Puuiki Hale
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Puuiki Hale
Building Overview
Puuiki Hale in North Shore — concrete building from 1973. Pets and short-term rentals not allowed per MLS data.
About Puuiki Hale
Puuiki Hale is a concrete condominium building located in the North Shore neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1973. Based on MLS data, details provided here reflect the information available from listing records.
Key features and amenities specific to Puuiki Hale are limited in the MLS summary provided. The building construction is listed as concrete and the year built is 1973. No additional amenity or unit-level details were included in the MLS data supplied for this description.
According to MLS data, pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted at Puuiki Hale. The management company is listed as unknown in the available records. Buyers should verify parking arrangements, maintenance fees, bylaws, and any other property details with the listing agent or association, as this summary is based solely on MLS data and may be incomplete.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
There is no information in the remarks about the percentage of owner-occupied units. Because no numeric or descriptive owner-occupancy statements were found, the owner_occupancy is unknown.
No evidence in the remarks about elevators. I searched the remarks for explicit statements of elevator count (e.g., '4 elevators', 'elevator') and found none, so the number of elevators is unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 4 current MLS listings list OTCOEX in association_fee_includes indicating common area electricity is included, but none of the public remarks explicitly mention 'common area electricity' or similar phrasing. The unanimous MLS checkbox suggests the building-level fee likely includes common electric, though the lack of agent remarks means confirmation is implied rather than directly stated.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Out of 5 listings, 0 public remarks mention 'hot water included' while 1/5 has HOTWAT checked and 2/5 list WTRHTR (water heater) in inclusions. One remark explicitly states 'newer tankless water heater' (in-unit), which is a strong indicator that hot water is provided by unit heaters rather than building-supplied hot water included in HOA fees. Given the lack of remarks confirming hot water in HOA and multiple indications of in-unit water heaters, the evidence is strong that maintenance fees do not include hot water.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 4 current MLS listings include SEWER in association_fee_includes, but none of the combined public remarks explicitly state 'sewer included' or similar. The consistent MLS entries support inclusion of sewer in maintenance fees, but confirmation is implied since agent remarks do not mention it.
All 4 current MLS listings list WATER in association_fee_includes, yet none of the public remarks explicitly note 'water included' or 'water in HOA.' The unanimous MLS data implies water is included in maintenance fees, but the lack of direct mention in remarks means the evidence is inferred rather than explicitly stated.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 2 of 5 public remarks explicitly reference outdoor spaces: one lists a 'tiled lanai' and another describes a 'common deck area outside of your living room' accessible via sliding glass door. CURRENT MLS has 1/5 listings with PATDEC/COVPAT checked; combined with the explicit remarks from multiple listings, evidence supports including patio/deck as a building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence that the building offers storage units/lockers is present in both MLS checkbox fields (storage in 1/4 amenities and 2/4 unit_features) and in public remarks. At least two listing remarks explicitly state "extra storage" and "dedicated storage," indicating multiple agents describe on-site storage rather than a single copy/paste error. Confidence is high because both structured MLS fields and remarks corroborate the feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings' remarks mention a building laundry room; instead two separate unit descriptions state 'in-unit laundry' and 'Washer and Dryer in unit.' MLS amenities are inconsistent (COMLAU checked on 2 of 4 listings), suggesting copy/paste errors rather than an actual shared laundry. Given absent remarks and evidence of in-unit laundry, it's unlikely the building offers community laundry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings' remarks mention assigned or reserved parking (0/4). Although 3 of 4 MLS parking_features checkboxes indicate ASSIGN, the concatenated agent remarks contain no phrases like 'assigned parking', 'reserved parking', 'deeded', or 'designated stall', suggesting checkbox errors or copy/paste. Given the absence of corroborating remarks across multiple agents, we omit assigned parking for the building.
Strong evidence across listings: 5 listings (current MLS) and multiple public remarks explicitly state covered parking (examples: "Two covered parking stalls", "covered parking stall", "1 covered parking stall"). Mentions appear across different agent remarks and units, confirming the building offers covered parking.
Listings repeatedly reference covered parking stalls and dedicated parking (e.g., "two covered parking stalls", "covered parking stall"), but there is no explicit language that parking is deeded/owned. Because deeded status is not stated, we cannot mark this as deeded.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for terms like 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', 'parking rental', and similar phrases. There is no information about any recurring parking charge, so the parking fee is unknown from these remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks describe available covered stalls and on-street parking in individual listings but contain no reference to a waitlist system. In absence of any mention, a waitlist is not indicated.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
One of four current MLS listings includes a double-wall construction code (DOUWAL), but none of the public remarks reference 'double wall' or 'double-wall construction.' The feature is included because at least one unit's MLS data indicates it, though it is not confirmed in agent remarks and may reflect unit-specific or agent-entered data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS checkbox indicates wood frame construction in 2 of 4 current listings for this building, but none of the public remarks mention construction or 'wood frame' explicitly. Evidence comes from agent-entered MLS fields (some agents/units list WOOFRA), so inclusion is implied rather than confirmed by remarks.
No analysis available
Only 1 of 5 MLS listings shows 'BRICK' in construction_materials, but none of the public remarks across the five listings mention brick exterior or 'brick-and-mortar' construction. Given the absence of any remark describing brick and the low occurrence in MLS checkbox data, evidence for brick construction is weak and likely a checklist error rather than a true building feature.
No analysis available
Listings use vacation-oriented marketing language (e.g., 'vacation retreat', 'every day feels like vacation') but do not explicitly state that short-term rentals are permitted. Because there is no explicit permission or regulatory language authorizing STR, STR allowance cannot be confirmed.
Searches for 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel program', or hotel brand management yielded no results. Since STR is not confirmed and no hotel pool language appears, hotel pool participation is not supported by the remarks.
There is no evidence of a rental pool program or language requiring owners to participate. Given STR is not confirmed and no listing mentions mandatory pool participation, mandatory pool is set to false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public remarks reference leasehold status or a lease expiration year (searched for phrases like 'lease expires', 'land lease to', 'leasehold expiring in', and specific years). Without explicit wording, the lease expiry year cannot be determined from these remarks.
Remarks explicitly state a VA-assumable loan ("VA Assumable 3.875%"), indicating the building/unit accepts VA financing. This is direct language from the listing, so confidence is high.
The listings reference HOA fees including water, sewer, and trash but do not mention comprehensive building or walls-in insurance. With no explicit mention, the building is marked as not fully insured by HOA with medium confidence.
No analysis available
Remarks do not state that the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation. Absence of any FLSE-related language in the listings leads to a default false with medium confidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings explicitly mention sunrise, 'morning sun', or eastern exposure. MLS view_descriptions show 0/4 with SUNRIS and there are no remark phrases like 'sunrise view' or 'morning sun' across the provided remarks, so it's unlikely the building offers a documented sunrise view.
One listing's public remarks explicitly state 'end your day with golden sunsets,' and CURRENT MLS data shows SUNSET in the view_descriptions for 1 of 5 listings. Several other listings list NONE (suggesting checkbox inconsistency), but the explicit remark and prior high-confidence history indicate some units in the building offer sunset views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.