Ulana Ward Village
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Ulana Ward Village
Building Overview
Ulana Ward Village in Ward Village — concrete building (2025) with fitness center and BBQ area.
About Ulana Ward Village
Ulana Ward Village is a concrete building located in Ward Village, completed in 2025. Size and unit mix are not provided in the available MLS data.
The building's listed amenities include a fitness center, a BBQ area, and a resident manager. Air conditioning is noted as window units.
Parking is described as covered and assigned with guest parking available. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed. Management company is listed as Unknown. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all details with the listing agent or management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for owner-occupancy percentages and descriptive phrases like '80% owner occupied' or 'highly owner occupied,' but found nothing. The remarks note that the buyer must occupy this specific unit for five years and that it is 'not intended for investors,' but that does not establish the building's owner-occupancy rate.
I searched the public remarks for explicit elevator references such as a count ('4 elevators') or wording like 'multiple elevators,' but found none. The building is described as a 'newly built highrise,' which suggests elevators likely exist, but the remarks do not confirm how many.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
1 listing explicitly states 'tv cable ...' in the maintenance fees; this is a direct mention and confirms cable TV is included in the association fees. Evidence comes from the listing's public remarks and matches one of the MLS checkbox entries.
The building-level remarks support this feature through the phrase "include: common area maintenance," and the shared amenities described suggest common-area power is part of the operating costs. Current MLS data is partially consistent (2/4 with OTCOEX), indicating this is likely a real inclusion rather than a pure copy-paste artifact.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no evidence in the remarks that hot water is included, and the consistent WTRHTR inclusion across all available MLS records is a strong indicator against it. This looks like a stable building pattern rather than an agent checkbox issue.
1 listing explicitly states 'internet' is included in the maintenance fees; this direct mention aligns with one MLS checkbox and provides strong evidence the building offers internet included in association fees.
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is not supported by the public remarks, and MLS checkbox usage is mixed. Because the evidence is inconsistent and no agent explicitly calls out sewer in the fee, this is best treated as not included.
No analysis available
BBQ facilities are strongly confirmed. The remarks mention "BBQs" as part of the common spaces, and the MLS data matches across all 4/4 listings, indicating stable building-level amenity information.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The MLS data strongly indicates a dog park or pet area, with DGPRK checked in all 4/4 listings. However, there is no supporting language in the public remarks, so this is supported mainly by the MLS amenity data rather than direct description.
No remarks explicitly reference a doorman or lobby attendant; the listing only lists 'on-site management' and staff-related comments. The MLS amenity checkbox is inconsistently used (1 of 2 listings), indicating the doorman flag may be agent-entered rather than verified.
Strong evidence supports an exercise room/fitness center for the building. Public remarks directly say "fitness center," and the MLS amenity checkbox is present in all 4/4 listings, suggesting this is a consistent building feature rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
A meeting-room-type amenity appears likely. The public remarks point to shared workspaces, which aligns with a conference/meeting room concept, and the MLS checkbox is present in all 4/4 listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is moderate evidence for a recreation area. While the remarks do not use the exact phrase "recreation area," they do reference shared common spaces, a playground, and entertainment areas, and 3/4 MLS listings include the RECARE amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Trash chute amenity is strongly indicated by the MLS data, with TRACHU appearing in all 4/4 listings. The public remarks are silent on this feature, so confidence comes from consistent listing metadata rather than narrative confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
In-unit laundry is strongly supported by MLS inclusions: 4 of 4 current listings include washer/dryer. No public remarks mention laundry, but there is no conflicting evidence, so this appears to be a stable building feature rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Assigned parking is clearly supported. The public remarks directly state that "The unit has an assigned parking stall," and current MLS data also shows ASSIGN in parking features. This is strong building-level evidence rather than a one-off inference.
Covered parking appears to be a building-level feature based on current MLS checkbox data across all current listings. The public remarks do not spell out "covered" or "garage," but the MLS consistency is strong enough to support inclusion. This looks like consistent listing data rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
The listing confirms an assigned parking stall, but does not say the stall is deeded, owned with the unit, or included in the deed. Because deeded ownership was not explicitly stated, this remains false.
