Sans Souci Inc
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Sans Souci Inc
Building Overview
Sans Souci Inc in Diamond Head-Kapahulu-St. Louis; 1960 concrete building with ocean and mountain views and parking available.
About Sans Souci Inc
Sans Souci Inc is located in the Diamond Head-Kapahulu-St. Louis neighborhood and was built in 1960. According to available records, the building is constructed of concrete. Specific unit sizes and counts are not provided in the available MLS data.
Based on MLS data, key features include ocean, mountain and sunset views. The property does not allow pets and short-term rentals are not permitted. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS records.
Parking is indicated as available in the MLS information; no details on assigned stalls, fees, or guest parking are provided. Buyers should verify parking arrangements, monthly maintenance or association fees, and any additional rules or restrictions with the listing agent or association, as this summary is based solely on MLS data.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
The county assessor reports 16 floors. Listings reach only floor 12 and have no penthouse listings, so they do not establish the top residential floor and are set aside for the floor count.
The county assessor's reconciled units, residential CPR, and dwelling sum all report 88 units for this single-structure parcel. No state registration or conflicting MLS unit count is available.
I searched for an owner-occupancy percentage and phrases such as "majority owner occupied" or "highly owner occupied." No qualifying information appears, so the owner-occupancy rate remains unknown.
I searched for statements such as "4 elevators," "four elevators," or "multiple elevators." No specific elevator count appears in the remarks, so the number remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
6 of 20 current MLS listings check CABTV in association_fee_includes, indicating some units/building listings list cable as included. None of the public remarks explicitly mention cable service being included and evidence appears limited (possible agent checkbox usage), so inclusion is plausible but not strongly confirmed across agents.
Common-area electricity is supported by the OTCOEX checkbox in 15 of 20 listings. The pattern is strong across the current MLS data, although public remarks generally use broad wording such as 'all inclusive' rather than explicitly saying common-area electricity.
No analysis available
Electricity inclusion is nearly universal in the current MLS data, appearing in 19 of 20 listings. Multiple remarks confirm the checkbox data, including 'includes electricity' and 'ALL INCLUSIVE' references, making this strong building-level evidence.
No analysis available
Hot water is marked included in all 20 current MLS listings. No public remarks contradict this, and the single WTRHTR entry appears anomalous compared with the otherwise unanimous HOTWAT data.
Only 5 of 20 listings identify internet service as included, and none of the supplied remarks mention internet or Wi-Fi. This is materially weaker than the other utility inclusions and may reflect inconsistent MLS checkbox usage rather than a confirmed building-wide benefit.
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is unanimous across all 20 current MLS listings. The explicit 'water/sewer' statement independently confirms the checkbox data, providing exceptionally strong evidence.
Water inclusion is supported by 18 of 20 current listings and directly confirmed in remarks stating that fees include 'water/sewer.' The broad agreement across listings and prior high confidence support including this feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is indicated in 14 of 20 listings through building amenities and in 9 of 20 listings as a unit feature, making it a commonly reported offering. None of the public remarks explicitly mention storage units, lockers, or extra storage, so the evidence relies primarily on repeated MLS fields rather than detailed agent descriptions.
The building's beach location and water activities are well documented, but no dedicated surfboard-storage facility is identified. This is treated as false with low confidence because the feature is not explicitly denied.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The public remarks provide no evidence of any swimming pool, much less a saltwater pool. The stated building context confirms that the building has no pool, supporting a false value.
In-unit laundry is explicitly mentioned in several listings, including phrases like 'washer/dryer in unit' and 'washer/dryer.' The MLS inclusions also show 8 of 20 listings checking washer/dryer, which suggests the feature is present in some units and not just a one-off typo. The evidence is consistent across multiple remarks and appears to be building/unit-specific rather than a single agent copy-paste error.
COMLAU is checked in 16/20 current listings, which is meaningful building-level MLS evidence for community laundry. However, none of the supplied remarks mention a shared laundry room, coin laundry, or laundry facilities, and two listings explicitly advertise washer/dryer in unit; confirmation from management or a site visit is recommended.
The public remarks do not indicate that community laundry requires payment. Because there is no explicit confirmation or denial, this is treated as false with low confidence.
The remarks do not describe community laundry facilities being available on every floor. No explicit denial was found, so this is treated as false with low confidence.
Parking is strongly supported across the building: at least 12 listings explicitly mention a parking stall, space, or parking inclusion. The evidence appears across multiple listings and agents, with examples including one, two, and even three parking stalls, confirming that the building offers parking to buyers.
Assigned parking remains strongly supported by the prior High-confidence determination and current MLS data showing ASSIGN on 15 of 20 listings. Multiple remarks explicitly use the phrases 'assigned parking' and 'one assigned parking stall,' while other listings describe included stalls consistent with building parking inventory.
Evidence indicates covered parking is available: 13/20 MLS listings include covered/garage codes and several remarks explicitly say 'covered parking stall' or 'covered, assigned' parking. Multiple separate listings reference covered stalls, supporting a high confidence that covered parking exists in the building.
