Terrace Towers
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Terrace Towers
Building Overview
Terrace Towers in McCully-Moiliili: 1969 concrete building; pets allowed, short-term rentals prohibited.
About Terrace Towers
Terrace Towers is a residential building located in the McCully-Moiliili neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1969 and is of concrete construction.
Key features noted in MLS-derived data include a pet-friendly policy and a prohibition on short-term rentals. No additional amenity details are provided in the available data.
Parking, maintenance fees, on-site management, and other property-specific details are not specified; the management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all building details, rules, fees, and policies with the listing agent or building management prior to making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit owner-occupancy data such as '80% owner occupied' or 'majority owner occupied.' The remarks only describe the building as suitable for owner-occupants, which is not the same as a quantified owner-occupancy rate.
I searched the public remarks for any reference to the number of elevators, including phrases like '4 elevators' or 'multiple elevators.' None were mentioned, so there is no basis to set a numeric value.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer appears to be included at the building level based on current MLS data: 4 of 5 listings check SEWER in association_fee_includes. None of the public remarks explicitly mention sewer, so this is supported more by the repeated MLS field than by narrative confirmation, which suggests moderate confidence rather than certainty.
Water appears to be included at the building level based on current MLS data: 4 of 5 listings check WATER in association_fee_includes. The remarks do not call out water directly, so this is inferred primarily from the repeated MLS entries rather than explicit agent descriptions.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
One of four current MLS listings includes the RECARE amenity checkbox, but none of the public remarks mention a recreation area, rec deck, or amenity deck. The lone MLS checkbox could indicate the building has a shared recreation area or may be an agent copy/paste; evidence is limited and not corroborated by remarks across multiple agents.
No listing remarks describe a recreation room or equivalent shared multipurpose room. The only support is the MLS amenity checkbox in 3/5 listings, which is weak without any matching text and appears consistent with agent copy/paste behavior.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no textual evidence across the remarks for a trash chute system. The amenity appears only in the MLS checkbox data for 3/5 listings, which is not enough on its own to confirm a building-level chute system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The pool feature is strongly supported by both historical MLS data and current public remarks. At least 2 listings explicitly mention a swim/swimming pool, and the prior amenity data indicated pool was checked in most listings, suggesting this is a genuine building amenity rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Community laundry is supported by both the MLS amenity data and the public remarks. One listing explicitly says the building offers "common laundry," and the feature appears in the current MLS amenities across all listings, suggesting this is a consistent building amenity rather than a one-off agent error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is clearly supported across the listings: 5/5 current MLS records include parking-related features, and one remark explicitly mentions a 'parking stall by the ground floor unit.' The evidence appears consistent rather than copy-paste noise, with multiple listings treating parking as a building amenity.
Assigned parking is supported by both MLS checkbox data and remarks. Three of five current listings show ASSIGN, and one public remark specifically describes a 'parking stall by the ground floor unit,' which implies a reserved or designated space. The evidence is moderate-to-strong and consistent with a building-level parking arrangement.
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like "deeded parking," "owned stall," or "parking included in deed" and did not find any explicit wording. The listing only confirms a parking stall exists, not that it is deeded.
No analysis available
I looked for terms such as "parking fee," "monthly parking," or "parking rental" and found no evidence of an ongoing parking charge. The remarks only indicate that a parking stall exists.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for "waitlist," "waiting list," or similar parking allocation language and found nothing. There is no evidence in the remarks that parking is assigned through a waitlist.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building is consistently marked as concrete in the current MLS data, with 5 of 5 listings showing CONCRE. None of the public remarks explicitly mention concrete construction, but there is also no evidence suggesting the material changed or that the MLS data was corrected downward. Given the full current consensus in MLS, this is a strong building-level feature to include.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for short-term rental indicators such as "STR allowed," "legal vacation rental," "NUC," or restriction language like "30-day minimum" and found no mention either way. With no evidence, STR allowance cannot be confirmed from the remarks.
I searched for phrases like "hotel rental pool," "managed by hotel," or branded pool programs and found none. Since there is no evidence that STRs are allowed, a hotel pool is also not supported by the remarks.
I looked for language such as "mandatory hotel pool," "must participate," or "cannot opt out" and found nothing. The remarks do not indicate any required rental program for owners.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold language such as a lease end year, ground lease expiration, or renewal date, but the remarks instead identify the property as fee simple. That means there is no land lease expiry to extract.
I searched the public remarks for VA-related language such as "VA approved," "VA financing," and "VA loans accepted" and found none. With no evidence in the remarks, the building cannot be confirmed as VA-approved from this data.
The remarks clearly say '100% insured!', which is direct evidence that the HOA/building has full insurance coverage. This is a strong, explicit match for fully insured/walls-in coverage.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit statements that the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation or is fire/life safety compliant. The remarks do not mention any such certification, so this cannot be confirmed from the listing text.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
3 of 5 current listings indicate CITY in the view field, while 2 of 5 show NONE. No public remarks explicitly describe a city, downtown, or urban view, so the evidence is moderate and likely reflects a building where some units have city-facing views rather than a universally marketed feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
0 of 4 current listings mention 'SUNSET' in view descriptions and 1 of 4 explicitly shows 'NONE'. None of the public remarks mention sunset, western exposure, 'evening sun', or similar—agents describe natural light and cross breezes but not sunset views. Given the lack of any supporting remarks and the MLS checkbox being unchecked, there is strong evidence the building does not offer sunset views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Resident manager is strongly supported by the data. Two current remarks explicitly say the building has a resident manager, and the MLS amenities flag is present across all current listings, suggesting this is a stable building feature rather than a one-off agent entry. The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and reads like standard listing copy, but it is directly confirmed in the remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.