University Towers
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
University Towers
Building Overview
University Towers in McCully-Moiliili, concrete construction (1964); pets and short-term rentals not allowed, per MLS data.
About University Towers
University Towers is a condominium building located in the McCully-Moiliili neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1964 and is of concrete construction.
Key policies for the property include that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not allowed, based on MLS data. No onsite management company is listed in the provided MLS information.
Additional details such as unit sizes, parking, maintenance fees, amenities, or management contact are not included in the supplied MLS data. Based on MLS data; buyers should verify all information independently with the listing agent or property manager.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for phrases like "80% owner occupied," "majority owner occupied," or any other ownership-percentage statement, but none was provided. The remarks do suggest the unit is suitable for owner-occupants, but that does not quantify the building’s owner-occupancy rate. Because no numeric evidence appears, the value remains unknown.
The public remarks explicitly reference a FOB-operated elevator, so the building definitely has elevator access. No listing provides a numeric elevator count, so I used the smallest confirmed value based on the singular wording. I did not find any mention of multiple elevators or a specific elevator total.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Three of five current listings check OTCOEX, which suggests common-area electricity/building power is included in maintenance fees. None of the public remarks mention it explicitly, so this appears to be MLS checkbox evidence rather than agent-confirmed detail.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No current listings include HOTWAT, and several list WTRHTR, which is a strong sign the units have their own water heaters rather than building-supplied hot water. The remarks do not describe hot water as included, so the best reading is that hot water is not a fee-covered building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All five current listings include SEWER in association_fee_includes, making this a very strong building-level feature. The remarks do not mention sewer directly, but the MLS data is unanimous and consistent across listings.
All five current listings check WATER in association_fee_includes, which is strong evidence that water is included in the maintenance fee. The public remarks do not contradict this, and the pattern is consistent across listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for surfboard-storage-related language such as 'surfboard storage' or 'bike and surfboard storage.' The remarks do not mention any such amenity.
No analysis available
All 5 current MLS listings have the TRACHU amenity checked, suggesting the building does offer a trash chute system. However, none of the remarks explicitly say "trash chute," "garbage chute," or "refuse chute," so this appears to be MLS-checkbox evidence rather than agent description confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I checked for pool references and specifically for saltwater/saline pool language. The current building context also indicates no pool, and the remarks do not contradict that.
Laundry in unit is strongly supported. Historical MLS data showed washer/dryer included across all current listings, and one public remark explicitly says "washer/dryer in unit." This looks like consistent building-level data rather than a one-off agent error.
No analysis available
I searched for references to paid laundry facilities, including coin laundry and card-operated machines. Nothing in the remarks suggests there is community laundry at all, paid or otherwise.
I looked for explicit wording such as 'laundry on each floor,' 'laundry room on every floor,' or similar phrases. The remarks instead mention an in-unit washer/dryer in one listing, which does not indicate community laundry on every floor.
Parking is consistently confirmed across the listings, with multiple remarks explicitly stating assigned parking stalls and two-stall coverage in one unit. This looks strong and not like a copy-paste checkbox issue because the remarks repeat parking details in several separate listings.
No analysis available
Covered parking is supported by direct listing language, including one remark stating "1-covered parking stall is included." While not every listing mentions covered parking, the repeated parking descriptions and the MLS coverage data support that the building offers covered stalls for some units.
The listings say things like "1 assigned parking stall" and "1-covered parking stall is included," which confirms parking is included but does not establish that it is deeded. I found no wording indicating owned/deeded parking.
No analysis available
I searched for references to a parking fee, monthly parking charge, or parking rental and found none. The remarks describe included parking stalls but do not mention any separate parking cost.
Guest parking is directly mentioned in one listing, which says "the building features guest parking" and another notes "both guest and street parking available." This suggests guest parking is an available building feature, though it appears to be less consistently reported than general parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for "parking waitlist," "parking waiting list," or similar phrasing and found nothing. The remarks mention parking availability, but not any waitlist system.
No analysis available
The remarks directly mention a 'FOB operated elevator,' which is strong evidence of electronic key/fob access. This is enough to support card/fob security for the building.
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like 'security patrol,' 'roving security,' or 'patrolled building.' The building is described as secure, but there is no explicit evidence of patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 5 current listings identify the building as concrete construction via the MLS field construction_materials='CONCRE'. None of the public remarks explicitly say 'concrete' or 'reinforced concrete', so the support comes from the consistent MLS data rather than agent remarks. Given the repeated building-level listing data, this appears to be a stable feature rather than copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for short-term rental indicators such as "STR allowed," "TVU," "NUC," or "vacation rental" and found none. With no evidence that short-term rentals are permitted, this is treated as not allowed based on the public remarks.
I looked for references to hotel rental pools, hotel-managed rental programs, or hotel-brand pool participation and found none. Since there is also no evidence that STR is allowed, this must remain false.
I searched for wording like "mandatory hotel pool," "must participate," or "cannot opt out" and found nothing. With no sign of an STR or hotel rental pool program, mandatory participation is not supported by the remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold language such as "lease expires 2050," "land lease to 2065," "ground lease ends," or any renewal/extension date and found none. Because no lease-expiry year is stated, this remains unknown.
I searched the public remarks for phrases such as "VA approved," "VA financing," and "VA loans accepted" and found nothing. With no explicit mention, there is no evidence that the building is VA loan approved.
The remarks directly state that the building is insured, which supports full building insurance/walls-in coverage. This is a strong explicit mention repeated across the listings. Confidence is high because the wording is direct and unambiguous.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for fire/life safety evaluation language such as FLSE passed, fire safety certified, and passed fire inspection, but found nothing explicit. The building is described as secure, meticulously maintained, and insured, but that is not the same as a documented FLSE pass. With no direct evidence, this is treated as not confirmed.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the four public remark blocks mention a city or downtown view; instead they reference lanai, mauka trade winds, and building amenities. Only 1 of 4 MLS view_descriptions lists 'CITY', suggesting a likely agent checkbox on a single unit rather than a confirmed building feature. Given the absence of corroborating remarks and no prior high-confidence history, city view is omitted for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunset views appear to be available in some units, based on MLS view_descriptions showing SUNSET in 2 of 5 listings. None of the public remarks explicitly call out sunset, evening sun, or western exposure, so this is moderate evidence rather than strong confirmation. The presence of a NONE view in one listing suggests the feature is unit-specific, not universal.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit statements like 'fireworks view,' 'watch fireworks from lanai,' or 'see fireworks from the unit.' The remarks discuss the lanai, trade winds, and location, but do not mention fireworks visibility.
No analysis available
The building is currently marked with RESMAN in 5 out of 5 MLS listings, which strongly indicates an on-site resident manager. None of the public remarks explicitly mention a resident manager, so this appears to come from the MLS amenity data rather than agent prose. Because the checkbox is consistent across all current listings, it is likely a real building feature rather than a one-off copy/paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.