Terrazza
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Terrazza
Building Overview
Terrazza in Makiki-Tantalus — concrete building from 1958; pets allowed, short-term rentals not permitted.
About Terrazza
Terrazza is a condominium building located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1958 and is of concrete construction. Specific information on building size (number of units or floors) is not provided in the available MLS data.
Key features recorded in MLS data include a pet-friendly policy and a prohibition on short-term rentals. The listing data does not provide further amenity details (such as a pool, gym, or common areas), so prospective buyers should confirm available on-site features when evaluating units.
Additional details such as parking arrangements, maintenance fees, and the managing company are not specified in the MLS-derived data (management company listed as unknown). Based on MLS data, buyers should verify parking, fee, and management information with the listing agent or association before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit percentages like "80% owner occupied" as well as qualitative phrases such as "majority owner occupied" or "highly owner occupied." No such information appears in the remarks, so the owner-occupancy rate cannot be determined from this data.
I searched the public remarks for an explicit elevator count such as "4 elevators" or "multiple elevators." The listings only confirm that the building has an elevator, not how many. Because no number is provided, the elevator count remains unknown from remarks.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public remark explicitly mentions common area electricity, building power, or similar wording. Although OTCOEX appears in 12 of 18 current MLS records, the lack of any corroborating remarks suggests this is not well supported and may be a copied MLS checkbox rather than a verified building expense.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listing remarks say hot water is included in maintenance fees. Instead, multiple remarks mention 'new water heater,' 'new water heater,' or 'Solar Water Heater,' which aligns with unit-level water heaters and supports HOTWAT being false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
This feature is consistently supported across the building. The remarks repeatedly state that maintenance fees cover 'water and sewer utilities' / 'water/sewer bill,' matching the high MLS frequency (14 of 18) and indicating this is a verified building-wide inclusion.
Water inclusion is clearly supported by both MLS data and public remarks. Several listings say the monthly maintenance fee covers 'water' or 'water and sewer utilities,' and the high MLS frequency (14 of 18) suggests this is a stable building expense rather than a copy-paste error.
BBQ is supported by current remarks and MLS amenities. At least 2 listings mention it, including phrases like 'community pool & BBQ area' and 'where you can barbecue.' Evidence suggests a shared building/community feature, not just a unit-level detail.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks mention dog parks as nearby attractions, not as a building amenity. Because the text does not describe an onsite dog park, dog run, or pet area, the feature is not supported as a building-level amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple public remarks explicitly describe a lanai or covered lanai in this building (approx. 8/14 listings mention it). Key phrases include "covered lanai," "large lanai," and "covered lanai with peaceful city garden views," appearing across different agent listings—suggesting the feature is a real building amenity even though only 3/14 current MLS checkboxes list PATDEC/COVPAT.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Recreation area appears in the listing remarks, most clearly in the phrase 'community pool and recreation area.' While only one listing explicitly says it, the wording is direct and refers to a shared amenity, so it is supported.
No public remarks mention a recreation room or comparable multi-purpose/game room. The lone current MLS checkbox is not reinforced by listing text, so this feature is not supported by the remarks evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for surfboard storage, board storage, surf storage, or bike-and-surfboard storage. The listings mention general storage and bike racks only, so there is no evidence that surfboard storage is available.
No analysis available
Strong, consistent evidence that the building has a trash chute: multiple (10+) current public-remarks explicitly list 'trash chute' or 'trash chute' among building amenities (quotes include 'trash chute' and 'trash chute, elevator, and on-site manager'). Historical MLS data also showed high confidence with TRACHU checked on many listings, and the current remarks confirm the feature across different agents rather than appearing as a one-off error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The pool feature is strongly confirmed. At least 10 of the provided public remarks mention it explicitly, including phrases like "a swimming pool," "community pool and BBQ area," "saltwater pool," and "pool & street parking." The repeated references across many listings suggest this is a real shared amenity rather than copied MLS boilerplate.
No analysis available
There are multiple clear mentions that the building pool is saltwater/salt water. This is strong public-remark evidence that the pool is salt-based.
