Punchbowl Plaza
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Punchbowl Plaza
Building Overview
Punchbowl Plaza in Makiki-Tantalus — built 1972; window A/C, covered assigned parking; no pets or short-term rentals.
About Punchbowl Plaza
Punchbowl Plaza is a residential building located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood, originally built in 1972. According to available records in the MLS, specific details on building size, unit counts, and construction type are not provided in the data set.
Based on MLS data, units at Punchbowl Plaza use window air conditioning. Parking is listed as available with covered, assigned stalls and guest parking. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed per the MLS information. The management company is not identified in the available records.
Buyers should note that information on maintenance fees, special assessments, unit layouts, and other building amenities was not included in the MLS summary provided. This narrative is based on MLS data only; prospective buyers and their agents should verify all details with the listing agent, property manager, or public records before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
The remarks explicitly state owner-occupancy figures (one says "52% owner occupancy" and another says "56% Owner Occupancy"). Given the existing user-verified current value of 52.00 and the rule to heavily weight user verifications unless overwhelming evidence exists, the owner_occupancy is retained at 52.0 with very high confidence; the presence of a conflicting 56% mention is noted but not considered sufficient to change the verified value.
Public remarks do not mention any elevators or number of elevators. Because no numeric value exists in current data and no explicit statements were found in the remarks, the number of elevators is unknown and cannot be inferred from the text.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
4 of 6 current listings check OTCOEX (common area/other common expenses) in the association fee. None of the public remarks mention common-area electricity; the MLS checkbox appears across multiple agent entries, suggesting the building commonly includes this, though agents may be copy/pasting.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence 87%: Only 1 of 3 listings has GAS checked in association_fee_includes and none of the public remarks mention gas or gas-related utilities, while the majority of agents left it unchecked, suggesting the single positive is likely a copy/paste or checkbox error rather than a true building-wide inclusion.
2 of 6 listings explicitly check HOTWAT (hot water included) while 2 other listings list WTRHTR (water heater) in unit inclusions, creating conflicting signals. No remarks mention hot-water being building-provided; inclusion is possible for some units but the evidence is inconsistent across listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 6 current listings have SEWER checked as included in the association fee. While public remarks do not explicitly state 'sewer included,' the unanimous MLS association_fee_includes entries and prior high confidence indicate sewer is included in the maintenance fee.
All 6 listings currently check WATER as included in the association fee. No public remarks mention water explicitly; given the consistent MLS checkbox across listings and prior medium confidence, water is likely included in the maintenance fee but confirmation from management would raise confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 6 listings in the MLS have the COMLAU amenity checked, and at least 2 independent remarks explicitly mention shared facilities—e.g., 'The well-maintained building provides secure community laundry' and 'Punchbowl Plaza has ... a community laundry area.' Evidence is strong across listings and matches the unanimous MLS checkbox, so community laundry is included with high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple recent listing remarks (at least 4–5 of the 6 provided) explicitly mention covered or secured parking: quotes include 'secure covered parking', 'Large covered stall', and 'covered, secured parking stall'. One listing only references an assigned stall but overall the evidence is consistent across different agents and aligns with prior MLS checkbox data indicating covered parking.
Listings clearly describe assigned/secured covered parking stalls and guest parking, but they do not use wording that indicates parking is deeded or owned with the unit. Absence of explicit 'deeded' language suggests parking is not deeded.
No analysis available
I looked for phrases like 'parking fee', 'monthly parking charge', or 'additional cost for parking' and found none. The listings describe secured and assigned parking but do not indicate any parking fee, so monthly parking fee is unknown from these remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for 'parking waitlist', 'waiting list', or instructions to 'join waitlist for parking' and found no references. The remarks describe assigned stalls and guest parking only, so there is no evidence of a waitlist.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Five of six current MLS listings list MASSTU (masonry/stucco) in construction materials and none of the public remarks contradict that. Evidence is strong across multiple agent listings and consistent with the prior High-confidence assessment, so the building is recorded as masonry/stucco.
No analysis available
Two of six current MLS listings include SLAB (concrete slab foundation) in construction materials while the other remarks are silent on foundation. Because the evidence is limited to some MLS entries and not confirmed in remarks, the feature is included with moderate confidence rather than as a definitive building-wide fact.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit STR language (allowed, permitted, NUC, TVU, minimum night rules) and found none. In absence of any STR language, there is no evidence that short-term rentals are allowed in this building.
I looked for phrases like 'hotel rental pool', 'managed by hotel', or named hotel programs and found none. Because there is no evidence STRs are allowed, participation in a hotel pool is also unsupported.
I searched for 'mandatory hotel pool', 'required to participate', or 'must be in rental program' and found no such statements. With no evidence of STR or hotel pooling, there is no indication of a mandatory rental pool requirement.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for language such as 'lease expires', 'land lease to', 'leasehold expiring in', and any renewal years. The public remarks contain no references to leasehold status or an expiry year, so the lease expiry is unknown.
I searched the remarks for phrases like 'VA approved', 'VA financing', or 'VA loans accepted' and found no mentions. Therefore there is no evidence in the listings that the building is VA-approved.
The public remarks do not state that the HOA or building is fully insured or has walls-in coverage. With no explicit statement present, this boolean is set to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
There is no reference in the provided public remarks to a fire/life safety evaluation or certification. In absence of any mention and with no prior value, the field is set to false with medium confidence (absence of mention suggests it likely isn't stated publicly).
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the six current public remarks mention sunset or western exposure (0/6). Remarks reference 'overlooking garden area', 'natural light', and 'breezy cross ventilation' but contain no phrases like 'sunset', 'evening sun', or 'western exposure', so there is no evidence the building offers sunset views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.