Princess Kealoha
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Princess Kealoha
Building Overview
Princess Kealoha in Makiki-Tantalus (1972) — concrete construction with mountain views and a pool.
About Princess Kealoha
Princess Kealoha is located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood and was built in 1972. According to available records, the building is constructed of concrete. Size and unit count details were not provided in the MLS data.
Based on MLS data, the property offers mountain views and includes an on-site pool. Air conditioning in units is noted as window-type. No information on additional on-site amenities was provided in the available records.
According to MLS information, parking is available, covered, and assigned, with guest parking also listed. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed. The management company is reported as unknown. Buyers should verify all details with the listing agent or management, as this summary is based solely on MLS-derived data.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit owner-occupancy data, including percentages like "80% owner occupied" or descriptive wording such as "highly owner occupied." The remarks do not provide any owner-occupancy information, so the percentage remains unknown.
I looked for a numeric elevator count in the remarks, including phrases like "4 elevators," "multiple elevators," or a direct count. The listings only confirm that the building has elevator access and that elevators were modernized, but they do not state how many elevators there are.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Zero of 11 listings mention cable, cable TV, or cable service being included in the maintenance fees. Although 10 of 11 MLS records contain the CABTV checkbox, the lack of supporting remarks across multiple agents makes this only moderately supported.
7 of 11 current listings have OTCOEX checked, but none of the public remarks clearly say common-area electric is included. Evidence is therefore moderate and appears driven by MLS checkbox data rather than multiple agent descriptions.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no MLS support for hot-water inclusion (0/11 HOTWAT), and several listings reference water heaters instead, including "new water heater" and other unit-level heater mentions. This is strong evidence the maintenance fee does not include hot water.
None of the 11 listings mention internet, Wi-Fi, or internet service being included in the fees. The feature appears in 5 of 11 current MLS records, suggesting it may apply to the building but remains weakly verified and could reflect copied listing data.
No analysis available
All 11 current listings have SEWER checked in association fees, while the remarks are largely silent on the topic. The consistency across listings suggests this is a building-level inclusion rather than a copy-paste outlier.
Water is checked in all 11 current MLS listings, although the public remarks do not explicitly mention it. The uniform MLS data strongly indicates the fee includes water at the building level.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence is modest but real: one listing explicitly says there is "Direct access to open rooftop deck to enjoy early morning yoga or the sunset." That language supports a common recreation area/recreation deck amenity. Because current MLS checkbox support is sparse, this is a lower-confidence true, but the remark is specific enough to include the feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Trash chute is supported by strong historical MLS data and direct remark evidence. One listing states the unit is "close to the elevator and trash chute," and the amenity is checked in 9 of 11 current listings, which suggests this is a real building feature rather than copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool is confirmed across the building: current MLS data has 11/11 listings checked for pool-related amenities, and several remarks explicitly say “pool,” “swimming pool,” or “invite friends and family over to cool off at the pool.” This appears consistent across multiple listings and agents, not just a single copy-paste mention.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that in-unit laundry is available in Princess Kealoha. Public remarks explicitly mention washer/dryer in unit across multiple listings, including phrases like 'Full size washer + dryer in unit' and 'A brand new washer/dryer.' This matches the MLS inclusions data, so the feature appears consistent and likely reliable rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All listings and MLS parking_features indicate building parking is available. Remarks repeatedly reference parking stalls (e.g., "3 parking stalls (two covered & one uncovered)", "1 covered parking", "parking is on ground floor as a stand alone parking stall"), so buyers can expect building-level parking.
Strong building-level evidence for assigned/reserved parking appears across multiple listings, not just one agent remark. Several units explicitly say they come with specific stalls or deeded parking, indicating this is a consistent feature of the building rather than a copy-paste error.
Covered parking is supported by both historical MLS data and several current remarks. The evidence is consistent across listings and includes explicit phrases like "1 covered parking" and "covered parking stall," so this feature should be retained.
The public remarks explicitly mention deeded parking, including "3 deeded parking stalls." That is direct evidence that parking is deeded/owned with the unit.
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like parking fee, monthly parking charge, parking rent, or additional parking cost, but found nothing. The remarks describe included/deeded stalls and guest parking, not a separate parking fee.
Guest parking is mentioned repeatedly across multiple listings, often with the same detail of "5 guest parking stalls." The repetition across different remarks suggests this is a genuine building amenity rather than a one-off agent checkbox.
While remarks reference a "secured building/lobby" and upgraded security cameras, none explicitly state secured or gated parking (e.g., "gated parking", "card access parking", "secured parking entry"). Given the lack of explicit parking-entry security language and only 1 MLS SECENT flag, there is insufficient evidence that parking has a secured/gated entry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for references to a parking waitlist, parking waiting list, or joining a waitlist for parking, but found none. The listings instead describe included stalls and guest parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the provided remarks, 4 listings explicitly mention window A/C and 0 mention central air conditioning, HVAC, or forced air. The pattern strongly suggests the building does not offer central AC as a building-wide feature, and the lone MLS checkbox appears unsupported by the public remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence the building is concrete. Current remarks include 'recent common area improvements to concrete repairs' and describe a secured high-rise with major building work, which aligns with the prior high-confidence MLS data. This looks consistent across listings rather than a one-off agent copy-paste issue.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no public remark support for masonry and stucco construction across the listings reviewed. Given the lack of any 'masonry' or 'stucco' language and the stronger concrete-related descriptions, the checkbox hits look like MLS noise or copy-forward data rather than verified building construction.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for any short-term rental references and found none. With no evidence of STR being permitted, the safest inference from the public remarks is that STR is not allowed.
I looked for hotel pool language such as hotel rental pool, hotel-managed program, or branded pool participation, but found nothing. Because there is no evidence that STR is allowed, this must remain false.
I searched for wording like mandatory hotel pool, required participation, or must-rent language and found none. Since there is no evidence of STR being allowed, mandatory pool participation is also false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for lease-related language such as "lease expires," "land lease," "leasehold," "ground lease," and any 4-digit expiration year, but found none. No lease expiry information is provided in the public remarks.
The listing remarks directly state that the building is VA approved, which indicates VA financing is accepted. This is strong, explicit evidence from the public remarks.
The public remarks directly state that the building is 100% insured, which matches the fully insured / walls-in coverage signal. This is strong explicit evidence, so this feature is set to true with very high confidence.
No analysis available
I searched for direct language like FLSE passed, fire/life safety evaluation passed, fire safety certified, or passed fire inspection. None was found in the public remarks, so there is no evidence here to confirm that the building passed such an evaluation.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are supported by MLS data and at least one public remark. One listing explicitly says the unit has 'ocean views,' while the current MLS view data shows OCEAN in 3 of 11 listings. Evidence suggests ocean-facing units exist in the building, but they are not the dominant view type.
Mountain views are well supported across both MLS data and public remarks. The current MLS view descriptions include MOUNTA in 7 of 11 listings, and remarks describe 'lush mountain landscapes' and 'beautiful mountain views.' This is consistent across multiple agents and does not look like a one-off copy-paste error.
Diamond Head views are strongly supported. Multiple listings explicitly mention 'sweeping views of Diamond Head,' 'boasting sweeping city and Diamond Head views,' and current MLS data shows DIAHEA in 6 of 11 listings. This is a clear, repeated building-level view feature.
City views are extremely well supported. The current MLS data includes CITY in 9 of 11 listings, and the remarks repeatedly reference 'city views,' 'downtown Honolulu,' 'panoramic city views,' and 'twinkling city lights.' This appears to be a consistent, building-wide feature rather than isolated marketing language.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.