Sans Souci Inc
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Sans Souci Inc
Building Overview
Sans Souci Inc in Diamond Head-Kapahulu-St. Louis; 1960 concrete building with ocean and mountain views and parking available.
About Sans Souci Inc
Sans Souci Inc is located in the Diamond Head-Kapahulu-St. Louis neighborhood and was built in 1960. According to available records, the building is constructed of concrete. Specific unit sizes and counts are not provided in the available MLS data.
Based on MLS data, key features include ocean, mountain and sunset views. The property does not allow pets and short-term rentals are not permitted. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS records.
Parking is indicated as available in the MLS information; no details on assigned stalls, fees, or guest parking are provided. Buyers should verify parking arrangements, monthly maintenance or association fees, and any additional rules or restrictions with the listing agent or association, as this summary is based solely on MLS data.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for owner-occupancy language such as a percentage, majority owner occupied, or highly owner occupied. The remarks do not provide any owner-occupancy information, so this remains unknown.
I looked for an explicit elevator count such as "4 elevators" or "multiple elevators," but found none. The only direct evidence is a reference to taking "a short elevator ride," which confirms elevator access but not the number of elevators.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
6 of 20 current MLS listings check CABTV in association_fee_includes, indicating some units/building listings list cable as included. None of the public remarks explicitly mention cable service being included and evidence appears limited (possible agent checkbox usage), so inclusion is plausible but not strongly confirmed across agents.
14 of 20 MLS listings flag OTCOEX (other/common electric) in the association fee includes, suggesting common-area electricity is typically included. The public remarks do not explicitly say 'common area electricity,' so the evidence is implied from MLS checkboxes across multiple listings rather than explicit agent remarks.
No analysis available
Evidence strongly supports electricity being included in the maintenance fee. One listing explicitly states the monthly fee is 'ALL INCLUSIVE' of '...water/sewer, electricity and maintenance,' and the current MLS pattern shows 19 of 20 listings including ELECTR. This looks like consistent building-level information rather than a one-off agent error.
No analysis available
Hot water is consistently checked in the MLS across all current listings, which is strong building-level evidence. While one listing includes WTRHTR in inclusions, the overall MLS pattern still overwhelmingly indicates hot water is included. No public remarks here clearly dispute hot water coverage.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is extremely well supported. Every current MLS listing includes SEWER, and at least one remark explicitly says the fee includes 'water/sewer.' This appears to be a stable building feature with no sign of agent copy-paste drift.
Water inclusion is supported by both the MLS pattern and the remarks. The current data shows WATER in 18 of 20 listings, and one remark directly states the monthly fee includes 'water/sewer.' This is consistent enough to treat as a building-level included utility.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS data indicates storage is commonly offered—15/20 listings have STORAG/ADDLVSTORAG and 7/20 list STORAG in unit features. None of the public remarks mention storage lockers or extra storage, and there is no owner/manager verification, so inclusion is based on strong MLS checkbox prevalence but lacks explicit confirmation in agent remarks.
I looked for surfboard storage, board storage, surf storage, and similar amenity descriptions, but found none. The remarks emphasize beach access and water activities, yet do not mention any dedicated surfboard storage facilities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for saltwater pool, salt pool, saline pool, and similar terms, but found no evidence in the remarks. The building context also indicates there is no pool, so there is no basis to mark a salt-water pool as present.
In-unit laundry is explicitly mentioned in several listings, including phrases like 'washer/dryer in unit' and 'washer/dryer.' The MLS inclusions also show 8 of 20 listings checking washer/dryer, which suggests the feature is present in some units and not just a one-off typo. The evidence is consistent across multiple remarks and appears to be building/unit-specific rather than a single agent copy-paste error.
No analysis available
I looked for terms such as coin laundry, coin-op, card-operated laundry, quarters, or laundry fees and found no public remark evidence. The only laundry-related references are to washer/dryer in unit, so there is no basis to mark paid community laundry as present.
I searched the public remarks for language like "laundry on each floor," "laundry room on every floor," or similar floor-by-floor community laundry references and found none. The listings instead mention in-unit washer/dryer in some residences, which does not confirm shared laundry facilities on every floor.
No analysis available
Assigned parking is strongly supported across the building. Multiple listings explicitly mention it in public remarks, including 'assigned parking,' '1 secured, covered, assigned, lobby-level parking,' and 'one assigned parking stall,' and the MLS data shows 15/20 listings with ASSIGN. This appears to be a real building feature rather than a copy-paste error.
Evidence indicates covered parking is available: 13/20 MLS listings include covered/garage codes and several remarks explicitly say 'covered parking stall' or 'covered, assigned' parking. Multiple separate listings reference covered stalls, supporting a high confidence that covered parking exists in the building.
