Surfview
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Surfview
Building Overview
Surfview in Makiki-Tantalus — concrete construction, built 1969; pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About Surfview
Surfview is located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood and was built in 1969. According to available records, the building is of concrete construction. Size and unit mix information are not provided in the MLS data available for this summary.
Key policies for Surfview noted in MLS records include that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS; no specific onsite amenities or common-area features are detailed in the provided data.
Additional details such as parking arrangements, maintenance fees, utilities, or other building-specific rules are not included in the MLS excerpt used for this description. Based on MLS data, buyers and their agents should verify all building particulars, policies, and fees with the listing agent or management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Common area electricity appears in 3 of 5 MLS records via OTCOEX. None of the remarks explicitly mention common electric, so this looks more like MLS checkbox data than agent description, but the building-level evidence is still sufficient to include.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water is not supported by the MLS pattern: 0 of 5 listings mark HOTWAT, and 4 of 5 list WTRHTR, which is a strong sign this is not a building-paid hot water amenity. No public remarks describe hot water included, so this should be treated as false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer is consistently included across all 5 MLS listings. There are no conflicting remarks, and the unanimous MLS data makes this a very high-confidence building feature.
Water is included in all 5 MLS listings. This is consistent across the building data and is not contradicted by any of the public remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for any surfboard-related storage amenities, including board storage or surf storage. The remarks do not mention any such facility.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool is confirmed by multiple listings: at least 2 remarks explicitly say the building has a pool, including one noting it is 'currently being retiled.' This aligns with the MLS amenities data showing pool-related codes in all 5/5 listings, suggesting a consistent shared building amenity rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
I looked for public references to saltwater pool features. The remarks mention that Surfview has a pool, but there is no indication that it is a saltwater pool.
Strong evidence supports in-unit laundry for this building. The MLS inclusions show washer/dryer in all 5/5 listings, and the remarks explicitly mention a "side by side, full size washer and dryer," confirming the feature rather than a copy-paste checkbox error. This is consistent across the listings and appears to be a reliable building-level amenity available in units.
No analysis available
I looked for any public mention of coin-op laundry, card laundry, quarters, or laundry fees. The remarks do not describe any community laundry system, and the only laundry reference is an in-unit washer and dryer.
I searched the public remarks for references to laundry facilities on each floor or any shared laundry rooms. The remarks only mention an in-unit side-by-side washer and dryer, which does not support community laundry on every floor.
Parking is clearly available for the building, supported by 5/5 current MLS records and multiple public remarks. Listings consistently describe assigned stalls or open assigned parking, so this appears to be a stable building feature rather than a one-off agent entry.
Assigned parking is strongly confirmed. All current MLS records indicate ASSIGN, and the remarks repeatedly use direct language like "assigned parking stall" and "open assigned parking," which is strong building-level evidence.
No analysis available
I searched for deeded, owned, or included-by-deed parking language and found only assigned parking. Assigned parking alone does not establish that the stall is deeded, so this is marked false based on the available remarks.
No analysis available
I looked for any parking fee, rental, or monthly charge wording, but the remarks only mention assigned parking and guest stalls. Since no fee is stated, the amount is unknown.
Guest parking is well supported by both MLS data and public remarks. At least 4 current listings include GUEST, and multiple remarks explicitly mention guest parking, including a count of "4 stalls," which suggests this is a real shared building amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for 'parking waitlist,' 'waiting list,' or similar language and found none. With no evidence that parking is managed by a waitlist system, this is marked false.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for any card/fob access security language. There were no public mentions of keycard entry or similar access control features.
No analysis available
I looked for any reference to building security patrols or roving security services. The public remarks do not mention patrol coverage.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the provided listings, 0 explicitly mention window AC or wall AC; one listing instead specifically says 'split AC units in the living room and primary bedroom.' The repeated absence of any window-unit language, combined with the explicit split-AC description, suggests the current MLS ACWIUN inclusion is not reliable for this building.
Five out of five current listings indicate concrete construction in the MLS data. The public remarks do not explicitly mention the building material, so this is supported mainly by consistent MLS reporting rather than descriptive text. With no conflicting remarks, the building should be treated as concrete construction.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for short-term rental language such as STR allowed, legal vacation rental, TVU, or NUC, and found nothing. There is also no mention of a 30-day minimum or owner-occupant-only restriction, so the public remarks do not support STR allowance.
I searched for hotel pool references like hotel rental pool, managed by hotel, or brand-specific pool participation and found none. Because STR allowance is not evidenced in the remarks, this must remain false.
I looked for language indicating mandatory participation in a rental pool, such as 'must participate' or 'cannot opt out,' and found none. There is no public-remarks evidence of any hotel pool program, so this is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold references such as 'lease expires,' 'ground lease ends,' 'land lease to,' or a renewal year, but nothing was stated. Because there is no specific lease-expiration year in the public remarks, the value remains unknown.
I searched the remarks for VA-specific language such as 'VA approved,' 'VA financing,' and 'VA loans accepted' and found none. With no evidence in the listings, this is left false with low confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence is limited: 1 of 5 current listings includes GARDEN in the view field, while the public remarks mostly discuss city, ocean, and Honolulu views rather than explicit garden views. One remark mentions the unit is 'positioned within lush landscaping,' which suggests a landscaped/garden-like setting, but this looks more implied than clearly verified.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks clearly state that the unit has views of the weekly Friday night fireworks in Waikiki. This is direct evidence of a fireworks view from the building/unit, not merely proximity to fireworks.
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence supports a resident manager on site. In 2 separate listings, remarks explicitly mention an "on-site resident manager" / "resident manager on premise," and the current MLS amenities checkbox is present on all 5/5 listings. This looks consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.