Ulana Ward Village
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Ulana Ward Village
Building Overview
Ulana Ward Village in Ward Village — concrete building (2025) with fitness center and BBQ area.
About Ulana Ward Village
Ulana Ward Village is a concrete building located in Ward Village, completed in 2025. Size and unit mix are not provided in the available MLS data.
The building's listed amenities include a fitness center, a BBQ area, and a resident manager. Air conditioning is noted as window units.
Parking is described as covered and assigned with guest parking available. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed. Management company is listed as Unknown. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all details with the listing agent or management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
The remarks explicitly require owner-occupancy by buyers (occupy first 5 years; not intended for investors), but no percentage (e.g., '80% owner occupied') is given. Because owner_occupancy expects a numeric percentage and none is stated, the percentage is unknown.
The remarks describe a 'newly built highrise' but do not state a number of elevators or use phrases implying a specific count. I searched the public remarks for explicit counts and common phrasing indicating multiple elevators and found none. With no numeric statement, the elevator count is unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
1 listing explicitly states 'tv cable ...' in the maintenance fees; this is a direct mention and confirms cable TV is included in the association fees. Evidence comes from the listing's public remarks and matches one of the MLS checkbox entries.
The public remark mentions 'common area maintenance' but also says 'Water & electricity are submetered & charged to the owner,' which implies building electricity (including common area electric) is not covered. Only 0/1 listing explicitly addresses electric billing, and MLS checkbox presence appears inconsistent across listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings list HOTWAT in association fees and both listings include WTRHTR in inclusions; the public remarks confirm 'Water & electricity are submetered & charged to the owner.' Strong evidence across remarks and inclusions indicates hot water is not included in the maintenance fee.
1 listing explicitly states 'internet' is included in the maintenance fees; this direct mention aligns with one MLS checkbox and provides strong evidence the building offers internet included in association fees.
No analysis available
No public remarks mention 'sewer included' while MLS has inconsistent checkbox usage (1/2). Lack of explicit mention across remarks suggests sewer is probably not included, but evidence is weak and inconsistent across listings/agents.
No analysis available
1 listing explicitly mentions "BBQs" among the common spaces ("...shared workspaces, & BBQs"). This direct mention in remarks plus MLS checkbox support constitutes strong evidence the building offers BBQ/grilling facilities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS data (2/2 listings) includes DGPRK, but the single public remarks text does not mention a dog park, dog run, or pet exercise area. Given the absence of remarks and potential agent copy/paste, confidence is low despite the MLS checks.
No remarks explicitly reference a doorman or lobby attendant; the listing only lists 'on-site management' and staff-related comments. The MLS amenity checkbox is inconsistently used (1 of 2 listings), indicating the doorman flag may be agent-entered rather than verified.
1 listing explicitly mentions a "fitness center" ("Well designed common spaces include a fitness center"). This is a direct confirmation across public remarks and is consistent with the MLS EXEROO amenity checked in both listings, so evidence is strong.
No analysis available
Remarks reference "shared workspaces" and "entertainment areas," suggesting communal work/meeting spaces. Both MLS listings have the MEEROO amenity checked; the evidence is moderate (implied by wording rather than an explicit 'meeting room' phrase).
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Remarks list "entertainment areas" and a "playground," which imply shared recreation/common amenity space. One of two MLS listings also has RECARE checked; evidence is moderate but primarily implied from phrasing rather than an explicit label 'recreation area.'
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Both MLS listings include the TRACHU amenity, but the public remarks make no mention of a trash chute or refuse system. With no remarks confirming and the possibility of checkbox copy/paste, confidence remains low.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS inclusions list a washer/dryer for 2 of 2 current listings, indicating some units have in-unit laundry. The single public remark supplied does not mention in-unit laundry, so evidence is primarily from MLS checkbox data across multiple listings (could be agent copy/paste, but multiple listings list it). Buyers seeking in-unit laundry would likely find units in this building that offer it.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Assigned parking is clearly indicated: 2/2 current MLS listings include ASSIGN and the remarks explicitly say 'The unit has an assigned parking stall.' Evidence is consistent across MLS data and agent remarks, so confidence is high.
