Punahou Wilder
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Punahou Wilder
Building Overview
Punahou Wilder in Manoa (built 1966); no pets and no short-term rentals allowed, per MLS data.
About Punahou Wilder
Punahou Wilder is a residential building located in the Manoa neighborhood, originally constructed in 1966. Based on MLS data, specific information about building size, number of units, and construction type is not provided in the available records.
According to available records, the building does not allow pets and does not permit short-term rentals. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data. No additional amenities or on-site services are specified in the provided data.
Details such as parking, maintenance fees, unit layouts, and other policies are not included in the MLS information available for this listing. Buyers and agents should verify all building facts, restrictions, and fees with the listing broker or property management prior to making any decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit owner-occupancy references such as percentages, "majority owner occupied," or similar wording. The remarks do not provide any owner-occupancy information, so this remains unknown.
I looked for explicit elevator counts such as "4 elevators," "multiple elevators," or other number-based references, but found none. The remarks do confirm the building has an elevator, so the safest supported value is at least one elevator.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is limited MLS support for common-area electricity: 2 of 4 current listings include OTCOEX. None of the public remarks explicitly mention common electric or building power included, so this may be a partial or copy-paste MLS checkbox rather than well-verified text evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer appears consistently included across all current listings, with 4 of 4 MLS records checking SEWER. The public remarks do not mention sewer directly, but the MLS data is unanimous and strongly supports this as a building-level fee inclusion.
Water appears consistently included across all current listings, with 4 of 4 MLS records checking WATER. The public remarks do not mention water directly, but the MLS data is unanimous and strongly supports this as a building-level fee inclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
3 of 4 current listings have the TRACHU amenity checked, but none of the public remarks explicitly mention a trash, garbage, or refuse chute. This looks like moderate MLS-level evidence rather than remark-backed confirmation, so it is included with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Community laundry appears to be a real building feature. It is supported by current MLS data (3 of 4 listings marked COMLAU) and by a public remark stating this is 'the only unit in the building w/ a washer & dryer,' which implies shared laundry for other residents. The evidence is consistent across listings and does not look like a one-off copy/paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is strongly supported: 3 of 4 listings have parking features populated in MLS, and 3 separate remarks explicitly reference an assigned parking stall. The wording is consistent across agents, with phrases like "one assigned parking stall near the elevator" and "Assigned parking stall," indicating building parking availability rather than a unit-specific anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for deeded parking, owned stall, parking included in deed, or similar ownership language. The remarks only confirm an assigned stall, which is not enough to conclude the parking is deeded.
No analysis available
I searched for parking fee, monthly parking rent, or any additional parking cost. No such information appears in the remarks, so the parking fee is unknown.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for parking waitlist language such as join waitlist, parking waiting list, or waitlist for parking. The remarks do not mention any waitlist system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 4 current listings carry the CONCRE material flag, which is a strong MLS-level signal even though the public remarks do not spell out “concrete construction.” There is no conflicting evidence in the remarks, so this is likely a building-level feature rather than a unit-specific note.
Three of four current listings indicate double-wall construction in MLS, but the public remarks are silent on the structure type. Because agents can copy/paste MLS fields, confidence is moderate rather than high, though the repeated occurrence across listings supports inclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The SLAB field appears in 3 of 4 current listings, which is consistent enough to treat as a building feature for search purposes. The remarks do not confirm it directly, so confidence is moderate and based mainly on MLS consistency.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for STR-related terms like short-term rental allowed, legal vacation rental, NUC, TVU, or minimum rental period rules. Nothing in the remarks indicates STRs are allowed, so this is treated as not supported by the listings.
I looked for hotel rental pool references such as hotel program, managed by hotel, Hilton pool, or similar. Since there is no evidence that short-term rentals are allowed, this must be false.
I searched for mandatory rental-pool wording such as required to participate, cannot opt out, or must be in rental program. No such language appears, and without STR permission this feature is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for lease expiry language such as lease expires, ground lease ends, leasehold expiring, or renewed through a future year. The remarks do not mention any land tenure or expiry year, so the value remains unknown.
I looked for phrases like VA approved, VA financing, and VA loans accepted, but none appeared in the public remarks. With no explicit evidence, this is treated as not supported by the listings.
The remarks directly state the building is not "100% insured for hurricane," which is strong evidence against full walls-in style coverage. This is an explicit denial, so confidence is high.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for fire/life safety evaluation language such as FLSE passed, fire safety certified, or life safety compliant, but nothing was mentioned. With no evidence in the listing remarks, this remains unconfirmed and is set to false by default under the rules.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views are supported by both MLS data and remarks. 3 of 4 listings include MOUNTA in the view description, and several agents explicitly wrote “Manoa mountains” and “mountain views.” This appears consistent across listings rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.