Terrazza
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Terrazza
Building Overview
Terrazza in Makiki-Tantalus — concrete building from 1958; pets allowed, short-term rentals not permitted.
About Terrazza
Terrazza is a condominium building located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1958 and is of concrete construction. Specific information on building size (number of units or floors) is not provided in the available MLS data.
Key features recorded in MLS data include a pet-friendly policy and a prohibition on short-term rentals. The listing data does not provide further amenity details (such as a pool, gym, or common areas), so prospective buyers should confirm available on-site features when evaluating units.
Additional details such as parking arrangements, maintenance fees, and the managing company are not specified in the MLS-derived data (management company listed as unknown). Based on MLS data, buyers should verify parking, fee, and management information with the listing agent or association before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit owner-occupancy percentages or qualitative statements about the owner-occupied share of units, but found none. The remarks describe the building as pet-friendly, boutique, and well maintained, but do not quantify ownership mix. The owner-occupancy rate therefore remains unknown from these remarks.
I searched the remarks for explicit elevator counts and only found generic references to an elevator. Because no numeric count was stated, I cannot infer how many elevators the building has. The building is clearly elevator-served, but the exact number remains unknown from these remarks.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS checkbox OTCOEX is present in 11 of 16 current listings, but 0 of the provided public remarks mention common area electricity or similar phrasing. Evidence is mixed: many agents checked the box in MLS, but there are no independent remarks confirming building-paid common electric, so inclusion is tentative and appears possibly due to agent copy/paste.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings have HOTWAT checked (0 of 14) and at least 7 listings mention unit water heaters or new water heaters (e.g., 'new water heater', 'newer water heater', 'solar water heater'), and WTRHTR appears in inclusions — strong evidence that hot water is not included in HOA fees.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple MLS listings (13/16) list SEWER as included in association fees and at least one public remark explicitly says 'Maintenance Fees include water/sewer bill.' Historical data was high-confidence and the remark directly confirms sewer is included, so this is strongly supported across MLS entries.
Multiple MLS listings (13/16) list WATER as included in association fees and at least one public remark explicitly says 'Maintenance Fees include water/sewer bill.' Historical data was high-confidence and the remark directly confirms water is included, providing strong corroboration.
One of 12 current listings mentions building BBQ facilities, with the remark: "Short walk to the Community Pool, BBQ & play area? Check." No other remarks reference BBQ and historical confidence is absent, so this is included as a building feature with moderate confidence (possible agent copy/paste).
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple public remarks explicitly describe a lanai or covered lanai in this building (approx. 8/14 listings mention it). Key phrases include "covered lanai," "large lanai," and "covered lanai with peaceful city garden views," appearing across different agent listings—suggesting the feature is a real building amenity even though only 3/14 current MLS checkboxes list PATDEC/COVPAT.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for surfboard-specific storage facilities, including board storage or surf storage. The remarks mention bike racks and general storage, but nothing about surfboard storage.
No analysis available
Strong, consistent evidence that the building has a trash chute: multiple (10+) current public-remarks explicitly list 'trash chute' or 'trash chute' among building amenities (quotes include 'trash chute' and 'trash chute, elevator, and on-site manager'). Historical MLS data also showed high confidence with TRACHU checked on many listings, and the current remarks confirm the feature across different agents rather than appearing as a one-off error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings (at least 10 of ~16 public remarks in this batch) explicitly mention a pool — phrases include "saltwater pool", "community pool", and "courtyard pool/fountain". Historical MLS checkbox data also marked the building as having a pool in 13/16 listings, and current remarks confirm the amenity across many agents rather than being isolated copy-paste errors.
No analysis available
There are multiple clear mentions that the building pool is saltwater/salt water. This is strong evidence that the pool is salt-based.
No public remarks (0/12) mention in-unit washer/dryer; instead many listings state 'community laundry' or 'two laundry rooms'. Although 2 of 12 MLS listings include WASHER/DRYER in inclusions, that small, inconsistent checkbox signal without any remark support suggests copy/paste error. Therefore set laundry_in_unit = false with high confidence until stronger, remark-level or owner/manager verification appears.
Strong, consistent evidence that the building has shared laundry: at least 10 separate listing remarks explicitly mention "community laundry" or "two laundry rooms" (examples: "community laundry", "community laundry on the 1st and 2nd floors", "two on-site community laundry rooms"). Mentions appear across multiple agent listings rather than isolated copy/paste errors, supporting high confidence that shared laundry exists building-wide.
I searched for any wording indicating paid community laundry, such as coin laundry, card-operated machines, or laundry fees. The listings mention community laundry, but none say it requires payment.
I looked for explicit language like laundry on each floor, floor-by-floor laundry, or laundry rooms on every level. The remarks only support laundry facilities on specific floors (1st and 2nd), so this feature is not confirmed.
Majority of listings (10 of 13) have parking checked in MLS and numerous agent remarks explicitly mention parking: quotes include "assigned covered parking", "large reserved parking stall", "off-street parking" and "lots of street parking." Evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents, so the building is very likely to offer parking (covered and/or assigned stalls and street/off-street options).
Strong evidence that the building offers assigned parking: at least 8 separate listing remarks explicitly reference assigned or reserved parking (e.g., "Includes 1 - assigned covered parking", "large reserved parking stall", "assigned covered parking"). Mentions come from multiple listing remarks/agents and consistently describe assigned/reserved stalls, supporting a high-confidence determination.
Strong evidence that the building has covered parking: at least 8 separate listing remarks explicitly mention covered parking (examples: "assigned covered parking", "full-size covered parking stall", "1 Covered Parking", "corner, covered parking stall"). Multiple agents' remarks consistently reference covered stalls, indicating broad confirmation of this feature.
