Varsity Villa
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Varsity Villa
Building Overview
Varsity Villa in McCully-Moiliili (1972) — concrete construction with assigned parking; pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About Varsity Villa
Based on MLS data, Varsity Villa is a condominium building located in the McCully-Moiliili neighborhood. The building was constructed in 1972 and is of concrete construction. Size and unit count are not provided in the available MLS records.
Key features reported in the MLS include assigned parking availability. Pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted according to the listing data. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS information.
Additional details such as maintenance fees, utility arrangements, specific parking stall allocations, and on-site amenities are not included in the provided MLS data. Buyers should verify all building details, rules, and fees with the listing agent or management; this summary is based solely on the available MLS records.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for numeric owner-occupancy statements and qualitative indicators such as highly owner occupied or mostly owner occupied. The remarks contain no evidence to estimate this percentage, so it remains unknown.
I looked for explicit elevator references and found repeated remarks placing units "near the elevator." No listing stated a count like "4 elevators" or similar, so the existence of an elevator is supported but the number is unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
CURRENT MLS shows SEWER checked on 14/17 listings, but none of the public remarks across the listings mention sewer being included (no phrases like 'sewer included' or 'sewer in HOA fees'). With no prior verification and no explicit remarks confirming the feature, the evidence for sewer being included is weak and likely a checkbox error across listings.
CURRENT MLS shows WATER checked on 14/17 listings, but none of the public remarks mention 'water included' or similar wording. Given the absence of prior verification and no explicit remarks supporting water being included, there is insufficient evidence to conclude water is included in maintenance fees; the MLS checkbox entries appear uncorroborated.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence the building has shared laundry: 14 of 17 MLS listings currently have the COMLAU amenity checked, and at least 8 separate public remarks explicitly state 'community laundry' or 'community laundry room' (phrases include 'community laundry facility on the first floor', 'secured community laundry', and 'community laundry room is secured & conveniently located on lower level lobby'). Evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents, supporting inclusion of the feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that the building provides parking: 17/17 current MLS entries include parking codes and none indicate 'NONE'. Public remarks across the listings repeatedly note '1 parking stall included' or 'one parking stall', confirming parking is provided for units. Evidence is consistent across multiple agents and listings.
Assigned parking is strongly supported: most MLS entries include the ASSIGN code (15/17) and numerous remarks explicitly say 'assigned parking stall', 'designated parking stall', or 'assigned open parking stall'. The language appears across many listings (multiple agents), indicating assigned/reserved stalls are typical for units.
No analysis available
I found repeated references to assigned, dedicated, or included parking stalls, but nothing saying the stall is deeded or owned with the unit. Assigned parking is not the same as deeded parking, so this is best marked false.
No analysis available
I searched for parking fee language such as monthly parking cost, parking rental, or extra parking charges and found none. The remarks only describe parking as included or assigned.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for any reference to a parking waitlist, waiting list, or joining a list for parking, and found nothing. The listings consistently describe parking as assigned or included instead.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
11 of 17 current MLS listings have 'CONCRE' checked in construction materials, providing moderate evidence the building is concrete. However, none of the public remarks across the listings mention concrete or reinforced construction (no phrases like 'concrete building' or 'reinforced concrete'), suggesting the checkbox may be copy-pasted by agents. Confidence is moderate (0.75) because the MLS checkbox agreement is reasonably common but not corroborated by descriptive remarks or user/site-visit verification.
Most listings for this building do not indicate double wall construction: only 3 of 16 currently check DOUWAL and historically it was rarely selected, with 13 of 15 omitting it. None of the public remarks across many listings mention double-wall or any structural renovation that would add it. This pattern suggests the building is not double-wall construction and that the few positive checkboxes are likely mistakes.
Across the latest listings, 13 of 16 units mark hollow tile (HOLTIL) in the construction materials, matching earlier sets where 12 of 15 did so. Although the public remarks do not explicitly mention hollow tile, the consistent selection of this field across many agents and over time strongly supports that the building is hollow-tile construction. There is no textual or data evidence indicating a change away from hollow tile.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental indicators like STR permitted, legal vacation rental, NUC, or TVU and found no supporting remarks. There is also no evidence of an exception or rental program that would imply STR is allowed.
I looked for hotel rental pool references such as hotel-managed units, Hilton/Trump/Ritz-style pools, or other rental program language and found none. Since STR is not evidenced as allowed, this must also remain false.
I searched for mandatory pool language such as required participation, cannot opt out, or must be in a rental program, and found nothing. With no hotel pool evidence and no STR allowance evidence, mandatory pool participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks repeatedly give the lease expiration year as 2029, including a specific date of September 1, 2029. This is consistent across multiple listings, so the lease expiry year is clear.
I searched the public remarks for any reference to VA loan eligibility or VA-approved status and found none. With no explicit mention, I cannot confirm VA financing is available.
I searched for insurance/coverage language suggesting full HOA walls-in coverage or comprehensive building insurance. The remarks do not mention this feature, so it cannot be verified from the listings.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for fire/life safety evaluation terms such as FLSE passed, fire inspection passed, and life safety compliant. Nothing in the public remarks indicates the building has passed such an evaluation, so this remains unconfirmed.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings mention sunset or western exposure: 0 of 17 current MLS view_descriptions contain 'SUNSET' and 6 of 17 explicitly list NONE. Public remarks do not reference 'sunset', 'evening sun', or 'western exposure' (one remark notes 'mountain/city views'). Given the consistent absence across multiple listings and MLS fields, there is high confidence the building does not offer sunset views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS amenities show RESMAN checked on 4 of 17 listings, but zero public remarks reference a resident or on-site manager (no phrases like 'resident manager', 'on-site manager', or 'live-in manager'). This pattern looks like inconsistent checkbox usage across agents rather than confirmed building staffing; therefore the feature is omitted until corroborating remarks or owner/manager verification appears.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.