Sakura
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Sakura
Building Overview
Sakura in Nuuanu-Punchbowl; concrete building (1973) with mountain views and a resident manager.
About Sakura
Sakura is a residential building located in the Nuuanu-Punchbowl neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1973 and is of concrete construction. Size and unit count are not provided in the MLS data.
Key features reported in MLS listings include mountain views and a resident manager on site. The property record indicates that pets are allowed and that short-term rentals are not permitted.
Parking is listed as available, covered, and assigned. The management company is shown as unknown in the MLS data. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all details, including unit sizes, fees, and management arrangements, with the listing agent or management.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit percentages such as "80% owner occupied" and descriptions such as "majority owner occupied" or "highly owner occupied." The listings provide no evidence to determine the owner-occupancy rate.
I searched for explicit counts such as "4 elevators," "four elevators," or "multiple elevators." The listings only indicate elevator access and do not establish the number of elevators.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Common-area electricity is included in the association fees according to 13 of 18 current MLS listings using the OTCOEX designation. None of the provided public remarks explicitly mention common-area electricity, so the conclusion relies primarily on the strong, repeated MLS data rather than agent remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water does not appear to be included in Sakura’s maintenance fee: 0 of 17 current MLS listings show HOTWAT, and multiple listings instead show WTRHTR, which is a strong indicator that units have their own water heaters. There are no public-remark mentions of building-supplied hot water, so this is best treated as a corrected false value.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is strongly supported by 17 of 18 current MLS listings listing SEWER in the association fee inclusions. No public remarks explicitly mention sewer, but the near-unanimous MLS reporting across listings provides very strong building-level evidence.
Water inclusion is supported by 16 of 18 current MLS listings listing WATER among the association fee inclusions. The public remarks contain no explicit water-fee language, but the consistent MLS data across many listings strongly supports this feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listing remarks mention a jogging path, walking path, running trail, or fitness path. With only 5 of 16 current MLS listings showing WAJOPA and no corroborating narrative evidence, there is not enough support to treat this as a building amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is strongly confirmed across many listings, with at least 10 current remarks explicitly mentioning a storage locker, storage area, or additional storage. The repeated detailed references—including a specific locker number and location—indicate a legitimate building/unit feature rather than copied checkbox data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Trash chute is strongly supported by current MLS data: 17 of 18 listings list TRACHU in the building amenities. None of the provided public remarks explicitly mention a trash chute, but the consistent reporting across nearly all listings indicates this is a building-level amenity rather than an isolated agent entry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
In-unit laundry is strongly supported across the building: at least 10 current listing remarks explicitly mention the feature, while 16 of 18 listings include washer/dryer in MLS inclusions. The repeated detailed phrases across multiple listings, including a “brand new washer and dryer just delivered” and an interior washer/dryer hookup, confirm this is a legitimate building offering rather than an isolated checkbox or copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is strongly confirmed across the building: current MLS data lists parking-related features for all 18 listings, and numerous remarks mention phrases such as "one assigned parking stall," "parking garage," "secured covered parking," "deeded parking stall," and "1 covered parking." The evidence comes from many separate listing descriptions and consistently indicates that the building offers parking.
Assigned parking remains strongly supported. At least five remarks explicitly reference "assigned parking stall," "one assigned covered parking stall," "your own dedicated" parking, or a "deeded parking stall," while 12 of 18 current listings contain the ASSIGN parking feature. Although some remarks only say covered or secured parking, the repeated explicit descriptions across listings confirm assigned parking at the building.
Covered parking is clearly present at this building. Many remarks mention 'assigned covered parking stall,' 'covered parking garage,' 'covered secure parking,' and 'partially covered parking stall.' The evidence is broad and repeated across many listings, so confidence is very high.
The remarks provide direct evidence that at least one unit's parking stall is deeded. Other listings consistently describe assigned, covered, included, or dedicated parking, with no contradiction.
No analysis available
The remarks describe assigned, covered, secured, and deeded parking but do not state an additional parking charge. The monthly parking fee is therefore unknown.
