Ridgecrest-Melemanu
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Ridgecrest-Melemanu
Building Overview
Ridgecrest-Melemanu in Mililani-Waipio — concrete building (1973) with pool and mountain views.
About Ridgecrest-Melemanu
Ridgecrest-Melemanu is located in the Mililani-Waipio neighborhood and was built in 1973. According to available records, the building is constructed of concrete. Size and unit count are not provided in the MLS data.
Key features include an on-site pool and a resident manager. Units have mountain views. Pets are allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted according to the available MLS information.
Parking is available with covered, assigned stalls and guest parking. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all details, fees, and policies with the listing agent or management prior to making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched all public remarks for explicit percentages and phrases indicating owner-occupancy level and found none. Owner-occupancy is therefore unknown from the remarks; without an explicit numeric statement, I cannot assign a percentage and leave the field null with low confidence. If a user verification or AOAO data is provided, that would supersede this.
Multiple remarks reference elevator access to units and that parking/units are on the same level, indicating the building has elevators. However, none of the public remarks state a numeric count, so the exact number of elevators is unknown. I searched the remarks for explicit phrases like '4 elevators', 'four elevators', or 'multiple elevators' and found none.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS association_fee_includes lists OTCOEX in 15/20 recent listings, indicating the HOA likely covers common-area electricity. None of the provided public remarks explicitly say 'common area electricity' or 'building power included' (remarks mention well‑maintained common areas but not electrical inclusion), so evidence appears to come mainly from repeated MLS checkbox entries across multiple agents rather than explicit agent remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across 20 listings, none show HOTWAT in the HOA inclusions, while most instead highlight individual water heaters (WTRHTR) and remarks like 'new water heater' or 'hot water heater'. This pattern confirms that hot water is not a building-supplied service covered by the maintenance fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence across the dataset: 19/20 MLS listings include SEWER in association_fee_includes and several public remarks explicitly say the HOA fee 'includes ... sewer' or 'water, sewer', confirming the building-level inclusion of sewer in HOA fees across multiple agents' listings.
Consistent, strong evidence: 19/20 MLS listings list WATER in association_fee_includes and numerous public remarks explicitly state the HOA fee 'includes water' (e.g., 'HOA fee that includes water, sewer...'), indicating water is included in the maintenance fees for this building.
No public remarks reference BBQs or grilling areas despite 5/20 MLS sheets having the BBQ amenity checked. Historical review previously concluded no BBQ amenities were described in listings. The checked MLS boxes appear inconsistent with agent remarks and likely represent copy/paste errors, so the building is reported as not offering BBQ facilities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There are no mentions of 'car wash', 'auto wash', or similar terms in the public remarks, and the MLS CRWSH checkbox is unset in all 20 listings. Given the uniform absence across MLS sheets and remarks, the building is reported as not having car wash facilities.
Amenity descriptions consistently highlight pool, rec area/rec room, tennis courts, dog park, gazebo, and resident manager but never reference a clubhouse or community center. Given these detailed lists and the low, inconsistent MLS clubhouse checkbox usage, it is very likely the building does not have a clubhouse.
No analysis available
Numerous listing remarks explicitly reference an on-site dog park—phrases include 'new fully fenced in dog park' and repeated mentions across listings—and the MLS checkbox appears in 15/20 sheets. Evidence is strong across multiple agent remarks and MLS entries, so the building is reported as having a dog park.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence across listings: at least 6 separate listings mention a recreation room/rec area (phrases include 'rec room', 'rec area', 'recreation area' and 'rec room for gatherings'). Mentions appear across different agent remarks rather than a single ad, corroborating the earlier high-confidence data that the building offers a recreation room/area.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listing remarks explicitly state the complex has 'tennis courts' (mentioned repeatedly alongside the pool), confirming historical high-confidence data even though only 4/20 MLS sheets list the TENCOU checkbox. Evidence is strong and consistent across multiple agents' remarks, so the building is listed as having tennis courts.
MLS checkbox data strongly indicates a trash chute (15 of 20 listings show TRACHU), but 0 public remarks mention 'trash chute', 'garbage chute', or 'refuse chute'. Because remarks do not confirm and historical confidence was only medium, the feature is included with moderate confidence based mainly on the repeated MLS amenity flags.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, consistent evidence that the building has a shared pool: the MLS checkbox was set for all units (20/20) and numerous current public remarks mention a pool (phrases include "huge swimming pool," "community pool," and "access to a community pool"). Mentions appear across multiple listings and agents, indicating the pool is a genuine building amenity rather than an isolated listing error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that the building offers in-unit laundry: public remarks across the recent listings repeatedly mention “full-size washer and dryer,” “in-unit laundry,” and “stacked washer/dryer.” This matches historical MLS data showing 17/20 listings listing washer/dryer inclusions, and the confirmations come from multiple agent remarks rather than a single outlier, indicating the feature is widely available in the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, consistent evidence across listings: 20/20 MLS records list parking and numerous public remarks explicitly state parking availability (quotes: "2 parking spaces", "assigned parking stall"). Mentions appear in multiple agents' remarks and align with the MLS checkboxes, indicating reliable building-level parking availability.
