Royal Palm at Waipio 3
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Royal Palm at Waipio 3
Building Overview
Royal Palm at Waipio 3 in Waipahu — built 1987; pets and short-term rentals not allowed, per MLS data.
About Royal Palm at Waipio 3
Based on MLS data, Royal Palm at Waipio 3 is a condominium complex located in the Waipahu neighborhood. The building was constructed in 1987. Size and construction type are not specified in the available MLS records.
According to available records, building policies include no pets allowed and no short-term rentals permitted. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data. Other amenities and onsite features are not detailed in the provided MLS information.
This summary is based on MLS data available for the property. Buyers should verify specific details such as unit size, construction type, management, amenity access, parking, maintenance fees, and any HOA rules directly with listing agents or management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for a percentage of owner-occupied units or descriptive phrases like majority owner occupied or highly owner occupied, but found none. The public remarks provide no owner-occupancy figure, so the value remains unknown.
I searched the remarks for any explicit elevator count or even a general reference to elevators, but found nothing. Because no listing remarks mention elevators, I cannot infer a number from the public text.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence supports common-area electricity/expenses being included. Multiple listings mention association-paid common area maintenance, landscaping, irrigation, and site management, which aligns with OTCOEX showing up in 18/20 current MLS listings. The pattern appears consistent across agents rather than a one-off copy-paste.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence strongly points to hot water not being included in the maintenance fee. Across the remarks, units consistently reference their own water heaters or gas water heaters, and the current MLS has 0/20 HOTWAT inclusions versus 13/20 WTRHTR inclusions. That combination is a strong indicator that this is an in-unit hot water setup rather than HOA-provided hot water.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer is a unanimous MLS inclusion for this building, with 20/20 current listings checking SEWER. Even though the public remarks rarely spell it out, the checkbox data is consistent enough to treat this as a reliable building feature. No contrary evidence appears in the listing remarks.
Water is also a unanimous MLS inclusion, with 20/20 current listings checking WATER. The remarks are broadly consistent with an HOA-covered community and do not provide any evidence against the inclusion. This is high-confidence building-level data.
BBQ is strongly supported across the listing set. At least 5+ remarks explicitly reference "BBQ area," "barbecues," or similar wording, including one listing that says amenities include a "BBQ area" and others that list "BBQ Area" alongside pool/cabana features. This looks consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I do not find direct evidence of a clubhouse/community center in these remarks. Several listings mention a pool, BBQ area, cabana, and walking paths, but none explicitly call out a clubhouse or community center. The cabana references appear to be amenity cabanas rather than a true clubhouse feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Building-level outdoor spaces are well documented: MLS checkbox is set on 7/19 listings and multiple public remarks explicitly state 'lanai', 'private lanai', 'covered lanai', 'patio', 'courtyard' and 'covered patio'. These phrases appear across many agent remarks (repeated in separate listings), indicating the complex offers patios/decks/lanai areas for units rather than being a single-unit exclusive feature.
Five MLS listings have walk/jog path checked and many public remarks explicitly mention 'walking paths', 'walk/jog path', or 'pedestrian walking path with 2 lighted tunnels' (e.g., 'Royal Palm also offers a pedestrian walking path with 2 lighted tunnels', 'walk/jog path'). This consistent, multi-listing language indicates the building provides shared walking/jogging paths.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Recreation area is mentioned directly in one remark: "amenities which features a BBQ area, recreation area, and pool." Other listings describe shared amenity spaces like a pool, cabana, and walking paths, but the explicit recreation-area wording appears less often than BBQ. Overall this is moderate-to-strong evidence, not just a checkbox artifact.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that the building offers storage/lockers: at least a dozen listings' remarks mention storage features (phrases include 'lanai with storage closet', 'patio storage closet', 'covered lanai with additional storage' and 'large enclosed courtyard with storage'). MLS checkbox data also shows storage present in several current listings (4/19 building-level, 7/19 unit-level), and the consistent, detailed remarks across multiple listings/agents indicate this is a real, building-wide amenity rather than a single-agent copy/paste error.
I looked for surfboard storage, board storage, or combined bike/surfboard storage references. The remarks only mention general storage closets and patio/storage space, which do not establish surfboard storage.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, consistent evidence that the building has a shared swimming pool. Multiple listings explicitly mention a 'pool,' 'association pool,' 'community pool,' and even a 'renovating/renovated pool,' across different agents and unit types, which aligns with the MLS amenities checkboxes. This appears to be a stable building-level amenity rather than copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit salt pool wording such as "saltwater pool" or "salt pool." The remarks only say pool, community pool, renovated pool, or association pool, so saltwater cannot be confirmed.
In-unit laundry is strongly supported across the current remarks: many listings explicitly say 'stacked washer/dryer,' 'washer/dryer in the unit,' 'washer & dryer in unit,' or 'newer in-unit washer and dryer.' This appears consistent across multiple agents and property descriptions, not just a single copy-paste remark, and it matches the current MLS inclusions showing washer/dryer in all 20/20 listings.
No analysis available
I searched for terms such as coin laundry, quarters, card-operated laundry, or laundry fees. The listings only refer to in-unit washer/dryer, so there is no public-remarks evidence that community laundry exists or that it requires payment.
I looked for explicit phrases like "laundry on every floor," "community laundry on each floor," or similar floor-by-floor laundry references. The public remarks instead repeatedly describe in-unit washer/dryer, which does not support community laundry on every floor.
