Punahou Hale and Oahuan Tower
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Punahou Hale and Oahuan Tower
Building Overview
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for an owner-occupancy percentage and phrases such as "majority owner occupied" or "highly owner occupied." None of the listings provide owner-occupancy information, so the percentage is unknown.
I searched for explicit elevator references, including "elevators," "multiple elevators," and specific counts such as "4 elevators." None of the listings mention elevators, so the number is unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Cable TV inclusion appears in the MLS fee breakdown for 2 of 6 listings, but there is no matching language in the public remarks. The remarks consistently mention other fee inclusions like electricity, water, and sewer, which suggests cable is not being actively described by agents and the MLS checkbox may be inconsistent.
6/6 listings show OTCOEX in association_fee_includes, so common-area electricity appears to be included in the maintenance fee. The remarks do not explicitly say “common area electricity,” but the MLS consistency across multiple listings is strong and appears to reflect the same building-level feature.
No analysis available
This is strongly confirmed. Multiple listings explicitly mention electricity included in the maintenance fees, and 6/6 MLS records have ELECTR checked, showing consistent agreement between remarks and MLS data.
No analysis available
6/6 MLS listings have HOTWAT checked, so hot water is treated as included. The public remarks do not explicitly mention hot water, but there is no evidence like WTRHTR to suggest the opposite, and the MLS pattern is uniform across listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is directly confirmed in the remarks and reinforced by 6/6 MLS records. The wording is repeated enough across listings to treat this as a clear building feature rather than a one-off entry.
Water inclusion is explicitly mentioned in several public remarks and matched by all 6 MLS records. This is strong, consistent evidence that water is included in the maintenance fee for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public remark mentions a recreation room across the listings reviewed. The only evidence is an inconsistent MLS amenity flag (RECROO in 2 of 6 listings), which looks more like copy-paste MLS noise than a verified building amenity. Based on the absence of remark support and weak, inconsistent MLS data, this feature is best treated as not confirmed for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is solid evidence that Punahou Hale offers storage/lockers or extra storage. Current MLS data shows the storage amenity in 3 of 6 listings, and at least one remark directly mentions 'additional storage on the same floor.'
I searched for surfboard storage, board storage, surf storage, and bike-and-surfboard storage. General additional storage is mentioned, but it is not identified as surfboard storage.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for salt water pool, saltwater pool, salt pool, and saline pool. No such language appears, and the current building context lists pool=False.
No analysis available
Strong, consistent evidence across the listings confirms shared laundry in the building. Multiple remarks explicitly say "community laundry," "community laundry for residents," and "community laundry is conveniently located on site," matching the existing MLS COMLAU history. This appears to be a stable building amenity rather than a one-off agent entry.
I searched for terms such as coin laundry, card-operated, quarters, laundry fee, and paid laundry. None of these payment-related details appear in the remarks.
I searched for references to laundry on each floor, laundry rooms on every floor, or floor-by-floor laundry. The listings confirm shared laundry exists, but provide no evidence that it is located on every floor.
Parking is clearly available at Punahou Hale. Across the provided remarks, 5 listings explicitly mention parking in some form, including 'no assigned parking; however, parking may be available via a waitlist for $120 per month,' 'Rental parking avail $120 mo, waitlist,' and 'stalls are available on a first-come, first-served basis for $120/month.' The evidence is consistent across multiple remarks and appears to be building-level information rather than a one-off agent claim.
None of the three recent public remarks indicate assigned or deeded parking; two listings explicitly state 'does not come with deeded parking' and 'stalls are available on a first-come, first-served basis for $120/month' (another notes 'parking immediately available for rent ($120/month)'). This consistent agent language across listings strongly indicates parking is rented rather than assigned/deeded.
No analysis available
Multiple listings state that parking is not included with the unit or is not deeded. Parking is instead available separately through rental or waitlist arrangements.
No analysis available
The public remarks consistently identify a monthly parking charge of $120. This applies to separately rented parking rather than deeded parking.
No analysis available
No listing remarks explicitly mention secured parking, gated parking, or card-access parking. The only security-related note is "secured building entry," which refers to the building entrance, not parking. The presence of multiple parking remarks without any secured-parking wording suggests the SECENT checkbox is likely unrelated or copy/pasted.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Several listings explicitly describe a parking waitlist system. Availability may be through a waitlist, with parking rented separately for $120 per month.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit card- or fob-based access language, including key card, keycard, card reader, and fob access. Secured entry alone does not establish a card-based security system.
