
Varsity House
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Varsity House
Building Overview
Varsity House in McCully-Moiliili — concrete building from 1970; pets and short-term rentals are not allowed.

About Varsity House
Varsity House is located in the McCully-Moiliili neighborhood and was built in 1970. According to available records the building is constructed of concrete. Size and unit count are not provided in the available MLS-derived data.
Key policies and features reported for Varsity House include a no-pets policy and a prohibition on short-term rentals. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data. No specific common-area amenities (pool, gym, etc.) are detailed in the provided records.
Information about parking, maintenance fees, assessments, and other owner costs is not included in the available MLS data. Based on MLS data analysis; buyers and agents should verify all details, including amenities, parking, fees, and management, with current building management or official records.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for numeric or descriptive owner-occupancy indicators such as '80% owner occupied', 'majority owner occupied', or 'highly owner occupied' and found none in the remarks. Without an explicit statement or an existing current value, the owner-occupancy percentage is unknown and cannot be estimated from these remarks.
I searched all public remarks for terms like 'elevator', '4 elevators', 'multiple elevators', and spelled-out numbers—no references were found. Because there is no explicit numeric statement and no existing current value to retain, the number of elevators is unknown and cannot be inferred from the remarks.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Only 1 of 7 current MLS listings lists CABTV in association fee inclusions and zero public remarks reference cable being included. Given the lack of corroborating remarks and that most listings do not check this box, cable-as-an-included-fee appears unlikely across the building.
5 of 6 current MLS listings list OTCOEX (common area electricity) in association fee inclusions; none of the public remarks explicitly state 'common area electricity' or 'common electric.' Evidence is strong across MLS checkbox data but appears to be agent-entered (no explicit remarks), so inclusion is implied rather than directly confirmed.
No analysis available
No analysis available
5 of 6 current MLS listings indicate GAS is included in association fees; 0 public remarks mention 'gas included' or similar. The MLS checkbox presence across multiple listings implies gas is included, though remarks do not explicitly confirm it and may reflect copy/paste.
HOTWAT is present in only 1/7 MLS listings while WTRHTR (water heater) appears in a listing, and none of the public remarks state that hot water is included. The presence of unit water heaters strongly suggests hot water is not a building-provided/fee-included service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Six of seven current MLS listings include SEWER among association fee inclusions, but zero public remarks explicitly state sewer is included. Multiple agent-entered MLS entries imply sewer is covered by the fees, though the evidence is primarily from MLS checkbox data rather than agent remarks.
Six out of seven MLS listings indicate WATER is included in association fees, while no public remarks explicitly confirm this. The repeated MLS checkbox entries suggest water is likely included in the HOA fees, though public remarks do not provide direct confirmation.
0 of 7 public remarks mention BBQ or grilling facilities; no phrases like 'BBQ', 'barbecue', or 'grill' appear in the remarks. The MLS shows 1/7 listings checked for BBQ but there is no corroborating language in agent remarks, suggesting a copy/paste or checkbox error rather than an actual building amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
0 of 7 public remarks mention a clubhouse, club house, or community center. Although one listing checkbox indicates CLUHOU, none of the agent remarks describe a clubhouse amenity, so the checkbox likely reflects inconsistent data entry rather than an actual building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
0 of 7 public remarks mention a meeting room or conference room; no phrases like 'meeting room' or 'conference room' appear. The single MLS checkbox indicating MEEROO is not supported by agent remarks and appears to be a data entry/copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
0 of 7 public remarks mention a putting green or golf putting green. The MLS shows PUTGRE for one listing, but agent remarks do not corroborate this amenity, indicating the checkbox is likely incorrect rather than evidence of an actual building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is mentioned in multiple current listings (at least 4 of 6) with phrases like "storage," "storage and community laundry," and "storage facilities." The consistency across several agent remarks (rather than a single outlier) indicates building-level storage/lockers are available, though some repetition suggests partial copy/paste between listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings' public remarks mention a pool and only 1 of 7 MLS listings has the pool amenity checked. With no historical confirmation or any remark like 'pool' or 'swimming pool,' the single checked amenity appears to be an isolated checkbox likely due to agent copy/paste rather than evidence the building actually has a pool.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listing remarks (6 variations) explicitly state building-level laundry: phrases include 'on-site laundry', 'community laundry', 'the community laundry room is also conveniently located on-site', and 'community amenities include laundry and storage facilities.' Historical MLS checkbox data also flagged COMLAU in 6 of 7 listings, so evidence is strong and consistent across multiple agents/listings rather than an isolated entry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 6 current MLS entries list parking in parking_features (types include OPEN/GARAGE/ASSIGN/etc.), and none show 'NONE'. Public remarks across the listings repeatedly reference parking (e.g., 'Includes assigned parking', 'assigned parking stall', 'assigned parking stall just outside your front door'), providing strong, consistent confirmation from multiple agents.
