Sakura
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Sakura
Building Overview
Sakura in Nuuanu-Punchbowl; concrete building (1973) with mountain views and a resident manager.
About Sakura
Sakura is a residential building located in the Nuuanu-Punchbowl neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1973 and is of concrete construction. Size and unit count are not provided in the MLS data.
Key features reported in MLS listings include mountain views and a resident manager on site. The property record indicates that pets are allowed and that short-term rentals are not permitted.
Parking is listed as available, covered, and assigned. The management company is shown as unknown in the MLS data. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all details, including unit sizes, fees, and management arrangements, with the listing agent or management.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for any owner-occupancy percentage or descriptive phrasing about the resident mix. The listings do not mention owner occupancy, so this percentage remains unknown from the provided information.
I reviewed the remarks for any direct reference to elevator service, including a count or wording like 'multiple elevators.' None of the listings mention elevators at all, so the number cannot be confirmed from the provided remarks.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Common area electricity appears to be included for Sakura based on 12 of 17 current MLS listings showing OTCOEX. The public remarks don’t explicitly mention it, but the MLS pattern is strong enough to treat this as a building-level included fee and likely not just agent copy-paste.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water does not appear to be included in Sakura’s maintenance fee: 0 of 17 current MLS listings show HOTWAT, and multiple listings instead show WTRHTR, which is a strong indicator that units have their own water heaters. There are no public-remark mentions of building-supplied hot water, so this is best treated as a corrected false value.
No analysis available
No analysis available
SEWER is included in 15 of 16 current MLS listings, making this a very strong building-level feature. The remarks across listings do not contradict it, and the consistency suggests this is not just agent copy-paste noise.
WATER appears in 14 of 16 current MLS listings, so the maintenance fee very likely includes water. The public remarks do not discuss water service directly, but the MLS data is broadly consistent across listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listing remarks mention a jogging path, walking path, running trail, or fitness path. With only 5 of 16 current MLS listings showing WAJOPA and no corroborating narrative evidence, there is not enough support to treat this as a building amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is clearly available in this building. At least 8 current listings explicitly mention storage-related features, including phrases like "storage locker," "dedicated storage locker," "bonus storage locker," and "additional storage in parking area." This aligns with the prior high-confidence MLS pattern and appears to be consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Trash chute is strongly supported by the current MLS data, with 15 of 16 listings listing TRACHU in amenities. None of the public remarks explicitly mention a trash/garbage/refuse chute, so the evidence is driven by repeated MLS input rather than narrative confirmation, but the volume is strong enough to include it.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Laundry in unit is strongly supported for this building. Multiple listings explicitly say 'in unit stack washer and dryer,' 'in-unit washer and dryer,' 'brand new washer and dryer just delivered,' and 'hook-up for washer/dryer is inside the unit.' With 15/17 current MLS listings showing washer/dryer in inclusions, this appears to be a stable building feature rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Assigned parking is strongly supported across the listings. At least 5+ remarks explicitly reference 'assigned,' 'deeded,' or 'designated' parking, including 'one assigned covered parking stall' and 'deeded parking stall fits a large vehicle.' This looks consistent across multiple agents rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
Covered parking is clearly present at this building. Many remarks mention 'assigned covered parking stall,' 'covered parking garage,' 'covered secure parking,' and 'partially covered parking stall.' The evidence is broad and repeated across many listings, so confidence is very high.
The remarks explicitly describe the parking stall as deeded, which is the clearest possible evidence for this feature. Other references to assigned, covered, secured, or convenient parking are consistent with this but were not needed to determine the value.
No analysis available
I looked for any mention of a separate parking cost, monthly parking charge, or rental fee and found none. The remarks describe the stall as deeded/assigned/covered, but they do not state that parking requires an additional payment.