Parking is clearly available for this building. All 20 recent listings show a parking feature in MLS data, and the remarks repeatedly confirm it with phrases like '1 covered parking,' '1 assigned parking stall,' and 'two parking stalls.' Evidence is strong and consistent across multiple agents, not just copy-paste checkbox data.
Multiple listings explicitly mention assigned/reserved stalls (examples: '1 assigned parking stall right in front of the unit', '1 assigned covered parking close to the unit's entrance', 'assigned parking stall #196'). At least 8–10 separate remark blocks reference assigned or reserved stalls, and the current MLS checkbox also indicates ASSIGN on most listings, so evidence is strong and consistent across agents.
Numerous remarks reference covered parking (phrases like '1 covered parking', 'covered parking stall', 'covered lanai with additional storage' used in context of parking), appearing in roughly a dozen listings. This is corroborated by MLS parking_features showing covered/garage codes on most listings, so covered parking is a confirmed building feature.
I searched for explicit deeded-parking language like "deeded parking," "owned stall," or "parking included in deed" and did not find it. The listings only say things like assigned, covered, or reserved parking, which does not confirm deeded ownership.
No analysis available
I looked for parking fee wording, monthly charges, or a dollar amount tied to parking, but found none. The remarks mention parking stalls and the option to lease a second stall, but they do not state a fee.
Guest parking appears to be a real building feature. It is checked in 14 of 20 current MLS listings and is directly mentioned in remarks, including 'Guest parking available' and 'Visitor parking near by.' The combination of historical high confidence and current confirmation makes this strong evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for terms like "parking waitlist," "waiting list," and "join waitlist for parking" and found no evidence. The remarks instead describe available assigned, covered, and guest parking.
No analysis available
I searched for card/fob access terms like keycard entry, electronic access, or fob access. The remarks mention security patrols, cameras, and a secure community, but not card-based building access.
Security guard/service is strongly supported across many listings, with at least 6 separate remark entries explicitly referencing security such as '24/7 security patrols,' '24 hr patrolling security,' and 'Nightly Security.' The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and appears to be a real building feature rather than a copy-paste checkbox artifact.
Multiple listings directly state security patrol service, including 24/7, nightly, and 24-hour patrolling security. This is strong public-remarks evidence that the building/community has security patrols.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that the building offers window AC units: current MLS data has ACWIUN set in 17 of 20 listings, and several separate remarks explicitly reference window A/C or air-conditioning units. This appears consistent across multiple agents and listing types, not just copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
Double wall construction is strongly supported by the MLS data, with 19 of 20 current listings coded DOUWAL. Public remarks do not spell out 'double wall' or 'double-wall construction,' but the consistency across nearly every listing makes this a high-confidence building feature rather than copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
Only 1 of 19 MLS listings lists MASSTU and none of the public remarks mention 'masonry' or 'stucco'. The absence in agent remarks and very low MLS prevalence point toward this feature not being present, though MLS data is mixed so confidence is limited.
No analysis available
Only 2 of 19 MLS listings include SLAB and none of the public remarks mention a 'concrete slab' foundation. The minimal MLS presence and lack of corroborating remarks suggest the building is probably not slab construction, but evidence is limited.
No analysis available
Wood frame construction appears in the current MLS materials for 15 of 20 listings, suggesting this is a real building characteristic rather than a one-off unit note. None of the public remarks explicitly mention 'wood frame' or 'wood frame construction,' so the evidence comes primarily from the repeated MLS coding across listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for STR indicators such as "short-term rental allowed," "NUC," "TVU," and "vacation rental" and found no supporting language. With no evidence that short-term rentals are permitted, this is treated as not allowed from the remarks.
I looked for references to hotel rental pools or hotel-managed rental programs and found none. Because there is no evidence that short-term rentals are allowed, this feature must be false.
I searched for wording like "mandatory pool," "required to participate," or "cannot opt out" and found nothing. Since there is no evidence of a hotel rental program and STR is not supported by the remarks, mandatory participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold wording such as "lease expires," "ground lease," "leasehold," and any 4-digit expiration year, but none appeared. Since there is no specific expiry date in the remarks, the lease expiry year remains unknown.
I searched the public remarks for VA-related language such as "VA approved," "VA financing," and "VA loans accepted" and found nothing. With no supporting language in the listings, I cannot verify VA loan eligibility from remarks alone.
I searched for terms indicating HOA full insurance or walls-in coverage, but the remarks do not mention insurance coverage at all. Without explicit wording, there is no basis to mark the building as fully insured from these listings.
No analysis available
I looked for language such as FLSE passed, fire/life safety evaluation passed, fire safety certified, life safety compliant, or passed fire inspection, but found none. With no affirmative remark evidence, this is treated as not established from the public listings.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Garden/courtyard-style views are supported by both historical and current remarks. At least 4 current listings explicitly reference garden-like outdoor areas (e.g. "cute courtyard for gardening and relaxing," "large, private courtyard," "courtyard" and "manicured community"/landscaping), while the MLS view field now shows GARDEN on 2 of 20 listings. The majority of listings still show NONE for view, so this appears to be a feature available only on some units rather than universal across the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for statements about watching fireworks from a lanai, unit, or building view. The remarks mention parks, shopping, pool, and security, but nothing about fireworks views.
No analysis available
Resident manager is strongly supported across the current remarks and MLS history. At least 3+ listings explicitly mention it using phrases such as 'resident manager with security,' 'Resident Manager on site,' and 'Site Managers office,' which is consistent with the high MLS RESMAN frequency (18/20). This looks like a real building feature, not a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.