I looked for phrases such as deeded parking, owned stall, or parking included in the deed. The remarks consistently describe parking as assigned or included with units, which supports that it is not explicitly deeded in the public remarks.
No analysis available
I searched for any stated parking charge, monthly parking fee, or parking rental cost and found nothing. The remarks only indicate parking is included/assigned, so there is no evidence of a separate parking fee.
Although 6/20 MLS checkboxes indicate guest parking, none of the public remarks mention 'guest' or 'visitor' parking across the listings reviewed. With no corroborating remarks and likely agent checkbox inconsistencies, there is strong evidence to omit guest parking as a building-level advertised feature.
Multiple listings reference secure access: public remarks repeatedly mention 'security gate', 'gated building', 'resident manager', and 'secured' parking (e.g., '1 secured, covered, assigned, lobby-level parking'). Combined with MLS SECENT checks (13/20) this provides strong evidence that parking/entry is secured.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for references to a parking waitlist, parking waiting list, or instructions to join a parking queue. There is no evidence in the remarks that parking is managed through a waitlist system.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit access-control terms like key card, fob access, card reader, or electronic entry and did not find them. The building is described as gated with secure access, but that is not enough to confirm a card-based security system.
No analysis available
I looked for any public remarks indicating a security patrol service and found none. The building is described as having a resident manager and a security gate, but there is no evidence of patrol coverage.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
19 of 20 current MLS listings for this building list 'CONCRE' as the construction material. None of the public remarks explicitly mention building materials or 'concrete,' but the overwhelming and consistent MLS checkbox usage across multiple listings (19/20) indicates the building is concrete construction. No owner/property-manager verification was provided to contradict this.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Steel frame construction is weakly suggested by current MLS data: 1 of 20 listings is tagged STEFRA. The public remarks across the listings do not mention steel frame or steel frame construction, so the evidence is not corroborated by agent descriptions and may reflect a sparse MLS entry rather than repeated confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The public remarks clearly indicate that vacation-rental activity is allowed, with multiple references to 30-day minimum stays and 39-day vacation rentals. That is strong evidence that short-term rental use is permitted in this building.
I searched for hotel rental pool language such as hotel rental pool, managed by hotel, Hilton pool, Trump pool, or similar branded rental programs and found none. The remarks do mention 30-day minimum stays and vacation rentals, but that is not evidence of a hotel pool program, so this remains false.
The listings show owner flexibility and optional rental use rather than a required rental-pool arrangement. Since nothing suggests mandatory participation and some remarks explicitly emphasize optionality, this is set to false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks explicitly state that the land lease was extended until 2089. This is the most recent/extended lease expiry year mentioned, so it is used as the lease expiry date.
I searched the public remarks for explicit VA financing language and found none. Because the listings discuss rental terms, parking, and unit features but never mention VA approval, there is no basis to mark this building as VA approved from remarks alone.
I looked for explicit wording like fully insured, full insurance, walls-in coverage, or comprehensive building insurance. The remarks only note that fees include insurance, which is not enough to confirm full HOA coverage.
No analysis available
I searched for direct references to fire/life safety compliance, including FLSE passed, fire safety certified, and passed fire inspection. The public remarks do not mention any of these, so there is no evidence to mark this feature as true.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are strongly confirmed for this building. The current remarks repeatedly reference oceanfront living and sweeping Pacific Ocean views across many listings, including phrases like 'direct ocean and beach front,' 'unobstructed views of the Pacific Ocean,' and 'breathtaking views of ... the Pacific.' This appears consistent across multiple agents and listings rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Public remarks repeatedly call out coastline and Waikiki shoreline vistas—phrases include 'sweeping coastline', 'Waikiki coastline', and 'coastline all the way down to Waikiki'. Combined with COASTL checked in MLS data and consistent agent descriptions, evidence is strong that the building offers coastline-view units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Many listings explicitly reference evening views and sunsets—examples: 'enjoy the Friday night fireworks, beautiful sunsets', 'watch beautiful sunsets', and 'Golden Sunset'. With SUNSET present in MLS view_descriptions and repeated explicit mentions across the public remarks, there is strong evidence the building offers sunset-view units.
No analysis available
The remarks repeatedly confirm fireworks views from units/lanai, not merely proximity to fireworks. Multiple listings explicitly say residents can watch the Friday night fireworks from the lanai or from the unit.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence supports an on-site resident manager at Sans Souci. 17 of 20 current MLS listings include the RESMAN amenity checkbox, and at least two public remarks explicitly state "resident manager" or "resident manager on property." This appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence that Sans Souci is a cooperative: 17 of 20 current MLS listings include COOTAX, and multiple listing remarks explicitly state 'co-op' or 'Cooperative Building' (for example, "co-op, residence" and "Sans Souci INC is a Cooperative Building"). This language appears across different unit listings and agents, reinforcing that the building is a co-op rather than a condominium.
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.