No analysis available
I searched for references to security patrols, roving guards, patrol services, and a patrolled building. The listings mention secured entry only and provide no evidence of patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete construction is strongly supported at the building level. All 6 current listings identify the property as concrete, and the remarks across multiple agents focus on unit condition and amenities rather than contradicting the building type. This appears consistent and not just a copy-paste artifact.
No analysis available
Hollow tile appears in only 1 of 5 current MLS records, and none of the remarks mention hollow tile or similar construction details. Because the evidence is sparse and not supported by remarks, this should be treated as tentative rather than confirmed.
There is no remark-based support for masonry/stucco construction, and the MLS signal is very weak at 1 of 6 listings. Because this feature is not corroborated by multiple agents or any site-specific description, it should be treated as not established for the building.
No analysis available
A slab foundation appears in 2 of 5 current MLS records, and historical confidence was medium. The remarks do not explicitly confirm a concrete slab, so this is supported mainly by the MLS pattern rather than by descriptive listing text.
There is only weak evidence for stone construction: 1 of 5 current listings flags STONE in the MLS materials field, while the remarks are silent on any stone building/exterior details. This looks more like an unconfirmed MLS checkbox than corroborated building evidence, so confidence remains tentative.
No analysis available
Above-ground construction is present in 2 of 5 MLS listings, but the public remarks are silent on this point. With no corroborating language from agents, the feature is only moderately supported and may be an inconsistent MLS entry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for explicit short-term rental permissions and related terms, but none appeared. Because there is no evidence supporting STR use, this is treated as false with medium confidence.
The remarks contain no references to a hotel rental pool, hotel operations, or branded rental program. This must also be false because short-term rental permission is not established.
The remarks do not mention mandatory participation in any rental pool or hotel program. This is false under the prerequisite that mandatory pool participation requires STR to be allowed.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for leasehold terms and specific expiration or extension years. No applicable lease expiry date was found.
The remarks were searched for explicit VA financing language, but none was found. There is no evidence that the building is VA loan approved.
I searched for insurance-related terms including fully insured, full insurance, comprehensive building insurance, and walls-in coverage. The remarks do not address building insurance, so full insurance is not supported.
Across the provided remarks, there are 0 mentions of fire sprinklers or any related fire-suppression system. The listings repeatedly describe other amenities like rooftop access and community laundry, but nothing suggests a sprinkler system, so there is no public-remarks support for this feature.
I searched for statements such as fire/life safety evaluation passed, FLSE passed, fire safety certified, life safety compliant, or passed fire inspection. No such language appears in the remarks, so there is no evidence that the evaluation passed.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views are supported by both MLS data and remarks across multiple listings. At least 4 of 6 current listings show MOUNTA, and one remark directly references 'scenic views of Tantalus' while another says 'sweeping views of the city, mountains, and Diamond Head.' This appears consistent across listings rather than a one-off agent copy-paste issue.
Diamond Head views are clearly documented in several listings and reinforced by MLS data. Two of six current listings include DIAHEA, and multiple public remarks explicitly mention Diamond Head views from the unit or rooftop area. The repeated language across listings suggests this is a real building feature offered by some units.
City views are supported by explicit remarks and current MLS data. Two of six listings show CITY in the view descriptions, and multiple remarks mention 'sweeping views of the city' or describe the building as offering central urban living with city-facing exposure. This indicates the feature is present in at least some units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunrise views are not substantiated by the public remarks. The only current view references are Tantalus, Diamond Head/coastline, and rooftop fireworks, which do not establish sunrise or eastern exposure.
0 of 2 current listings mention SUNSET in view_descriptions. Remarks highlight 'Diamond Head views' and ability to 'catch Friday night fireworks' from the rooftop, but do not explicitly say 'sunset', 'western exposure', or 'evening sun.' With MLS checkboxes unchecked and no direct mentions across listings, there is strong evidence the building should not be listed as having sunset views.
No analysis available
Multiple listings explicitly describe viewing Friday night fireworks from Punahou Hale's rooftop deck. This is direct evidence of a fireworks view from a building amenity, though the remarks do not specifically state that every unit has the view.
No analysis available
There are 4 of 6 listings with RESMAN marked in MLS amenities, but the public remarks do not describe a resident manager, on-site manager, or live-in manager. This looks more like moderate MLS checkbox evidence than confirmation from listing text, so confidence is only moderate and may reflect copy/paste data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.