Sunset Shores
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Sunset Shores
Building Overview
Sunset Shores in North Shore, built 1982, concrete construction. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed.
About Sunset Shores
Sunset Shores is a condominium building located in the North Shore neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1982 and is of concrete construction. Size and unit mix information are not provided in the MLS data available for this summary.
Key property policies and management details listed in MLS data include a no-pets policy and a prohibition on short-term rentals. The management company is shown as Unknown in the MLS records. No other common-area amenities or services are specified in the provided data.
Additional details such as parking provisions, maintenance fees, amenity lists, and association rules are not included in the MLS data supplied. This summary is based on available MLS information; buyers and agents should verify all building specifics, policies, and fees with the listing agent or association documents.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Cable TV inclusion appears in a majority of the current MLS records (5 of 7 listings). The public remarks do not mention cable one way or the other, so this looks more like a checkbox-derived building feature than something explicitly advertised in remarks.
All current MLS listings reviewed for this building include OTCOEX, indicating common area electricity is consistently included in the maintenance fee. The remarks describe shared amenities like the pool, spa, BBQ area, secured entry, and open-air hallways, which fits a building-paid common-area power setup.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the 8 public remarks mention hot water being included in the maintenance fee. MLS data is consistently contrary: only 1/8 listings checks HOTWAT, while 6/8 list WTRHTR, supporting the previously high-confidence conclusion that hot water is not included.
Internet service appears in a substantial minority of the MLS records (4 of 7), which suggests it may be included for this building but not consistently entered. The public remarks do not mention internet or Wi-Fi, so this is supported mainly by MLS checkbox data.
No analysis available
No public remarks explicitly mention sewer fees, but current MLS data shows SEWER in 8/8 listings. This is strong, consistent evidence across the available listings and confirms that sewer is included.
None of the 8 public remarks explicitly mention water fees, but MLS data shows WATER in 8/8 listings. The complete consistency across current listings confirms that water is included in the maintenance fee.
BBQ is strongly supported across multiple listings and multiple remark sets. At least 4-5 remarks explicitly mention shared grilling amenities, including "BBQ area," "BBQ pavilion," "oceanfront BBQ area," and "community provided grill." This looks like a genuine building amenity, not a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Several listing remarks explicitly reference outdoor living spaces: at least four listings mention a "private lanai", "Juliet balcony", or "cozy lanai", and communal descriptions include a "patio area" with grill/seating and a BBQ pavilion. MLS amenity checkboxes also list PATDEC/COVPAT in 3 of 6 listings, so there is strong, corroborating evidence that the building offers patios/decks/lanai amenities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 2 of 6 MLS records check recreation_area, and none of the public remarks include the expected keywords (e.g., 'recreation area', 'rec area', 'recreation deck'). Given the lack of any supporting remarks and low MLS prevalence, there is little evidence the building offers a distinct labeled recreation area.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only a single MLS checkbox indicates a sauna and no public remarks include the word 'sauna' or equivalent. With no corroborating language across multiple listings, there is insufficient evidence to conclude the building has a sauna.
No analysis available
The listings mention nearby surfing and surf breaks, but they do not identify any dedicated surfboard or board storage facility. No evidence supports this feature.
No analysis available
Trash chute is supported by current MLS checkbox data in 6 of 7 listings, but none of the public remarks explicitly mention a trash chute or similar system. This makes the evidence more moderate than the other features, and it may reflect MLS data entry rather than remark confirmation. Still, the current MLS pattern is strong enough to retain it as likely present.
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 4 of the 8 listing remarks explicitly mention the amenity, including "pool, jacuzzi," "beachfront pool, spa," "saltwater pool, hot tub," and "pool, jacuzzi and patio area." This is strong, repeated confirmation from multiple listings and aligns with the current MLS data and prior high-confidence determination.
At least 4 of 8 current listings explicitly mention the building pool, with phrases including “beachfront pool,” “saltwater pool,” and “Association maintained pool.” This aligns with the previously high-confidence evidence and the pool amenity being marked in 8/8 listings, indicating a legitimate shared building feature rather than isolated copy-paste.
No analysis available
The remarks directly identify the pool as saltwater. This is explicit, high-confidence evidence that the building's pool is salt water.
In-unit laundry is strongly supported across the building: 8/8 current MLS listings include washer/dryer, with at least 3 listings explicitly mentioning in-unit laundry. Key phrases include “Full-sized washer & dryer in-unit,” “an in-unit washer/dryer,” and “Stacked in-unit washer and dryer,” providing confirmation from multiple listing remarks beyond checkbox data.
No analysis available
The listings describe in-unit laundry in multiple units and do not mention shared paid laundry facilities. No evidence supports this feature.
The remarks mention in-unit washers and dryers but do not describe community laundry facilities on every floor. No evidence supports this feature.
