Sunset Shores
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Sunset Shores
Building Overview
Sunset Shores in North Shore, built 1982, concrete construction. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed.
About Sunset Shores
Sunset Shores is a condominium building located in the North Shore neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1982 and is of concrete construction. Size and unit mix information are not provided in the MLS data available for this summary.
Key property policies and management details listed in MLS data include a no-pets policy and a prohibition on short-term rentals. The management company is shown as Unknown in the MLS records. No other common-area amenities or services are specified in the provided data.
Additional details such as parking provisions, maintenance fees, amenity lists, and association rules are not included in the MLS data supplied. This summary is based on available MLS information; buyers and agents should verify all building specifics, policies, and fees with the listing agent or association documents.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Cable TV inclusion appears in a majority of the current MLS records (5 of 7 listings). The public remarks do not mention cable one way or the other, so this looks more like a checkbox-derived building feature than something explicitly advertised in remarks.
All current MLS listings reviewed for this building include OTCOEX, indicating common area electricity is consistently included in the maintenance fee. The remarks describe shared amenities like the pool, spa, BBQ area, secured entry, and open-air hallways, which fits a building-paid common-area power setup.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The evidence points against hot water being included in the maintenance fee. Most current listings show WTRHTR rather than HOTWAT, and the public remarks discuss in-unit appliances and plumbing updates without describing building-supplied hot water service.
Internet service appears in a substantial minority of the MLS records (4 of 7), which suggests it may be included for this building but not consistently entered. The public remarks do not mention internet or Wi-Fi, so this is supported mainly by MLS checkbox data.
No analysis available
Sewer is consistently included across all current MLS listings (7 of 7), matching the prior high-confidence pattern. The public remarks do not suggest any change, so this appears to be a stable building-level inclusion.
Water is included in the maintenance fee across all current MLS listings reviewed (7 of 7). The remarks are silent on water service, but the MLS data is fully consistent and strongly supports this feature.
BBQ is strongly supported across multiple listings and multiple remark sets. At least 4-5 remarks explicitly mention shared grilling amenities, including "BBQ area," "BBQ pavilion," "oceanfront BBQ area," and "community provided grill." This looks like a genuine building amenity, not a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Several listing remarks explicitly reference outdoor living spaces: at least four listings mention a "private lanai", "Juliet balcony", or "cozy lanai", and communal descriptions include a "patio area" with grill/seating and a BBQ pavilion. MLS amenity checkboxes also list PATDEC/COVPAT in 3 of 6 listings, so there is strong, corroborating evidence that the building offers patios/decks/lanai amenities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 2 of 6 MLS records check recreation_area, and none of the public remarks include the expected keywords (e.g., 'recreation area', 'rec area', 'recreation deck'). Given the lack of any supporting remarks and low MLS prevalence, there is little evidence the building offers a distinct labeled recreation area.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only a single MLS checkbox indicates a sauna and no public remarks include the word 'sauna' or equivalent. With no corroborating language across multiple listings, there is insufficient evidence to conclude the building has a sauna.
No analysis available
I searched for surfboard storage, board storage, and related amenity descriptions. The building is near surfing and beaches, but the remarks do not mention any dedicated surfboard storage.
No analysis available
Trash chute is supported by current MLS checkbox data in 6 of 7 listings, but none of the public remarks explicitly mention a trash chute or similar system. This makes the evidence more moderate than the other features, and it may reflect MLS data entry rather than remark confirmation. Still, the current MLS pattern is strong enough to retain it as likely present.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Whirlpool/spa is repeatedly confirmed across the remarks and aligns with the MLS data. Multiple listings mention "jacuzzi," "spa," or "hot tub," indicating a shared amenity rather than a unit-specific feature. The evidence is strong and consistent across different listings.
Pool is confirmed by the current remarks in multiple listings, with 6+ descriptions referencing a shared amenity pool (e.g., 'beachfront pool,' 'saltwater pool,' and 'association maintained pool'). The MLS checkbox is also set on all 7/7 listings, which aligns with the remarks and suggests this is a real building amenity rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
The public remarks directly state that the building has a saltwater pool. This is explicit evidence, so confidence is very high.
In-unit laundry is strongly supported for this building: current MLS data shows washer/dryer in the inclusions on all 7 listings. Multiple remarks explicitly say "Full-sized washer & dryer in-unit," "in-unit washer/dryer," and "Stacked in-unit washer and dryer," confirming the feature across several listings and agents.
No analysis available
I looked for evidence of coin laundry or any paid laundry system in the public remarks. Nothing in the listing text indicates a community laundry area or payment requirement; only in-unit laundry is mentioned.