MLS parking_features indicate covered/garage parking in both current listings (2/2), but the agent remarks do not mention garage/carport. This suggests covered parking is likely but is only implied by MLS codes rather than described in remarks, so confidence is moderate.
The public remarks explicitly note an 'assigned parking stall', which confirms assigned parking but does not indicate the stall is deeded/owned with the unit. Because 'deeded' is not mentioned, this is reported as false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
Searched the remarks for 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', 'parking rental', or similar phrases and found none. Without any explicit parking fee information, the monthly parking fee is unknown.
Guest parking is supported by both MLS codes (2/2 listings include GUEST) and the remark 'Lots of guest parking.' Multiple sources align, so confidence is high.
MLS data indicates secured entry for parking (SECENT) across current listings (2/2), but agent remarks do not describe a gate or card access. The evidence is primarily from MLS codes, so confidence is moderate.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Looked for phrases like 'parking waitlist', 'waiting list for parking', or 'join waitlist' and found no references. Given no mention of a waitlist and the presence of assigned and guest parking, this is reported as false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings' remarks explicitly mention a security guard or 24/7 security; the provided remark only notes 'on-site management' and 'congenial staff.' The MLS checkbox appears inconsistently (1 of 2 listings), suggesting possible agent copy/paste rather than a confirmed building service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Both current MLS listings (2/2) have the ACWIUN inclusion checked, indicating wall/window air conditioning units. Public remarks supplied do not mention AC details, so the indication comes from MLS checkboxes (possible agent copy/paste) and is therefore moderate but not fully confirmed by agent remarks or site descriptions.
Both current MLS listings (2 of 2) for this building indicate concrete construction via the CONCRE construction_materials flag. Public remarks for the provided listing do not explicitly state construction type (no phrases like 'concrete' or 'reinforced concrete'), so the conclusion relies on consistent MLS checkbox data across multiple agents rather than explicit remark confirmation.
1 of 1 current MLS listings indicate double wall construction via the DOUWAL construction_materials flag. No remarks explicitly describe the wall type, but there is no contrary evidence that would undermine the MLS construction data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The public remarks impose owner-occupancy and explicitly say the property is not intended for investors, which strongly indicates short-term rentals are not permitted. Set to false with high confidence.
Because STRs are disallowed by the owner-occupancy requirement, hotel rental pool participation cannot apply and is set to false with high confidence.
With STRs disallowed in the building, there is no possibility of a mandatory hotel rental pool; set to false with high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched the remarks for explicit 4-digit lease expiry years and phrases like 'lease expires', 'land lease to', 'leasehold expiring', or renewal language. No land lease or lease-expiry information is present, so the expiry year is unknown.
Searched the public remarks for phrases like 'VA approved', 'VA financing', or 'VA loans accepted' and found no references. Because there is no mention and no explicit current value provided, this is reported as false with medium confidence.
The public remarks explicitly list 'master insurance' as included in the maintenance fees, which indicates building-level ('walls-in') insurance provided by the HOA. Because the feature is explicitly mentioned in the remarks, this is set to true with high confidence.
No analysis available
The public remarks do not reference any fire/life safety evaluation (FLSE) or similar certification. When no mention exists and there is no current documented true value, the absence suggests the feature is not asserted—so set to false with medium confidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Across 1 current MLS listing, none mention ocean, water, or Pacific views in the view_description. With no supporting remarks or historical evidence, there is no indication that this building offers ocean-view units, so view_ocean is marked false with moderate confidence pending future corroboration.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings (0 of 2) mention city or downtown views and the provided public remarks make no reference to city/cityscape views. Current MLS view_descriptions do not list CITY, there is no prior high-confidence record of this feature, and agent remarks contain no supporting language (e.g., "city view" or "downtown view"). Therefore the building is marked as not offering city views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
In the only available MLS listing, the view_description does not mention sunrise views, morning sun, or eastern exposure. Given the lack of any explicit or implied references across listings, view_sunrise is set to false with moderate confidence until additional listings provide contrary evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Both current MLS listings (2/2) list RESMAN and the public remarks explicitly state 'On-site management.' The explicit phrase in the remarks plus consistent MLS amenity checkboxes across multiple listings indicates a resident/on-site manager is present at the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.