Suncrest A
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Suncrest A
Building Overview
Suncrest A in Ewa, built 1998, concrete construction; pets and short-term rentals are not allowed.
About Suncrest A
Suncrest A is a residential building located in the Ewa neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1998 and is of concrete construction, reflecting typical durable materials for its era.
Based on MLS data, key policies for Suncrest A include no pets and no short-term rentals. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS records provided. No specific amenity, parking, or fee information was included in the available MLS data.
This summary is based on MLS data analysis; buyers should verify details such as management, parking, fees, and any additional building amenities with the listing agent or condominium association prior to making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence for common-area electricity is weak: just 1 of 5 listings has OTCOEX in association_fee_includes, and none of the remarks mention common electric or building power. With no historical confidence and no remark support, this appears more like a copy/paste checkbox than a verified building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water does not appear to be included. Across all 5 current listings, HOTWAT is absent and WTRHTR is present, which is a strong pattern that the building does not provide hot water as part of the association fee. The remarks also contain no explicit hot-water-included language.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer is supported by the current MLS data in 4 of 5 listings. There are no remark statements explicitly mentioning sewer, but the repeated association-fee checkbox across multiple records is strong enough to treat sewer as included.
Water is included based on the current MLS records: 4 of 5 listings mark WATER in association_fee_includes. The public remarks do not explicitly mention water, but the repeated checkbox data across multiple listings supports inclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least one of the four listings explicitly mentions a ground-floor 316 sq ft fully fenced courtyard ('large concrete 316 sq ft courtyard which is fully fenced'), and 2/4 current MLS listings have patio/deck checkboxes (PATDEC/COVPAT). Evidence is mixed across listings/agents (some listings omit any outdoor mention), suggesting some units have patios/decks but the amenity is not consistently reported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public remarks (0/4 listings) mention storage units, lockers, or extra storage. CURRENT MLS amenity checkbox for storage is unchecked on all 4 listings, while 2/4 unit-level flags exist (likely copy/paste). Given the absence of any remarks confirming storage and the unchecked building-level checkbox, there is high confidence the building does not offer dedicated storage units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Three of four current MLS listings include POOL in amenities, but none of the public remarks for the four listings mention a pool. Evidence is mixed: the MLS checkbox is present in a majority of listings (3/4) but agent remarks do not describe a pool, so the feature is included with moderate confidence (0.70) pending further verification.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence for in-unit laundry. One public remark explicitly says "in-unit washer and dryer," and the current MLS data shows washer/dryer included across all current listings. This appears consistent rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is clearly present for this building. All 5/5 MLS listings indicate parking features, and multiple remarks across listings mention 'two assigned parking stalls' or 'two parking stalls,' showing consistent evidence from several listings rather than a one-off copy-paste.
Assigned parking is strongly supported. At least three remarks explicitly describe the stalls as 'assigned,' including the repeated phrase 'two assigned parking stalls (one covered, one open),' which aligns with the MLS checkbox data.
Covered parking is confirmed across the remarks and MLS data. Several listings explicitly say 'one covered and one open stall,' and the MLS data shows covered/garage parking in all 5/5 listings.
The listings clearly describe assigned parking stalls, which indicates allocated parking spaces, but they never state that the stalls are deeded or owned with the unit. Since deeded parking is not explicitly mentioned, this is best marked false based on the available remarks.
No analysis available
I searched for any reference to a parking fee, monthly parking cost, or parking rental charge and found none. The remarks only say the unit has assigned stalls and ample guest parking.
Guest parking is very well supported. Multiple listings mention 'ample guest parking,' and the MLS checkbox data shows guest parking in all 5/5 listings, indicating consistent building-level availability.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for phrases like 'parking waitlist' or 'join waitlist for parking' and found nothing. The presence of assigned stalls suggests parking is already allocated, not managed through a waitlist in these remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window air conditioning is supported by both the current MLS data and the public remarks. One listing explicitly says 'window ACs,' and the MLS inclusion checkbox was checked across all current listings, suggesting this is a consistent building feature rather than a one-off agent error.
Concrete construction appears to be a real building feature. MLS data currently has CONCRE checked in 4 of 5 listings, and one remark mentions a "large concrete 316 sq ft courtyard," which is consistent with concrete construction. The evidence is stronger on the MLS side than in the remarks, but it still supports including the feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Steel frame construction is indicated by the MLS checkboxes in 4 of 5 listings, but the public remarks do not explicitly confirm it. Because this appears to be building-level data and the current MLS pattern is strong, it should be included, though the evidence looks more like checkbox-driven MLS data than agent-verified remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for any explicit indication that short-term rentals are allowed, including legal STR terminology, and found none. Because there is no affirmative mention, the building is not shown as STR-allowed from these listings.
I looked for hotel rental pool language such as 'hotel pool,' 'managed by hotel,' or branded pool programs and found nothing. Since STR is not indicated in the remarks, this must also be false.
I searched for language showing a required or mandatory rental pool, such as 'must participate' or 'cannot opt out,' and found none. With no evidence of STR or hotel-pool participation, this is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold wording such as 'lease expires 2050,' 'ground lease ends,' or any 4-digit lease expiry year. The remarks do not mention land tenure or a lease expiration date, so this remains unknown.
I searched the public remarks for any explicit VA financing language such as 'VA approved' or 'VA loans accepted' and found none. With no direct mention, there is no evidence this building is VA-approved from these remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple unit remarks (2 of 4) explicitly mention Diamond Head views — phrases include "peek of Diamond Head from the front door" and "view of Diamond Head from the front door". MLS view_descriptions are mixed (1/4 MOUNTA, 2/4 NONE), but the explicit remarks across different listings indicate some units offer a mountain (Diamond Head) view, so the building should be listed as offering mountain views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no supporting evidence for sunset views across the provided listings. None of the remarks describe sunset, evening sun, or western exposure; the only view mentioned is Diamond Head from the front door. This looks like a feature that is not present in the building rather than a copy-paste listing error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.