Shores at Suncrest I
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Shores at Suncrest I
Building Overview
Shores at Suncrest I in Ewa — built 1997; pets allowed; short-term rentals not permitted.
About Shores at Suncrest I
Based on MLS data, Shores at Suncrest I is a residential building located in the Ewa neighborhood, built in 1997. Size (number of units/square footage) and construction type are not specified in the available MLS records.
Key recorded policies for the building include that pets are allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. The MLS information provided does not list specific on-site amenities, common area features, or unit-level details.
Additional management and operational details are limited in the MLS data: the management company is listed as unknown and there are no MLS-noted details about parking, maintenance fees, or association rules. Buyers should verify all building specifics, policies, fees, and amenity information with the listing agent or condominium association before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
The remarks target first-time buyers and describe the home’s features and location but provide no quantitative or qualitative statement about what percentage of units are owner-occupied. Without explicit figures or phrases like 'mostly owner-occupied', the owner-occupancy rate cannot be determined. The value remains unknown.
The provided remarks focus on the townhome layout, parking, lanai, and community amenities like pool and playground, but do not reference any elevators. Without an explicit statement, the number of elevators in the building is unknown. No reasonable inference can be made from the available text.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The public remarks describe parking, a lanai, extra storage, pool and playground access, but do not reference any surfboard-specific storage areas. I searched for terms like 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', 'surf storage', and 'bike and surfboard storage' and found none. In the absence of any mention, it's likely the building does not offer dedicated surfboard storage.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The public remarks reference a pool but provide no indication that it is a saltwater or saline system. I searched for terms like 'salt water pool', 'saltwater', 'saline', and 'salt pool' and found no mentions. In the absence of any explicit description, the pool is assumed not to be saltwater.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for terms such as 'coin laundry', 'coin-op', 'card operated', 'paid laundry', and 'laundry fee' and found no mentions. The focus on in-unit washer/dryer implies residents are not using a paid community laundry setup.
Searched for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'laundry room on every floor', and 'floor-by-floor laundry' but found none. Listings emphasize in-unit washer/dryer, suggesting there is no separate community laundry on every floor.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for indications that parking is deeded, such as 'deeded parking', 'owned stall', or 'parking included in deed'. The listings only describe 'assigned' parking stalls and guest/street parking, which does not confirm deeded ownership. In the absence of explicit deeded language, parking is treated as not confirmed deeded.
No analysis available
I looked for terms like 'parking fee', 'monthly parking charge', 'additional parking cost', or 'parking rental'. The remarks mention maintenance and reserve fees but do not specify any separate parking fee. Without explicit wording, the presence or amount of a parking fee is unknown.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I checked for language such as 'parking waitlist', 'waiting list for parking', or needing to sign up for parking. The remarks only note assigned stalls and ample street/guest parking. With no mention of a waitlist system, it is assumed there is no formal parking waitlist based on current information.
No analysis available
The remarks describe the unit’s finishes, parking, community pool, playground, and nearby amenities but do not reference any building access control systems such as key cards, fobs, or electronic readers. I searched for terms like 'key card', 'fob access', 'card reader', and 'electronic access' and found none, so this feature is assumed not present based on available information.
No analysis available
The listing remarks focus on the remodeled interior, parking availability, community pool/playground, and location but provide no indication of any on-site or roving security patrol service. I specifically looked for phrases such as 'security patrol', 'roving security', 'patrolled', or 'security service' and found no evidence, so this is assumed not present given the current data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for terms like 'short-term rental', 'vacation rental', 'NUC', 'TVU', or any minimum-night stay language. The listings emphasize primary residential use and do not advertise STR potential. In the absence of any STR-related language, short-term rentals are treated as not allowed based solely on the remarks.
I looked for phrases such as 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel rental program', 'managed by hotel', or branding like Hilton/Trump/Ritz. None of the remarks suggest any hotel-type operation or rental pool. Combined with the apparent residential nature of the complex and no STR evidence, participation in a hotel pool is ruled out.
I checked for wording like 'mandatory hotel pool', 'required to participate in rental program', or similar conditions. The listings do not mention any rental program at all, much less a mandatory one. Since there is no sign of STR or hotel pool participation, mandatory pool participation is considered not present.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for phrases such as 'lease expires', 'land lease to', 'leasehold expiring', or 'ground lease ends' followed by a year. The remarks do not mention leasehold or any expiration date, so the lease expiry year cannot be determined from the provided information.
I searched the remarks for terms like 'VA approved', 'VA financing', or 'VA loans accepted'. None of the listings reference VA eligibility. Due to the complete absence of VA-related language, the building is assumed not to be VA-approved based on available remarks.
The text does not address HOA insurance coverage type or extent. Since there is no explicit claim of full or walls-in insurance, it is treated as not confirmed that the building is fully insured by the HOA. This is a default assumption based on lack of evidence, not a verified negative.
No analysis available
Remarks describe interior upgrades, parking, and location benefits but do not discuss fire or life safety evaluations or certifications. Given this absence and no prior data, it is assumed the listing does not advertise a passed fire/life safety evaluation. This is a likely-but-uncertain default rather than confirmed information.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Looked for phrases such as 'fireworks view', 'watch fireworks from lanai', or similar indications of visible fireworks from the property. Since nothing related was mentioned, it is assumed there is no specific fireworks view.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.