Evidence for in-unit laundry is weak and somewhat inconsistent. Public remarks overwhelmingly reference shared laundry facilities such as "community laundry" and "two laundry rooms," while only 5 of 18 current MLS entries list washer/dryer in the inclusions. This looks more like selective or copy-pasted MLS data than a clearly confirmed building feature, but it suggests the possibility that some units may include it.
Strong, consistent evidence that the building has shared laundry: at least 10 separate listing remarks explicitly mention "community laundry" or "two laundry rooms" (examples: "community laundry", "community laundry on the 1st and 2nd floors", "two on-site community laundry rooms"). Mentions appear across multiple agent listings rather than isolated copy/paste errors, supporting high confidence that shared laundry exists building-wide.
I searched for wording that the community laundry requires payment, such as coin laundry, card-operated machines, quarters, or a laundry fee. The public remarks mention community laundry rooms but do not say they are paid, so there is no direct evidence for this feature.
I looked for explicit language such as laundry on each floor, floor-by-floor laundry, or laundry rooms on every level. The remarks only mention laundry rooms on the 1st and 2nd floors / two laundry rooms total, which indicates the amenity exists but not on every floor.
Strong evidence the building offers parking. Across many listings, agents mention parking in multiple forms—assigned, garage, reserved, off-street, and street parking—indicating this is a consistent building feature rather than a one-off unit amenity.
Strong evidence that the building offers assigned parking: at least 8 separate listing remarks explicitly reference assigned or reserved parking (e.g., "Includes 1 - assigned covered parking", "large reserved parking stall", "assigned covered parking"). Mentions come from multiple listing remarks/agents and consistently describe assigned/reserved stalls, supporting a high-confidence determination.
Covered parking is very well supported. Multiple listings explicitly describe covered stalls or garages, and the remarks are consistent across agents rather than isolated or copy-paste noise.
I looked for 'deeded parking,' 'owned stall,' or 'parking included in deed.' The listings consistently mention assigned, covered, reserved, or permit-based parking instead, which suggests parking is not deeded from the remarks alone.
No analysis available
I searched for terms like 'parking fee,' 'monthly parking charge,' 'additional parking cost,' and 'parking rental,' but found none. The remarks discuss parking availability and type, not any extra monthly parking expense.
Guest parking appears to be available based on remarks mentioning an 'extra overnight visitor stall' and visitor-oriented parking access. This is less widespread than standard or covered parking, but the wording is specific enough to support the feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for 'parking waitlist,' 'waiting list,' or 'join the waitlist for parking,' and found no such references. The public remarks describe parking as available in various forms, with no indication of a waitlist system.
No analysis available
I looked for card/fob access language such as electronic entry, keycard entry, or controlled access. The remarks mention an on-site manager and that the building feels secure, but there is no public remark evidence of a card-based security system.
No analysis available
I searched for wording like security patrol, roving security, patrol service, or a patrolled property. The remarks describe the building as safe or secure and mention an on-site manager, but they do not indicate a patrol service.
No analysis available
Central AC is supported by several listing remarks, not just checkbox data. At least 2 listings explicitly mention it, including one describing 'New Central AC as of Jan '23 w/Nest thermostat,' which strongly suggests a real system rather than copied MLS fields. The presence of AC-related MLS flags in current data further reinforces this feature.
No analysis available
MLS checkbox data lists ACWIUN in 12/16 current listings. Public remarks explicitly state "built-in window air conditioner" in one listing and multiple other listings mention new AC or cooling (e.g., "new AC", "central air"), indicating some units use window/wall units. Evidence is strong across many listings and the explicit mention confirms the feature exists in the building.
MLS data lists concrete construction in 11/16 current listings (historically ~10/14), suggesting the building is primarily concrete. Public remarks do not explicitly say 'concrete,' so the evidence is largely from multiple agents' MLS entries rather than repeated remark text. Consistent agent entries across many listings indicate moderate-to-strong support for concrete construction.
