The Residence at Makiki
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
The Residence at Makiki
Building Overview
The Residence at Makiki in Makiki-Tantalus; concrete construction with mountain views, built in 2016.
About The Residence at Makiki
The Residence at Makiki is located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood and was built in 2016. According to available records, the building is concrete construction and offers mountain views.
Key features noted in MLS data include permitted pets and a policy that short-term rentals are not allowed. The listing data does not provide additional amenity details beyond these items and the reported views.
Parking is listed as available, covered, assigned, with guest parking. Management company information is unknown in the MLS data. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all building details, policies, fees, and any additional amenities with the listing agent or management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like '80% owner occupied,' 'majority owner occupied,' or 'highly owner occupied,' but found no such language. The listings describe the building as modern, secure, and pet-friendly, but provide no evidence about the share of owner-occupied units.
I searched the remarks for explicit elevator counts such as '4 elevators,' 'multiple elevators,' or a written number, but found none. The only elevator-related text is a passing location reference, which does not confirm how many elevators the building has.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Five of eight listings currently show the common-area electricity/OTCOEX fee inclusion, which suggests this is a building-level maintenance item. None of the public remarks explicitly mention it, so this appears to be supported mainly by MLS checkbox data rather than agent descriptions.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the provided listings, there are no remarks indicating sewer is included in the maintenance fee. With 0/8 current MLS listings checking SEWER and no supporting language from agents, there is no evidence this building includes sewer in the HOA/maintenance fee.
None of the public remarks explicitly say water is included in the maintenance fee, and only 1 of 8 listings has WATER checked in MLS. Given the strong pattern of detailed amenity descriptions elsewhere but silence on water, this appears unconfirmed and likely copy-paste or agent-dependent rather than a verified building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings confirm patio/deck-type amenities for this building. At least 3 remarks explicitly describe an enclosed/private lanai or fenced-in patio, suggesting this is a real building/unit amenity rather than a copy-paste checkbox. The evidence is strong and repeated across several agents/listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public remarks describe a recreation area or similar shared amenity in The Residence at Makiki. Only 2 of 8 listings have the RECARE amenity flag, and none of the remarks provide supporting detail, so the evidence is weak and inconsistent. This appears more like MLS checkbox noise than a confirmed building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is strongly supported: 4+ listings explicitly mention an "assigned private storage locker" or "assigned storage locker." This aligns with the current MLS data showing storage in most listings (7/8 amenities and 6/8 unit features), so the feature appears to be reliably available in the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence across the listings supports in-unit laundry. 7 of 8 current MLS entries include washer/dryer in inclusions, and multiple remarks explicitly confirm it with phrases like 'full-size in-unit washer and dryer' and 'stacked washer/dryer.' This appears consistent across agents rather than a one-off copy/paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Assigned parking is strongly supported across the remarks. At least 3 listings explicitly mention assigned parking, including phrases like "assigned parking stall," "extra large assigned parking stall," and "1 full sized tandem parking stall for 2 vehicles," which is consistent with the MLS showing assigned parking in all 8/8 listings. The wording appears repeated across multiple listings, suggesting this is a real building feature rather than a one-off agent error.
Covered parking is clearly documented in the public remarks. At least 2 listings explicitly say "covered parking stall," and the MLS data also shows covered/garage-type parking in 6/8 listings. The evidence is consistent across multiple remarks and aligns with the current MLS pattern, so this feature should be included.
I looked for explicit deeded/owned parking language such as 'deeded stall,' 'owned stall,' or 'parking included in deed,' and none was found. The listings consistently describe assigned, covered, and tandem parking, which indicates parking exists but does not support a deeded-parking conclusion.
No analysis available
I searched for any parking cost language, including 'fee,' 'monthly charge,' 'parking rent,' or similar terms, and found nothing. The remarks confirm assigned parking, but they do not say whether there is an extra monthly parking fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for references to a parking waitlist, join-the-waitlist language, or any mention of limited parking requiring a queue, and none appeared. The listings instead describe assigned and guest parking stalls, which suggests parking is available without a documented waitlist.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings mention window AC; instead, multiple remarks say "split AC," "air conditioning," or just "A/C." Across the available remarks this appears to be a consistent copy-paste pattern describing split-system cooling, not window units, so the building should not be marked as offering window AC.
No analysis available
Double wall construction is indicated in the current MLS materials for 5 of 8 listings, which is enough to treat it as a plausible building feature. The remarks do not mention double-wall construction, so the evidence is moderate and appears to rely on MLS checkbox data rather than explicit agent descriptions.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Steel frame construction appears in the current MLS materials for 6 of 8 listings, suggesting this is a building-level construction type rather than a one-off unit attribute. None of the public remarks explicitly mention steel framing, so this is supported more by MLS consistency than by descriptive copy.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit short-term rental indicators such as 'STR permitted,' 'NUC,' 'TVU,' 'vacation rental allowed,' or minimum-stay language, and found no support for STRs. The remarks focus on standard owner-occupant condo features and approvals like VA approved and pet-friendly, but do not indicate short-term rental allowance.
I looked for hotel pool references such as hotel rental pool, managed by hotel, Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool, or similar, and found none. Since there is no evidence STR is allowed, this feature must also be false.
I searched for mandatory participation language like required rental program, cannot opt out, or must be in the pool, and found nothing. With no evidence of any hotel/STR pool and no requirement language, this is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for leasehold language such as 'lease expires,' 'ground lease,' 'leasehold,' or any 4-digit expiration year, but found nothing. The building is described as a modern condo built in 2016, but no public remarks indicate any land tenure lease expiry.
The public remarks directly and repeatedly say the building is VA approved, which is strong evidence that VA financing is accepted. No contradictory language appears in the listings.
The remarks directly state that the building is "100% insured," which is strong evidence of full HOA building insurance / walls-in coverage. This is a clear affirmative mention and does not require inference.
Fire sprinklers are confirmed across the current remarks, with one listing explicitly saying "Sprinklers installed and 100% insured." The MLS data also shows FIRSPR in 7 of 8 listings, suggesting this is a building-level feature rather than a one-off agent note.
I looked for direct fire/life safety certification language, but the remarks do not state that the building passed an FLSE or fire/life safety evaluation. Sprinklers and insurance are positive indicators, but they are not the same as an explicit safety-evaluation pass.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain view appears to be an available building-level view feature based on MLS data: 6 of 8 listings include 'MOUNTA' in the view description. None of the public remarks explicitly call out mountain, Koolau, or mauka views, so the evidence is moderate rather than explicit and may reflect MLS copy rather than repeated agent mention.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.