Sky Tower Apartments
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Sky Tower Apartments
Building Overview
Sky Tower Apartments in Makiki-Tantalus, built 1967; no pets or short-term rentals allowed.
About Sky Tower Apartments
Sky Tower Apartments is located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood and was built in 1967. According to available MLS records, specific details such as building size, number of units, and construction type are not provided in the data set.
Based on MLS data, there are no amenities or building features listed in the available records. Buyers should note that the MLS information provided does not include common-area details, unit-level features, or amenity descriptions for this property.
According to MLS data, pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. The management company is listed as unknown in the records. This summary is based on available MLS data; prospective buyers and their agents should verify all details, including parking, maintenance fees, rules, and management information, with the listing agent or building management.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for owner-occupancy percentages or descriptive terms like 'majority owner occupied' or '80% owner occupied,' but found none. The remarks mention resident manager, owner motivation, and general building condition, but nothing that indicates the percentage of owner-occupied units.
I searched the public remarks for explicit elevator references such as 'elevators,' 'multiple elevators,' or a numeric count, but found none. One remark even says the unit is accessible 'without any stairs or elevator,' which describes access to the unit rather than the building’s elevator count.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 13 current MLS listings show OTCOEX in association_fee_includes, which is strong building-level evidence that common area electricity is included in the maintenance fee. No public remarks explicitly mention it, but the MLS data is unanimous, so this appears to be a stable building feature rather than copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The MLS pattern strongly points to hot water not being included: 0 of 13 listings have HOTWAT, while 11 of 13 instead list WTRHTR (water heater) in the unit. That is a strong negative signal and fits the remarks, which mention in-unit washers/dryers and renovations but never say hot water is included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 13 current MLS listings include SEWER, making this a very high-confidence building feature. Public remarks do not explicitly call it out, but the repeated MLS inclusion across listings is strong enough to treat sewer as included in the fee.
Water is included in 12 of 13 current MLS listings, which is strong near-unanimous evidence for the building. The public remarks are silent on water service, but there is no indication of a recent change or agent correction.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Car wash facilities are strongly supported by the public remarks. At least 6 listings explicitly mention a "dedicated car wash area," "carwash area," or "car wash stall," which aligns with the historical MLS pattern of CRWSH in 12/13 listings. The repeated wording across different listings suggests this is a real shared building amenity rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings explicitly mention board/surfboard storage multiple times, including storage for bikes and surfboards. That is strong evidence the building offers surfboard storage.
No analysis available
There is no mention of a trash chute system in any of the provided public remarks. Although 3/13 MLS entries currently show TRACHU, the lack of any corroborating language like "trash chute" or "garbage chute" across multiple listings suggests this amenity is not actually supported by the building remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence for a pool. Multiple listings from different agents/remarks mention it directly, including 'heated salt water pool,' 'swimming pool,' and 'sparkling pool,' and the current MLS amenities show 13/13 listings with pool-related codes. This appears to be consistent across the building rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
Moderate-to-strong evidence the building pool is heated: at least two separate public remarks explicitly state 'Heated salt water pool' and several listings reference the pool amenity. The heated description appears in multiple agent remarks and aligns with prior MLS HEAPOO checks, supporting inclusion with high confidence.
The remarks directly identify the pool as salt water several times, which is strong explicit evidence. This aligns with the building context showing a pool and supports a high-confidence true value.
This feature is strongly supported across the building: multiple current listings explicitly mention in-unit laundry, and the MLS inclusions are universally checked for washer/dryer (13/13). The wording is consistent across different remarks and agents, suggesting this is a real building/unit feature rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
I looked for signs that community laundry requires payment, such as coin-op, card-operated, quarters, or a laundry fee. The public remarks do not mention any paid laundry system, so this cannot be confirmed from the listings.
I searched for explicit language such as "laundry on each floor," "laundry room on every floor," or similar wording. The remarks only mention laundry retrofits and in-unit washer/dryer, not community laundry placement by floor, so there is no evidence for this feature.
Parking is offered by the building and repeatedly referenced across listings (e.g., '1 covered parking', 'covered parking stall', 'car wash area'). MLS checkbox data shows parking present on all 12 listings, and multiple agent remarks across different listings describe covered stalls and common parking areas.
Strong, consistent evidence across many listings that parking is assigned. Multiple remarks explicitly use phrases like '1 assigned parking stall,' 'one covered assigned parking stall,' and 'assigned covered parking,' which appears to be repeated by different agents rather than a one-off copy error.
Covered parking is clearly documented across the building. Several listings explicitly state 'covered parking,' '1 covered parking stall,' and 'covered, assigned parking stall,' confirming this is a shared building feature.
I looked for deeded, owned, or included-in-deed parking language and found only assigned, covered parking stalls. That supports parking being assigned rather than deeded.
No analysis available
I searched for any public remark mentioning a parking fee, parking rental, or monthly charge, and found none. The listings mention assigned parking and guest parking, but no separate parking cost.
