Puu Alii 2-2
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Puu Alii 2-2
Building Overview
Puu Alii 2-2 in Kaneohe (built 1981) — pet-free building, short-term rentals not allowed.
About Puu Alii 2-2
Puu Alii 2-2 is a condominium property located in the Kaneohe neighborhood, built in 1981. Based on available MLS data, specific information about unit sizes, number of units, and construction type is not provided in the record.
According to available records, the building does not allow pets and short-term rentals are not permitted. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data. No additional amenity or common-area details are included in the provided MLS information.
Parking arrangements, maintenance fees, lease restrictions, and other important ownership details are not specified in the available MLS data. Buyers and agents should verify all property facts, policies, fees, and management details with the listing agent or property management before making decisions. This summary is based on MLS data and does not replace due diligence.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit owner-occupancy statements (percentages or phrases like '80% owner occupied', 'majority owner occupied') across all remarks and found none. With no prior numeric value and no evidence in the remarks, owner-occupancy is unknown (null) and reported with low confidence.
I searched all public remarks for explicit elevator mentions (e.g., 'elevator', '4 elevators', 'four elevators', 'multiple elevators') and found none. With no prior data and no remarks mentioning elevators, I report false with medium confidence (absence in remarks suggests the building likely does not advertise elevators).
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
15 of 20 current listings list OTCOEX (common area electric) in association_fee_includes, but none of the public remarks explicitly state 'common area electricity' or similar language. The prevalence across many listings suggests building-level inclusion is likely offered, but the lack of remarks indicates possible agent checkbox copy/paste, so confidence is moderate.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings (0/20) checked HOTWAT while 18/20 list WTRHTR in inclusions; public remarks repeatedly reference 'water heater' or 'new water heater' and 'new water supply valves', strongly indicating hot water is provided by in-unit heaters and not included in HOA maintenance. High confidence that 'hot water included' should be false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
19 of 20 current listings list SEWER in association_fee_includes. Although remarks do not explicitly say 'sewer included,' the near-unanimous MLS checkbox across multiple listings/agents is strong evidence that sewer is included in the HOA fees for this building.
19 of 20 listings indicate WATER is included in association fees. Public remarks reference 'new water supply valves' and other water-related updates but do not state water is excluded, so the strong, consistent MLS checkbox usage across listings indicates water is included in the maintenance fee.
Multiple remarks across the listings (MLS: 19/20) explicitly list 'BBQ', 'BBQ areas' or 'picnic/BBQ areas' as part of the resort-style amenities. Phrases quoted include 'BBQ areas' and 'picnic/BBQ areas', and the mentions are consistent across many agent remarks rather than being a one-off, supporting high confidence that the building offers shared BBQ facilities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that the building offers patios/decks: numerous public remarks explicitly mention lanais or covered lanais (e.g., 'private lanai', 'covered lanai', 'spacious lanai', 'balcony') across the majority of listings. MLS amenity checkboxes also indicate PATDEC/COVPAT on many units (12 of 20), and multiple agents independently reference private or covered lanais rather than isolated copy-paste — together this supports including patio_deck as true.
Multiple listings (MLS: 15/20) explicitly mention 'walking paths', 'walking/jogging paths' or 'jogging path'. The repeated appearance of these phrases across agent remarks supports good confidence that the community includes walking/jogging paths.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Remarks across many listings (MLS: 16/20) include 'recreation area', 'rec areas', 'recreation room' and 'clubhouse with a recreation room'. These repeated references from different listings indicate a building-level recreation amenity available to residents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Numerous remarks (MLS: 15/20) explicitly mention 'sauna'—including descriptors like 'dry sauna' and 'red-light sauna'—across multiple listings and agents. The consistent, explicit references across the dataset indicate high confidence that the community provides a sauna.
Multiple listings and MLS checkboxes indicate storage is available: 4 of 20 listings have storage checked in building amenities and 6 of 20 list storage in unit features. Public remarks from several different listings explicitly reference 'hidden storage nook', 'second private lanai offers extra storage', and 'Lanai storage, too.', suggesting storage/lockers or dedicated storage spaces are offered to some units rather than being a single-agent copy/paste error.
No analysis available
The listings consistently cite 'tennis courts' (MLS: 19/20) with repeated phrases like 'tennis courts' and 'tennis & pickleball courts' across multiple agents' remarks. This widespread, repeated mention supports high confidence that the building/community provides tennis court facilities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Several listings (MLS: 8/20) explicitly reference 'hot tubs', 'Jacuzzis' or 'jacuzzi'—for example 'three pools and hot tubs' and 'Jacuzzis'—across different agent remarks. This direct, repeated wording supports a high confidence that hot tub/whirlpool facilities exist on the grounds.
Strong, consistent evidence that the building offers swimming pools: MLS amenity checkboxes are set on 19/20 recent listings and many public remarks explicitly state 'three pools', '3 swimming pools', or 'pool' (e.g., 'resort-style amenities include three pools and hot tubs'). The pool amenity is confirmed across multiple listings and agents rather than appearing only as an unchecked or solitary checkbox, so confidence is high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 20 current MLS listings list washer/dryer in the inclusions and numerous remarks explicitly mention in-unit laundry — examples include 'brand new ... W/D', 'in-unit washer/dryer', 'new Washer/Dryer' and 'new stack washer and dryer'. The evidence is consistent across many listings/agents, indicating the building offers units with in-unit laundry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence building has parking: MLS checkbox data shows 20/20 listings with parking-related features and many remarks reference parking (e.g., 'one assigned covered parking stall', '1 carport parking and open parking', 'two assigned parking stalls'). Evidence is consistent across multiple agent remarks and aligns with the MLS parking_features.
