Sakura
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Sakura
Building Overview
Sakura in Nuuanu-Punchbowl; concrete building (1973) with mountain views and a resident manager.
About Sakura
Sakura is a residential building located in the Nuuanu-Punchbowl neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1973 and is of concrete construction. Size and unit count are not provided in the MLS data.
Key features reported in MLS listings include mountain views and a resident manager on site. The property record indicates that pets are allowed and that short-term rentals are not permitted.
Parking is listed as available, covered, and assigned. The management company is shown as unknown in the MLS data. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all details, including unit sizes, fees, and management arrangements, with the listing agent or management.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for owner-occupancy percentages and descriptive phrases like 'majority owner occupied' or 'highly owner occupied.' The remarks do not provide any occupancy mix or ownership ratio. Because there is no explicit figure or description, the owner-occupancy percentage is unknown.
I searched the public remarks for elevator-related language such as 'elevator,' 'elevators,' 'multiple elevators,' and spelled-out counts like 'four elevators.' Nothing in the listings explicitly states the building has elevators or gives a count. Since there is no direct evidence, the number of elevators remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS checkboxes list OTCOEX in 10/15 current listings indicating common area electricity is generally included. None of the public remarks explicitly state 'common area electricity' or similar phrasing, suggesting agents may be using MLS checkboxes rather than writing it into remarks. Evidence is implied by multiple MLS entries rather than explicit agent remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No MLS listings list HOTWAT as included (0/15) while 6/15 explicitly list WTRHTR (water heater) in unit inclusions, implying units have their own hot water heaters. Public remarks contain no statements like 'hot water included' or 'hot water in HOA.' Taken together this is strong evidence that hot water is not included in the maintenance fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
SEWER is listed in the association fee fields on 14/15 current MLS listings, indicating sewer is typically included in the maintenance fee. Public remarks do not explicitly mention 'sewer included' but also do not contradict; the consistency across MLS entries supports inclusion.
WATER is listed as included in the association fees on 13/15 current MLS listings, suggesting water is generally covered by the maintenance fee. While public remarks lack explicit phrasing like 'water included,' the strong, repeated MLS checkbox usage across agents supports marking water as included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence this building offers storage/lockers: at least 9 separate public remarks explicitly reference 'storage locker', 'bonus storage locker', 'small storage area', or 'storage galore' (examples: 'storage locker #61 (Located on Level P2-next to stall #47)', 'additional storage in parking area'). MLS checkbox data also lists STORAG/ADDLVSTORAG in 9 of 15 listings and STORAG in 5 of 15 unit_features, and multiple agents independently mention the lockers rather than a single copy/paste note.
No analysis available
No analysis available
14 of 15 current MLS listings list TRACHU in amenities, but 0 of the public remarks mention a trash/garbage/refuse chute. Evidence leans on repeated MLS checkbox entries across multiple listings (possible copy/paste), so the feature is included with moderate confidence pending owner/manager verification or explicit remark confirming or denying it.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings (the public remarks repeatedly state phrases like 'in-unit washer/dryer', 'washer and dryer in the unit', and 'washer and dryer are in the unit') indicate that some units in this building have in-unit laundry. The MLS inclusions also show 13 of 15 listings include washer/dryer, so evidence is consistent across many agents and supports including laundry_in_unit for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Assigned parking is supported by both MLS checkbox data and agent remarks. CURRENT MLS: 9/15 listings have ASSIGN; remarks in these listings include phrases like "deeded parking stall" and "premium/assigned parking stall," and multiple agents reference a dedicated stall or storage next to a stall. Evidence is strong across listings and aligns with prior High confidence.
Covered parking is well-supported by MLS checkbox data and public remarks. CURRENT MLS: 11/15 listings indicate covered/garage parking; agent remarks repeatedly state "covered parking," "covered stall," and reference parking garage levels. Multiple independent remarks across listings confirm covered parking is available.
The remarks repeatedly describe the parking as assigned/covered, and one listing explicitly says 'Deeded parking stall fits a large vehicle.' That is strong public evidence that parking is deeded with the unit.