No analysis available
At least three listings explicitly describe assigned or dedicated parking, including “two parking spaces assigned to the unit” and “2-PARKING.” This is supported by the majority of current MLS records (5/8) and appears to be a genuine building feature rather than an isolated checkbox error.
Covered parking is clearly present. One listing explicitly describes "two full-size, side-by-side, covered parking stalls," which is a direct confirmation and stronger than MLS checkbox data alone. The wording suggests this is a real building/unit amenity rather than a copy-paste assumption.
The remarks confirm parking availability, including "two parking spaces assigned to the unit" and "two full-size, side-by-side, covered parking stalls." They do not state that the parking is deeded, owned, or included in the unit deed.
No analysis available
The listings describe assigned and covered parking but provide no separate parking-cost information. No monthly fee or additional parking charge was found.
Guest parking appears to be offered based on MLS parking_features in 5 of 7 listings. However, none of the public remarks explicitly mention guest or visitor parking, so this is supported mainly by checkbox data rather than descriptive confirmation. The evidence is moderate, not as strong as the covered parking evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks indicate that parking is available or assigned to the units. They do not mention a parking waitlist or any process for obtaining a parking space.
No analysis available
The building is described as secure, but the specific type of security access is not provided. No evidence confirms a card- or fob-based access system.
No analysis available
The remarks refer to secured entry and a secured lobby but do not describe patrol services. No evidence supports building security patrol.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 8 of 8 current listings identify concrete in the construction materials, reinforcing the prior high-confidence determination. The public remarks do not use the phrase "concrete construction," but the consistent reporting across listings is strong evidence rather than an isolated agent entry.
Five of 8 current listings identify double-wall construction, compared with 4 of 7 previously, indicating repeated MLS reporting across the building. However, no public remark says "double wall" or "two walls," so the evidence may partly reflect copied checkbox data.
No analysis available
Masonry/stucco appears in only 2 of 8 MLS records and is not mentioned in any of the provided remarks. Because the feature lacks narrative confirmation and has inconsistent MLS support, it should not currently be treated as validated.
No analysis available
A concrete slab foundation is indicated in 2 of 7 current MLS listings, but none of the remarks mention 'concrete slab' or 'solid concrete foundation.' This is enough to keep the feature as a lower-confidence building attribute, but not enough for a stronger conclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings discuss rental demand, stable tenants, and vacation use in general terms. No explicit statement allows short-term rentals or identifies a legal vacation-rental program.
The remarks mention the building's pool and spa amenities, but not a hotel rental pool, hotel operations, or management by a hotel brand. Because short-term rental permission is not established, this feature is false.
No remarks state that owners must participate in a hotel rental pool or rental program. Since STR permission and hotel-pool participation are not established, mandatory participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The explicit fee-simple description indicates that the property is not identified as leasehold. No lease expiry, ground lease, or renewal year was mentioned, so no expiry year applies.
The remarks mention an assumable loan but do not state that the building is VA approved or that VA financing is accepted. No qualifying VA language was found.
No analysis available
Across the provided listings, 0 remarks mention a fire sprinkler system or related wording. The remarks consistently describe ocean views, parking, pools, laundry, and building security, which makes the fire-sprinkler checkbox look like an unverified MLS entry rather than a confirmed building feature.
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are confirmed across all 8 current listings and by multiple agents, not merely a single checkbox. Remarks consistently describe the building as oceanfront and cite panoramic, unobstructed, or front-row ocean views from units.
MLS checkbox data shows 4 of 6 listings list mountain views, but the concatenated public remarks contain no references to "mountain," "mauka," or "Koolau." The evidence for mountain views is therefore MLS-driven and implied rather than corroborated by agent remarks, so confidence is moderate.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Coastline views and access are well supported across at least 7 of 8 current listings, with repeated references to beachfront living, private beach access, shoreline views, and Hawaii's coastline. The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and aligns with the previously High-confidence determination.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunrise views appear in a subset of the listings, with at least one clear remark and 3/7 MLS view descriptions tagged SUNRIS. This is enough to confirm the building offers sunrise-oriented units, though the evidence is not as universal as ocean or sunset views.
Sunset views are strongly confirmed across all 8 current listings. Multiple independent remarks reference sunsets and the building's serene coastal setting, including direct statements that residents can enjoy magnificent sunsets from their units or lanais.
No analysis available
The remarks emphasize ocean views, sunsets, and beach views but do not mention fireworks visibility. No evidence supports a fireworks view from the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the provided listings, 0 remarks mention a resident manager or any on-site/live-in management. The text repeatedly highlights the building as well managed and secure, but that is not the same as an actual resident manager, so the current MLS checkbox appears unsupported by the public remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.