Royal Court
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Royal Court
Building Overview
Royal Court in Downtown-Chinatown (built 1970) with a pool and mountain views, concrete construction.
About Royal Court
Royal Court is located in the Downtown–Chinatown neighborhood and was built in 1970. According to available records the building is concrete construction. Size details (number of units or floors) are not provided in the MLS data.
Based on MLS data, building amenities include a pool and a resident manager. Units are reported to have split and window air conditioning and the property offers mountain views.
Parking is available, covered, and assigned. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS. This information is based on MLS data and buyers should verify all details, rules, and fees with the seller or managing agent prior to making any decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for ownership-occupancy clues such as exact percentages or phrases like "majority owner occupied" or "highly owner occupied." None of the remarks provide any owner-occupancy statistic, so the percentage is unknown.
I looked for explicit elevator counts such as "4 elevators," "multiple elevators," or written numbers in the remarks. The listings confirm the building has elevators, but none of the remarks provide a count, so the number remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
9 of 14 current listings include OTCOEX in association fees. No public remarks directly mention common electricity or building power, so this is supported mainly by the MLS data rather than narrative confirmation. Because the checkbox appears in a majority but not all listings, confidence is moderate rather than high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
12 of 14 current listings include HOTWAT, and 0 of 14 show WTRHTR, which is a strong indicator that the building includes hot water in the fees. Public remarks across multiple agents do not mention any unit-supplied water heater setup. The evidence is fairly strong, though not explicitly spelled out in the narrative descriptions.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 14 current listings include SEWER in association_fee_includes. This is a consistent building-level utility with no conflicting remarks, so confidence is very high. The unanimity suggests this is not a copy/paste anomaly.
All 14 current listings include WATER in association_fee_includes. No remarks suggest water is separately metered or excluded, so this appears to be a stable building feature. The evidence is strong enough for very high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that the building offers patio/deck-style outdoor space. At least 10+ listings mention a lanai, covered balcony, or rooftop lanai/refuge, including phrases like "large covered lanai," "covered balcony," and "spacious lanai." The consistency across multiple remarks supports this as a real building feature rather than MLS checkbox noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks directly and repeatedly confirm surfboard storage facilities. This is strong, clear evidence that the building offers dedicated surfboard storage.
No analysis available
The evidence is strong that the building has a trash chute system: current MLS amenities show TRACHU in all 14/14 listings, and one remark explicitly says the building offers a "trash chute." This looks consistent across listings rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool is strongly supported across the listing set: 14/14 MLS records currently include pool in amenities, and several remarks independently confirm it. Multiple agents describe it directly as a 'swimming pool,' 'huge swim pool,' and 'sparkling pool,' suggesting this is a real shared building amenity rather than a copied checkbox.
No analysis available
I looked for direct references to a saltwater pool, but none were found. The building has a pool, yet the public remarks only describe it as a swimming pool or sparkling pool without specifying water type.
Strong evidence that the building offers in-unit laundry. Multiple listings explicitly say “washer and dryer in the unit,” “stacked washer and dryer,” “in-unit W/D,” and “brand new in-unit large capacity washer and dryer.” This appears consistent across many listings and agents, not a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
I looked for any public remarks indicating a fee-based shared laundry setup, such as coin laundry or card-operated machines. The remarks instead repeatedly mention in-unit washer/dryer, so there is no evidence of paid community laundry.
I searched the remarks for references to laundry facilities being located on each floor, but found none. The listings mention in-unit washers and dryers several times, which does not indicate community laundry on every floor.
No analysis available
Strong evidence across several listings that parking is assigned/reserved. At least 3 remarks explicitly say "assigned" or "gated assigned parking," which is consistent with the MLS checkbox data and does not look like a one-off copy/paste error.
Covered parking is very well supported, with many listings explicitly stating covered stalls, covered parking, or a garage. This appears consistent across multiple agents and aligns with the MLS data showing most listings have covered parking features checked.