No analysis available
I looked for any explicit parking fee, monthly parking charge, or additional parking rental cost, and found none. The listing only says the unit has an assigned parking stall and lots of guest parking.
Guest parking is supported by both MLS codes (2/2 listings include GUEST) and the remark 'Lots of guest parking.' Multiple sources align, so confidence is high.
Secured-entry parking is supported by current MLS data across all current listings. While the public remarks do not explicitly mention gated or card-access parking, the repeated SECENT checkbox data is consistent and strong. This suggests a stable building feature rather than a one-off agent entry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for references to a parking waitlist, joining a list for parking, or parking shortages requiring a waitlist, but found nothing. The remarks instead indicate the unit has an assigned stall and guest parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings' remarks explicitly mention a security guard or 24/7 security; the provided remark only notes 'on-site management' and 'congenial staff.' The MLS checkbox appears inconsistently (1 of 2 listings), suggesting possible agent copy/paste rather than a confirmed building service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window AC is supported by the current MLS data across all available listings (4/4 with ACWIUN checked). Public remarks do not mention A/C, but the repeated MLS inclusion suggests this is a consistent building/unit feature rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
Concrete construction is strongly supported by the MLS record: all current listings flag CONCRE in construction_materials. The public remarks do not explicitly say "concrete," but the building is described as a "newly built highrise," which is consistent with a concrete tower.
1 of 1 current MLS listings indicate double wall construction via the DOUWAL construction_materials flag. No remarks explicitly describe the wall type, but there is no contrary evidence that would undermine the MLS construction data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks clearly impose owner-occupancy requirements and explicitly state the property is not intended for investors, which indicates short-term rentals are not allowed. This is strong evidence against STR use in the building.
Because the remarks indicate the property is owner-occupied and not intended for investors, hotel pool participation is not applicable. No hotel rental program, managed hotel, or similar pool was mentioned.
There is no indication of any mandatory rental pool arrangement in the remarks. Since short-term rentals are not allowed here, a mandatory hotel pool would not be possible.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold language such as "lease expires [year]," "ground lease ends," or renewal/extension dates, but nothing was stated. The remarks mention deed restrictions and housing trust terms, not a land lease expiration year.
I looked for explicit references to VA loan approval or VA financing in the public remarks and found none. Since there is no direct statement, this cannot be confirmed from the listing text.
The remarks explicitly say maintenance fees include 'master insurance,' which indicates building-level insurance coverage. This is strong evidence that the HOA provides full or walls-in style insurance coverage.
No analysis available
I looked for terms related to fire/life safety evaluation passing, certification, or inspection approval, but there were no such mentions. Because this is a boolean feature and there is no current verified value provided, I mark it as false with only moderate confidence based on absence of evidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Across 1 current MLS listing, none mention ocean, water, or Pacific views in the view_description. With no supporting remarks or historical evidence, there is no indication that this building offers ocean-view units, so view_ocean is marked false with moderate confidence pending future corroboration.
No analysis available
No analysis available
City views appear to be available in the building based on MLS view data: 3 of 4 current listings list CITY. The public remarks are silent on views, so this looks more like listing-level MLS information than repeated agent copy in remarks, but the current data still supports view_city = true.
Coastline views are supported only by limited current MLS data: 1 of 4 listings lists COASTL. Because the remarks make no mention of views, this is weaker evidence than city views, but it is enough to indicate the building has at least some coastline-view units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
In the only available MLS listing, the view_description does not mention sunrise views, morning sun, or eastern exposure. Given the lack of any explicit or implied references across listings, view_sunrise is set to false with moderate confidence until additional listings provide contrary evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The evidence strongly supports resident/on-site management. One current remark explicitly states "On-site management," and the historical MLS data shows 4/4 listings with RESMAN in amenities. This looks consistent across listings rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.