No analysis available
I searched for terms like 'parking fee,' 'monthly parking charge,' and 'parking rental' and found no references. The remarks describe deeded/assigned parking, but do not mention any separate monthly parking cost.
No analysis available
Secured-entry parking/building access is supported by both MLS data and agent remarks. CURRENT MLS: 8/15 listings have SECENT; many remarks state "secured parking," "secured entry," or "building is key secured," and several listings note on-site resident manager and key-secured building entry. Evidence is consistent across multiple agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for 'parking waitlist,' 'waiting list,' or similar language and found none. The remarks only indicate assigned or deeded parking, with no evidence of a waitlist system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
One of the listing remarks explicitly states the unit has "a split AC unit in the bedroom," and the MLS inclusions flag ACSPL in 1 of 14 current listings. Evidence is limited to a single listing/agent mention (others reference cool trade winds but not AC), so while not widespread across multiple agents, there is explicit confirmation that at least some units have split/ductless AC.
6/15 current listings list ACWIUN in inclusions, suggesting some units may have window air conditioners, but none of the public remarks explicitly mention window or wall AC units. Several remarks explicitly reference a 'split AC unit' or natural trade winds, indicating mixed AC types; the MLS checkbox presence across multiple listings provides implied but not definitive evidence.
All 15 current MLS listings list 'CONCRE' in construction_materials (previously 14/14), though none of the public remarks explicitly say 'concrete' or 'reinforced concrete'. The evidence is consistent across multiple agents' MLS entries (likely copy/paste), providing moderate implied confidence that the building is concrete construction.
5 of 15 MLS listings check 'DOUWAL' (double wall) in construction_materials, but no public remarks reference 'double wall' or 'double-wall construction' and there is no prior verification. This is inconsistent across listings and may reflect copy/paste errors by agents; evidence for double-wall construction is therefore weak.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for STR-related terms such as 'short-term rental allowed,' 'vacation rental,' 'NUC,' or 'TVU' and found no mentions. With no explicit allowance in the public remarks, STR is not confirmed for this building.
I looked for references to hotel rental pools, hotel-managed programs, or branded rental pools and found none. Since the remarks do not indicate STR is allowed, this must remain false.
I searched for phrases like 'mandatory hotel pool,' 'must participate,' or 'cannot opt out' and found nothing. There is no evidence in the remarks that any rental-pool participation is required.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold, ground lease, or lease expiry language such as 'lease expires 2050' or 'ground lease ends' and found nothing. There is no specific lease expiration year stated in the remarks.
I searched the public remarks for explicit VA-related language such as 'VA approved,' 'VA financing,' or 'VA loans accepted' and found none. With no evidence in the remarks, I cannot confirm VA loan approval for this building.
I searched the remarks for insurance language such as 'fully insured,' 'walls-in coverage,' 'full insurance,' or 'comprehensive building insurance.' None of the listings mention HOA insurance coverage at all. With no evidence in the remarks, full insurance is not confirmed.
No analysis available
I looked for phrases indicating a passed fire/life safety evaluation, such as 'FLSE passed,' 'passed fire inspection,' 'fire safety certified,' or similar. The remarks mention fire alarm upgrades, but that is not the same as an explicit pass or compliance statement. With no direct mention, this is treated as not confirmed.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence for mountain views appears in the remarks and MLS: 3/14 current MLS listings include MOUNTA in view_descriptions, and at least two public-remarks entries explicitly reference mountains (quotes: "Breathtaking ... mountain views"; "natural breeze flowing from the mountains"). The mentions are present across different remarks but are not ubiquitous, so confidence is moderate.
No analysis available
Multiple public-remarks entries explicitly describe city/downtown views — e.g., 'views of Punchbowl and Downtown Honolulu', 'city views on the cooler side of the building', and 'overlooking...Punchbowl & Kakaako'. At least five distinct listing remarks reference city or downtown views, and historical MLS data previously indicated CITY in view_descriptions for some listings, so evidence is strong that the building offers city views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 15 current MLS listings include the RESMAN amenity and numerous remarks explicitly state an on-site manager, with phrases like "resident manager on property", "Full time resident manager" and "on-site residential manager." Evidence is consistent across multiple agent remarks and listings, indicating the building has a resident manager on-site.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.