Puu Alii 2-2
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Puu Alii 2-2
Building Overview
Puu Alii 2-2 in Kaneohe (built 1981) — pet-free building, short-term rentals not allowed.
About Puu Alii 2-2
Puu Alii 2-2 is a condominium property located in the Kaneohe neighborhood, built in 1981. Based on available MLS data, specific information about unit sizes, number of units, and construction type is not provided in the record.
According to available records, the building does not allow pets and short-term rentals are not permitted. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data. No additional amenity or common-area details are included in the provided MLS information.
Parking arrangements, maintenance fees, lease restrictions, and other important ownership details are not specified in the available MLS data. Buyers and agents should verify all property facts, policies, fees, and management details with the listing agent or property management before making decisions. This summary is based on MLS data and does not replace due diligence.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for owner-occupancy indicators such as percentages ('80% owner occupied') or qualitative descriptions ('majority owner occupied,' 'highly owner occupied') and found none. The remarks discuss unit features and community amenities, but do not state an owner-occupancy rate.
I searched the public remarks for explicit elevator references such as 'elevator,' '4 elevators,' 'four elevators,' or 'multiple elevators' and found none. The listings describe townhomes and community amenities, but do not mention any building elevator count.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Most current listings (16 of 20) check OTCOEX in association fees, which strongly suggests common area electricity is included for the building. The public remarks across many listings do not explicitly say it, so this appears to be MLS-driven rather than copy-pasted from marketing copy.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No current listings (0 of 20) list HOTWAT, while 18 of 20 list WTRHTR instead. Public remarks repeatedly reference 'water heater' and 'new water heater,' which is consistent with units having their own heaters rather than building-supplied hot water being included in the fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is extremely consistent in the MLS data: 19 of 20 current listings show SEWER included. The remarks do not explicitly say 'sewer included,' but the MLS evidence is overwhelming and appears stable across listings.
Water is included in the association fee in 19 of 20 current listings, making this a very strong building-level feature. While the remarks are mostly indirect, mentions of water supply updates are consistent with the MLS pattern and do not suggest a change.
BBQ/grilling facilities are strongly supported by the public remarks. Multiple listings explicitly say “BBQ areas,” “picnic/BBQ areas,” or “BBQ,” and the historical MLS data shows this in 19/20 listings, suggesting a consistent shared amenity rather than copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Clubhouse/community-center type amenities appear to be part of the building’s shared facilities. Remarks mention “clubhouse,” “club houses,” and “recreation room,” while the current MLS data shows 18/20 listings with CLUHOU, indicating broad support even if wording varies by agent.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, consistent evidence that the building offers patio/deck-style outdoor spaces. At least 20+ listings mention a lanai or covered lanai, with phrases like "private lanai," "covered lanai," "spacious lanai," and "two private lanais." The repeated references across multiple remarks make this a high-confidence building feature rather than an isolated unit-level detail.
Walking/jogging path amenities are supported by multiple listings using phrases like “walking paths,” “walking/jogging path,” and “jogging path.” The historical MLS data shows 15/20 listings with WAJOPA, so this appears to be a real shared community feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Remarks across many listings (MLS: 16/20) include 'recreation area', 'rec areas', 'recreation room' and 'clubhouse with a recreation room'. These repeated references from different listings indicate a building-level recreation amenity available to residents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Numerous remarks (MLS: 15/20) explicitly mention 'sauna'—including descriptors like 'dry sauna' and 'red-light sauna'—across multiple listings and agents. The consistent, explicit references across the dataset indicate high confidence that the community provides a sauna.
Multiple listings and MLS checkboxes indicate storage is available: 4 of 20 listings have storage checked in building amenities and 6 of 20 list storage in unit features. Public remarks from several different listings explicitly reference 'hidden storage nook', 'second private lanai offers extra storage', and 'Lanai storage, too.', suggesting storage/lockers or dedicated storage spaces are offered to some units rather than being a single-agent copy/paste error.
No analysis available
Tennis court facilities are clearly present in the building/community amenities. Listings repeatedly mention “tennis courts” and “tennis/pickleball courts,” and the historical MLS pattern is 19/20, which is strong confirmation across multiple remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Several listings (MLS: 8/20) explicitly reference 'hot tubs', 'Jacuzzis' or 'jacuzzi'—for example 'three pools and hot tubs' and 'Jacuzzis'—across different agent remarks. This direct, repeated wording supports a high confidence that hot tub/whirlpool facilities exist on the grounds.
Pool access is strongly and consistently supported across the listings. At least 20+ remarks explicitly mention pools, often in shared-amenity language such as "three pools and hot tubs," "three swimming pools," and "pool, hot tub, tennis courts," indicating the feature is available at the building/community level. The current MLS amenity data is also highly consistent, so confidence is very high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
In-unit laundry is very strongly supported: numerous current listings explicitly say 'in-unit washer/dryer,' 'washer/dryer in unit,' or note a 'new Washer/Dryer' / 'stack washer and dryer.' The evidence is consistent across multiple remarks and appears to be genuine listing detail rather than a one-off copy-paste error. Current MLS data also shows 20/20 listings include washer/dryer, reinforcing high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is clearly present across the building. The MLS history shows 20/20 listings with parking-related features, and many current remarks explicitly reference parking in different forms, including assigned stalls, carport/covered stalls, and two-space configurations. This is consistent across multiple listings and appears to be reliable, not a one-off copy-paste error.
Assigned parking is well supported by both MLS data and remarks. Several listings explicitly say 'assigned parking' or 'two assigned parking stalls,' which appears repeatedly across multiple agents and unit types. The evidence is strong enough to treat assigned parking as a building feature available to buyers.