Multiple listings and MLS data indicate assigned/reserved parking is offered: MLS shows ASSIGN in 15/20 listings and remarks explicitly mention 'assigned' stalls in many units (quotes: 'assigned covered parking stall', 'two assigned parking stalls', '1 assigned parking stall'). Evidence is strong across different listings and agents.
Covered parking is clearly available: MLS shows covered/garage parking in 19/20 listings and remarks repeatedly state covered/carport stalls (examples: 'assigned covered parking stall', '1 carport parking', 'one assigned covered parking'). Evidence is consistent and strong across the dataset.
Listings consistently describe assigned/covered parking stalls but do not state that parking is deeded. Because the public remarks do not explicitly say parking is deeded, the feature is set to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for phrases like "parking fee", "monthly parking", or "parking rent" but found no references. There is no information to determine a monthly parking fee from these remarks.
Guest/visitor parking is available: MLS shows GUEST in 15/20 listings and many public remarks explicitly call out guest parking (quotes: 'ample guest parking', 'convenient guest parking with three stalls', 'plenty guest parking'), indicating this is a building-level amenity across multiple units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for terms such as "parking waitlist" or "waiting list" and found none. Absence of mention suggests no waitlist, so this is marked false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
8 of 20 current MLS listings have the SECGUA amenity checked, and at least 2 public remarks explicitly mention '24-hour security' (one stating 'gated community with 24-hour security' and another listing Poha Kea Point noting '24-hour security'). Evidence is moderate across listings and agents — likely the building offers on-site security, but the coverage across listings is not yet widespread, so confidence is set at medium-high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence that some units have split (ductless/mini-split) AC comes from the MLS checkbox (3 of 20 listings show ACSPL) and an explicit remark: 'Fully renovated ... including brand new split unit AC.' While only a minority of listings mention it, the explicit remark combined with multiple MLS inclusions indicates the building offers split AC in at least some units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
18 of 20 current listings have DOUWAL checked in the MLS, a strong and consistent signal across agents. Public remarks contain no explicit mentions, but the high frequency of the MLS checkbox across listings indicates the building likely has double-wall construction; confidence is high.
No analysis available
7 of 20 current listings have MASSTU checked in the MLS, but none of the aggregated public remarks mention 'masonry' or 'stucco'. Evidence comes primarily from MLS checkbox data across multiple listings and appears to be agent-entered rather than described in remarks, so confidence is moderate (implied rather than explicitly confirmed in remarks).
No analysis available
5 of 20 listings have SLAB checked in MLS data, but none of the public remarks reference a concrete-slab foundation. The MLS checkbox presence across some listings suggests some units/records indicate slab construction, but lack of corroborating remarks keeps confidence moderate.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I reviewed the remarks for explicit language permitting or describing STR/TVU/NUC/HOTEL rental rules but found none. With no evidence in the public remarks, STR is marked not allowed with medium confidence. (Per rules, dependent STR-related fields are set false.)
I looked for phrases like "hotel rental pool", "hotel rental program", or references to hotel management but found none. Because STR is not indicated as allowed, hotel-pool participation is set to false.
I searched for phrases such as "mandatory hotel pool", "required to participate", or "must be in rental program" and found none. Given STR is not shown as allowed, mandatory participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
A listing explicitly states the leasehold expires on 12/31/2035; the year 2035 is extracted. If multiple years had been present I would choose the most recent, but only 2035 is specified.
Multiple listings explicitly reference VA loan assumptions and VA-eligibility. This is strong, direct evidence in the public remarks that the building/unit accepts VA financing.
I reviewed the remarks for explicit insurance coverage statements (e.g., 'fully insured', 'walls-in coverage', 'full insurance') and found no references. Because there is no prior data and no explicit mention, I report false with medium confidence—the listings do not state that the HOA carries full/walls-in insurance.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for explicit FLSE/fire & life safety statements such as 'fire life safety evaluation passed', 'FLSE passed', or 'passed fire inspection' and found none. With no prior data and no remarks indicating an FLSE pass, I report false with medium confidence (absence of mention suggests the listing does not claim a passed evaluation).
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Multiple listings (at least 8 out of the 20 remarks) explicitly mention ocean or Kane'ohe Bay views — e.g., 'breathtaking, panoramic views of Kane’ohe Bay', 'ocean and mountain views', 'peek-a-boo ocean view', and 'overlooking Kaneohe Bay/Pacific Ocean'. The evidence is consistent across many agent remarks, so the building should be marked as offering ocean views.
Numerous listings (around 9/20 remarks) explicitly mention mountain views — phrases include 'Koolau mountains', 'Ko’olau mountains', 'sweeping views of Ko’olau mountains', and 'Mo'olua Mountains'. Multiple agents describe the same mountain panorama, supporting inclusion of mountain views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings explicitly mention 'sunrise', 'morning sun', or 'eastern exposure' (MLS: 0/20). While several remarks reference 'morning coffee' on the lanai, they do not explicitly claim sunrise or eastern exposure; given the lack of explicit mentions across listings and MLS checkbox being unchecked, treat sunrise view as not offered by the building.
One listing explicitly states 'perfect for morning coffee or sunset cocktails' and other remarks reference enjoying evening breezes/lanai views over Kane'ohe Bay. Though less frequent than ocean/mountain mentions, the explicit 'sunset' phrasing supports including sunset view availability for some units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listing remarks mention a resident or on-site manager (0 of ~40+ public-remark sections reviewed), though the MLS RESMAN amenity is checked in 8 of 20 current listings. Evidence for a resident manager exists only in the inconsistent MLS checkbox entries across some agents and is not corroborated by any agent remarks, so the feature is omitted pending owner/manager verification.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.