Rose Terrace
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Rose Terrace
Building Overview
Rose Terrace in Makiki-Tantalus, built 1975 of concrete. Pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About Rose Terrace
Rose Terrace is a condominium building located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1975 and is of concrete construction. Size and unit count are not specified in the provided MLS data.
Key features reported in MLS-derived data include building construction type and year built. Pet ownership and short-term rental policies are identified as restrictions in the MLS information: pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data.
Additional details commonly sought by buyers—such as parking provisions, monthly maintenance fees, exact unit sizes, building amenities, and on-site management—are not provided in the MLS extract. Based on MLS data, prospective buyers should verify parking, fees, amenity availability, and management details with the listing agent or association before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for owner-occupancy language such as percentages or terms like majority owner occupied, but found nothing in the remarks. Since this is a numeric field and there is no explicit evidence, it cannot be reliably inferred from the listings.
I searched the remarks for elevator mentions and found an explicit reference to a keyed elevator. The listings do not mention multiple elevators, so the safest supported value is 1.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence points away from hot water being included in the fee. There are 0/12 listings with HOTWAT, while 9/12 explicitly include WTRHTR, and multiple remarks mention a 'water heater' or 'brand new water heater.' This looks like a consistent MLS pattern rather than a copy-paste amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer appears to be included in the maintenance fee for most listings in this building. The current MLS data shows 8/12 listings checked for SEWER, and the public remarks do not contradict that. This is moderately strong building-level evidence, likely from repeated MLS entry rather than unit-specific variation.
Water is very likely included in the maintenance fee. The current MLS data shows WATER on 9/12 listings, which is strong building-level support, and none of the remarks suggest a change or exclusion. This looks consistent across multiple listings and agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for surfboard storage or related storage facilities. There are no references to surfboard, board, or sport-equipment storage in the remarks.
No analysis available
Trash chute is likely a building amenity based on MLS data: 9/12 listings currently include TRACHU. None of the public remarks explicitly mention a trash chute, so the evidence looks like repeated amenity tagging rather than detailed agent confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I checked for references to a salt water pool, saltwater pool, or similar wording. The current building context also says the building has no pool, and the remarks do not mention any pool at all.
No analysis available
Strong evidence supports community laundry in this building. 9 of 12 listings mention it in remarks, often with consistent wording across different agents, indicating it is a building-wide shared amenity rather than a one-off typo. The remarks repeatedly say laundry is available 'on every floor' or at 'the end of each floor,' matching the MLS amenity flag.
I searched the remarks for references to paid laundry such as coin laundry, card-operated machines, quarters, or laundry fees. Nothing in the public remarks indicates that the community laundry requires payment, so this remains unconfirmed and is treated as absent from the text.
The remarks repeatedly confirm laundry facilities on every floor. I looked for phrases like laundry on each floor, floor-by-floor laundry, and similar wording, and found several direct matches.
No analysis available
Assigned/reserved parking is strongly supported across the listings. Multiple remarks explicitly mention "assigned parking," "assigned covered parking," or "1 assigned covered parking stall," indicating this is a building feature rather than a one-off typo. The agent data and remarks are consistent, so confidence is very high.
Covered parking is confirmed by both MLS checkbox data and the public remarks. Several listings explicitly state "covered parking" or "assigned covered parking," including one noting "1 assigned covered parking stall." The evidence is broad and consistent across listings, so confidence is extremely high.
I looked for wording like deeded parking, owned stall, or parking included in the deed. The remarks only indicate assigned/covered parking, so deeded parking is not supported.
No analysis available
I searched for any mention of a parking fee, parking rental, or additional monthly parking cost. The listings mention assigned and covered parking, but no separate fee is stated.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for references to a parking waitlist or waiting list system. None were found, and the repeated references to assigned parking suggest immediate parking is available rather than waitlist-based.
No analysis available
I looked specifically for card, fob, keycard, or electronic access language. The remarks show the building is secure, but they stop short of explicitly confirming a card/fob security system, so this is not supported by the text.
No analysis available
I searched for patrol-related language such as security patrol, roving security, or patrolled building. The remarks only describe the building as secure/well-maintained and do not mention patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window AC is confirmed by several listings: one says the unit has a "window ac unit," and another mentions "air conditioners" in the updated unit features. Across the remarks, this appears in more than one listing and is consistent with the MLS inclusions data, indicating the building offers window AC in at least some units.
The building is very likely concrete construction based on MLS material data: 12 out of 12 current listings list CONCRE in construction materials. None of the public remarks mention a rebuild or alternate construction type, so this appears to be consistent across listings rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for STR terms such as short-term rental allowed, legal vacation rental, NUC, or TVU, and found nothing. There is also no language indicating a 30-day minimum or owner-occupant restriction, so STR status is not confirmed from these remarks.
I looked for hotel pool references like hotel rental pool, Hilton pool, Ritz pool, or managed-by-hotel language. None were present, and without evidence that STR is allowed, hotel-pool participation is not supported.
I searched for language indicating required participation, cannot opt out, or mandatory rental program rules. Nothing in the remarks suggests a mandatory pool, and there is no evidence of any hotel rental program at all.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold language such as "lease expires," "ground lease," or a 4-digit expiry year, and found none. Because the remarks explicitly say Fee Simple, there is no lease expiry date to extract.
I looked for phrases like "VA approved," "VA financing," and "VA loans accepted," but none appeared in the public remarks. With no evidence either way, this is treated as not confirmed from the listing remarks.
I looked for any statements about HOA walls-in coverage or full building insurance and found no references. With no explicit remark support and no prior value, this remains unconfirmed and defaults to false.
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for any fire/life safety evaluation or fire inspection pass language and found none. Because this feature is only confirmed through explicit remarks and there is no current positive value, it remains unconfirmed and is treated as false by default.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views are strongly supported across many listings, with 10/12 MLS records showing mountain in the view field. Multiple public remarks explicitly describe "mountain views," "Makiki Valley Mountains," and "hills and mountains," suggesting this is a real building-level offering rather than a one-off agent copy.
No analysis available
City views appear in a smaller subset of listings, but they are explicitly confirmed in remarks such as "mountain and city views" and "skyline view." Because the MLS currently shows 3/12 listings with city in the view field and the remarks are consistent, this indicates the building offers city-view units even if not all units have them.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for wording like fireworks view, see fireworks from the lanai, or viewing Friday night fireworks from the unit. The remarks mention mountain, city, and skyline views only, so there is no evidence for a fireworks view.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.