No analysis available
Secured-entry parking/access is well supported. Multiple listings mention 'gated entry to parking garage,' 'secured parking,' 'secure parking,' and 'secured entry,' which aligns with the MLS secured-entry history. The pattern appears consistent across several agents and not like a one-off checkbox error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for parking waitlist language such as "join waitlist," "waiting list," or similar references and found nothing. The listings instead emphasize deeded, assigned, and convenient stalls.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Split AC is strongly supported by the current remarks: at least 2 listings explicitly mention split AC units, including one noting 'two newly installed split AC units in both the living room and bedroom' and another stating 'a split AC unit in the bedroom.' This matches the prior MLS inclusion flag (ACSPL) and appears to be a real building/unit feature rather than copy-paste noise.
The current MLS data shows ACWIUN in 7 of 17 listings, indicating window AC is present in at least some units. Public remarks repeatedly mention split AC in a few listings, but none explicitly mention window AC, so this appears to come from MLS inclusions rather than agent descriptions. Confidence is moderate because the checkbox pattern is consistent but not directly confirmed in remarks.
All current listings show CONCRE in construction_materials (17/17), providing overwhelming building-level evidence that Sakura is concrete construction. None of the public remarks explicitly mention concrete, but there is also no contradictory evidence; the MLS data is consistent across listings and appears reliable rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
5 of 15 MLS listings check 'DOUWAL' (double wall) in construction_materials, but no public remarks reference 'double wall' or 'double-wall construction' and there is no prior verification. This is inconsistent across listings and may reflect copy/paste errors by agents; evidence for double-wall construction is therefore weak.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for STR indicators such as "short-term rental allowed," "NUC," "TVU," or "vacation rental" and found none. The remarks also do not mention any 30-day minimum or owner-occupant-only restriction, so this is an absence-based inference rather than explicit proof.
I searched for hotel pool references like hotel rental program, managed-by-hotel language, or branded pool participation and found nothing. Because there is no evidence that STR is allowed, hotel-pool participation must be treated as false.
I looked for mandatory pool wording such as "required to participate," "must be in the rental program," or "cannot opt out" and found none. With no evidence of STR allowance or a hotel pool program, mandatory participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold language such as "lease expires," "ground lease ends," "leasehold," or renewal years and found nothing. Based on the remarks provided, I cannot identify any lease expiry year.
The listing explicitly references an assumable VA loan, which is strong public evidence that VA financing is available for this building/listing context. I did not find any contradictory language in the remarks.
I looked for HOA insurance wording indicating full or walls-in coverage. Nothing in the remarks references the building being fully insured, so there is no basis to confirm this feature from the listing text.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit fire/life safety language such as FLSE passed, fire safety certified, life safety compliant, or passed fire inspection. The remarks only note that fire alarms were upgraded, which is not the same as a passed fire/life safety evaluation, so there is no support for marking this true.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views are strongly supported across the listings. Multiple public remarks explicitly mention "mountain and sunset views," "mountain and city views," "views of Punchbowl," and "breathtaking ocean, city and mountain views," which aligns with the existing MLS mountain-view data. This does not look like a one-off agent error; the feature appears consistently available in the building.
No analysis available
City views are very well supported by both MLS data and multiple independent remarks. Several listings explicitly reference "city views" or views toward Downtown Honolulu, reinforcing that this is a real building-level feature offered by some units. The evidence appears broad rather than copy-pasted from a single source.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunset views are confirmed, though less frequently than mountain or city views. At least one public remark explicitly says "beautiful mountain and sunset views," and the MLS has SUNSET flagged for some listings, which is enough to support that some units offer this exposure. The evidence suggests a genuine feature, but it is not as broadly advertised as the mountain/city views.
Cemetery views are not supported by the public remarks across these listings: 0 listings explicitly mention cemetery views, while multiple listings describe other views such as mountain, city, ocean, Punchbowl, treetops, and stream views. Given the weak MLS signal and the lack of any corroborating remark, this feature appears unlikely to be an actual building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Resident manager is strongly supported: many listings explicitly say "resident manager," "on-site resident manager," "on-site residential manager," "resident manager on property," and even "Full time resident manager." Current MLS amenities also show RESMAN in 17/17 listings, which matches the remarks and suggests consistent building-level data rather than a one-off copy/paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.