Pulewa at Mehana
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Pulewa at Mehana
Building Overview
Pulewa at Mehana in Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale (2011) — features a pool and fitness center; sunset views.
About Pulewa at Mehana
Pulewa at Mehana is a condominium building located in the Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 2011 using a steel frame construction. Size and unit mix information are not provided in the MLS data.
Key on-site amenities listed in the MLS include a pool, fitness center, and BBQ area. Units are noted to have split air conditioning and the property offers sunset views.
Parking is described as available with covered stalls and guest parking. Pet ownership and short-term rentals are not allowed per the MLS data. The management company is listed as unknown in the available records. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all details, rules, and fees with the listing agent or property management prior to purchase.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for owner-occupancy statements such as "80% owner occupied," "majority owner occupied," or similar wording, but none appeared. The remarks do not provide an occupancy percentage, so this remains unknown from the available text.
I searched the public remarks for explicit elevator references such as "elevator," "elevators," or phrases like "multiple elevators," and found none. Because no elevator information appears in the remarks, the number of elevators cannot be determined from this data.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Common area electricity appears to be included in the maintenance fee based on the current MLS pattern: 14 of 20 listings show OTCOEX. The public remarks do not explicitly mention it, so this is supported primarily by the repeated MLS checkbox data rather than agent narrative.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The evidence points against maintenance fees including hot water. Across the remarks, multiple listings mention a water heater or newly installed water heater, which is a strong indicator that hot water is unit-supplied rather than included in HOA fees. Only 1 of 20 MLS entries shows HOTWAT, so this appears to be a rare or erroneous checkbox rather than a building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is very well supported for this building. The current MLS pattern shows SEWER in 17 of 20 listings, and one remark explicitly says the HOA fees “cover water and sewer,” confirming the checkbox data.
Water inclusion is strongly supported across the building. The current MLS data shows WATER in 17 of 20 listings, and at least one remark directly states the HOA fees “cover water and sewer,” making this a high-confidence feature.
BBQ is strongly supported across many listings and appears to be a shared community amenity, not a copy-paste error. Multiple remarks mention "BBQ areas," "BBQ area," and "barbeque area," with references to the Mehana Activity Center and recreation center. The historical MLS data is consistent with these repeated remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Clubhouse/community-center access is supported by several independent remarks. Listings mention a "clubhouse," "community center," "recreation center," and even a "party room," suggesting a shared resident facility rather than a unit-specific feature. The historical MLS data aligns with these descriptions.
No analysis available
Dog park access is very well supported and appears consistently across many listings. Remarks explicitly mention "Pawsome Dog Park," "dog park," and pet-friendly community amenities, making this one of the strongest features in the dataset. The MLS history and current remarks reinforce each other.
No analysis available
The exercise room amenity is well supported across the listings. Several remarks explicitly reference a 'fitness room,' 'exercise room,' or 'community gym,' indicating this is a shared building/community amenity rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
Some listings describe a party/meeting room within the community center.
Patio/deck-style outdoor space is clearly supported across many listings, not just one agent. I found numerous explicit mentions including 'covered lanai,' 'covered balcony,' 'front patio,' 'private outdoor seating area,' 'two lanais,' and 'lounge decks,' plus other references to yards and outdoor seating. The consistent language across multiple remarks aligns with the prior high-confidence MLS amenity data.
Walking/jogging path access is strongly supported by multiple listings. Current remarks use consistent phrases like "walking paths," "walking/jogging paths," "jogging path," and "strolling pathways," indicating a shared community amenity. The historical MLS data is in line with this repeated language.
No analysis available
Private yard space is very strongly supported, with many listings explicitly mentioning "private yard," "fenced yard," "fully fenced courtyard," "wraparound yard," and "enclosed grassy yard." This is consistent across numerous remarks and appears to be a genuine feature available in some units, not merely MLS checkbox noise.
No analysis available
Recreation area access is strongly supported across the listings. Multiple agents describe the Mehana Activity Center and 'recreation area' amenities, suggesting this is a genuine community feature rather than a checkbox error.
A recreation room is supported by multiple listings and appears to be a real shared amenity. The strongest phrases are 'recreation room,' 'party room,' and 'Rec Room for parties,' which are consistent across separate descriptions.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS unit_features list STORAG for 9/20 listings, and some remarks mention extra or bonus storage, suggesting certain units come with additional storage space.
No analysis available
One listing explicitly mentions 'tennis court' ("dog park, tennis court and basketball court etc."), and CURRENT MLS shows 1/20 listings with the TENCOU amenity. The evidence is limited to a single agent remark and may reflect a site amenity or an isolated/templated inclusion; confidence set to 0.75 due to explicit but sparse confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool is strongly supported by the public remarks and the current MLS data. Roughly 30 listings mention it directly with phrases like "community pool," "swimming pool," "resort-style amenities," and "large swimming pool," usually as part of the Mehana Activity Center or Pulewa at Mehana amenities. The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and does not look like a one-off copy/paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
In-unit laundry is strongly supported across the listing set and appears consistent rather than a one-off copy-paste error. At least 8 listings explicitly mention it in the remarks, including multiple clear phrases such as "In-unit front-load washer and dryer included," "In-unit stacked washer dryer," and "washer and dryer in unit." This aligns with the current MLS data showing washer/dryer in inclusions on 19 of 20 listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is overwhelmingly supported across the listings. Multiple remarks mention "one-car garage," "assigned driveway space," "two parking stalls," and "street parking," showing this building offers parking in many forms. The evidence is broad and consistent across numerous agents, not just a single copy-paste remark.
Assigned/reserved parking is well evidenced in both MLS data and remarks. Several listings explicitly say "assigned parking stalls," "reserved parking spaces," or similar, indicating this is a real building-level feature. The repetition across multiple listings makes this strong, not likely a one-off error.
