Pulua
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Pulua
Building Overview
Pulua (neighborhood unknown) — built 1986, concrete construction; pets and short-term rentals are not allowed.
About Pulua
Pulua is a condominium building recorded as built in 1986. Location details in MLS records do not specify a neighborhood; construction is listed as concrete. Size and unit count are not provided in the available MLS data.
Key policy details noted in the MLS records include that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data. No additional amenities or building features are specified in the provided records.
Parking, maintenance fees, utilities, unit layouts, HOA rules, and other common building details are not included in the available MLS information. Based on MLS data analysis, buyers should verify all building details, policies, and fees with the listing agent or management before making any decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
There is no owner-occupancy percentage or description in the public remarks. Because no numeric or descriptive evidence appears, the owner-occupancy percentage is unknown from these remarks.
Remarks contain no reference to any elevator count or presence. I searched the entire public_remarks for explicit elevator mentions (numeric or worded) and found none, so the number of elevators is unknown from these remarks.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
7 of 11 current MLS listings check OTCOEX (common area electricity) in association_fee_includes. No public remarks mention 'common area electricity' or similar phrases, so the primary evidence is the majority of MLS checkboxes across agents; this appears plausible but is not directly corroborated in remarks and may reflect copy/paste practices.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings (0/11) indicate HOTWAT in association_fee_includes while 5/11 mention WTRHTR (unit water heater). Remarks explicitly note 'The water heater was replaced in 2024,' and there are no remarks saying 'hot water included' or similar. Strong, consistent evidence across MLS checkboxes and remarks that hot water is not included in the maintenance fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 11 of 11 current MLS listings include SEWER in association_fee_includes, and the public remarks explicitly state 'Water/Sewer is included in maintenance fees.' This is consistent and strongly indicates sewer is included in the maintenance fee.
All 11 of 11 current MLS listings include WATER in association_fee_includes, and remarks state 'Water/Sewer is included in maintenance fees.' This provides strong, consistent evidence that water is included in the maintenance fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings' remarks mention a jogging or walking path (0 of 11). Only 1 of 11 MLS amenity checkboxes lists WAJOPA, suggesting a single-agent checkbox rather than a true building feature. Given the absence of descriptive remarks like 'jogging path' or 'walking trail' and the lone amenity flag, the evidence that the building has a jogging path is weak and likely a copy/paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Building offers in-unit laundry: MLS checkbox shows WASHER/DRYER in 9 of 11 listings and at least seven public remarks explicitly mention "full-size washer & dryer," "in-unit full size washer & dryer," "washer/dryer replaced," or "new washer and dryer." Evidence is consistent across multiple agent remarks and aligns with the MLS inclusions, so confidence is high (0.90).
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 11 current MLS listings include parking-related features (OPEN/OP*/COVER/GARAGE/ASSIGN). Remarks repeatedly reference parking stalls or proximity to parking (e.g., 'close to parking stall', 'near parking and mailboxes'), and no listings indicate 'NONE', so building-level parking is well supported across multiple agents.
Nine of 11 MLS records mark assigned parking and several remarks explicitly mention assigned stalls (notably '2 ASSIGNED PARKING STALLS!' and 'designated parking stalls numbered 55 and 106'), indicating assigned/reserved parking is a building feature supported by multiple listings and agent remarks.
No analysis available
Multiple listings explicitly state 'assigned' or 'designated' parking stalls (e.g., '2 ASSIGNED PARKING STALLS', 'designated parking stalls numbered 55 and 106'). There is no language indicating parking is deeded/owned with the unit, so based on the remarks parking appears assigned rather than deeded.
No analysis available
I looked for any reference to parking fees (e.g., 'parking fee', 'monthly parking charge', 'additional cost for parking') and found none. The remarks only reference assigned stalls, without indicating any fee.
Seven of 11 MLS records list guest parking in parking_features, but none of the public remarks explicitly reference 'guest' or 'visitor' parking. The MLS data implies guest parking exists, but the lack of explicit mentions in remarks suggests only moderate confidence until further confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for terms indicating a waitlist (e.g., 'parking waitlist', 'waiting list') and found no references. Absence of such mentions suggests there is no advertised waitlist in these remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
8 of 11 current MLS listings include the ACWIUN inclusion, and several public remarks explicitly mention window AC (quotes: "window AC units", "window AC in the bedroom"). Evidence comes from multiple listings/agents rather than a single outlier, so it's likely some units in the building have window air conditioning units.
No analysis available
Although 10 of 11 MLS entries have DOUWAL checked, none of the listing remarks mention 'double wall' or similar construction details. There is no explicit evidence or verification in the remarks to support double-wall construction, so the feature is omitted due to lack of corroboration.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Although 6 of 11 current MLS listings have WOOFRA checked, none of the public remarks describe the building as wood frame (they only mention 'wood laminate' or flooring). There is no owner/site verification or explicit construction descriptions across listings, so evidence for wood-frame construction is weak and likely a checkbox error.
Only 3 of 11 MLS listings have ABOGRO checked, and none of the public remarks reference 'above ground' construction or materials. With no owner/site verification or explicit remarks describing this characteristic, the evidence is insufficient and the feature is omitted.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I reviewed the remarks for explicit allowance or regulation of short-term rentals (phrases like 'short-term rental allowed', 'vacation rental allowed', '30-day minimum', 'NUC') and found none. Therefore there is no evidence in the public remarks that STRs are permitted.
There are no references to a hotel rental pool or hotel-managed rental program in the remarks. Because STRs are not indicated as allowed, hotel-pool participation is not applicable and is set to false.
No listings mention a hotel or mandatory rental pool, and since STRs are not shown as allowed in the remarks, mandatory hotel-pool participation is not applicable and is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for terms like 'lease expires', 'land lease', 'leasehold', and specific years (e.g., 'lease expires 2050') and found no references. Since there is no indication this is a leasehold property in the remarks, the lease expiry year is unknown.
I searched the remarks for phrases indicating VA loan approval (e.g., 'VA approved', 'VA financing', 'VA loans accepted') and found none. Therefore there is no evidence the building is VA-approved from these remarks.
The remarks do not state the HOA or building is fully insured or has walls-in coverage. With no explicit mention and no existing data, this field is set to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
There is no explicit statement that the building has passed a fire/life safety evaluation in the provided remarks. Per rules, absent any mention and with no prior data, this is marked false with medium confidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the provided public remarks (0/11) mention 'sunset', 'western exposure', 'evening sun', or similar phrases. CURRENT MLS metadata indicates only 1 of 11 listings lists SUNSET in view_descriptions while 5 of 11 list NONE, suggesting the SUNSET checkbox is inconsistent and likely an agent error rather than a true building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.