved', 'VA financing', or 'VA loans accepted' and found no mentions. Several remarks emphasize cash-only sales and lessor preapproval, which do not indicate VA approval. With no explicit evidence, VA financing is marked false with medium-low confidence.
I searched the public remarks for terms indicating the HOA provides full building/walls-in insurance (e.g., 'fully insured', 'full insurance', 'walls-in coverage') and found no references. Because there is no explicit statement in the listings, this is set to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for phrases like 'fire life safety evaluation passed', 'FLSE passed', 'fire safety certified', and 'life safety compliant' and found none. With no current value provided in the data, absence of mention is treated as likely not present (medium confidence).
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings mention sunset or western exposure: 0 of 17 current MLS view_descriptions contain 'SUNSET' and 6 of 17 explicitly list NONE. Public remarks do not reference 'sunset', 'evening sun', or 'western exposure' (one remark notes 'mountain/city views'). Given the consistent absence across multiple listings and MLS fields, there is high confidence the building does not offer sunset views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS amenities show RESMAN checked on 4 of 17 listings, but zero public remarks reference a resident or on-site manager (no phrases like 'resident manager', 'on-site manager', or 'live-in manager'). This pattern looks like inconsistent checkbox usage across agents rather than confirmed building staffing; therefore the feature is omitted until corroborating remarks or owner/manager verification appears.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.