University Towers
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
University Towers
Building Overview
University Towers in McCully-Moiliili, concrete construction (1964); pets and short-term rentals not allowed, per MLS data.
About University Towers
University Towers is a condominium building located in the McCully-Moiliili neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1964 and is of concrete construction.
Key policies for the property include that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not allowed, based on MLS data. No onsite management company is listed in the provided MLS information.
Additional details such as unit sizes, parking, maintenance fees, amenities, or management contact are not included in the supplied MLS data. Based on MLS data; buyers should verify all information independently with the listing agent or property manager.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks mention that the unit may suit 'owner-occupants or investors,' but this does not establish the building's owner-occupancy rate. No numeric percentage or qualifying ownership statement was provided, so the value remains unknown.
The listings confirm elevator access but provide no numeric elevator count. Because the current value is 1 and no remarks contradict it, it is retained with low confidence; there is no evidence in the remarks to confirm or deny that exact count.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Four of six current listings include OTCOEX in the association fee inclusions, which moderately supports inclusion of common-area expenses or building power. No remarks mention common-area electricity, so the evidence is primarily MLS checkbox data and may partly reflect agent copy-paste.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No current listings include HOTWAT, and several list WTRHTR, which is a strong sign the units have their own water heaters rather than building-supplied hot water. The remarks do not describe hot water as included, so the best reading is that hot water is not a fee-covered building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All six current listings include SEWER in the association fee inclusions. No public remarks quote sewer inclusion, but the unanimous agreement across multiple listings strongly supports that sewer is included in the maintenance fee.
All six current listings include WATER in the association fee inclusions. While the remarks do not specifically state that water is included, the consistent checkbox across all listings is strong evidence of a building-level feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks do not mention surfboard storage, board storage, surf storage, or combined bike and surfboard storage. No public-remarks evidence supports this feature.
No analysis available
Zero of the 6 provided listings mention a trash chute, garbage chute, or refuse chute in their remarks. Nevertheless, TRACHU is checked in all 6 current MLS listings, consistently indicating that the building likely has a trash chute, though the lack of descriptive remarks limits confidence and leaves some possibility of copied checkbox data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks contain no reference to a saltwater, salt, saline, or other swimming pool. The current building context indicates that the building has no pool, so a saltwater pool is not supported.
Laundry in unit is strongly supported. Historical MLS data showed washer/dryer included across all current listings, and one public remark explicitly says "washer/dryer in unit." This looks like consistent building-level data rather than a one-off agent error.
No analysis available
The remarks do not reference coin-operated, card-operated, paid, or fee-based community laundry. There is also no mention of shared laundry facilities generally.
The remarks do not mention laundry on each floor, laundry rooms on every floor, or floor-by-floor laundry. Therefore, there is no public-remarks evidence that this feature exists.
Parking is consistently confirmed across the listings, with multiple remarks explicitly stating assigned parking stalls and two-stall coverage in one unit. This looks strong and not like a copy-paste checkbox issue because the remarks repeat parking details in several separate listings.
Assigned or included parking is supported by 4 of 6 current MLS records and multiple listing remarks. Key phrases include '1 assigned parking stall,' 'Includes two parking stalls,' and repeated references to a unit with one parking stall, indicating this is a building-level offering rather than an isolated checkbox.
Covered parking remains strongly supported by the prior High-confidence evidence and current MLS data in 3 of 6 listings. The explicit phrase '1-covered parking stall is included' directly confirms the feature, while the evidence is consistent with covered parking being available to at least some units.
The listings describe parking as “assigned parking stall,” “two parking stalls,” and “1-covered parking stall is included.” These statements establish parking availability but do not confirm deeded or separately owned parking.
No analysis available
I searched for parking fees, monthly parking charges, additional parking costs, and parking rental language. No parking fee is mentioned; the remarks instead describe stalls as included or assigned.
Guest parking is directly confirmed in at least two listing remarks, including 'the building features guest parking' and 'both guest and street parking available.' This matches the prior High-confidence assessment and current GUEST indicators in 2 of 6 listings, providing strong building-level evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for parking waitlist, waiting list, and similar language. The listings mention assigned stalls, guest parking, and street parking, but provide no evidence of a parking waitlist.
No analysis available
Multiple listings describe controlled elevator access, including an explicitly "FOB operated elevator" and a "keyed elevator." This is strong evidence of card, fob, or keyed electronic access security.
No analysis available
The listings use general terms such as "secured building" and "secure, well-maintained building," but do not mention security patrol, roving security, or a patrol service. General security wording is insufficient to establish patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 6 current listings identify the building as concrete through the MLS construction-materials field. None of the public remarks explicitly mention concrete construction, but the consistent building-level MLS data strongly supports this feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks refer generally to investors and rental potential but do not mention short-term rentals, STR, TVU, NUC, vacation rentals, or a minimum rental period. Therefore, public remarks provide no evidence that short-term rentals are allowed.
No remarks reference a hotel rental pool, hotel-managed rental program, or participation in a branded hotel pool. Because STR allowance is not established, this feature is false under the prerequisite rule.
I searched for mandatory hotel pool, required participation, must rent, and cannot opt out language, but found none. Since STR allowance is not established, mandatory hotel-pool participation must be false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold, ground lease, lease expiration, renewal, and extension language, including specific years. No applicable lease-expiry date or renewal year was found.
The remarks do not mention VA approval, VA financing, or acceptance of VA loans. Based on the absence of these indicators, there is no public-remark evidence that the building is VA approved.
Multiple public remarks directly state that the building is insured. This strongly supports building-level insurance, although the remarks do not specifically use the phrase 'walls-in coverage.'
No analysis available
The remarks describe the building as secured, well-maintained, and insured, but do not provide evidence of a passed fire/life safety evaluation. This is treated as false with medium-low confidence because the feature is not mentioned.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the four public remark blocks mention a city or downtown view; instead they reference lanai, mauka trade winds, and building amenities. Only 1 of 4 MLS view_descriptions lists 'CITY', suggesting a likely agent checkbox on a single unit rather than a confirmed building feature. Given the absence of corroborating remarks and no prior high-confidence history, city view is omitted for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunset views appear to be available in some units, with 2 of 6 current listings marking SUNSET in the view descriptions. However, 2 listings mark views as NONE and none of the six public remarks mention sunset, western exposure, or evening sun, so the evidence is unit-specific and not consistently documented.
No analysis available
The listings mention private lanais and convenient proximity to Waikiki and other areas, but do not state that units or the building have Friday night fireworks views. No qualifying fireworks-from-the-unit language was found.
No analysis available
0 of 6 public remarks mention a resident manager or on-site manager. However, RESMAN appears in 6 of 6 current MLS listings, reinforcing the prior high-confidence conclusion that the building has a resident manager, though the checkbox evidence may reflect copied MLS data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.