University Towers
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
University Towers
Building Overview
University Towers in McCully-Moiliili, concrete construction (1964); pets and short-term rentals not allowed, per MLS data.
About University Towers
University Towers is a condominium building located in the McCully-Moiliili neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1964 and is of concrete construction.
Key policies for the property include that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not allowed, based on MLS data. No onsite management company is listed in the provided MLS information.
Additional details such as unit sizes, parking, maintenance fees, amenities, or management contact are not included in the supplied MLS data. Based on MLS data; buyers should verify all information independently with the listing agent or property manager.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
The remarks mention the building is suitable for 'owner-occupants or investors' but give no numeric owner-occupancy percentage. Per rules, we will not assign a percentage without an explicit numeric statement; searched for phrases like 'owner occupied' with a percent and found none.
The public remarks confirm the building has at least one elevator ("FOB operated elevator") but do not provide a numeric count. Per rules, we will not guess a number without an explicit statement. Searched remarks for phrases like '4 elevators', 'four elevators', or 'multiple elevators' and found none.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
2 of 4 current listings include OTCOEX in the association_fee_includes suggesting common area electricity/building power is included. Remarks (0/4) do not explicitly state 'common area electricity' or 'building power included', so this is an implied signal across agent-entered MLS fields rather than explicit confirmation in remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the 4 listings include HOTWAT in the association_fee_includes (0/4), while 2 listings explicitly list WTRHTR (water heater) in unit inclusions, which strongly implies hot water is supplied by individual unit heaters and not included in HOA maintenance fees. Given the unchecked HOTWAT boxes across listings and lack of remarks asserting hot water inclusion, hot water included is set to false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All four current listings have SEWER checked in their association_fee_includes (4/4), indicating sewer is included in maintenance fees per MLS entries. However, none of the public remarks explicitly state 'sewer included' so this assessment relies on consistent agent-entered MLS fields rather than explicit language in remarks.
All four listings list WATER in association_fee_includes (4/4), suggesting water fees are included in the maintenance. Remarks (0/4) do not explicitly reference 'water included' or 'water in HOA', so this determination is driven by consistent MLS entries rather than explicit remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for phrases like 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', or 'bike and surfboard storage'. The remarks do not reference any surfboard storage, so there is no evidence this amenity exists.
No analysis available
All 4 current MLS listings have the TRACHU amenity checked, but none of the public remarks mention a 'trash chute', 'garbage chute', or 'refuse chute'. Because this feature is newly present only in MLS checkboxes (and absent from remarks), the evidence is mixed: MLS data implies the building has a trash chute, but agent copy/paste is possible, so confidence is moderate.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Checked for phrases like 'salt water pool' or 'saltwater pool'. No pool is indicated in the building context and remarks contain no pool references, so pool_salt is set to false and retained with low confidence.
All four current MLS listings include WASHER/DRYER in the inclusions (4/4). One listing's remarks explicitly say 'washer/dryer in unit'; the other remarks do not mention laundry but the consistent checklist across multiple listings suggests this feature is available in some units rather than an isolated entry error.
No analysis available
Looked for terms such as 'coin laundry', 'paid laundry', 'card operated', or 'quarters'. The remarks do not mention any community laundry (paid or otherwise), so there is no evidence of paid community laundry.
Searched for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'laundry room on every floor', or 'floor-by-floor laundry'. Remarks instead mention 'washer/dryer in unit' and do not describe any community laundry facilities on each floor, so there is no evidence this feature exists.
Parking is consistently indicated across all 4 listings and the MLS checkbox data, with remarks stating '1 assigned parking stall', 'ONE PARKING stall', and '1-covered parking stall' and noting guest/street parking. Evidence is strong and consistent across multiple listings/agents, so the building offers parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The public remarks explicitly state a single assigned/covered parking stall is included with the unit ('1 assigned parking stall', '1-covered parking stall is included'), which indicates the parking is provided with the unit. Based on this language in the remarks, parking_deeded is set to true with high confidence.
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like 'parking fee', 'monthly parking charge', or 'parking rental' but found none. Without explicit mention, the monthly parking fee is unknown (null).
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for 'parking waitlist' or similar language and found no references. Absence of any mention leads to a false value with medium-low confidence.
No analysis available
Searched for 'key card access', 'fob access', 'card reader', or similar. The explicit phrase 'FOB operated elevator' provides strong evidence the building uses card/fob electronic access.
No analysis available
Looked for language such as 'security patrol' or 'patrolled building'. The remarks mention the building is 'secure' but provide no specific reference to a patrol service, so there is no evidence a security patrol exists.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 4 current listings list construction_materials='CONCRE' (4/4). Public remarks for the units do not mention 'concrete', 'reinforced concrete', or similar language, so the concrete designation is based on unanimous MLS checkbox entries across multiple listings rather than explicit agent remarks; this is suggestive but not fully confirmed.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for 'short-term rental', 'vacation rental', 'TVU', 'NUC', '30-day minimum', or similar terms and found none. With no evidence in the remarks, STR is set to false with medium-low confidence.
I searched for 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel rental program', or references to hotel management and found none. Because STR is not indicated as allowed, hotel-pool participation is set to false.
I looked for wording like 'mandatory hotel pool', 'required to participate', or 'must be in rental program' and found no references. Given no STR allowance, mandatory pool is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for explicit leasehold language and a four-digit lease expiry year (e.g., 'lease expires 2050' or 'land lease to 2065') but found nothing. Therefore the lease expiry year is unknown (null).
I searched the remarks for phrases like 'VA approved', 'VA financing', or 'VA loans accepted' and found none. With no evidence in the remarks, VA financing approval is set to false with medium-low confidence.
The public remarks explicitly state the building is insured ("INSURED building"), which supports that the HOA carries building insurance/walls-in coverage. This is recorded as true with high confidence based on the explicit language in the remarks.
No analysis available
There is no explicit statement that the building has passed a fire/life safety evaluation. I searched for terms like 'FLSE passed', 'fire safety certified', and 'passed fire inspection' and found no matches, so the field is set to false with medium confidence (absence of mention).
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the four public remark blocks mention a city or downtown view; instead they reference lanai, mauka trade winds, and building amenities. Only 1 of 4 MLS view_descriptions lists 'CITY', suggesting a likely agent checkbox on a single unit rather than a confirmed building feature. Given the absence of corroborating remarks and no prior high-confidence history, city view is omitted for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for explicit mentions like 'fireworks view', 'watch fireworks from lanai', or 'see fireworks from the unit'. No such language appears in the remarks, so there is no evidence the building has fireworks views.
No analysis available
All 4 current listings include the RESMAN amenity in MLS checkboxes, but none of the public remarks mention 'resident manager', 'on‑site manager', or similar phrases. This pattern suggests the feature is present in MLS data (4/4) but lacks corroborating agent remarks and may be copy‑pasted; moderate confidence (0.75) is assigned and owner/manager verification is recommended.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.