Terrace Towers
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Terrace Towers
Building Overview
Terrace Towers in McCully-Moiliili: 1969 concrete building; pets allowed, short-term rentals prohibited.
About Terrace Towers
Terrace Towers is a residential building located in the McCully-Moiliili neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1969 and is of concrete construction.
Key features noted in MLS-derived data include a pet-friendly policy and a prohibition on short-term rentals. No additional amenity details are provided in the available data.
Parking, maintenance fees, on-site management, and other property-specific details are not specified; the management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all building details, rules, fees, and policies with the listing agent or building management prior to making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Remarks suggest the building appeals to owner-occupants but do not provide a numeric owner-occupancy percentage. Without an explicit percentage in the public remarks, the owner-occupancy percent cannot be determined from the listings.
Remarks do not mention the number of elevators. Because there is no prior numeric value and no explicit statement in the public remarks, no elevator count can be determined from the provided listings.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
One of four current MLS listings includes the RECARE amenity checkbox, but none of the public remarks mention a recreation area, rec deck, or amenity deck. The lone MLS checkbox could indicate the building has a shared recreation area or may be an agent copy/paste; evidence is limited and not corroborated by remarks across multiple agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple unit listings and MLS checkbox data indicate the building has a pool: 3 of 4 listings have the pool amenity checked and at least two separate remarks state the building 'offers a swim pool' and 'amenities ... include swimming pool'. The mentions appear across different remarks rather than being limited to a single listing, providing strong evidence the building offers a shared pool.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The MLS amenity checkbox COMLAU is present on all 4/4 current listings and the public remarks explicitly state 'common laundry' in one listing. Consistent MLS checkbox usage across multiple listings plus the explicit phrase in the remarks provides strong evidence the building offers shared laundry facilities (though agent copy/paste is possible, the explicit mention supports the feature).
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS checkbox data consistently lists parking on all 4 listings (various types: open, covered, garage). One public remark explicitly states 'Featuring parking stall by the ground floor unit,' supporting the MLS. While agents sometimes copy/paste, the uniform presence of parking in every MLS listing provides strong evidence the building offers parking.
MLS data shows ASSIGN on 2 of 4 listings, and one listing's remarks specifically note a 'parking stall by the ground floor unit,' implying a designated stall. This indicates the building offers assigned parking for at least some units, though not every listing's remarks mention it.
No analysis available
The remarks reference a parking stall by the ground floor unit, which strongly implies a parking stall that accompanies the unit. I searched for terms like 'deeded parking', 'owned stall', and related phrasing and the listing language supports that interpretation.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', and similar phrases and found no information about an ongoing parking charge. There is no evidence to provide a numeric monthly fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for terms like 'waitlist' or 'waiting list' for parking and found none. There is no evidence in the remarks that a parking waitlist system exists.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All four current listings (4/4) have the MLS construction_materials set to CONCRE, but none of the public remarks mention concrete construction (no phrases like 'concrete building' or 'reinforced concrete'). This suggests the checkbox may have been applied across listings (possible copy/paste) so inclusion is based on MLS data only and is given moderate confidence rather than high certainty.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for indicators of short-term rental permissions or restrictions and found none. Absence of any STR-related language leads to a default 'no evidence' assessment that STRs are allowed.
I looked for phrases like 'hotel rental pool', 'part of hotel operations', or named hotel programs and found none. Because there is no evidence STRs are allowed, a hotel rental-pool flag is not supported by the remarks.
I searched for language such as 'mandatory hotel pool', 'required to participate', or 'must be in rental program' and found none. Since there is no evidence STRs or a hotel pool exist, mandatory participation is unsupported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks state this is a 'fee simple unit', so leasehold expiration does not apply. I looked for phrases like 'lease expires' or 'land lease to [year]' and found none.
I searched the public remarks for phrases like 'VA approved', 'VA financing', or 'VA loans accepted' and found none. Therefore there is no evidence in the remarks that the building is VA-approved.
One of the public remarks explicitly states '100% insured!', indicating the building/HOA provides full (walls-in) insurance coverage. This explicit wording supports a high-confidence true value.
No analysis available
There is no statement in the public remarks indicating the building has passed a fire/life safety evaluation. In the absence of any mention, the default assumption is that it is not confirmed (treated as false) with medium confidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
0 of 4 current listings mention 'SUNSET' in view descriptions and 1 of 4 explicitly shows 'NONE'. None of the public remarks mention sunset, western exposure, 'evening sun', or similar—agents describe natural light and cross breezes but not sunset views. Given the lack of any supporting remarks and the MLS checkbox being unchecked, there is strong evidence the building does not offer sunset views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All four current listings list RESMAN in amenities; two listings' remarks explicitly state 'well maintained building with resident manager' and 'amenities ... include ... resident manager'. Multiple listings and the amenity checkbox consistently report an on-site/resident manager, suggesting the building offers this feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.