Uluwehi at Hoopili
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Uluwehi at Hoopili
Building Overview
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public remarks (0 of 10 listings) state that hot water is included. Eight listings explicitly list WTRHTR (water heater) in inclusions, indicating individual unit water heaters rather than building-supplied hot water. Given the MLS checkbox is unchecked across listings and no remarks counter this, there is strong evidence that hot water is not included in the maintenance fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 10 current listings include the DGPRK amenity flag, but none of the public remarks mention a dog park or pet area. Given prior Low historical confidence and the complete absence of descriptive remarks, the evidence is weak and likely reflects agents checking the amenity box rather than documented facility details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
8 of 10 current listings have the POOL amenity box checked, but 0 listings' public remarks mention a pool (no phrases like 'pool' or 'swimming pool'). Historical confidence was Low/absent and there is no owner/manager/site-visit verification; the most likely explanation is agents copying amenities without verification, so the building is reported as not having a pool.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 10 current listings include washer/dryer in the inclusions and each public remark explicitly mentions 'washer/dryer' (e.g., 'modern appliances ... and washer/dryer'). This consistent, repeated language across multiple unit listings and agents provides strong evidence that some units in the building have in-unit laundry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 10 listings have parking features checked in the MLS (e.g., OPEN, GARAGE, COVERED), but none of the public remarks mention parking or parking stalls. Evidence relies entirely on MLS checkbox data across multiple listings and lacks corroborating agent remarks, so parking is included with moderate confidence (0.70).
All 10 listings include 'ASSIGN' in parking_features, however none of the public remarks mention 'assigned', 'reserved', 'deeded', or 'designated' stalls. Given the lack of corroborating remarks and prior low confidence, assigned parking is recorded but with low confidence (0.40) due to possible checkbox copy/paste.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 10 current listings include ACSPL in inclusions and every public remark repeatedly states "Split air conditioning" (e.g., "Split air conditioning and modern appliances..."). The evidence is consistent across multiple listings/agents and aligns with the MLS checkbox, so we conclude some units in the building have split (ductless/mini-split) AC systems.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Eight of ten current MLS listings indicate steel-frame construction (STEFRA), but none of the public remarks mention 'steel frame' or 'steel frame construction'. This is MLS-checkbox level evidence (possibly copy/paste) so the feature is included with moderate confidence rather than confirmed by agent remarks or historical records.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 10 current MLS listings list wood-frame construction (WOOFRA). None of the public remarks explicitly say 'wood frame' or 'wood frame construction', but the uniform MLS checkbox across multiple agents/buildings gives strong evidence the building is wood frame. Remarks appear copy-pasted and omit structure type, but consistent MLS data (10/10) yields high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 10 current MLS listings list FIRSPR in amenities, but none of the public remarks (0/10) include phrases like 'fire sprinkler' or 'sprinkler system.' Evidence is consistent across agent-filled checkboxes but lacks explicit descriptive confirmation in remarks, so the feature is included with moderate confidence (MLS-only support).
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings (0 of 10) mention sunset views or related phrases. All 10 current listings have View = NONE in MLS and public remarks are silent on western or evening views, with no agent remarks claiming a recent change. Given the consistent absence across multiple listings and the prior low confidence, we conclude the building does not offer sunset views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.