Princess Kealoha
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Princess Kealoha
Building Overview
Princess Kealoha in Makiki-Tantalus (1972) — concrete construction with mountain views and a pool.
About Princess Kealoha
Princess Kealoha is located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood and was built in 1972. According to available records, the building is constructed of concrete. Size and unit count details were not provided in the MLS data.
Based on MLS data, the property offers mountain views and includes an on-site pool. Air conditioning in units is noted as window-type. No information on additional on-site amenities was provided in the available records.
According to MLS information, parking is available, covered, and assigned, with guest parking also listed. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed. The management company is reported as unknown. Buyers should verify all details with the listing agent or management, as this summary is based solely on MLS-derived data.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit owner-occupancy percentages or qualitative statements like "majority owner occupied" or "highly owner occupied." Nothing in the public remarks specifies the owner-occupancy rate, so it cannot be determined from these listings.
I searched the remarks for explicit counts such as "2 elevators," "4 elevators," or "multiple elevators," and found no numeric elevator count. The listings only confirm that elevators exist and were modernized, so the total number remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
MLS checkbox CABTV is set in 9/10 current listings, but 0 of the provided public remarks mention cable being included (no phrases like 'cable included' or 'cable service included in fees'). Evidence of cable being included in the HOA is weak and likely agent checkbox propagation rather than confirmed in remarks.
MLS checkbox for common area electric (OTCOEX) appears in 6/10 listings, however 0 of the public remarks reference common area electricity being included. With no corroborating language in agent remarks, the evidence that common electric is covered by fees is weak.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Although SEWER is checked across all 10 current MLS listings, none of the public remarks explicitly say 'sewer included' or 'sewer in HOA fees'—they only reference plumbing work (e.g., 'waste drain plumbing lines have been replaced'). Without explicit remarks, evidence that sewer is included in maintenance fees is not confirmed.
Water is checked in all 10 MLS listings, yet 0 of the public remarks explicitly indicate 'water included' or similar. The only water-related mention is a 'new water heater', which does not confirm that water utility is covered by association fees, so inclusion remains unverified in the remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
8 of 10 current MLS listings have the TRACHU amenity checked and one listing's public remarks explicitly mention the unit is "close to the elevator and trash chute." While many agent remarks do not repeat the feature (suggesting some copy/paste), the strong MLS prevalence plus an explicit remark across listings support including trash_chute=true with high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 10 current MLS listings have the pool amenity checked, and at least 5 separate public-remark sections explicitly reference a pool (quotes include 'secured building amenities includes a pool', 'Invite friends and family over to cool off at the pool', and 'The building includes a swimming pool'). Evidence is consistent across multiple agent remarks and MLS checkbox data, giving high confidence that the building offers a shared swimming pool.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 10 current MLS listings list washer/dryer in the inclusions, and multiple public remarks explicitly state phrases like "Full size washer + dryer in unit" and "a brand new washer/dryer." The repeated explicit mentions across different listings/agents plus uniform MLS checkbox data provide strong, consistent evidence that some units in the building have in-unit laundry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All listings and MLS parking_features indicate building parking is available. Remarks repeatedly reference parking stalls (e.g., "3 parking stalls (two covered & one uncovered)", "1 covered parking", "parking is on ground floor as a stand alone parking stall"), so buyers can expect building-level parking.
Several unit remarks explicitly state specific parking stalls are provided to the unit (examples: "3 parking stalls", "comes with TWO parking stalls", "Comes with 1 covered parking stall close to the elevator"). Combined with 6/10 MLS ASSIGN flags, evidence is strong that assigned/reserved stalls exist for units.
Covered parking is consistently referenced: remarks include phrases like "two covered & one uncovered", "1 covered parking", and several units note covered stalls near the elevator. MLS checkbox data (9/10 listings) also indicates covered/garage parking.
Multiple remarks mention parking stalls included with the unit, and one listing explicitly says the penthouse has "3 deeded parking stalls." That is direct evidence the parking is deeded/owned with the unit.
No analysis available
I looked for phrases such as "parking fee," "monthly parking," "parking rent," and "additional parking cost," but found nothing. The remarks only describe included stalls and guest parking, not a separate monthly parking charge.
Guest parking is repeatedly mentioned across listings: multiple remarks state "5 guest parking" or "five guest parking stalls", and MLS guest flags appear in several listings, indicating the building provides guest parking.
While remarks reference a "secured building/lobby" and upgraded security cameras, none explicitly state secured or gated parking (e.g., "gated parking", "card access parking", "secured parking entry"). Given the lack of explicit parking-entry security language and only 1 MLS SECENT flag, there is insufficient evidence that parking has a secured/gated entry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for "parking waitlist," "parking waiting list," and similar wording, but there were no references. The listings describe included stalls and guest parking, but do not mention any waitlist system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that the building is concrete: 8 of 10 current MLS listings have CONCRE checked, and multiple remarks explicitly mention 'concrete repairs' and 'spalling repairs' as recent common-area work. Remarks also describe high-rise, concrete-repair work across listings, indicating consistent confirmation across different agent remarks rather than a single copy/paste instance.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Limited MLS checkbox presence (2 of 10) but no supporting language in any public remarks—no mentions of 'masonry' or 'stucco'—so there is low evidence the building should be classified as masonry & stucco. Given the lack of corroborating remarks and absent prior confidence, the MAS/STU flag is likely an agent data entry and is omitted.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for short-term rental language such as "STR," "vacation rental," "NUC," "TVU," and "30-day minimum," and found none. With no evidence of STR permission in the public remarks, this is treated as not allowed.
I looked for references to a hotel rental pool, hotel-managed program, Hilton/Trump/Ritz-style pools, or any similar arrangement, but found none. Since there is no evidence that STR is allowed, this must remain false as well.
I searched for wording like "mandatory hotel pool," "required to participate," or "must be in rental program," but found nothing. The remarks also do not indicate any optional or mandatory rental pool structure.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for phrases like "lease expires," "land lease," "leasehold," "ground lease," and any 4-digit expiration year, but found none. The only tenure-related clue was "fee simple," which indicates no lease expiry date is being advertised in these listings.
One of the public remarks explicitly states the building is "VA approved," indicating VA financing is accepted. This is direct evidence from the listings, so confidence is high.
I searched for terms like 'fully insured', '100% insured', 'walls-in coverage'. The public remarks explicitly state 'The building is 100% insured!', which directly indicates full HOA/building insurance (walls-in) and supports a high-confidence true assignment.
No analysis available
I looked for direct references to fire/life safety evaluation status and related wording such as FLSE, fire safety certification, or a passed fire inspection. The remarks mention a fire alarm system installed and general building maintenance, but that is not enough to confirm a formal pass.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Diamond Head is mentioned in multiple listings: MLS data shows 5 of 10 listings with DIAHEA and public remarks include explicit phrases like 'panoramic city & DH views' and 'facing east and Diamond Head.' The mentions appear across different unit remarks rather than a single isolated listing, indicating the building offers Diamond Head views for some units.
City views are well-supported: MLS data lists CITY in 8 of 10 listings and the public remarks repeatedly mention 'city', 'downtown', and 'twinkling city lights' across multiple listings. Evidence is strong and consistent across listings, indicating the building offers city-view units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.