Ridgeway B2
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Ridgeway B2
Building Overview
Ridgeway B2 — neighborhood information not provided; built 1972; pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About Ridgeway B2
Ridgeway B2 is a condominium property listed in MLS records with a year built of 1972. Neighborhood and specific location details are not provided in the available MLS data. Information on building size, number of units, and construction type is also not included in the records available.
Based on MLS data, key occupancy policies for Ridgeway B2 are that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. The listing does not provide details on on-site amenities, common areas, or unit-level features, and the management company is noted as unknown in the MLS.
Additional details such as parking arrangements, maintenance fees, assessment history, and other rules or restrictions are not available in the provided MLS information. Buyers should verify all building facts, policies, fees, and management details through direct inquiry with the listing agent or property manager and review official HOA or condominium documents.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Cable TV is included in the association fee for 3 of 4 current listings. No public remarks explicitly mention cable, so the evidence relies on repeated MLS checkbox data rather than agent descriptions, but the consistency across most listings suggests the feature is available.
Two of three listings include OTCOEX in association_fee_includes, suggesting common-area electricity is part of the maintenance fee. The public remarks do not confirm or contradict it, so confidence is moderate rather than high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the 4 current listings indicate HOTWAT, and 3 of 4 identify WTRHTR. No public remarks mention included hot water, while the water-heater data consistently points away from hot water being included in the maintenance fee.
Internet service is listed as included in the association fee for 2 of 4 current listings. No public remarks confirm internet or Wi-Fi, and the split MLS coverage makes this less certain than water or sewer.
No analysis available
All 4 of 4 current listings include SEWER in the association fee. No public remarks explicitly mention sewer, but unanimous MLS data across multiple listings strongly supports that maintenance fees cover sewer.
All 4 of 4 current listings include WATER in the association fee. Although none of the public remarks discuss water charges, the consistent data across every listing strongly indicates that maintenance fees cover water.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listing remarks mention car wash facilities, and the only evidence is a single MLS amenity checkbox in 1/3 listings. With no supporting description from agents or site-visit style confirmation, this appears more like inconsistent MLS data than a verified building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building has a pool, supported by pool-related MLS amenities on 4 of 4 listings and an explicit remark in 1 of 4 listings mentioning "community amenities including pool." This is consistent with the previously high-confidence assessment and indicates a shared community amenity rather than a unit-specific feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 4 current listings indicate washer/dryer in the inclusions, which is consistent across multiple listings and suggests that in-unit laundry is available. However, none of the remarks use phrases such as “in-unit laundry” or “washer/dryer,” so the evidence may partly reflect copied MLS checkbox data rather than explicit agent verification.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is strongly supported across the current data: 4/4 listings have parking-related MLS features, and 3 listings explicitly mention parking stalls. Key phrases include '2 assigned side-by-side parking stalls' and 'two parking stalls located right in front of your unit,' indicating parking is a building/community offering rather than an isolated listing detail.
Assigned parking is strongly supported by both MLS data and remarks: 3/4 listings have ASSIGN checked, while one listing explicitly states '2 assigned side-by-side parking stalls.' Other listings reference two stalls near or directly in front of the unit, consistent with designated parking across multiple listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
1 of 4 listings explicitly mentions "split AC units in every room," providing strong direct evidence that at least some units in the building offer split AC. The MLS data independently shows ACSPL in 1 of 4 listings, supporting the feature rather than suggesting a checkbox-only copy/paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
0 of 4 listings mention double-wall construction or two walls. The feature is supported only by the MLS checkbox in 3 of 4 listings, with no corroborating remarks from multiple agents, so it is treated as an apparent MLS data error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
0 of 4 listings mention above-ground construction or materials. The only support is the ABOGRO checkbox in 3 of 4 listings, without corroboration across agent remarks, so the feature is excluded as likely unreliable MLS checkbox data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
1 of 3 current listings includes GARDEN in the view field, while another shows NONE. Public remarks mention exterior outlooks like "scenic backyard views of the golf course and Pearl Harbor" and a breezy corner setting, but they do not explicitly say garden, courtyard, or landscaped views. This looks like limited MLS evidence rather than consistent confirmation across multiple agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the 4 listings mentions sunset views or related terms. Two listings explicitly report NONE for views, while the remaining remarks only describe scenic golf course/Pearl Harbor views, so there is no strong building-level evidence for sunset views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Three of four current listings identify RESMAN as an amenity, consistent with its appearance in two of three historical listings. No listing remarks mention a resident manager, live-in manager, or on-site manager, so the evidence is moderate and may be copy-paste rather than independently confirmed.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.