Guest parking is strongly supported by both historical MLS data and current remarks. Multiple listings reference '8 guest parking stalls,' 'ample guest parking,' and 'plenty of guest parking right near unit,' indicating this is a real and recurring building amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for terms like parking waitlist, parking waiting list, or join the waitlist for parking and found nothing. The remarks describe assigned parking stalls, which does not indicate a waitlist system.
No analysis available
I looked for key card, fob, card reader, or electronic access references. The listings clearly describe fob-required entry and secured doors, which is consistent with a card/fob security system.
Across the provided listings, there are repeated references to security cameras, secured entry, fob access, and a resident manager, but no listing explicitly mentions a security guard, 24-hour security, or on-site security staff. The evidence looks more like general building security rather than guard service, so the MLS amenity checkbox is likely a copy/paste error.
I searched for explicit patrol references such as security patrol, roving security, or patrolled building. The remarks mention secure entry, cameras, and a resident manager, but not patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the provided listings, 0 mention window air conditioning or wall AC, while several explicitly describe the units as "breezy," with "cross winds," "cool breezes," or "excellent cross ventilation." The only evidence is a partial MLS inclusion checkbox signal (4/13), which is too weak to override the repeated remark pattern. This does not look like a building feature buyers can rely on.
Concrete construction is strongly supported. Current MLS data is unanimous (13/13), and several public remarks mention 'spalling,' exterior painting, and other repairs consistent with a concrete high-rise. The evidence appears consistent across multiple listings and agents, not just a single copy-paste remark.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 3 of 10 current listings list MASSTU in construction_materials, and no public remarks mention 'masonry' or 'stucco'. Multiple listings discuss 'spalling' and concrete repairs, which aligns with concrete construction rather than masonry/stucco, so MASSTU appears to be an inconsistent checkbox and is likely not a building-level feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence for above-ground construction is weak and unsupported by remarks. Only 2 of 13 current MLS listings carry ABOGRO, and no listing text explicitly describes the building as above-ground constructed. This looks like unreliable MLS checkbox data rather than a confirmed building feature.
There is no meaningful evidence that the building is brick construction. The lone BRICK checkbox in current MLS data is not reinforced by any remarks, while the rest of the listings are silent on brick. This appears more like inconsistent MLS copy/paste than a verified building characteristic.
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental language such as STR permitted, NUC, TVU, or vacation rental references and found none. Because there is no public-remark evidence showing STR is allowed, it is not confirmed.
I looked for hotel pool references such as hotel rental pool, Hilton pool, Ritz pool, or managed-by-hotel wording and found nothing. Since there is also no evidence that STR is allowed, this must be false.
I searched for mandatory participation language like required to rent, cannot opt out, or mandatory hotel pool and found nothing. With no evidence of a hotel rental pool and no STR allowance shown, mandatory pool participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I found evidence that the building/unit is leasehold, which confirms the tenure type. However, I did not find any specific wording like "lease expires 2050," "ground lease ends," or a renewal year, so the expiry year cannot be extracted.
I searched the public remarks for VA-specific language such as "VA approved," "VA loans accepted," or "VA financing" and found none. With no evidence in the remarks, this is treated as not confirmed from public listing text.
I searched for insurance language such as 'fully insured,' 'walls-in coverage,' 'full insurance,' or similar HOA coverage terms, but found nothing. The remarks discuss repairs, security, and building maintenance, but do not address insurance coverage.
No analysis available
Multiple remarks point to completed fire/life-safety remediation, including a new fire alarm system, fire safety work, and other related repairs. While the exact phrase 'FLSE passed' is not used, the repeated references strongly support that the building has passed or materially completed fire/life-safety evaluation work.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are strongly supported across the listings. At least 11 of 13 current MLS entries mention OCEAN, and several remarks explicitly describe 'partial ocean views' or 'city and ocean views,' suggesting this is a real and recurring building feature rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
City views appear to be a consistent building feature. Current MLS data shows CITY in 12 of 13 listings, and the remarks repeatedly mention 'city views,' 'city and ocean views,' and 'city lights at dusk,' confirming the pattern across multiple listings.
Coastline views are not well supported by the public remarks. Only 2 of 13 MLS listings reference COASTL, and none of the remarks explicitly describe coastline, shoreline, or coastal views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is not enough evidence to support sunrise views as a building-wide feature. Only 2 of 13 MLS listings reference SUNRIS, and none of the remarks describe sunrise, morning sun, or eastern exposure.
Sunset views are present in at least some units. The MLS shows SUNSET in 6 of 13 listings, and remarks include direct wording like 'evening sunsets' and 'city lights at dusk,' which is stronger than a mere checkbox pattern.
No analysis available
I searched for wording like "fireworks view," "watch fireworks from lanai," or "see fireworks from unit." The listings describe city/ocean views and lanai views, but nothing indicates a direct fireworks view from the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
High-confidence evidence that Sky Tower has an on-site/resident manager: the MLS amenity RESMAN is present across listings (historically 11–12 of 11–12), and at least 6 separate public remarks explicitly mention an on-site or resident manager (quotes include 'on-site manager', 'on-site resident manager', and 'resident manager'), indicating consistent references across multiple agents rather than a lone copy/paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.