No analysis available
Secured-entry parking/access is well supported. Multiple listings mention 'gated entry to parking garage,' 'secured parking,' 'secure parking,' and 'secured entry,' which aligns with the MLS secured-entry history. The pattern appears consistent across several agents and not like a one-off checkbox error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks consistently indicate that units have assigned or included parking stalls. No parking waitlist or waiting-list process was mentioned, supporting a false value, although absence of mention is not definitive.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Split AC is strongly supported by the current remarks: at least 2 listings explicitly mention split AC units, including one noting 'two newly installed split AC units in both the living room and bedroom' and another stating 'a split AC unit in the bedroom.' This matches the prior MLS inclusion flag (ACSPL) and appears to be a real building/unit feature rather than copy-paste noise.
The current MLS data shows ACWIUN in 7 of 17 listings, indicating window AC is present in at least some units. Public remarks repeatedly mention split AC in a few listings, but none explicitly mention window AC, so this appears to come from MLS inclusions rather than agent descriptions. Confidence is moderate because the checkbox pattern is consistent but not directly confirmed in remarks.
All 18 of 18 current listings report CONCRE as the construction material, strongly confirming that Sakura is a concrete building. No public remarks explicitly use phrases such as 'concrete construction' or 'reinforced concrete,' but the uniform data across multiple listings supports the feature rather than suggesting a copy-paste error.
5 of 15 MLS listings check 'DOUWAL' (double wall) in construction_materials, but no public remarks reference 'double wall' or 'double-wall construction' and there is no prior verification. This is inconsistent across listings and may reflect copy/paste errors by agents; evidence for double-wall construction is therefore weak.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings do not provide affirmative evidence that short-term rentals are allowed. They also do not explicitly state a prohibition such as a 30-day minimum or owner-occupant-only rule; under the no-evidence rule, this is treated as false with moderate-low confidence.
The remarks contain no evidence that the building participates in a hotel rental pool or hotel rental program. Because short-term rental permission is not established, this feature must be false.
The listings do not mention any mandatory hotel rental-pool obligation or required participation in a rental program. Since short-term rental permission is not established, mandatory pool participation must be false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for leasehold terminology, lease expiry dates, ground lease references, and renewal or extension years. No specific four-digit lease expiration year was found, so the value remains unknown.
The remarks directly reference an assumable VA loan, providing strong evidence that VA financing is available in this building/listing context. No contradictory financing information appears in the remarks.
I searched for references to fully insured, full insurance, fully covered insurance, comprehensive building insurance, and walls-in coverage. No supporting or opposing insurance statement was found in the remarks.
No analysis available
I searched for FLSE-passed, fire safety certified, life safety compliant, and passed fire inspection language. The fire alarm upgrade is not evidence that the required evaluation was passed, so this remains unconfirmed.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views are strongly supported across the listings. Multiple public remarks explicitly mention "mountain and sunset views," "mountain and city views," "views of Punchbowl," and "breathtaking ocean, city and mountain views," which aligns with the existing MLS mountain-view data. This does not look like a one-off agent error; the feature appears consistently available in the building.
No analysis available
City views are consistently supported across the listing set: 11 of 18 MLS records mention CITY, and multiple agents explicitly describe “city views,” “mountain and city views,” and views toward “Downtown Honolulu.” This confirms the building offers city-view units rather than reflecting a single copied description.
No analysis available
Garden-related views or setting are present in 3 of 18 current MLS listings, with an explicit remark describing a “peaceful garden setting.” Other listings reference “lush greenery,” “lush treetops,” and tree-top views, so the evidence supports garden/landscaped views for some units, though less consistently than city views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunset views are confirmed, though less frequently than mountain or city views. At least one public remark explicitly says "beautiful mountain and sunset views," and the MLS has SUNSET flagged for some listings, which is enough to support that some units offer this exposure. The evidence suggests a genuine feature, but it is not as broadly advertised as the mountain/city views.
Cemetery views are not supported by the public remarks across these listings: 0 listings explicitly mention cemetery views, while multiple listings describe other views such as mountain, city, ocean, Punchbowl, treetops, and stream views. Given the weak MLS signal and the lack of any corroborating remark, this feature appears unlikely to be an actual building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Resident management is consistently documented across the building: at least 8 current remarks explicitly mention a resident manager or equivalent, including “on-site resident manager,” “resident manager on property,” and “full time resident manager.” Combined with RESMAN appearing in 18/18 listings and prior high-confidence support, this is strong building-wide evidence rather than an isolated or likely copy-pasted checkbox.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.