Punahou Marquis
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Punahou Marquis
Building Overview
Punahou Marquis in Manoa, built 1969; pets and short-term rentals are not allowed. Management company listed as unknown.
About Punahou Marquis
Based on MLS data, Punahou Marquis is a condominium building located in the Manoa neighborhood, originally built in 1969. Size (number of units, floors, or square footage) and construction type are not specified in the available MLS records.
According to available records, key policies for the building include a prohibition on pets and a prohibition on short-term rentals. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data. No additional amenities or common-area features are specified in the provided MLS information.
Parking arrangements, maintenance fees, assessments, and other building policies are not detailed in the MLS data supplied. Buyers should verify all building details, rules, fees, and management information with the listing agent, management company, or official condominium documents before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Remarks include phrases like 'Tenant Occupied' for this unit and marketing language referencing investment/student housing, but no explicit owner-occupancy percentage or clear definitive statement about overall owner-occupancy for the building. Without an explicit numeric mention, the owner_occupancy cannot be determined and is left null.
Public remarks repeatedly describe the property as a 'walk-up condo' and reference gated entrances to floors, which is explicit evidence the building lacks elevators. Based on that language, the building is assessed as having 0 elevators.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 4 current listings show OTCOEX in association_fee_includes (common area electricity included). Public remarks across the listings do not explicitly mention 'common area electricity' or 'building power included', so evidence comes entirely from consistent MLS checkboxes and appears to be copy-pasted across agents; confidence is moderate (0.78).
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings show HOTWAT in association_fee_includes (0/4) and 3 of 4 listings list WTRHTR (water heater) in inclusions, implying units provide their own hot water. Remarks do not claim 'hot water included', so conclude hot water is not included in the maintenance fee (high confidence).
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 4 current listings show SEWER in association_fee_includes (sewer included). Public remarks do not explicitly state 'sewer included' or 'sewer in HOA', so the conclusion relies on consistent MLS checkboxes across multiple listings; evidence is moderate (0.78).
All 4 current listings show WATER in association_fee_includes (water included). There are no explicit remarks like 'water included' or 'water in HOA' in the public remarks, so this determination is based on consistent MLS checkbox data across listings and is given moderate confidence (0.78).
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', 'surf storage', or similar and found no references. There is no evidence in these listings that surfboard storage is provided.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building is noted as having no pool in the provided context, and the public remarks do not mention a pool or 'salt water'/'saltwater'. Given there is no pool, a saltwater pool is not applicable.
No analysis available
All four current listings list COMLAU in amenities and agent remarks repeatedly state shared laundry (e.g., 'maintained secure building with clean community laundry room', 'well maintained secured community laundry area', 'there is also community laundry'). Evidence is consistent across multiple listings/agents and explicitly describes a building laundry facility, so include community_laundry=true with high confidence.
Multiple remarks reference 'community laundry' or 'community laundry area' but there is no mention of payment method. I looked for terms like 'coin laundry', 'coin-op', 'quarters', 'card operated', or 'paid laundry' and found none.
Listings repeatedly reference a community laundry room/area ('maintained secure building with clean community laundry room'), but there is no language such as 'laundry on each floor' or 'laundry room on every floor'. I searched for phrases like 'on each floor', 'every floor', and 'floor-by-floor laundry' and found none.
No analysis available
Strong evidence across listings that parking is assigned: public remarks in these listings repeatedly state '1 parking space (assigned)' (appears in multiple agent remarks). Combined with current MLS checkbox showing ASSIGN on all 4 listings, confidence is very high that the building offers assigned parking.
MLS parking_features are inconsistent (2 of 4 listings include covered/garage codes) but none of the public remarks mention 'covered', 'garage', or 'carport'. Because remarks from multiple agents do not corroborate the covered-parking checkboxes and there is no prior confirmation, there is insufficient evidence to conclude the building has covered parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings reference secured entry and gated entrances ('secured entry into building', 'gated entrance to each floor'), but I found no explicit mention of key card or fob access. I searched for 'key card', 'fob', 'card reader', and similar terms and found none.
No analysis available
I looked for phrases like 'security patrol', 'roving security', or 'patrol service' and there were no references in the remarks. The building is described as 'secured' but that does not imply a patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Three of four current MLS listings list concrete in construction_materials, but none of the public remarks mention 'concrete', 'concrete building', or similar. Evidence rests mainly on MLS checkbox data across multiple listings rather than explicit agent remarks, so inclusion is tentative.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Two of four current MLS listings indicate a slab foundation, but none of the public remarks explicitly state 'concrete slab' or similar. Because evidence is limited to mixed MLS checkbox entries and remarks are silent, the feature is possible but uncertain.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The public remarks explicitly say 'Building Insurance coverage is 100%', which indicates full (walls-in) insurance by the HOA. This explicit statement yields high confidence that the building is fully insured.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for terms like 'fire life safety evaluation', 'FLSE passed', 'fire safety certified', and 'passed fire inspection' but found no references. In the absence of any mention, the field is set to false with medium confidence (absence of evidence).
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public remarks (0 of 4 listings) mention sunset views, western exposure, or evening sun. Current MLS data shows 0/4 listings with SUNSET in view_descriptions and 3/4 marked NONE; with no prior confirmation and no remarks indicating a recent change, the evidence supports setting view_sunset to false.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for phrases such as 'fireworks view', 'see fireworks from', or 'watch fireworks from' and found no references indicating fireworks can be seen from the building or units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.