Double-wall construction appears in 7 of 18 current MLS listings, which is stronger than a one-off checkbox but still not confirmed by the remarks. The public descriptions do not explicitly use the terms "double wall" or "double-wall construction," so this looks more like MLS-based evidence than remark-based confirmation.
3 of 13 current MLS listings include HOLTIL and a public remark explicitly notes 'hollow tile walls', giving strong corroborating evidence across MLS data and agent remarks rather than a lone checkbox.
Five of 16 MLS listings include masonry/stucco (MASSTU) and at least one public remark specifically notes 'hollow tile walls,' which is consistent with masonry construction. There is no explicit use of the word 'stucco' in the remarks, so the conclusion is implied from MLS entries plus the hollow-tile mention across listings.
No analysis available
Concrete slab construction is present in 6 of 18 current MLS records, but the public remarks do not explicitly reference a slab foundation. Because the descriptions are silent on foundation type, this remains a moderate-confidence MLS signal rather than a remark-confirmed feature.
No analysis available
There is limited MLS checkbox support for wood frame construction, with 4 of 18 listings marked WOOFRA. However, the public remarks provided do not explicitly say "wood frame" or "wood frame construction," so this is not strongly corroborated by listing text.
Only 2/12 MLS entries list ABOGRO in construction materials, but none of the 12 public remarks mention 'above ground' construction, 'above ground building', or above-ground materials. Given the lack of explicit remarks and no prior confidence history, the evidence for this feature is weak and appears to be inconsistent across agents (likely copy/paste), so we do not include it.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I reviewed the remarks for STR indicators such as short-term rental allowed, vacation rental, NUC, or TVU, and found no support. With no public evidence of STR permission, this is best marked as not allowed based on the provided remarks.
I searched for hotel pool references like hotel rental pool, managed by hotel, or brand-specific pool programs, but found none. Since STR itself is not supported in the remarks, hotel pool participation must be false.
I looked for language indicating required participation, such as mandatory pool membership or cannot opt out, and found nothing. Because there is no evidence of a hotel rental pool program in the remarks, mandatory participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for leasehold language such as 'lease expires,' 'ground lease,' 'renewed through,' and specific expiry years, but found nothing. Based on the remarks provided, the land tenure lease expiry cannot be determined.
There is direct, repeated evidence that VA financing is accepted for this building. The public remarks clearly state VA approval and VA financing eligibility.
Multiple listings explicitly state the building is fully insured, including clear phrases like "100% Insured" and "100% hurricane coverage." This is strong public-remark evidence that the HOA provides full building insurance/walls-in style coverage.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for any fire/life safety evaluation or fire-safety certification language, including FLSE-related wording and inspection-pass statements. Nothing in the public remarks indicates the building has passed such an evaluation, so this is treated as not evidenced in the listings.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
City-view units are clearly present in this building. At least 5+ listings explicitly mention views such as "panoramic Honolulu skyline," "breathtaking Honolulu skyline views," and "city garden views," while others describe the building/unit as in "urban Honolulu" or close to downtown. The evidence appears consistent across multiple listings and agents, not just a single copy-paste remark.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least one listing (the penthouse) explicitly mentions “amazing sunsets” and “breathtaking Honolulu skyline views,” confirming that some units have sunset/western exposure. Although the MLS view_descriptions largely do not list SUNSET (0/14) and many agents may omit or copy/paste view checkboxes, the explicit public remark is strong evidence that the building offers sunset views for some units.
No analysis available
I looked for direct statements that residents can see Friday night fireworks from units or from the building. The remarks describe skyline, sunset, and ocean views, but do not mention fireworks visibility, so this feature is unsupported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Current data shows RESMAN checked in 3/14 listings and at least three separate public remarks explicitly state 'on-site manager' or 'onsite manager' (e.g., 'Building amenities include... on-site manager', 'The Terrazza has an onsite manager', 'The Terrazza features an onsite manager'). Multiple agents independently mentioning an on-site/onsite manager provides reasonably strong evidence the building has a resident/on-site manager.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.