The listings consistently describe assigned, reserved, or covered stalls, which supports parking availability but not deeded ownership. I found no public-remarks wording like "deeded parking," "owned stall," or "parking included in deed."
No analysis available
I looked for parking fee language such as "monthly parking," "parking rental," or "additional parking cost," but the remarks only mention assigned or covered parking. There is no evidence of a separate parking fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for "parking waitlist," "waiting list," and similar phrasing, but found none. The remarks instead describe parking as assigned, reserved, or covered without any waitlist reference.
No analysis available
I looked for card/fob access language such as keycard entry, fob access, or electronic access. The remarks mention an on-site manager and general building access, but nothing about a card-based security system.
No analysis available
I searched for security patrol wording such as roving security, patrolled building, or patrol service. The only related security note is an on-site manager, which does not confirm patrol service.
No analysis available
At least one listing remark explicitly states "New Central AC as of Jan '23 w/Nest thermostat," and MLS checkbox data shows central AC checked in a few unit records (1/12 in unit_features, 2/12 in inclusions). Coverage is limited across listings and may reflect unit-specific installs or agent copy/paste, so inclusion is warranted for buyers but confidence is moderate.
No analysis available
MLS checkbox data lists ACWIUN in 12/16 current listings. Public remarks explicitly state "built-in window air conditioner" in one listing and multiple other listings mention new AC or cooling (e.g., "new AC", "central air"), indicating some units use window/wall units. Evidence is strong across many listings and the explicit mention confirms the feature exists in the building.
MLS data lists concrete construction in 11/16 current listings (historically ~10/14), suggesting the building is primarily concrete. Public remarks do not explicitly say 'concrete,' so the evidence is largely from multiple agents' MLS entries rather than repeated remark text. Consistent agent entries across many listings indicate moderate-to-strong support for concrete construction.
Five of 16 MLS listings list double-wall construction (DOUWAL), but no public remarks explicitly describe 'double wall' or 'double-wall construction.' The evidence is therefore MLS-driven and implied rather than confirmed in agent remarks, giving moderate (implied) confidence.
3 of 13 current MLS listings include HOLTIL and a public remark explicitly notes 'hollow tile walls', giving strong corroborating evidence across MLS data and agent remarks rather than a lone checkbox.
Five of 16 MLS listings include masonry/stucco (MASSTU) and at least one public remark specifically notes 'hollow tile walls,' which is consistent with masonry construction. There is no explicit use of the word 'stucco' in the remarks, so the conclusion is implied from MLS entries plus the hollow-tile mention across listings.
No analysis available
Only 3 of 14 listings list SLAB and none of the public remarks mention 'concrete slab' or a slab foundation. Given the low prevalence in MLS data, absence of any slab references in agent remarks, and no prior strong evidence, slab foundation is unlikely for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 2/12 MLS entries list ABOGRO in construction materials, but none of the 12 public remarks mention 'above ground' construction, 'above ground building', or above-ground materials. Given the lack of explicit remarks and no prior confidence history, the evidence for this feature is weak and appears to be inconsistent across agents (likely copy/paste), so we do not include it.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I reviewed the remarks for terms like "short-term rental," "vacation rental," "NUC," "TVU," or minimum-stay rules and found no support for STRs. Since there is no evidence of STR permission in the remarks, this is treated as not allowed.
I searched for hotel pool references such as "hotel rental pool," "managed by hotel," or brand-specific pool programs, but found none. Because STR is not evidenced in the remarks, hotel pool participation is also not supported.
I looked for language indicating mandatory participation, such as "must be in rental program" or "cannot opt out," and found none. There is also no evidence of any hotel pool arrangement at all in the public remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold language such as "lease expires," "ground lease," "renewed through," and specific 4-digit expiry years, but found nothing. There is no public-remarks evidence to identify a lease expiration year.
There is direct, repeated evidence that VA financing is accepted for this building. Multiple listings mention VA financing approval and even an assumable VA loan, which is strong confirmation.
Multiple listings explicitly state that the building is fully insured, including exact phrases like "100% Insured" and "100% hurricane coverage." That is strong direct evidence for walls-in/full-building coverage. This feature is confirmed with very high confidence.
No analysis available
I searched for public-remark language indicating a passed fire/life safety evaluation or similar fire-safety certification, but found nothing. The remarks do mention general building amenities and condition, yet nothing that directly confirms FLSE status. With no explicit evidence, this remains unconfirmed and treated as false/unknown from the remarks.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listing remarks explicitly reference city or skyline views — phrases include "panoramic Honolulu skyline," "breathtaking Honolulu skyline views," "city garden views," and "urban Honolulu." MLS view_descriptions also show CITY for 8 of 16 listings. Evidence is consistent across several different listings/agents, indicating the building offers units with city views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least one listing (the penthouse) explicitly mentions “amazing sunsets” and “breathtaking Honolulu skyline views,” confirming that some units have sunset/western exposure. Although the MLS view_descriptions largely do not list SUNSET (0/14) and many agents may omit or copy/paste view checkboxes, the explicit public remark is strong evidence that the building offers sunset views for some units.
No analysis available
I looked for direct statements that residents can see Friday night fireworks from the building or units. The remarks reference skyline and ocean views, but not fireworks viewing.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Current data shows RESMAN checked in 3/14 listings and at least three separate public remarks explicitly state 'on-site manager' or 'onsite manager' (e.g., 'Building amenities include... on-site manager', 'The Terrazza has an onsite manager', 'The Terrazza features an onsite manager'). Multiple agents independently mentioning an on-site/onsite manager provides reasonably strong evidence the building has a resident/on-site manager.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.