Covered parking is strongly supported across many listings for this building. Multiple remarks explicitly mention a garage, enclosed garage, or covered stall, while others note mixed parking such as "1 covered /1 open" or "one covered, and one uncovered parking stall." This appears consistent across different agents and is not just a copy-paste checkbox issue.
I looked for explicit deeded-ownership language such as deeded parking, owned stall, or parking included in the deed. The listings consistently describe assigned stalls, garage spaces, driveway parking, and guest parking, but I found no explicit evidence that parking is deeded.
No analysis available
I searched for language about a parking fee, monthly parking rental, or additional parking cost. The remarks discuss parking availability and stall counts, but no listing states a separate parking charge.
Guest parking is clearly available according to both the remarks and MLS data. Several listings mention it directly, including "guest stalls throughout the complex," "ample guest parking," and "Lots of visitors’ parking," matching the MLS pattern where 10 of 20 records include guest parking. The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and listing dates.
No analysis available
Tandem parking appears to exist in at least one unit, but the evidence is limited. One listing explicitly mentions "tandem driveway parking," while the MLS data shows only 1/20 flagged TANDEM, so this is likely a minority feature rather than common building-wide parking. Confidence is moderate because the remark is explicit, but the overall frequency is low.
No analysis available
I looked for references to a parking waitlist, joining a waitlist, or parking being limited by a queue. The public remarks do not mention any waitlist system, and the repeated references to assigned parking suggest the opposite.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Split AC is confirmed by a very large share of the current remarks. At least 15+ listings explicitly mention it with phrases such as "split AC in every room," "split air conditioning throughout," "split ACs in each room," and "newly installed split AC unit." The consistency across many different remarks makes this a high-confidence building feature rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
Concrete construction is weakly supported by the MLS checkbox data, with 7 of 20 current listings marked CONCRE. None of the public remarks explicitly say the building is concrete or reinforced concrete, so this appears to be MLS-driven rather than remark-confirmed evidence.
Double-wall construction is strongly supported, with 15 of 20 current listings carrying DOUWAL. The remarks do not directly confirm it, but the high listing count makes this a well-supported building feature.
No analysis available
Very limited MLS support (2/20 listings) and no public-remarks references to masonry or stucco. Given the absence in remarks and lack of historical confirmation, masonry & stucco is unlikely to be a building-level feature for most units.
Steel frame construction is strongly supported by the MLS, with 14 of 20 current listings marked STEFRA. The public remarks do not directly mention steel framing, but the repeated MLS support across many listings suggests this is a real building-level feature rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
Concrete slab is only lightly indicated in current MLS data (5/20) and is not mentioned in any of the public remarks. With no supporting commentary and weak checkbox coverage, this does not look reliably established for the building.
No analysis available
There are no explicit public-remarks mentions of wood frame or wood frame construction in the listing set. Because only 5 of 20 current listings show the MLS code, the evidence is weak and likely reflects inconsistent agent entry rather than a confirmed building characteristic.
Above-ground construction has moderate support from MLS, with 5 of 20 current listings marked ABOGRO. The remarks repeatedly describe second-floor layouts, split-level homes, and ground-floor units, which is consistent with above-ground construction, but no listing explicitly states the phrase directly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for STR indicators such as short-term rental allowed, NUC, TVU, vacation rental, or 30-day minimum restrictions. None were found in the public remarks, so there is no evidence that short-term rentals are allowed in this building.
I looked for hotel rental pool references such as hotel-managed units, pool participation, Hilton pool, or similar programs. There are no such mentions, and since STR is not supported by the remarks, hotel-pool participation cannot be true.
I searched for language indicating all units must participate in a rental program or hotel pool. The remarks contain no mandatory-pool language, so this is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for leasehold wording such as lease expires, ground lease ends, renewed through, or a specific lease expiry year. Nothing in the listings indicates the building is leasehold or provides a 4-digit expiration year.
The remarks repeatedly and directly confirm VA financing/assumption is available in this building. The language is explicit across many listings, so this is a high-confidence positive.
I searched for HOA insurance language such as "fully insured," "walls-in coverage," "full insurance," or "comprehensive building insurance," and found no references. Since the remarks do not mention building insurance coverage, there is no basis to infer full insurance.
No analysis available
I looked for language indicating a passed fire/life safety evaluation, fire safety certification, life safety compliance, or a passed fire inspection, but found nothing. The remarks focus on unit features and amenities, not building compliance status, so there is no evidence to mark this as passed.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views are clearly present in at least some units at Mehana/Pulewa. Across the provided remarks, several listings explicitly reference 'peaceful mountain views' and related scenic outlooks, suggesting this is a real feature rather than a copy-paste checkbox error. The evidence is stronger in the remarks than in the MLS view field, which appears inconsistently populated.
No analysis available
There is no supporting evidence for city views in the remarks provided. With only 2/20 MLS listings indicating CITY and most listings showing NONE, this looks like either occasional unit-specific data or agent inconsistency rather than a building-level feature. Buyers searching for city views should not rely on this building based on the current record.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no evidence that this building offers sunset views. None of the 20 current MLS listings mention sunset, western exposure, or similar language, and 13/20 explicitly show NONE in the view field. The public remarks are consistent with generic outdoor living descriptions rather than a sunset-view feature, suggesting the MLS data likely corrected this omission.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the provided listings, there are 0 explicit mentions of a resident manager, live-in manager, on-site manager, or building manager on property. The current MLS amenity flag appears in only 2/20 listings, which is too sparse to trust as building evidence and looks more like unchecked MLS checkbox noise than confirmed on-site staffing.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.