Covered parking is clearly available in the building. The MLS history shows covered/garage parking in 19 of 20 listings, and the public remarks repeatedly describe covered stalls or covered assigned parking. This is consistent across many listings and is high-confidence evidence.
I looked for explicit phrases like deeded parking, owned stall, or parking included in deed. The remarks only describe assigned/covered parking and guest parking, so there is no clear evidence that parking is deeded.
No analysis available
I searched for references to parking rent, monthly parking costs, or additional parking charges. Nothing was stated in the public remarks, so there is no evidence of a parking fee.
Guest parking is consistently mentioned throughout the listings. The MLS history shows guest parking in 15 of 20 listings, and multiple remarks explicitly say 'ample guest parking,' 'guest stalls,' or similar wording. This appears to be a real building amenity rather than a single-agent artifact.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for phrases such as parking waitlist, waiting list, or join the waitlist for parking. The remarks do not mention any waitlist system, so this is treated as not indicated.
No analysis available
No analysis available
8 of 20 current MLS listings have the SECGUA amenity checked, and at least 2 public remarks explicitly mention '24-hour security' (one stating 'gated community with 24-hour security' and another listing Poha Kea Point noting '24-hour security'). Evidence is moderate across listings and agents — likely the building offers on-site security, but the coverage across listings is not yet widespread, so confidence is set at medium-high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Current remarks repeatedly confirm split/ductless air conditioning, including phrases like "brand-new split AC" and "brand new split unit AC." The evidence appears in multiple listings and is consistent with the historical MLS checkbox data showing ACSPL on several units, so this is high-confidence building-level feature evidence.
No analysis available
Public remarks across the listings do not mention concrete construction, and the current MLS signal is weak at just 4 of 20 listings. This looks more like inconsistent agent checkbox usage than a reliable building-wide feature.
Double wall construction is strongly supported: 19 of 20 current listings have DOUWAL checked, and prior analysis already rated this as high confidence. The remarks do not explicitly discuss the wall structure, but the MLS consistency is overwhelming across listings and agents.
No analysis available
7 of 20 current listings have MASSTU checked in the MLS, but none of the aggregated public remarks mention 'masonry' or 'stucco'. Evidence comes primarily from MLS checkbox data across multiple listings and appears to be agent-entered rather than described in remarks, so confidence is moderate (implied rather than explicitly confirmed in remarks).
No analysis available
The slab signal is weak and inconsistent, with only 6 of 20 listings checked in MLS and no supporting language in the public remarks. This does not look like a dependable building-wide feature.
No analysis available
Wood frame appears to be the likely construction type based on MLS data: 14 of 20 current listings have WOOFRA checked. The remarks themselves do not explicitly confirm it, so this is driven mainly by the consistent MLS pattern rather than copy-paste text.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit STR indicators such as short-term rental allowed, legal vacation rental, TVU, or NUC. None were found in the public remarks, so STR is not evidenced here.
I looked for hotel rental pool, managed by hotel, or similar program language. There were no such mentions, and because STR is not shown, this must remain false.
I searched for language like mandatory hotel pool, required participation, or cannot opt out. Nothing was found, and since STR is not established, mandatory pool participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
A listing explicitly gives the lease expiration date as 12/31/2035. I extracted the year 2035 as the lease expiry year.
The public remarks directly and repeatedly reference VA financing and assumable VA loans. This is strong evidence that the building/unit is VA loan approved or at least VA-financing eligible in practice.
I looked for insurance-related statements like 'fully insured,' 'full insurance,' 'walls-in coverage,' or 'comprehensive building insurance' and found none. The remarks do not provide any evidence that the HOA is fully insuring the building.
No analysis available
I searched for fire/life safety language such as 'fire life safety evaluation passed,' 'FLSE passed,' 'fire safety certified,' or 'passed fire inspection' and found no references. There is no public-remarks evidence that this building has passed a fire/life safety evaluation.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Multiple listings (at least 8 out of the 20 remarks) explicitly mention ocean or Kane'ohe Bay views — e.g., 'breathtaking, panoramic views of Kane’ohe Bay', 'ocean and mountain views', 'peek-a-boo ocean view', and 'overlooking Kaneohe Bay/Pacific Ocean'. The evidence is consistent across many agent remarks, so the building should be marked as offering ocean views.
Numerous listings (around 9/20 remarks) explicitly mention mountain views — phrases include 'Koolau mountains', 'Ko’olau mountains', 'sweeping views of Ko’olau mountains', and 'Mo'olua Mountains'. Multiple agents describe the same mountain panorama, supporting inclusion of mountain views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Garden-view language appears frequently across the remarks, with multiple listings explicitly mentioning "lush gardens," "landscaped courtyard," "lush tropical greenery," and "beautiful lush garden views." This is strong, repeated evidence from several listings rather than a one-off description, and it matches the MLS pattern where 14 of 20 listings currently show GARDEN in the view descriptions.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings explicitly mention 'sunrise', 'morning sun', or 'eastern exposure' (MLS: 0/20). While several remarks reference 'morning coffee' on the lanai, they do not explicitly claim sunrise or eastern exposure; given the lack of explicit mentions across listings and MLS checkbox being unchecked, treat sunrise view as not offered by the building.
One listing explicitly states 'perfect for morning coffee or sunset cocktails' and other remarks reference enjoying evening breezes/lanai views over Kane'ohe Bay. Though less frequent than ocean/mountain mentions, the explicit 'sunset' phrasing supports including sunset view availability for some units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listing remarks mention a resident or on-site manager (0 of ~40+ public-remark sections reviewed), though the MLS RESMAN amenity is checked in 8 of 20 current listings. Evidence for a resident manager exists only in the inconsistent MLS checkbox entries across some agents and is not corroborated by any agent remarks, so the feature is omitted pending owner/manager verification.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.