Most listings (16/20 per MLS) indicate assigned parking and multiple public remarks explicitly mention 'assigned' or 'designated' stalls (quotes: 'two assigned, covered parking stalls', 'one parking stall assigned to the unit'). The evidence is consistent and strong across different agent remarks.
Multiple listings and MLS checkboxes consistently report covered parking: 19/20 MLS listings have covered/garage parking checked and many public remarks state "covered parking stalls" or "covered parking" (quotes: "2 covered parking stalls", "two assigned, covered parking stalls"), providing strong building-level evidence of covered parking.
Multiple listings mention assigned/covered parking stalls and assigned parking stalls, but there is no explicit public-remarks language indicating parking is deeded or included in the unit deed. Therefore we do not mark parking as deeded.
No analysis available
There is explicit mention of a $50/month charge the seller pays for an additional parking stall; this demonstrates a monthly parking fee for extra stalls.
Public remarks for multiple listings describe 'plenty of guest parking' alongside other common amenities like the pool and dog park, indicating a dedicated guest parking provision. With 10/20 MLS records also marking GUEST, the evidence is strong that the building offers guest/visitor parking. This should be highlighted for buyers who expect parking availability for visitors.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for 'parking waitlist', 'waiting list', or similar phrasing. Remarks direct buyers to the HOA/manager for additional stalls but do not mention an official waitlist system, so parking_waitlist is not indicated in the remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings (0/20) mention a security guard or 24/7 security; remarks reference a resident manager or management onsite but never use terms like "security guard" or "24-hour security." Given the MLS checkbox is unchecked across all current listings and there are no explicit remarks announcing newly added security personnel, there is strong evidence the building does not offer a security guard service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence: 20/20 current MLS listings indicate construction_materials = CONCRE. None of the public remarks explicitly mention construction type, but the consistency across multiple listings/agents (all 20) supports a high-confidence conclusion that the building is constructed with concrete.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for 'short-term rental', 'STR', 'vacation rental', '30-day minimum', 'NUC', and related terms. With no supporting language in the public remarks, STRs are not indicated as allowed in this building.
There is no reference to hotel rental programs or management by a hotel. Because STRs are not indicated in remarks, hotel-pool participation is false.
There is no evidence owners must participate in any rental pool; combined with absence of STR/hotel-pool mentions, mandatory pool participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for phrases like 'lease expires', 'land lease to', 'leasehold', and explicit 4-digit expiry years. No statements about land tenure or lease expiry were found in the provided remarks.
Multiple listings explicitly state the building is VA approved/VA+USDA approved. Based solely on public remarks, VA financing is accepted in this building.
Several public remarks explicitly describe the Ridgecrest community as 'fully insured' and note healthy reserves. Based solely on these explicit statements in multiple listings, the building is assessed as fully insured (walls-in coverage) with high confidence.
No analysis available
I searched all public remarks for evidence the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation (terms searched: 'fire life safety evaluation', 'FLSE passed', 'fire safety certified', 'passed fire inspection', 'life safety compliant') and found no statements indicating the building has passed such an evaluation. Because there is no mention and no current verified value, the field is set to false with medium confidence (absence of mention suggests it is not publicly asserted).
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings (3 mentions across the current remarks) explicitly reference mountain views, with key phrases like "lanai that overlooks a grassy area with forest and mountain views" and "checking out the mountain view." Evidence is consistent across several agent remarks and aligns with historical high-confidence data, indicating the building offers units with mountain views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least four listings describe garden or landscaped/courtyard outlooks using phrases such as "overlooks a grassy area," "beautifully landscaped and well maintained back yard," and "nicely landscaped grassy garden area." The repeated, explicit language across multiple agent remarks supports that the building offers garden-style views for some units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
15 of 20 current MLS listings have the RESMAN amenity checked. One remark explicitly says 'AOAO amenities include ... resident manager,' and several other remarks reference onsite/active management or 'management intel,' indicating consistent reporting across agents. While agent copy/paste is possible, the prevalence of the checkbox plus explicit mention provides strong evidence the building has a resident manager.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.