I searched for explicit deeded-parking language such as deeded parking, owned stall, or parking included in deed. The listings only describe assigned or included stalls, which is not enough to confirm deeded parking. Without explicit wording, this remains false.
No analysis available
I looked for any parking cost terms such as monthly parking fee, parking rental, or additional parking charge. The remarks mention parking stalls and gated parking, but no separate fee. Because no fee is stated, the value remains unknown.
No analysis available
There is strong, repeated evidence that the parking area has secured entry. Several listings mention gated parking, secured stalls, or secured entrance, suggesting this is a real building feature rather than agent checkbox noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like parking waitlist, waiting list, or join a list for parking. The remarks do not mention any such system and instead describe assigned/included parking. With no evidence of a waitlist, this is set to false.
No analysis available
I searched for card-based or fob-based entry terms like key card access, electronic access, or card reader. The remarks support general security, but they do not specifically confirm a card/fob access system.
No analysis available
I looked for any indication of patrol service or roving security in the remarks. None was found, so there is no evidence that the building has security patrol.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the provided listings, 0 remarks explicitly mention window air conditioners; instead, multiple agents describe split A/C, brand-new split A/C, or A/C units in bedrooms/living room. The limited MLS checkbox signal (6/14) is weaker than the remark evidence, so this feature does not appear reliably supported for the building.
Concrete construction is strongly supported by the MLS data: 14 of 14 listings list construction_materials as CONCRE. There are no remarks contradicting this, so the building should be treated as concrete-built with very high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for short-term rental language including STR permitted, legal vacation rental, NUC/TVU, or 30-day minimum restrictions. None of the remarks mention any rental allowance, so there is no evidence that STR is permitted in this building. Because STR permission is not supported in the public remarks, this is marked false.
I searched for hotel rental pool references such as hotel program, managed by hotel, Hilton pool, Ritz pool, or similar. Nothing in the remarks indicates any hotel-style rental pool participation. Since STR itself is not evidenced, this must also be false.
I looked for language indicating mandatory participation in a rental pool, such as must rent, required program, or cannot opt out. The remarks contain none of that. With no evidence of a hotel pool or STR program, mandatory pool participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for any mention of leasehold, ground lease, renewal, or an expiry year such as "lease expires 2050" or "renewed through 2075." No such details were provided in the remarks. The only tenure clue was "Fee Simple," which means there is no lease expiry to extract.
The remarks directly confirm VA financing approval. I searched for phrases like VA approved, VA financing, and VA loans accepted, and found an explicit match.
I looked for any HOA insurance language suggesting full building or walls-in coverage. The public remarks do not mention insurance status at all, so there is no evidence that the building is fully insured.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for fire/life safety evaluation language, including FLSE passed, fire safety certified, life safety compliant, and passed fire inspection. Nothing in the listings indicates the building has passed such an evaluation, so there is no evidence to mark this true.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence supports city views: 13 of 14 current MLS listings include CITY, and several remarks independently describe 'city views,' 'the Honolulu and Kakaako skyline,' and 'city lights.' This looks consistent across multiple agents rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunset views are clearly supported, though not as universal as city views: 6 of 14 current listings include SUNSET, and several remarks directly call out 'beautiful sunset views' and 'amazing sunsets.' The repeated explicit language across multiple listings indicates this is a real feature for at least some units in the building.
Cemetery views appear to be a genuine building feature for some units: 8 of 14 current listings include CEMETA, and at least one remark explicitly says 'View of cemetery.' Because this is supported by both MLS data and a direct remark, confidence is high.
The remarks directly confirm fireworks visibility from the building/unit, not just proximity to fireworks events. This is strong evidence that some units have views of Friday night fireworks.
No analysis available
Resident manager is consistently supported by both MLS amenities and public remarks. Multiple listings explicitly say "onsite Resident Manager," "The building offers a Resident Manager," and "on-site management," appearing to be repeated across agents rather than a one-off copy error. This is strong building-level evidence that the property has an on-site resident manager.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.