Puu Alii 2-1
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Puu Alii 2-1
Building Overview
Puu Alii 2-1 in Kaneohe, built 1980, concrete construction. Pets allowed; short-term rentals not permitted.
About Puu Alii 2-1
Puu Alii 2-1 is a condominium property located in the Kaneohe neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1980 and is of concrete construction. Specific unit sizes and count of residences are not provided in the available MLS data.
Based on MLS data, key property policies include that pets are allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS records. No additional amenity listings (such as pools, fitness facilities, or community spaces) are provided in the data supplied.
MLS-derived information for this listing is limited. Buyers should verify details such as unit sizes, parking arrangements, HOA fees, specific pet rules, and management contacts with the seller, the HOA, or the listing agent prior to making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
There is an indication that at least one listing/unit is owner-occupied, but no numeric percentage of owner-occupied units for the building is stated. Because no explicit percentage appears in the remarks, the owner-occupancy percentage is unknown and cannot be guessed.
No evidence in the provided public remarks that specifies the number of elevators. I searched for explicit phrases like '4 elevators', 'four elevators', 'multiple elevators' and found nothing, so the count is unknown and cannot be inferred.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings repeatedly reference assigned parking stalls (e.g., '1 assigned parking', 'two assigned parking spaces'), but there is no explicit language indicating parking is deeded/owned, so deeded parking is not supported by the remarks.
No analysis available
Searched for 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', 'parking charge' and similar phrases; no information about parking fees was provided in the public remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Looked for 'parking waitlist', 'waiting list', or similar wording and found none; absence of mention suggests no waitlist noted in the public remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings mention "24-hour security" among the common amenities, implying on-site security presence/patrol.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for 'short-term rental', 'vacation rental', 'STR', '30-day minimum', 'TVU', and related terms; none were present. Therefore there is no evidence STRs are permitted.
Because public remarks do not indicate STRs are allowed and there is no mention of any hotel rental pool or hotel-managed program, hotel rental pool participation is not supported.
With no evidence of a hotel rental pool or STR allowance in the remarks, there is likewise no basis to conclude any mandatory rental-pool participation exists.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for phrases like 'lease expires', 'land lease to', 'leasehold expiring in', or explicit years; found no evidence to determine a lease expiry year.
Multiple listings explicitly state the property is VA assumable and reference an assumable 2.3% VA loan, so VA financing applicability is supported by the public remarks.
The public remarks do not indicate that the HOA provides full (walls-in) insurance. With no explicit insurance coverage language present, the feature is marked false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
There is no explicit statement in the public remarks that the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation. Absence of any FLSE/fire-inspection language leads to a default false with medium confidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.