At least 5 of the listing remark blocks explicitly state assigned parking (phrases include "Includes assigned parking", "assigned parking stall", and "Parking stall below unit"). The language appears across multiple agent remark blocks (some duplicated text suggests copy/paste), but the consistent, repeated statements across listings provide strong evidence the building offers assigned parking.
No analysis available
Listings consistently mention an 'assigned parking stall' and 'parking stall below unit' (e.g., 'Includes assigned parking', 'assigned parking stall just outside your front door'). However, there is no language indicating the stall is deeded/owned, so deeded parking cannot be confirmed.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for terms like 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', or dollar amounts tied to parking and found none. The presence or amount of a parking fee cannot be determined from the provided remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for language indicating a parking waitlist (e.g., 'parking waitlist', 'join waitlist') and found none; remarks only reference assigned/on-site stalls. There is no evidence of a waitlist system in the listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Six of seven current MLS listings list 'CONCRE' as a construction material, and historical aggregation gave Medium confidence that the building is concrete. Public remarks do not explicitly mention construction, suggesting agents likely used MLS checkboxes consistently across listings rather than describing it in remarks, but the high count across independent listings implies the building is likely concrete.
Three of five current MLS listings indicate 'DOUWAL' (double wall) in construction materials, which implies the building may have double-wall construction. The public remarks do not reference 'double wall' or similar phrases, so this assessment relies on MLS checkbox data across listings rather than explicit descriptive remarks.
No analysis available
Only two of seven MLS listings list 'MASSTU' and none of the public remarks reference masonry or stucco. This limited and inconsistent checkbox reporting across agents suggests masonry/stucco is not a reliably documented building-level feature.
No analysis available
Three of seven current MLS listings list 'SLAB' as a construction material and historical data indicated Medium confidence for a slab foundation. No public remarks describe a concrete slab explicitly, but multiple listings checking the slab box provides moderate implied evidence the building has a concrete slab foundation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit STR-related language and minimum-stay rules and found the listings silent on STR policy. Without explicit mention, STR allowance cannot be confirmed and is marked false per absence of evidence.
Searches for 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel rental program', or hotel-managed rental references returned no results. Because STRs are not indicated as allowed, there is no basis to claim hotel-pool participation.
I looked for language such as 'mandatory hotel pool', 'required to participate', or conversely 'optional' and found nothing. With no indication that STRs or a hotel pool exist, mandatory participation cannot be supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for four-digit lease expiry years and phrases such as 'lease expires', 'land lease to', or 'leasehold' and found no references. Therefore the lease expiry year is unknown from the public remarks.
I searched all public remarks for phrases indicating VA loan approval (e.g., 'VA approved', 'VA financing', 'VA loans accepted') and found none. With no evidence in the listings, VA approval cannot be confirmed.
I searched the remarks for HOA insurance language like 'fully insured', 'walls-in coverage', or 'full insurance' and found no such statements. As there is no explicit mention or current value, the building is not documented as being fully insured by the HOA in the public remarks (false with medium confidence).
No analysis available
I reviewed the remarks for explicit statements such as 'FLSE passed', 'fire life safety evaluation passed', or 'passed fire inspection' and found none. With no current value provided and no explicit mention, absence of evidence suggests the FLSE pass is not documented in public remarks (treated as false with medium confidence).
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings (0 of 6) or any public remarks mention mountain, Koolau, or mauka views. The MLS view_descriptions contain 0/6 MOUNTA and one listing explicitly shows NONE; remarks contain no phrases like 'mountain view' or 'mauka view.' Evidence across multiple listings is consistent that the building does not offer mountain views.
No analysis available
No listings (0 of 6) or any public remarks mention city, downtown, or urban views. The MLS view_descriptions contain 0/6 CITY and one listing explicitly shows NONE; remarks contain no phrases like 'city view' or 'downtown view.' Multiple listings consistently lack any indication of city views, so the building is reported as not offering city views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings (0/7) mention sunset views and one listing explicitly lists View=NONE. None of the current public remarks reference 'sunset', 'western exposure', or 'evening sun'—they only mention a 'breezy unit' and 'open lanai/patio'. Evidence is consistent across multiple agent listings and appears to confirm the building does not offer documented sunset views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.