
Punahala Apartments
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Punahala Apartments
Building Overview
Punahala Apartments in Manoa — concrete building (1966); pets and short-term rentals are not allowed.

About Punahala Apartments
Punahala Apartments is located in the Manoa neighborhood and was built in 1966. According to available records, the building is constructed of concrete. Size and unit count information are not provided in the MLS data available for this listing.
Key policies reported in the MLS indicate that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS records. No specific on-site amenities are described in the provided data.
MLS data for this building is limited: details such as parking arrangements, maintenance fees, utility responsibilities, and amenity lists are not provided in the available records. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all building details, policies, and fees with the listing agent or property management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
County records and the state registration both report 8 floors, supported by listing floor fields and unit-number floors reaching 8.
The county parcel records report 49 residential units, matching the state registration's 49 units; the parcel contains one building.
Owner occupancy from AOUO registration(s) 103. Refreshed by Real_Estate_Scraper/reb_registry/propagate_owner_occupancy.py, which this lock does not block.
I searched for explicit counts such as '4 elevators,' 'four elevators,' or 'multiple elevators.' No elevator count was found, so the number remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Six of eight listings include OTCOEX in the association fee inclusions, which supports that common-area expenses are included. None of the provided remarks specifically mention common-area electricity, common electric, or building power, so the evidence is primarily MLS checkbox data rather than independent agent confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All eight listings identify SEWER as included in the association fees. No remarks explicitly quote 'sewer included' or otherwise discuss the fee breakdown, but the consistent 8/8 MLS reporting across listings is strong building-level evidence.
All eight listings identify WATER as included in the association fees. None of the remarks explicitly mention water being included, but the consistent reporting across all listings strongly indicates this is a building-wide fee inclusion rather than an isolated listing error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks do not describe any dedicated surfboard or board storage facilities. No evidence of surfboard storage was found.
No analysis available
No listings explicitly mention a trash chute or related terms in their remarks. Nevertheless, 7 of 8 current MLS records include TRACHU, which suggests the building likely offers this amenity, though the evidence may reflect repeated checkbox data rather than independently verified remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building's pool is strongly supported by both MLS data and remarks from at least three listings. Key phrases include “onsite swimming pool,” “heated swimming pool,” and “great & grand recreation deck with heated pool,” indicating a shared building amenity rather than an isolated or copied unit feature.
No analysis available
A swimming pool is explicitly mentioned, but its water type is not specified. No evidence confirms a saltwater pool.
All 8 of 8 current listings indicate washer/dryer inclusions, and at least 1 listing explicitly mentions an "in unit washer and dryer." Although most remarks do not independently describe the laundry setup, the consistent MLS data across all listings supports that in-unit laundry is available in the building.
No analysis available
The remarks mention an in-unit washer and dryer, not paid community laundry. No evidence of payment-required laundry facilities was found.
The remarks mention an in-unit washer and dryer but do not describe community laundry facilities. There is no evidence that laundry is available on every floor.
No analysis available
Assigned parking is supported by 8/8 current MLS records and explicit remarks in at least two listings, including "fully covered assigned parking stall" and "parking stall ... near the elevator." The consistent MLS data plus direct wording indicates this is a genuine building feature rather than an unsupported checkbox.
No analysis available
Parking is referenced as a stall located near the elevator and as a fully covered assigned stall. No language indicates that the parking is deeded, included in the unit deed, or owned separately.
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for parking rental or fee language, including costs for additional stalls. Nothing was found, so no parking fee is evidenced.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for references to joining or being placed on a parking waitlist. No such information was found.
No analysis available
The remarks do not describe a card- or fob-based building access system. No evidence of security-card access was found.
No analysis available
The listing remarks do not mention any security patrol service. There is no evidence that the building is patrolled.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete is listed in the construction materials for all 8 of 8 listings, making this strong and consistent evidence across the building. No remarks contradict or clarify the construction type, but the unanimous checkbox pattern supports including it.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Masonry/stucco appears in only 1 of 8 listings, with no supporting remarks from any listing. Because the evidence is isolated and uncorroborated, this feature is omitted as likely checkbox noise or a listing-specific data error.
No analysis available
A concrete slab is recorded in only 1 of 8 listings, and no public remarks support the claim. The isolated entry appears likely to be an unverified MLS checkbox, so the feature is excluded.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks do not explicitly address short-term rental permissions or restrictions. In the absence of any STR-related mention, this is treated as false with medium-low confidence.
The remarks contain no indication of a hotel rental pool or hotel-operated rental program. Because STR allowance is not established, the prerequisite for a hotel pool is not met.
The remarks provide no evidence that owners must participate in a hotel rental program. Since STR allowance and hotel-pool participation are not established, mandatory participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks contain no specific lease-expiry year or lease-renewal information. Therefore, the expiration year is unknown rather than inferred.
The remarks were searched for VA approval and financing language, but none was present. With no explicit evidence, this is treated as false with medium-low confidence.
The explicit statement that the building is '100% insured for fire and hurricane' strongly supports full building insurance. This is treated as a high-confidence confirmation of being fully insured.
No analysis available
The remarks do not provide evidence that the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation. Under the no-mention rule for this boolean feature, the value is treated as false with medium-low confidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
City views are supported by 4 of 8 current MLS view descriptions and multiple detailed remarks. Two listings explicitly mention city views, while another notes a Diamond Head view from the lanai and bedroom, making this a legitimate building-level feature rather than an unsupported checkbox.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listing explicitly indicates a Friday night fireworks view associated with the residence. This satisfies the requirement for a fireworks view from the building or unit.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings explicitly mention a resident manager or on-site building manager. RESMAN appears in 6 of 8 MLS records, but the absence of any supporting remarks across multiple agents makes this evidence look like possible copy-paste or unverified checkbox data rather than confirmation of the feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.