I searched for phrases like "laundry on every floor," "laundry room on each floor," and similar floor-by-floor community laundry wording. The remarks instead refer to in-unit washer/dryer, which does not support community laundry on every floor.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Covered parking is clearly present. One listing explicitly describes "two full-size, side-by-side, covered parking stalls," which is a direct confirmation and stronger than MLS checkbox data alone. The wording suggests this is a real building/unit amenity rather than a copy-paste assumption.
I searched for deeded parking, owned stall, parking included in deed, and similar language. The listings only confirm assigned/covered parking and do not establish that the stalls are deeded.
No analysis available
I looked for parking fee, monthly parking charge, or parking rental language, but found none. The remarks confirm parking is assigned/covered, but they do not mention any separate parking cost.
Guest parking appears to be offered based on MLS parking_features in 5 of 7 listings. However, none of the public remarks explicitly mention guest or visitor parking, so this is supported mainly by checkbox data rather than descriptive confirmation. The evidence is moderate, not as strong as the covered parking evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for parking waitlist, parking waiting list, or join waitlist for parking, and found nothing. The listings describe assigned parking, but do not reference any waitlist system.
No analysis available
I searched for card/fob access terms such as keycard entry, fob access, and card reader. The remarks mention a secured entry and secured lobby, but those are not explicit card-access indicators.
No analysis available
I looked for any reference to security patrol service or roving guards. The remarks only indicate a secure or secured building/lobby, with no patrol service mentioned.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete construction is strongly supported by the MLS history: 7 of 7 current listings mark CONCRE. Public remarks do not explicitly say 'concrete,' but there is no conflicting evidence, and the consistency across all listings makes this a high-confidence building feature.
Double-wall construction appears in 4 of 7 current MLS listings, which suggests the feature is present in the building or at least repeatedly reported by agents. The public remarks do not explicitly reference 'double wall' or similar wording, so this remains moderate-confidence and may reflect checkbox-style MLS entry rather than detailed description.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
A concrete slab foundation is indicated in 2 of 7 current MLS listings, but none of the remarks mention 'concrete slab' or 'solid concrete foundation.' This is enough to keep the feature as a lower-confidence building attribute, but not enough for a stronger conclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for short-term rental allowed, STR permitted, vacation rental allowed, NUC/TVU language, and similar phrases. The remarks only mention general rental potential and vacation use, so STR allowance is not supported from public remarks.
I searched for hotel rental pool, hotel program, Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool, or management-by-hotel references and found none. Since STR is not established as allowed, this also remains false.
I looked for mandatory pool language such as required to participate, cannot opt out, or must be in rental program, but found nothing. There is also no evidence of any STR/hotel pool program in the remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold wording such as lease expires, ground lease ends, or renewed through, but the remarks directly say fee simple. Because this is not leasehold, there is no lease expiry year to extract.
I searched the remarks for VA-approved, VA financing, and VA loans accepted, but found no such references. The only financing detail is an assumable loan at about 3.25%, which does not indicate VA approval.
No analysis available
Across the provided listings, 0 remarks mention a fire sprinkler system or related wording. The remarks consistently describe ocean views, parking, pools, laundry, and building security, which makes the fire-sprinkler checkbox look like an unverified MLS entry rather than a confirmed building feature.
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are consistently and explicitly advertised across all 7 listings. Multiple agents use strong phrases like "oceanfront gem," "front-row ocean views," and "wall-to-wall oceanfront views," which suggests this is a stable building-level feature rather than a copy-paste error.
MLS checkbox data shows 4 of 6 listings list mountain views, but the concatenated public remarks contain no references to "mountain," "mauka," or "Koolau." The evidence for mountain views is therefore MLS-driven and implied rather than corroborated by agent remarks, so confidence is moderate.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Six of six listings and the public remarks repeatedly reference beachfront and coastline access—quotes include "private beach access," "directly over the beach," and references to the North Shore coastline—providing strong, consistent evidence that coastline views are available.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunrise views appear in a subset of the listings, with at least one clear remark and 3/7 MLS view descriptions tagged SUNRIS. This is enough to confirm the building offers sunrise-oriented units, though the evidence is not as universal as ocean or sunset views.
Sunset views are strongly and repeatedly confirmed across all 7 listings. The remarks consistently reference sunsets in multiple ways, indicating this is a core and stable feature of the building rather than agent noise.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit references to being able to watch fireworks from the unit, lanai, or building. The remarks focus on ocean views, sunsets, and surf, but do not mention fireworks visibility.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the provided listings, 0 remarks mention a resident manager or any on-site/live-in management. The text repeatedly highlights the building as well managed and secure, but that is not the same as an actual resident manager, so the current MLS checkbox appears unsupported by the public remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.