Multiple listings confirm that units may include assigned or included parking, including secured and covered stalls. However, no listing explicitly says the parking is deeded, owned, or included in the unit deed.
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for monthly parking fees, parking charges, additional parking costs, or parking rental amounts. None were stated; references to monthly fees concern overall maintenance, lease rent, or co-op charges rather than parking.
Although 6/20 MLS checkboxes indicate guest parking, none of the public remarks mention 'guest' or 'visitor' parking across the listings reviewed. With no corroborating remarks and likely agent checkbox inconsistencies, there is strong evidence to omit guest parking as a building-level advertised feature.
Multiple listings reference secure access: public remarks repeatedly mention 'security gate', 'gated building', 'resident manager', and 'secured' parking (e.g., '1 secured, covered, assigned, lobby-level parking'). Combined with MLS SECENT checks (13/20) this provides strong evidence that parking/entry is secured.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for parking waitlist, waiting-list, queue, or instructions to join a list for parking. No such system or requirement was mentioned.
No analysis available
The listings confirm controlled or gated access but do not establish a card- or fob-based security system. This feature is therefore treated as false with low confidence.
No analysis available
The remarks refer to a security gate and resident manager, but neither establishes a security patrol service. No direct evidence of patrols was found, so this is treated as false with low confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete construction is supported by 18 of 20 current listings and prior high confidence for this building. No public remarks explicitly mention concrete, but the strong, repeated MLS material designation across many listings supports including it.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Steel frame construction is weakly suggested by current MLS data: 1 of 20 listings is tagged STEFRA. The public remarks across the listings do not mention steel frame or steel frame construction, so the evidence is not corroborated by agent descriptions and may reflect a sparse MLS entry rather than repeated confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Eight of 20 current listings identify above-ground construction, but none of the provided remarks use phrases such as 'above ground construction' or describe above-ground materials. This supports the feature with moderate confidence, while the partial adoption across listings suggests the MLS data should be treated cautiously.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings explicitly describe a 30-day minimum rental requirement. Under the provided rules, a 30-day minimum means short-term rental is not allowed, even though the remarks discuss rental income and vacation use.
The remarks contain no references to a hotel rental pool, hotel rental program, branded hotel management, or participation in hotel operations. Because short-term rental is not allowed under the stated 30-day-minimum evidence, this feature must also be false.
No listing states that owners must participate in a hotel rental pool or cannot opt out of a rental program. Because short-term rental is not allowed under the stated 30-day-minimum evidence, mandatory hotel-pool participation must also be false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building is explicitly described as leasehold, and the most recent specific lease information states that the land lease was extended until 2089. This later extension supersedes the less-specific reference to a 65-year lease.
The remarks were searched for explicit references to VA approval, VA financing, or VA loans being accepted. None were found, so there is no public-remarks evidence that the building is VA approved.
I searched for fully insured, full insurance, comprehensive building insurance, and walls-in coverage. The general reference to included insurance does not establish full HOA insurance coverage, so this feature is not confirmed.
No analysis available
I searched for FLSE, fire/life safety evaluation, fire safety certification, life safety compliance, and passed fire inspection language. None of these terms or equivalent claims were found in the remarks.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
All 20 of 20 listings mention ocean views, including phrases such as "sweeping unobstructed views of the Pacific Ocean," "direct ocean and beach front," and "unhindered views of the Pacific Ocean." The evidence is strong across numerous listings and clearly confirms that the building offers ocean-view units.
No analysis available
At least 5 of 20 listings are marked with Diamond Head views, while remarks explicitly state "breathtaking views of majestic Diamond Head," "Diamond Head view greeting you at your front door," and "a breath-taking view of Diamond Head." The repeated specific descriptions confirm that Diamond Head-view units are available in the building.
No analysis available
Public remarks repeatedly call out coastline and Waikiki shoreline vistas—phrases include 'sweeping coastline', 'Waikiki coastline', and 'coastline all the way down to Waikiki'. Combined with COASTL checked in MLS data and consistent agent descriptions, evidence is strong that the building offers coastline-view units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
One of 20 listings is marked for sunrise, and one detailed remark references watching surfers catch "the first waves of dawn." This is limited, partly implied evidence, so confidence is moderate rather than high, but it indicates that the building may offer sunrise-view units.
Eighteen of 20 listings mention sunset views, including "beautiful sunsets," "spectacular sunsets every night," and "views of daily sunsets." The consistent repetition across many listings and agents strongly confirms that the building offers sunset-view units.
No analysis available
The remarks repeatedly and directly confirm views of Friday night fireworks from units and private lanais. This is strong, consistent evidence that the building has fireworks views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building has an on-site resident manager. Two current remarks explicitly mention a 'resident manager' or 'resident manager on property,' and 17 of 20 current MLS listings include the RESMAN amenity checkbox, providing strong evidence across listings rather than a single isolated claim.
No analysis available
Sans Souci is strongly validated as a cooperative: 18 of 20 current listings include COOTAX, and multiple listings explicitly use “co-op” or “Cooperative Building.” Although some remarks loosely call units condos, the repeated COOTAX data and direct cooperative descriptions across listings are compelling building-level evidence rather than a likely checkbox error.
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.