Spinnaker Place Townhome 4
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Spinnaker Place Townhome 4
Building Overview
Spinnaker Place Townhome 4 in Ewa, concrete construction built 2006; pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About Spinnaker Place Townhome 4
Based on MLS data, Spinnaker Place Townhome 4 is located in the Ewa neighborhood and was built in 2006. The building is constructed of concrete. Size and unit-specific square footage are not specified in the available MLS records.
According to available records, key policies for the property include a no-pets rule and a prohibition on short-term rentals. The management company is listed as Unknown in the MLS data. No additional building amenities are specified in the provided information.
Buyers should verify all details with their agent or the listing broker, as this summary is based solely on MLS data and may be incomplete or subject to change.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 3 of 3 current listings show OTCOEX, suggesting maintenance fees include common-area electricity. The public remarks do not explicitly mention common electric power, so this appears to be an MLS data pattern rather than a copy-pasted remark detail.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the 3 current listings include HOTWAT, and all 3 list WTRHTR, which is a strong signal that hot water is not a fee-included building amenity here. The remarks are silent on hot water, so the MLS inclusion pattern is the main evidence and points consistently to false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
BBQ/grilling is supported by the remarks, with 1+ listings explicitly mentioning "barbeques" and outdoor dining in the courtyard. The language appears in the listing descriptions rather than just the MLS checkbox, so this is stronger than copy-paste amenity data alone.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Clubhouse/community center is clearly supported by the remarks. At least 2 listing descriptions mention it directly, including phrasing like "residents enjoy... clubhouse" and "its own recreation center," making this strong cross-listing evidence rather than a checkbox-only claim.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
3 listings mention outdoor patio/deck-style space, including a "private courtyard," "covered lanai," and a fenced yard used for relaxing or entertaining. The repeated references across separate remarks suggest this is a real shared building feature rather than copied MLS data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is supported by the MLS across all 3 listings, with 1 listing showing storage in amenities and 2 listings showing storage in unit features. The remarks do not explicitly say 'storage locker' or 'storage unit,' but they do mention 'additional attic space' and 'ample storage,' which is consistent with storage availability in the building. Evidence looks like MLS feature data rather than repeated remark-based confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool is clearly a building amenity. All 3 listings mention it directly, with phrases like 'resort style amenities including a pool,' 'a refreshing pool,' and 'a sparkling pool.' The remarks are consistent across multiple listings and align with the current MLS amenities, so this appears to be a reliable shared feature rather than copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
In-unit laundry is supported by the current MLS inclusions data: 3 out of 3 listings list washer/dryer. None of the public remarks mention laundry, but there is also no evidence against it, and the repeated inclusion across listings suggests this is a real building feature rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Covered parking is strongly supported by the remarks: 3 separate listings mention a "2 car garage" or "attached 2 car garage." This is consistent across multiple agents and does not look like a one-off checkbox error.
I looked for explicit public-remark wording like deeded parking, owned stall, or parking included in the deed. The listings only describe a 2-car garage, which indicates parking exists but does not confirm deeded ownership, so I am not marking it as deeded.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for parking fee language such as monthly parking charge, parking rental, or additional cost, but found none. Since the garage is described without any separate charge, there is no evidence of a parking fee in the public remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for any mention of a parking waitlist, waiting list, or joining a list for parking and found nothing. The remarks instead reference an attached 2-car garage, which does not suggest waitlist-managed parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Central AC is strongly supported across 3/3 listings. Remarks repeatedly say "central A/C" or "Central AC," and one listing adds that it was "updated approximately 3 years ago," suggesting a real building-level system rather than a checkbox artifact. The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents, so confidence is very high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 3/3 current listings include DOUWAL, giving strong consensus in the MLS fields. There are no public remarks confirming or disputing it, so this looks like a consistent building-level construction attribute from the listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 3/3 current listings include STEFRA, which is strong MLS-level evidence for steel frame construction. The public remarks do not discuss construction, so this appears to come from listing data rather than agent narrative.
2/3 current listings include SLAB, indicating a likely concrete slab foundation but not unanimous support across listings. Since the public remarks do not address foundation details, this is supported mainly by the MLS fields and may reflect incomplete checkbox consistency.
No analysis available
No analysis available
2/3 current listings include ABOGRO, which suggests above-ground construction but with less than unanimous listing support. The public remarks are silent on construction details, so this may reflect partial MLS consistency or copy/paste variation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for indicators of short-term rental permission such as STR allowed, legal vacation rental, NUC, or TVU, as well as restrictions like 30-day minimum or owner-occupant only. The remarks contain no STR policy information, so there is no evidence that short-term rentals are allowed.
I looked for hotel rental pool references such as hotel-managed, Hilton pool, or rental program language and found none. Because short-term rentals are not supported by the remarks, hotel pool participation is set to false.
I searched for mandatory participation language like required rental program, cannot opt out, or must be in the pool, and found nothing. With no evidence of STR or a hotel pool, mandatory pool participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for leasehold language such as 'lease expires,' 'ground lease ends,' 'leasehold expiring,' or renewal/extension dates, but found nothing. With no lease tenure details in the listings, the expiry year cannot be determined from these remarks.
The public remarks directly confirm VA financing is available for this building/unit. I looked for phrases like VA approved, VA financing, or VA loans accepted, and found an explicit VA loan reference.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Garden-oriented views appear in the building’s listings, with 2 of 3 MLS records marking GARDEN in the view field. The public remarks reinforce this with phrases like "mini-garden retreat" and "beautifully landscaped grounds," indicating the feature is real but not universal across all units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.